Skip to content

Black Star - Magnetic Stent Removal in Transplant Patients

Comparison of Cystoscopic Removal Versus Magnetic Device Removal of Ureteral Stents in Renal Transplant Recipients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03143556
Enrollment
40
Registered
2017-05-08
Start date
2017-05-29
Completion date
2018-11-30
Last updated
2021-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

End Stage Renal Failure With Renal Transplant, Kidney Failure, Chronic

Keywords

renal transplant, magnetic ureteral stent, Black-Star®

Brief summary

This is a pilot, single-centre, feasibility study to assess the feasibility issues and collect preliminary clinical data for the design of future randomized controlled trial to evaluate the feasibility and patient comfort of magnetic retrieval device removal of ureteral stent in transplant patients.

Detailed description

To curtail the pain and discomfort during cystoscopic stent removal and in order to improve patient's quality of life, a newly developed ureteral stent with a small magnet at its distal end and a customized magnetic retrieval catheter is recently used in Europe. The product is Black-Star® with a retrieval device by Urotech (Achenmühle, Germany). The magnetic Blackstar stent is a ureteral stent with a small magnet fixed with a string at the distal loop. The placement of stent is similar as routinely done on a guidewire, the only difference is to include the magnetic piece over the guidewire. To remove the stent a customized catheter with a magnetic Tiemann tip is used. The catheter is inserted after urethral application of a standard lubricant and removed with the stent after coming in contact with the stent's magnet. The stent comes in various sizes and is currently being used in Europe. The studies have concluded fast and easy retrieval of stent without requirement of cystoscopy and decreased patient discomfort.

Interventions

DEVICEMagnetic stent

Patients who are undergoing renal transplant surgery for the treatment of end stage renal failure will be assigned to magnetic stent or routine stent using computer generated randomization method in the operating room. Those who receive magnetic stent would get their stent removal by magnetic device retrieval and not by routine cystoscopy.

Sponsors

St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients at least 18 years of age and capable of giving informed consent 2. Patients scheduled for deceased donor renal transplant surgery

Exclusion criteria

1\) Patients undergoing Live donor renal transplant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility and patient comfort of the retrieval device, using standard validated questionnaire Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ)3-6 weeksAll patients will be followed up 4 weeks post renal transplant surgery, until ureteral stent removal. Feasibility and comfort of stent retrieval, Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) at 4 weeks before stent removal and 1 week post stent removal.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Outcome measure: Retrieval timeBaseline (intraoperatively)Retrieval time in minutes: The time taken for ureteric stent removal (both routine and magnetic stent) will be documented and mean time taken will be calculated. This will show which technique takes less time.
Outcome measure: Infection rate3-6 weeksInfection rates: Number of Urine culture positive with stent in situ and after removal of stent (both routine and magnetic stent). This will suggest if magnetic stent is associated with an increased incidence of urinary tract infections as compared to the routine stent.
Outcome measure: Cost effectiveness3-6 weeksCost effective analysis: Units will be Canadian Dollars; we will analyze the cost of disposables, sterilization of instruments, use of cystoscopy suite and also nursing and surgeon charges. Mean cost taken for either procedure will be compared to find cost effectiveness

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026