Skip to content

Optimizing Access to Care Through New Technologies: a Randomized Study Evaluating the Impact of Telephone Contact and the Sending by the General Practitioner of Suspicious Lesions Melanoma Photographs Taken With a Smartphone, on the Time Limit to the Consultation With a Dermatologist

Optimizing Access to Care Through New Technologies: a Randomized Study Evaluating the Impact of Telephone Contact and the Sending by the General Practitioner of Suspicious Lesions Melanoma Photographs Taken With a Smartphone, on the Time Limit to the Consultation With a Dermatologist

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03137511
Acronym
OASE Melanome
Enrollment
270
Registered
2017-05-02
Start date
2017-05-23
Completion date
2018-11-28
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients at Risk for Melanoma

Keywords

Public Health, General Medicine, Dermatology

Brief summary

Early detection of melanoma showed an impact on the thickness of the lesions at the time of diagnosis. One challenge is to improve the modalities. Decrease the rate of non-compliant patients among patients referred to the dermatologist for a suspicious lesion (patients who will never go to the consultation), and reduce the time interval between the first identification of the lesion and the excision allowing the diagnosis are major issues. Direct contact between the general practitioner (GP) and the dermatologist would probably make it possible to shorten the care pathway of patients with lesions justifying excision. The objective is to evaluate whether contacting the dermatologist directly by telephone and e-mailing the photograph of a suspicious melanoma lesion can significantly reduce the time required for access to the consultation for the following patients: (a) referred for a suspicious lesion of melanoma by the GP (b) and having a sufficiently suspicious lesion of melanoma so that the dermatologist conclude at the need for excision (true positives). Expected results: The procedure should shorten the care pathway for patients with melanoma and decrease the proportion of patients who do not consult the dermatologist when they were referred ("non-observing patients"). This should facilitate the identification of thinner lesions. The benefit for the patient is then direct with a survival at 5 years higher. In public health terms, it is expected a benefit as better optimization of resources. In a situation of shortage of professionals, access to the dermatologist should be optimized by optimizing emergency access for patients who require it.

Interventions

OTHERTaking photographs of suspicious lesions with his smartphone and sending them to the dermatologist

Taking photographs of suspicious lesions with his smartphone and sending them to the dermatologist

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Cluster randomization of MGs corresponding to their exercise sites

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Patients: * Consulting a general practitioner participating in the study, * Having a suspicious cutaneous lesion of melanoma according to the MG, * Referred to a dermatologist who agreed to participate in the study, * \> = 18 years of age, with written informed consent, * Affiliated to a social security scheme

Exclusion criteria

Patients: * Consulting a general practitioner who does not participate in the study, * Having no suspect melanoma lesion according to MG, * Referred to the dermatologist for symptoms or pathologies unrelated to a suspicion of melanoma * Wishing to consult a dermatologist who refused to participate in the study, * Refusing the transmission by mail of 2 anonymised photos, * \<18 years of age, or with no written informed consent. * Major under tutelage, under curatorship

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time limit for consultation general practitioner / dermatologist, patients having a sufficiently suspicious lesion of melanoma12 monthsTime limit for consultation between consultation of the general practitioner and consultation with the dermatologist, for patients: 1. referred for a suspicious lesion of melanoma by the general practitioner, 2. and having a sufficiently suspicious lesion of melanoma so that the dermatologist conclude at the need for excision

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time limit for consultation general practitioner / dermatologist, patients NOT having a sufficiently suspicious lesion of melanoma12 monthsTime limit for consultation between consultation of the general practitioner and consultation with the dermatologist, for patients: 1. referred for a suspicious lesion of melanoma by the general practitioner, 2. BUT NOT having a sufficiently suspicious lesion of melanoma so that the dermatologist conclude at the need for excision
"Non-observing" patients between the 2 randomization groups12 monthsProportion of "non-observing" patients between the 2 randomization groups. A non-observing patient is a patient who has not consulted a dermatologist within 12 months following the prescription of his or her GP.

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 15, 2026