Nasotracheal Intubation
Conditions
Brief summary
Epistaxis or post-pharyngeal bleeding is the most common complication after nasotracheal intubation (NTI). Prior thermal softening of the endotracheal tube (ET) has been recommended as one of the methods to prevent nasal trauma from nasotracheal intubation. However, thermal softening of tubes tends to adversely affect the nasotracheal navigation of the ET. During NTI under conventional direct laryngoscopy, the tip of the Macintosh laryngoscope is advanced into the vallecula, indirectly elevating the epiglottis by applying pressure on the hyoepiglottic ligament. Although this maneuver allows optimal visualization of the glottis, it lifts the larynx away from the tip of the advancing nasotracheal tube (NTT), which generally lies along the posterior pharyngeal wall. Most clinicians use Magill forceps to direct the tip of the NTT anteriorly to enter the glottis. Magill forceps may cause damage to the cuff of an ET or may injure oropharyngeal mucosa. The use of a video laryngoscope and a cuff inflation technique has been proposed as a method for reducing the malalignment of tubes. Indirect laryngoscopy using a Video laryngoscopy can reduce malalignment by minimizing lifting the glottis during laryngoscopy. The cuff inflation technique (wherein the cuff of ET tube is inflated with 15 mL of air) has been used while performing "blind" NTI to guide such malaligned polyvinyl chloride (PVC) ET tubes into the laryngeal inlet. Recently, one study reported that the cuff inflation technique consistently improved the oropharyngeal insertion of the different ET tubes of varying stiffness during direct laryngoscope-guided NTI. There has never been study about effect of cuff inflation technique on navigability when performing NTI under video laryngoscopy guidance with ET tubes of varying stiffness.Investigators assessed and compared the incidence of nasal injury and nasotracheal navigability with two technique during cuff inflation-supplemented NTI guided by video- laryngoscopy
Interventions
OTHERThermo-softening
The thermosoftening treatment of the tubes was performed by using a warm cabinet set to 45°C (approximately 117°F). One bottle of normal saline (1 L) containing a thermometer and three tubes (6.0 -7.0 mm ID) was put into a chamber of the cabinet 30 min before intubation.
OTHERRoom temperature
nasotracheal tube, sized 6.0 -7.0 mm inner diameter (ID), were put into a bottle of sterilized normal saline (1 L, 25 °C) at room temperature.
Sponsors
Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* ASA status I-III, older than 18 yr, who under went elective surgery and requiring ET intubation as part of anesthetic management were enrolled in the study.
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with bleeding diathesis, history of recurrent nasal obstruction or any nasal/pharyngeal surgery, and those with anticipated difficult tracheal intubation were excluded.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| severity of epistaxis | during navigation from nose to oropharynx | The severity of epistaxis was evaluated under VL using a 4-point scale:no epistaxis; mild epistaxis (blood on the tracheal tube only); moderate epistaxis (blood pooling in the pharynx); or severe epistaxis (blood in the pharynx sufficient to impede intubation) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| the navigation of ET tube from nose to oropharynx | during navigation from nose to oropharynx | The navigability (ease of insertion) was scored as grade 1 if the tube advanced smoothly from the nose into oropharynx, grade 2 if there was resistance in the passage that could be managed by side-to-side rotation of the tube, and grade 3 if the tube impinged unduly and the other nostril had to be used. |
| time | The passage of each ET tube from nasal cavity to trachea was divided into 3 phases (phase 1: from the nose into oropharynx, phase 2: from oropharynx into the laryngeal inlet , phase 3: from the laryngeal inlet into the trachea) | time required for passage of tube in each phase |
| air volume | during navigation from oropharynx to laryngeal inlet | the volume of air needed for cuff inflation during navigation from oropharynx to laryngeal inlet |
| the navigation of ET tube from oropharynx to laryngeal inlet | during navigation from oropharynx to the laryngeal inlet | The tube was then advanced further from oropharynx into the laryngeal inlet under video laryngoscopic vision, and a smooth passage was scored as grade 1. In case the tube failed to align with the laryngeal inlet, the tube tip was withdrawn into the laryngopharynx and the cuff of the tube was sequentially inflated with air in 4 mL aliquots up to a maximal volume of 40 mL by an assistant on request until it aligned with the laryngeal inlet (cuff inflation technique) and got engaged in it thereafter (grade 2). If this technique was unsuccessful, the cuff was deflated and Magill forceps were used to engage the tube tip into the laryngeal inlet (grade 3). |
| the navigation of ET tube from laryngeal inlet to trachea | during navigation from laryngeal inlet to trachea | A smooth passage was considered grade 1. If the ET tube tip got stuck in the laryngeal vestibule, optimal external laryngeal manipulation (OELM) applied (grade2); If the ET tube tip got stuck in the laryngeal vestibule, it was rotated clockwise while maintaining a gentle forward pressure on it until it got disengaged from its impingement and then slipped into the trachea (grade 3). In case this maneuver was unsuccessful, Magill forceps were used to complete the intubation process (grade 4). |
Countries
South Korea
Outcome results
None listed