Skip to content

M8891 First in Human in Solid Tumors

An Open-label, Phase I Dose Escalation Trial of Methionine Aminopeptidase 2 Inhibitor M8891 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03138538
Acronym
M8891
Enrollment
27
Registered
2017-05-03
Start date
2017-08-08
Completion date
2020-09-16
Last updated
2022-03-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced Solid Tumors, Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Keywords

Advanced Solid Tumors, Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma, M8891, Methionine Aminopeptidase 2 Inhibitor

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety, tolerability, Pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic and clinical activity of M8891 as single agent in participants with advanced solid tumors in Part 1.

Interventions

DRUGPart 1: M8891

Participants receives M8891 orally once daily at escalated dose levels under fasting condition for consecutive 21-day cycles of continuous treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or any criterion for withdrawal from the study.

Sponsors

Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants must be refractory to or intolerant of existing cancer therapy(ies) known to provide clinical benefit. * Histologically confirmed advanced solid tumors with no clear curative treatment options available after at least 1 prior systemic anticancer therapy. * Tumor accessible for biopsies and agreement to conduct pre-dose and post-dose fresh tumor biopsies. * Male or female subjects at least 18 years of age * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) of 0 to 1 at Screening * Histologic or cytologic evidence/proven of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) with clear cell component * Part 2A: Participants should have progressed to 1 or more previous lines of systemic anticancer therapy, excluding treatment with cabozantinib * Part 2B: Participants should have progressed to 1 or 2 previous lines of systemic anticancer therapy, excluding treatment with cabozantinib. Participants should have failed to only 1 previous TKI for metastatic disease. Adjuvant therapy with sunitinib will be considered as 1 line of therapy for metastatic disease in the case that disease progression occurs during or within 3 months of the completion of the treatment. * Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply

Exclusion criteria

* ECOG PS \>= 2 * Extensive prior radiotherapy on more than 30% of bone marrow reserves, or prior bone marrow/stem cell transplantation within 5 years of study start. * Severe bone marrow, renal or liver impairment. * Tumor in contact with, invading or encasing major blood vessels or radiographic evidence of significant cavitary pulmonary lesions * Uncontrolled hypertension defined as sustained Blood Pressure (BP) \> 150 millimeters of mercury (mm Hg) systolic or \> 100 mm Hg diastolic despite optimal antihypertensive treatment * Participant is pregnant or breastfeeding * Part 2A and 2B: Previous use of cabozantinib or a MetAP2 inhibitor, tumor in contact with invading or encasing major blood vessels or radiographic evidence of significant cavitary pulmonary lesions * Other protocol defined

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Who Experienced Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03At the end of Cycle 1 (each Cycle is of 21 days)A DLT was defined as the occurrence of any of following events that were judged by the study investigator, to be related to the study medication: Grade 4 liver enzyme elevation; Grade 4 neutropenia lasting \>5 days or Grade \>= 3 neutropenia with fever; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia lasting \>5 days or Grade \>=3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding; Any treatment interruption \>7 days or \>30% of total dose in Cycle 1 due to AEs not related to the underlying disease or concomitant medication; Grade \>=3 non-hematologic toxicity excluding Grade 3 nausea or vomiting lasting \<48 hours, and resolves to \<= Grade 1 either spontaneously or with medication, Grade 3 fatigue \<= 3 days, Grade 3 hypertension in the absence of maximal medical therapy, Grade 3 rash \<= 3 days, Grade 3 electrolyte abnormality that lasts \<72 hours, is not clinically complicated, and resolves spontaneously or responds to conventional medication and Grade \>=3 single lab value increase without clinical correlate.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) by SeverityUp to 1136 DaysSeverity of adverse events (AE) were assessed by the investigator according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 as Grade 1 to Grade 5. Grade 1= Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4= Life-threatening and Grade 5= Death. The number of participants that experienced at least one solicited local TEAE were summarized by grade. The term TEAE is defined as AEs starting or worsening after the first intake of the study drug. TEAEs include both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Number of participants with Grade \>=3, \>=4 and 5 were reported.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of M8891Cycle 1 Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 (Each cycle is of 21 days)Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) was taken directly from the observed concentration-time curve.
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of M8891Cycle 1 Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 (Each cycle is of 21 days)The time to reach the maximum observed plasma concentration (tmax) was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t) of M8891Cycle 1 Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 (Each cycle is of 21 days)The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down).
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of M8891Cycle 1 Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 (Each cycle is of 21 days)The AUC from time zero (dosing time) extrapolated to infinity, based on the predicted value for the concentration at tlast, as estimated using the linear regression from the determination of the terminal first order (elimination) rate constant (lambda z). AUC0-inf = AUC0-t plus Clast pred/lambda z. Lambda Z was terminal elimination rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression on terminal data points of the curve. Clastpred was the last predicted quantifiable concentration.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve Within One Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau) of M8891Cycle 1 Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 (Each cycle is of 21 days)AUC (0-tau) is the area under the plasma concentration time curve within 1 dosing interval. Calculated using the mixed log linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down).
Apparent Terminal Half Life (t1/2) of M8891Cycle 1 Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 (Each cycle is of 21 days)Terminal half-life of M8891 in Plasma was calculated as log2/ lambda z. Lambda z was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed concentration curve using linear regression on terminal data points of the curve.
Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (Lambda z) of M8891Cycle 1 Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 (Each cycle is of 21 days)Lambda z was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed concentration curve using linear regression on terminal data points of the curve.
Apparent Total Body Clearance (CL/f) of M8891Cycle 1 Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 (Each cycle is of 21 days)Apparent total body clearance of drug from plasma following extravascular administration, calculated as dose/AUC0-infinity for M8891. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero (dosing time) extrapolated to infinity of unchanged drug calculated as AUC0-t + AUCextra. AUCextra represents the extrapolated part of AUC0-infinity calculated by Clastpred/lambda z, where Clastpred is the predicted plasma concentration at the last sampling time point, calculated from the log linear regression line for lambda z determination at which the measured plasma concentration is at or above lower limit of quantification.
Apparent Body Clearance of Drug Following Extravascular Administration At Steady State (CLss/f) of M8891Cycle 1 Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 (Each cycle is of 21 days)The apparent total body clearance of drug at steady state following extravascular administration, taking into account the fraction of dose absorbed. It is calculated as dose/AUCtau for M8891.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and TEAEs Leading to DeathUp to 1136 DaysAn Adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug or worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. The term TEAE is defined as AEs starting or worsening after the first intake of the study drug. TEAEs include both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs.
Accumulation Ratios of AUC (Racc AUC) of M8891Pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 21 days)Racc (AUC) is defined as the accumulation factor to assess the increase in exposure until steady state is reached. Accumulation ratio for AUC was calculated as AUC, after dosing on Day 15 divided by AUC, after dosing on Day 1 of Cycle 1.
Accumulation Ratio of Cmax (Racc Cmax) of M8891Pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 21 days)Accumulation ratio of Cmax was calculated as Cmax, after dosing on Day 15 divided by Cmax, after dosing on Day 1 of Cycle 1.
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaUp to 1136 DaysBOR was determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) as assessed by investigators. BOR is defined as the best response of any of the complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from the date of randomization until disease progression. CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeter (mm). PR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. Stable disease (SD) defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest SLD while on study. PD is defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the SLD of target lesion, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
Number of Participants With Clinical BenefitUp to 1136 DaysClinical benefit defined as Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD) for \>= 12 weeks. Clinical benefit was assessed according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR: defined as disappearance of all target and all non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeter (mm). PR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD: defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest SLD while on study. PD is defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the SLD of target lesion, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Up to 1136 DaysProgression-free survival (PFS) defined as the time from first study drug administration to either first observation of progressive disease (PD) (as assessed by Investigators according to RECIST v1.1) or occurrence of death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Progressive disease (PD) defined as at least a 20% increase in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS was measured using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates. Here the 20 mg dose level was selected for stratification as the highest dose level equal to or smaller than the median of all dose levels administered to at least 1 participant.
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Abnormalities to Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI-CTCAE Version 4.03Up to 1136 DaysThe laboratory measurements included hematology, biochemistry, and urinalysis values were graded with National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03 toxicity grades (where Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life threatening and Grade 5 = death). Number of participants with change from baseline to grade 3 or higher values for the hematology, biochemistry and urinalysis parameters were reported.
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsUp to 1136 DaysVital sign assessments included assessments of heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, weight, respiratory rate and temperature. Clinical relevance was assessed by the investigator. Number of participants who had any clinically meaningful change from baseline in vital signs were reported.
Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesUp to 1136 DaysECG parameters included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration, QT intervals, and corrected QT(QTc) intervals. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. Number of participants with clinically meaningful change from baseline in 12-lead ECG were reported.
Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PF) Score of 2 or Higher Than 2Up to 1136 DaysECOG PS score is widely used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participants' disease is progressing, and is used to assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the participant, and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. The score ranges from Grade 0 to Grade 5, where Grade 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, Grade 1 = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature (like light house work, office work), Grade 2 = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities, Grade 3 = Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours and Grade 4 = Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair, Grade 5 = Death. Number of participants with ECOG performance status score of 2 or higher than 2 were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Objective ResponseUp to 1136 DaysObjective response is defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). CR is defined as disappearance of all evidence of target and non-target lesions. PR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions.
Apparent Volume of Distribution During Terminal Phase (VZ/f) of M8891Cycle 1 Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 (Each cycle is of 21 days)Apparent volume of distribution during the terminal phase following extravascular administration for M8891 was calculated. Vz/f = Dose/(AUC0-infinity multiply by Lambda z) following single dose. The AUC from time zero (dosing time) extrapolated to infinity, based on the predicted value for the concentration at tlast, as estimated using the linear regression from lambda z determination. AUC(0- inf)=AUC0-t plus Clastpred/lambda z where Clastpred was last predicted concentration. Lambda Z was terminal elimination rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression on terminal data points of the curve.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

First/last participant (informed consent): 08 August 2017. Last participant completed: 16 September 2020.

Pre-assignment details

This study was to be conducted in 2 parts; Part 1 was the dose escalation phase and Part 2 was the expansion phase. However, due to early termination of the study, the sponsor decided not to conduct the expansion phase (Part 2).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
M8891 7 mg
Participant received M8891 at dose of 7 mg orally with first dose in Cycle 1 Day 1 and consist of consecutive 21-day cycles of continuous once daily M8891 monotherapy under fasting conditions until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or any criterion for withdrawal from the study.
3
M8891 12 mg
Participant received M8891 at dose of 12 mg orally with first dose in Cycle 1 Day 1 and consist of consecutive 21-day cycles of continuous once daily M8891 monotherapy under fasting conditions until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or any criterion for withdrawal from the study.
3
M8891 20 mg
Participant received M8891 at dose of 20 mg orally with first dose in Cycle 1 Day 1 and consist of consecutive 21-day cycles of continuous once daily M8891 monotherapy under fasting conditions until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or any criterion for withdrawal from the study.
3
M8891 35 mg
Participant received M8891 at dose of 35 mg orally with first dose in Cycle 1 Day 1 and consist of consecutive 21-day cycles of continuous once daily M8891 monotherapy under fasting conditions until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or any criterion for withdrawal from the study.
8
M8891 60 mg
Participant received M8891 at dose of 60 mg orally with first dose in Cycle 1 Day 1 and consist of consecutive 21-day cycles of continuous once daily M8891 monotherapy under fasting conditions until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or any criterion for withdrawal from the study.
7
M8891 80 mg
Participant received M8891 at dose of 80 mg orally with first dose in Cycle 1 Day 1 and consist of consecutive 21-day cycles of continuous once daily M8891 monotherapy under fasting conditions until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or any criterion for withdrawal from the study.
3
Total27

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicM8891 12 mgM8891 20 mgM8891 35 mgM8891 7 mgM8891 60 mgM8891 80 mgTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants1 Participants4 Participants1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants13 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants2 Participants4 Participants2 Participants3 Participants0 Participants14 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
3 Participants3 Participants4 Participants2 Participants6 Participants3 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants3 Participants3 Participants2 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants2 Participants5 Participants0 Participants4 Participants1 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 31 / 32 / 32 / 80 / 70 / 3
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 32 / 33 / 38 / 87 / 73 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 31 / 33 / 33 / 81 / 70 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Who Experienced Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.03

A DLT was defined as the occurrence of any of following events that were judged by the study investigator, to be related to the study medication: Grade 4 liver enzyme elevation; Grade 4 neutropenia lasting \>5 days or Grade \>= 3 neutropenia with fever; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia lasting \>5 days or Grade \>=3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding; Any treatment interruption \>7 days or \>30% of total dose in Cycle 1 due to AEs not related to the underlying disease or concomitant medication; Grade \>=3 non-hematologic toxicity excluding Grade 3 nausea or vomiting lasting \<48 hours, and resolves to \<= Grade 1 either spontaneously or with medication, Grade 3 fatigue \<= 3 days, Grade 3 hypertension in the absence of maximal medical therapy, Grade 3 rash \<= 3 days, Grade 3 electrolyte abnormality that lasts \<72 hours, is not clinically complicated, and resolves spontaneously or responds to conventional medication and Grade \>=3 single lab value increase without clinical correlate.

Time frame: At the end of Cycle 1 (each Cycle is of 21 days)

Population: Dose escalation set included all participants treated in dose-escalation cohorts who did not miss \> 4 cumulative days planned doses of M8891 in the first cycle of the dose-escalation part for other than safety reasons.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
M8891 7 mgNumber of Participants Who Experienced Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.030 Participants
M8891 12 mgNumber of Participants Who Experienced Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.030 Participants
M8891 20 mgNumber of Participants Who Experienced Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.030 Participants
M8891 35 mgNumber of Participants Who Experienced Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.030 Participants
M8891 60 mgNumber of Participants Who Experienced Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.031 Participants
M8891 80 mgNumber of Participants Who Experienced Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Assessed Using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.031 Participants
Secondary

Accumulation Ratio of Cmax (Racc Cmax) of M8891

Accumulation ratio of Cmax was calculated as Cmax, after dosing on Day 15 divided by Cmax, after dosing on Day 1 of Cycle 1.

Time frame: Pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 21 days)

Population: PK analysis set included all participants from the safety analysis set without major protocol deviations/violations or events that would affect PK. Here Number Analyzed=number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
M8891 7 mgAccumulation Ratio of Cmax (Racc Cmax) of M88912.46 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27.5
M8891 12 mgAccumulation Ratio of Cmax (Racc Cmax) of M88912.36 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33.5
M8891 20 mgAccumulation Ratio of Cmax (Racc Cmax) of M8891NA Ratio
M8891 35 mgAccumulation Ratio of Cmax (Racc Cmax) of M88912.32 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27.4
M8891 60 mgAccumulation Ratio of Cmax (Racc Cmax) of M88911.97 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 37.8
M8891 80 mgAccumulation Ratio of Cmax (Racc Cmax) of M8891NA Ratio
Secondary

Accumulation Ratios of AUC (Racc AUC) of M8891

Racc (AUC) is defined as the accumulation factor to assess the increase in exposure until steady state is reached. Accumulation ratio for AUC was calculated as AUC, after dosing on Day 15 divided by AUC, after dosing on Day 1 of Cycle 1.

Time frame: Pre-dose and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 of Cycle 1 (each cycle is 21 days)

Population: PK analysis set included all participants from the safety analysis set without major protocol deviations/violations or events that would affect PK. Here Number Analyzed=number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
M8891 7 mgAccumulation Ratios of AUC (Racc AUC) of M88912.82 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 29.3
M8891 12 mgAccumulation Ratios of AUC (Racc AUC) of M88912.36 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27.4
M8891 20 mgAccumulation Ratios of AUC (Racc AUC) of M8891NA Ratio
M8891 35 mgAccumulation Ratios of AUC (Racc AUC) of M88912.38 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27.8
M8891 60 mgAccumulation Ratios of AUC (Racc AUC) of M88911.90 RatioGeometric Coefficient of Variation 37.2
M8891 80 mgAccumulation Ratios of AUC (Racc AUC) of M8891NA Ratio
Secondary

Apparent Body Clearance of Drug Following Extravascular Administration At Steady State (CLss/f) of M8891

The apparent total body clearance of drug at steady state following extravascular administration, taking into account the fraction of dose absorbed. It is calculated as dose/AUCtau for M8891.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 (Each cycle is of 21 days)

Population: PK analysis set included all participants from the safety analysis set without major protocol deviations/violations or events that would affect PK. As R2 was \<0.80, %AUCextra was \>20% and elimination phase was not characterized, CLss/f derived from lambda z was regarded as implausible and not calculated.

Secondary

Apparent Terminal Half Life (t1/2) of M8891

Terminal half-life of M8891 in Plasma was calculated as log2/ lambda z. Lambda z was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed concentration curve using linear regression on terminal data points of the curve.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 (Each cycle is of 21 days)

Population: PK analysis set included all participants from the safety analysis set without major protocol deviations/violations or events that would affect PK. As coefficient of correlation (R2) was \<0.80, %AUCextra was \>20% and elimination phase was not characterized, t1/2 derived from lambda z was regarded as implausible and not calculated.

Secondary

Apparent Total Body Clearance (CL/f) of M8891

Apparent total body clearance of drug from plasma following extravascular administration, calculated as dose/AUC0-infinity for M8891. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero (dosing time) extrapolated to infinity of unchanged drug calculated as AUC0-t + AUCextra. AUCextra represents the extrapolated part of AUC0-infinity calculated by Clastpred/lambda z, where Clastpred is the predicted plasma concentration at the last sampling time point, calculated from the log linear regression line for lambda z determination at which the measured plasma concentration is at or above lower limit of quantification.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 (Each cycle is of 21 days)

Population: PK analysis set included all participants from the safety analysis set without major protocol deviations/violations or events that would affect PK. As R2 was \<0.80, %AUCextra was \>20% and elimination phase was not characterized, CL/f derived from lambda z was regarded as implausible and not calculated.

Secondary

Apparent Volume of Distribution During Terminal Phase (VZ/f) of M8891

Apparent volume of distribution during the terminal phase following extravascular administration for M8891 was calculated. Vz/f = Dose/(AUC0-infinity multiply by Lambda z) following single dose. The AUC from time zero (dosing time) extrapolated to infinity, based on the predicted value for the concentration at tlast, as estimated using the linear regression from lambda z determination. AUC(0- inf)=AUC0-t plus Clastpred/lambda z where Clastpred was last predicted concentration. Lambda Z was terminal elimination rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression on terminal data points of the curve.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 (Each cycle is of 21 days)

Population: PK analysis set included all participants from the safety analysis set without major protocol deviations/violations or events that would affect PK. As R2 was \<0.80, %AUCextra was \>20% and elimination phase was not characterized, VZ/f derived from lambda z was regarded as implausible and not calculated.

Secondary

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Zero Extrapolated to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of M8891

The AUC from time zero (dosing time) extrapolated to infinity, based on the predicted value for the concentration at tlast, as estimated using the linear regression from the determination of the terminal first order (elimination) rate constant (lambda z). AUC0-inf = AUC0-t plus Clast pred/lambda z. Lambda Z was terminal elimination rate constant determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed plasma concentration curve using linear regression on terminal data points of the curve. Clastpred was the last predicted quantifiable concentration.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 (Each cycle is of 21 days)

Population: PK analysis set included all participants from the safety analysis set without major protocol deviations/violations or events that would affect PK. As R2 was \<0.80, %AUCextra was \>20% and elimination phase was not characterized, AUC0-inf derived from lambda z was regarded as implausible and not calculated.

Secondary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t) of M8891

The AUC from time zero (= dosing time) to the last sampling time (tlast) at which the concentration is at or above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), calculated using the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down).

Time frame: Cycle 1 Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 (Each cycle is of 21 days)

Population: PK analysis set included all participants from the safety analysis set without major protocol deviations/violations or events that would affect PK. Here Number Analyzed=number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
M8891 7 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t) of M8891Day 19080 Nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.3
M8891 7 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t) of M8891Day 1525400 Nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 50.3
M8891 12 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t) of M8891Day 116300 Nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 9.6
M8891 12 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t) of M8891Day 1538600 Nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.6
M8891 20 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t) of M8891Day 134200 Nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 41
M8891 20 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t) of M8891Day 15NA Nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)
M8891 35 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t) of M8891Day 159400 Nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22.7
M8891 35 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t) of M8891Day 15141000 Nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13.9
M8891 60 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t) of M8891Day 171700 Nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 26.3
M8891 60 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t) of M8891Day 15134000 Nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 18.4
M8891 80 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t) of M8891Day 186900 Nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 22.5
M8891 80 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-t) of M8891Day 15NA Nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)
Secondary

Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve Within One Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau) of M8891

AUC (0-tau) is the area under the plasma concentration time curve within 1 dosing interval. Calculated using the mixed log linear trapezoidal rule (linear up, log down).

Time frame: Cycle 1 Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 (Each cycle is of 21 days)

Population: PK analysis set included all participants from the safety analysis set without major protocol deviations/violations or events that would affect PK. Here Number Analyzed=number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
M8891 7 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve Within One Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau) of M8891Day 19100 ng*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 21.2
M8891 7 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve Within One Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau) of M8891Day 1525700 ng*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 48.4
M8891 12 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve Within One Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau) of M8891Day 116300 ng*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 9.6
M8891 12 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve Within One Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau) of M8891Day 1538500 ng*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.7
M8891 20 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve Within One Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau) of M8891Day 132400 ng*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 35.7
M8891 20 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve Within One Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau) of M8891Day 15NA ng*h/mL
M8891 35 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve Within One Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau) of M8891Day 159100 ng*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.3
M8891 35 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve Within One Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau) of M8891Day 15137000 ng*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 15.6
M8891 60 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve Within One Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau) of M8891Day 171400 ng*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 26.8
M8891 60 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve Within One Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau) of M8891Day 15133000 ng*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 17.4
M8891 80 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve Within One Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau) of M8891Day 184500 ng*h/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.6
M8891 80 mgArea Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve Within One Dosing Interval (AUC0-tau) of M8891Day 15NA ng*h/mL
Secondary

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of M8891

Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) was taken directly from the observed concentration-time curve.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 (Each cycle is of 21 days)

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included all participants from the safety analysis set without major protocol deviations/violations or events that would affect PK. Here Number Analyzed=number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
M8891 7 mgMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of M8891Day 1514 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.6
M8891 7 mgMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of M8891Day 151260 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 39.2
M8891 12 mgMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of M8891Day 1934 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 12.4
M8891 12 mgMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of M8891Day 152210 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.1
M8891 20 mgMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of M8891Day 11780 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 48.9
M8891 20 mgMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of M8891Day 15NA Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
M8891 35 mgMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of M8891Day 12960 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17
M8891 35 mgMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of M8891Day 156840 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.9
M8891 60 mgMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of M8891Day 13630 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 31.2
M8891 60 mgMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of M8891Day 156600 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20.2
M8891 80 mgMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of M8891Day 14760 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 15.6
M8891 80 mgMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of M8891Day 15NA Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Secondary

Number of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) Criteria

BOR was determined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) as assessed by investigators. BOR is defined as the best response of any of the complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) recorded from the date of randomization until disease progression. CR: Disappearance of all evidence of target and non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeter (mm). PR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. Stable disease (SD) defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest SLD while on study. PD is defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the SLD of target lesion, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.

Time frame: Up to 1136 Days

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
M8891 7 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaProgressive Disease1 Participants
M8891 7 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaPartial Response0 Participants
M8891 7 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaComplete Response0 Participants
M8891 7 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaNot Evaluable0 Participants
M8891 7 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaStable Disease2 Participants
M8891 12 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaPartial Response0 Participants
M8891 12 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaProgressive Disease0 Participants
M8891 12 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaComplete Response0 Participants
M8891 12 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaNot Evaluable1 Participants
M8891 12 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaStable Disease2 Participants
M8891 20 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaPartial Response0 Participants
M8891 20 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaProgressive Disease0 Participants
M8891 20 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaNot Evaluable2 Participants
M8891 20 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaStable Disease1 Participants
M8891 20 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaComplete Response0 Participants
M8891 35 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaStable Disease0 Participants
M8891 35 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaComplete Response0 Participants
M8891 35 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaPartial Response0 Participants
M8891 35 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaProgressive Disease3 Participants
M8891 35 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaNot Evaluable5 Participants
M8891 60 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaProgressive Disease1 Participants
M8891 60 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaComplete Response0 Participants
M8891 60 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaNot Evaluable4 Participants
M8891 60 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaPartial Response0 Participants
M8891 60 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaStable Disease2 Participants
M8891 80 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaComplete Response0 Participants
M8891 80 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaProgressive Disease1 Participants
M8891 80 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaPartial Response0 Participants
M8891 80 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaNot Evaluable2 Participants
M8891 80 mgNumber of Participants With Best Overall Response Assessment According to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) CriteriaStable Disease0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Abnormalities to Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI-CTCAE Version 4.03

The laboratory measurements included hematology, biochemistry, and urinalysis values were graded with National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03 toxicity grades (where Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life threatening and Grade 5 = death). Number of participants with change from baseline to grade 3 or higher values for the hematology, biochemistry and urinalysis parameters were reported.

Time frame: Up to 1136 Days

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
M8891 7 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Abnormalities to Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI-CTCAE Version 4.03Grade >= 3 hematology0 Participants
M8891 7 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Abnormalities to Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI-CTCAE Version 4.03Grade >= 3 biochemistry0 Participants
M8891 7 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Abnormalities to Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI-CTCAE Version 4.03Grade >= 3 urinalysis0 Participants
M8891 12 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Abnormalities to Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI-CTCAE Version 4.03Grade >= 3 hematology0 Participants
M8891 12 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Abnormalities to Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI-CTCAE Version 4.03Grade >= 3 biochemistry0 Participants
M8891 12 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Abnormalities to Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI-CTCAE Version 4.03Grade >= 3 urinalysis0 Participants
M8891 20 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Abnormalities to Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI-CTCAE Version 4.03Grade >= 3 hematology1 Participants
M8891 20 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Abnormalities to Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI-CTCAE Version 4.03Grade >= 3 biochemistry2 Participants
M8891 20 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Abnormalities to Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI-CTCAE Version 4.03Grade >= 3 urinalysis0 Participants
M8891 35 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Abnormalities to Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI-CTCAE Version 4.03Grade >= 3 hematology2 Participants
M8891 35 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Abnormalities to Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI-CTCAE Version 4.03Grade >= 3 biochemistry2 Participants
M8891 35 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Abnormalities to Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI-CTCAE Version 4.03Grade >= 3 urinalysis0 Participants
M8891 60 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Abnormalities to Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI-CTCAE Version 4.03Grade >= 3 hematology4 Participants
M8891 60 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Abnormalities to Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI-CTCAE Version 4.03Grade >= 3 biochemistry3 Participants
M8891 60 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Abnormalities to Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI-CTCAE Version 4.03Grade >= 3 urinalysis0 Participants
M8891 80 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Abnormalities to Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI-CTCAE Version 4.03Grade >= 3 biochemistry0 Participants
M8891 80 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Abnormalities to Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI-CTCAE Version 4.03Grade >= 3 urinalysis0 Participants
M8891 80 mgNumber of Participants With Change From Baseline in Laboratory Test Abnormalities to Grade 3 or Higher Severity Based on NCI-CTCAE Version 4.03Grade >= 3 hematology1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinical Benefit

Clinical benefit defined as Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR) or Stable Disease (SD) for \>= 12 weeks. Clinical benefit was assessed according to RECIST Version 1.1. CR: defined as disappearance of all target and all non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeter (mm). PR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions. SD: defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest SLD while on study. PD is defined as at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the SLD of target lesion, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions.

Time frame: Up to 1136 Days

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
M8891 7 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical BenefitPartial Response0 Participants
M8891 7 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical BenefitComplete Response0 Participants
M8891 7 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical BenefitStable Disease2 Participants
M8891 12 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical BenefitPartial Response0 Participants
M8891 12 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical BenefitComplete Response0 Participants
M8891 12 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical BenefitStable Disease0 Participants
M8891 20 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical BenefitPartial Response0 Participants
M8891 20 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical BenefitComplete Response0 Participants
M8891 20 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical BenefitStable Disease0 Participants
M8891 35 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical BenefitPartial Response0 Participants
M8891 35 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical BenefitComplete Response0 Participants
M8891 35 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical BenefitStable Disease0 Participants
M8891 60 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical BenefitPartial Response0 Participants
M8891 60 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical BenefitComplete Response0 Participants
M8891 60 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical BenefitStable Disease1 Participants
M8891 80 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical BenefitComplete Response0 Participants
M8891 80 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical BenefitStable Disease0 Participants
M8891 80 mgNumber of Participants With Clinical BenefitPartial Response0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values

ECG parameters included rhythm, heart rate (as measured by RR interval), PR interval, QRS duration, QT intervals, and corrected QT(QTc) intervals. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. Number of participants with clinically meaningful change from baseline in 12-lead ECG were reported.

Time frame: Up to 1136 Days

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
M8891 7 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values0 Participants
M8891 12 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values0 Participants
M8891 20 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values0 Participants
M8891 35 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values0 Participants
M8891 60 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values0 Participants
M8891 80 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs

Vital sign assessments included assessments of heart rate, diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, weight, respiratory rate and temperature. Clinical relevance was assessed by the investigator. Number of participants who had any clinically meaningful change from baseline in vital signs were reported.

Time frame: Up to 1136 Days

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
M8891 7 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs0 Participants
M8891 12 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs0 Participants
M8891 20 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs0 Participants
M8891 35 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs0 Participants
M8891 60 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs0 Participants
M8891 80 mgNumber of Participants With Clinically Meaningful Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PF) Score of 2 or Higher Than 2

ECOG PS score is widely used by doctors and researchers to assess how a participants' disease is progressing, and is used to assess how the disease affects the daily living abilities of the participant, and determine appropriate treatment and prognosis. The score ranges from Grade 0 to Grade 5, where Grade 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction, Grade 1 = Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature (like light house work, office work), Grade 2 = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities, Grade 3 = Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours and Grade 4 = Completely disabled. Cannot carry on any self-care. Totally confined to bed or chair, Grade 5 = Death. Number of participants with ECOG performance status score of 2 or higher than 2 were reported.

Time frame: Up to 1136 Days

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
M8891 7 mgNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PF) Score of 2 or Higher Than 20 Participants
M8891 12 mgNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PF) Score of 2 or Higher Than 21 Participants
M8891 20 mgNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PF) Score of 2 or Higher Than 21 Participants
M8891 35 mgNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PF) Score of 2 or Higher Than 21 Participants
M8891 60 mgNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PF) Score of 2 or Higher Than 20 Participants
M8891 80 mgNumber of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PF) Score of 2 or Higher Than 20 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and TEAEs Leading to Death

An Adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug or worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. The term TEAE is defined as AEs starting or worsening after the first intake of the study drug. TEAEs include both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs.

Time frame: Up to 1136 Days

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
M8891 7 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and TEAEs Leading to DeathTEAEs3 Participants
M8891 7 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and TEAEs Leading to DeathTEAEs leading to death0 Participants
M8891 12 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and TEAEs Leading to DeathTEAEs2 Participants
M8891 12 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and TEAEs Leading to DeathTEAEs leading to death1 Participants
M8891 20 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and TEAEs Leading to DeathTEAEs3 Participants
M8891 20 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and TEAEs Leading to DeathTEAEs leading to death2 Participants
M8891 35 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and TEAEs Leading to DeathTEAEs8 Participants
M8891 35 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and TEAEs Leading to DeathTEAEs leading to death2 Participants
M8891 60 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and TEAEs Leading to DeathTEAEs7 Participants
M8891 60 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and TEAEs Leading to DeathTEAEs leading to death0 Participants
M8891 80 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and TEAEs Leading to DeathTEAEs3 Participants
M8891 80 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) and TEAEs Leading to DeathTEAEs leading to death0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) by Severity

Severity of adverse events (AE) were assessed by the investigator according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03 as Grade 1 to Grade 5. Grade 1= Mild, Grade 2=Moderate, Grade 3=Severe, Grade 4= Life-threatening and Grade 5= Death. The number of participants that experienced at least one solicited local TEAE were summarized by grade. The term TEAE is defined as AEs starting or worsening after the first intake of the study drug. TEAEs include both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. Number of participants with Grade \>=3, \>=4 and 5 were reported.

Time frame: Up to 1136 Days

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
M8891 7 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) by SeverityGrade >=40 Participants
M8891 7 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) by SeverityGrade >=30 Participants
M8891 7 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) by SeverityGrade 50 Participants
M8891 12 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) by SeverityGrade >=41 Participants
M8891 12 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) by SeverityGrade >=31 Participants
M8891 12 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) by SeverityGrade 51 Participants
M8891 20 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) by SeverityGrade >=42 Participants
M8891 20 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) by SeverityGrade >=33 Participants
M8891 20 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) by SeverityGrade 52 Participants
M8891 35 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) by SeverityGrade >=42 Participants
M8891 35 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) by SeverityGrade >=38 Participants
M8891 35 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) by SeverityGrade 52 Participants
M8891 60 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) by SeverityGrade >=41 Participants
M8891 60 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) by SeverityGrade >=34 Participants
M8891 60 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) by SeverityGrade 50 Participants
M8891 80 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) by SeverityGrade >=32 Participants
M8891 80 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) by SeverityGrade 50 Participants
M8891 80 mgNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) by SeverityGrade >=41 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

Objective response is defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) and partial response (PR). CR is defined as disappearance of all evidence of target and non-target lesions. PR: At least 30% reduction from baseline in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of all lesions.

Time frame: Up to 1136 Days

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
M8891 7 mgPercentage of Participants With Objective Response0 Percentage of participants
M8891 12 mgPercentage of Participants With Objective Response0 Percentage of participants
M8891 20 mgPercentage of Participants With Objective Response0 Percentage of participants
M8891 35 mgPercentage of Participants With Objective Response0 Percentage of participants
M8891 60 mgPercentage of Participants With Objective Response0 Percentage of participants
M8891 80 mgPercentage of Participants With Objective Response0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival (PFS) defined as the time from first study drug administration to either first observation of progressive disease (PD) (as assessed by Investigators according to RECIST v1.1) or occurrence of death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Progressive disease (PD) defined as at least a 20% increase in sum of longest diameter (SLD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. PFS was measured using Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates. Here the 20 mg dose level was selected for stratification as the highest dose level equal to or smaller than the median of all dose levels administered to at least 1 participant.

Time frame: Up to 1136 Days

Population: Safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
M8891 7 mgProgression-Free Survival (PFS)2.7598 Months
M8891 12 mgProgression-Free Survival (PFS)1.3799 Months
Secondary

Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (Lambda z) of M8891

Lambda z was determined from the terminal slope of the log-transformed concentration curve using linear regression on terminal data points of the curve.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 (Each cycle is of 21 days)

Population: PK analysis set included all participants from the safety analysis set without major protocol deviations/violations or events that would affect PK. As R2 was \<0.80, %AUCextra was \>20% and elimination phase was not characterized, lambda z was regarded as implausible and not calculated.

Secondary

Time to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of M8891

The time to reach the maximum observed plasma concentration (tmax) was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Pre-dose, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 12, 24 hours post-dose on Day 1 and 15 (Each cycle is of 21 days)

Population: PK analysis set included all participants from the safety analysis set without major protocol deviations/violations or events that would affect PK. Here Number Analyzed=number of participants evaluable at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
M8891 7 mgTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of M8891Day 154.00 Hour
M8891 7 mgTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of M8891Day 13.17 Hour
M8891 12 mgTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of M8891Day 152.00 Hour
M8891 12 mgTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of M8891Day 14.00 Hour
M8891 20 mgTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of M8891Day 15NA Hour
M8891 20 mgTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of M8891Day 16.00 Hour
M8891 35 mgTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of M8891Day 154.07 Hour
M8891 35 mgTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of M8891Day 14.04 Hour
M8891 60 mgTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of M8891Day 17.13 Hour
M8891 60 mgTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of M8891Day 153.11 Hour
M8891 80 mgTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of M8891Day 15NA Hour
M8891 80 mgTime to Reach Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of M8891Day 13.38 Hour

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026