Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of Integra® Cadence™ Total Ankle System in Primary Ankle Joint Replacement (CADENCE)

A Post-Market, Prospective, Non-Randomized, Multi-Center, Open-Label, Clinical Evaluation of the Integra® Cadence™ Total Ankle System in Primary Ankle Joint Replacement

Status
Suspended
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03142958
Acronym
Cadence
Enrollment
132
Registered
2017-05-08
Start date
2017-08-24
Completion date
2025-04-30
Last updated
2024-11-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Degenerative Arthritis, Post Traumatic Arthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

A post market, prospective, non-randomized, multi-center, open-label,clinical study using survivorship as the reference performance goal to study the safety and efficacy of the Cadence Total Ankle System (TAS) when used for primary ankle arthroplasty.

Interventions

DEVICEIntegra Cadence Total Ankle System

Primary or revision on total ankle replacement

Sponsors

Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patient is skeletally mature. * The patient qualifies for primary Total Ankle Replacement (TAR) per the surgeon and has a diagnosis of one of the following: Primary Arthritis (e.g. Degenerative Disease), Secondary Arthritis (e.g. Post-Traumatic, Avascular Necrosis, if minimally 2/3 of the talus is preserved), or Systemic Arthritis of the ankle (e.g. Rheumatoid Arthritis, Hemochromatosis). * The patient is willing and able to complete scheduled follow-up visits, evaluations and questionnaires as described in the Informed Consent. * The patient reads, understands and signs the Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved Informed Consent.

Exclusion criteria

* The patient is Morbidly Obese (defined by Body Mass Index (BMI) \> 40 or BMI of 35 - 40 with significant medical problems caused by or made worse by their weight). * The patient has one of the following conditions, which could compromise the affected limb: ankle arthrodesis with malleolar exeresis, severe neurological (Charcot's Arthropathy) or vascular disease, loss of musculature or neuromuscular compromise. * The patient has an active local/systemic infection that may affect the prosthetic joint or has a recent history of infection. * The patient has a condition that may impair proper wound healing (e.g., poor soft tissue envelope). * The patient is pregnant or plans to become pregnant during the follow up period. * The patient has a metabolic disorder or disease that may compromise bone quality (e.g. arthrogryposis etc.), physiological or anatomical anomalies, and/or malignancy/local bone tumors. * The patient has inadequate neuromuscular status (e.g., prior paralysis, severe neuropathy). * The patient has a known sensitivity or allergic reaction to one or more of the implanted materials.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Implant Survivorship2 yearsImplant survival defined as absence of device removal or revision.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relative change of Range Of Motion (ROM) compared to baselineup to 10 YearsRelative change of ROM compared to baseline
Relative change of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) compared to baselineup to 10 YearsRelative change of FAAM compared to baseline
Relative change of Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) - Mobility compared to baselineup to 10 YearsRelative change of PROMIS PF - Mobility compared to baseline
Relative change of Quality of Life Measure Short Form - 36v2 (SF-36v2)up to 10 YearsRelative change of SF-36v2 compared to baseline
Implant Survivorship5 and 10 YearsImplant survival defined as absence of device removal or revision.
Relative change of Pain compared to baselineup to 10 YearsRelative change of Visual Analogue Scale Pain compared to baseline

Countries

Canada, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026