Skip to content

Investigating Accelerated Learning in Healthy Subjects: Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation

Investigating Accelerated Learning in Healthy Subjects

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03138590
Enrollment
20
Registered
2017-05-03
Start date
2017-04-04
Completion date
2022-01-25
Last updated
2022-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Adults

Keywords

transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS), accelerate learning, memory

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether it is possible to accelerate learning and improve associative memory performance in healthy subjects, by applying transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) targeting the trigeminal nerve during a verbal paired-associate learning task

Detailed description

Associative memory refers to remembering the association between two items, such as a face and a name or a word in English and the same word in another language. It is not only important for learning, but it is also one of the first aspects of memory performance that is impacted by aging and by Alzheimer׳s disease. For decades, neuroscientists have investigated associative learning and memory and ways to accelerate and enhance associative learning and memory. Transcranial Direct Current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive and painless electrical stimulation technique that has demonstrated to accelerate learning and improve memory in some studies. To investigate whether it is possible to accelerate learning and improve associative memory using tDCS, the performance in a Verbal Paired-Associate memory task of 2 groups will be compared. The first group will get active tDCS during the verbal paired-associate learning task. The second group will get sham tDCS during the verbal paired-associate learning task.

Interventions

DEVICETranscranial Direct Current Stimulation- Neuroconn DC Stimulator PLUS

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation targeting the trigeminal nerve

Sponsors

The University of Texas at Dallas
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

participants will be randomly assigned to one of 2 groups: (1) active tDCS (2) sham tDCS

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Native English Speaker

Exclusion criteria

* History of severe head injuries, epileptic insults, or heart disease. * Severe psychiatric disorders and severe untreated medical problems * Acquainted with the foreign language used in the learning task * Contraindications for tDCS (e.g. pregnant, implanted devices)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Associative Memory Assessed by a Verbal Paired-Associate Test1 week after stimualtionChanges in performance in the Verbal Paired-Associate memory task is compared between the 2 groups (1. Active tDCS 2. Sham tDCS) to investigate the influence of tDCS on Associative Memory.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active tDCS
Active transcranial Direct Current Stimulation targeting the trigeminal nerve Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation- Neuroconn DC Stimulator PLUS: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation targeting the trigeminal nerve
10
Sham tDCS
Sham transcranial Direct Current Stimulation targeting the trigeminal nerve Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation- Neuroconn DC Stimulator PLUS: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation targeting the trigeminal nerve
10
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSham tDCSTotalActive tDCS
Age, Continuous21.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.33
21.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6
21.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.67
Beck Anxiety Inventory Scale2.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.99
2.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
2.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.07
Beck Depression Inventory Scale4.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.34
4.65 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.92
5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.65
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants17 Participants9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Mini Mental State Examination29.5 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.972
29.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.99
29.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.06
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 Participants20 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants13 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants7 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Associative Memory Assessed by a Verbal Paired-Associate Test

Changes in performance in the Verbal Paired-Associate memory task is compared between the 2 groups (1. Active tDCS 2. Sham tDCS) to investigate the influence of tDCS on Associative Memory.

Time frame: 1 week after stimualtion

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active tDCSAssociative Memory Assessed by a Verbal Paired-Associate Test32.9 percentage of words recalled from V1Standard Deviation 16.2
Sham tDCSAssociative Memory Assessed by a Verbal Paired-Associate Test38.1 percentage of words recalled from V1Standard Deviation 18.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026