Skip to content

The Effect of Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Feeding Arterial for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

The Clinical Value of Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Feeding Arterial for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03143140
Enrollment
120
Registered
2017-05-08
Start date
2014-05-22
Completion date
2018-12-01
Last updated
2018-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Neoplasms

Keywords

Ablation Techniques

Brief summary

To evaluate a novel technique-ultrasound guided percutaneous abaltion of tumor feeding artery before RFA for liver malignancy.

Detailed description

Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most common tumor in clinical practice. In recent years, various local therapies, especially radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been proved safe and effective.The main limitation of RFA is that its therapeutic impact is significant compromised by blood flow cooling effect, especially in hypervascular HCC. Recent studies showed combined therapy of TACE and RFA can decrease the blood supply of tumor, increase ablated volume and therefore improve the outcome. However, TACE application is limited in patients who cannot tolerate this therapy due to the side effects of repeated TACE, poor liver function or previously legated hepatic artery. The present study is focus on difficult-to-treat HCC patients who are neither surgical candidates, nor TACE candidates. The investigators introduce the novel treatment mode that RFA followed ultrasound guided percutaneous ablation of tumur feeding arterial to treat these difficult cases and evaluate the clinical effect.

Interventions

OTHERPAFA

percutaneous ablation of tumor feeding artery

ablation of tumor area directly

Sponsors

Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. tumor number ≤3, maximum tumor size ≤5cm; 2. accessibility of tumors via a percutaneous approach; 3. tumor feeding artery can be detected by 3D contrast enhance ultrasound; 4. platelet count ≥ 50,000/ml and INR \<1.6; 5. life expectancy more than 6 months 6. Child grade A or B

Exclusion criteria

1. patients who scheduled liver transplantation 2. with extrahepatic metastasis 3. women during menstruation, pregnancy, child birth and baby nursing period 4. patients with severe mental disorder 5. cardiopulmonary failure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
completed tumor necrosis1 monthContrast enhanced CT or MRI was examed to evaluate tumor necrosis 1 month after ablation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
tumor recurrenceup to 36 monthstumor recurrence around the ablation zone

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026