Skip to content

One Year Clinical Evaluation of IPS Empress CAD Versus Polished Celtra Duo Ceramic Laminate Veneers

One Year Clinical Evaluation of IPS Empress CAD Versus Polished Celtra Duo Ceramic Laminate Veneers

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03136276
Enrollment
36
Registered
2017-05-02
Start date
2017-07-31
Completion date
2018-09-30
Last updated
2017-05-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diastema, Tooth Discoloration, Tooth Fractures

Brief summary

When restoring teeth with IPS Empress laminate veneers, fracture of restorations may occur. So, material with higher mechanical properties is required. Celtra Duo is a new material with glass ceramics infiltrated by 10% zirconia particles which increase the fracture resistance of the material.

Interventions

standard etchable glass ceramics

OTHERpolished Celtra Duo

new glass ceramic material

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

double blind

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

All subjects are required to be: 1. From 18-50 years old, be able to read and sign the informed consent document. 2. Have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations 3. Psychologically and physically able to tolerate conventional dental procedures 4. Patients with teeth problems indicated for laminate veneer: 1. Discoloration 2. Fracture not involving more than 50% enamel loss 3. Mild malposition 4. Diastema 5. Enamel fluorosis 6. Stained or defective restorations 5. Able to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient with post and core endodontically treated teeth 2. Patient with fractured teeth of more than 50% enamel loss 3. Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation 4. Pregnant women's 5. Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth 6. Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations 7. Lack of opposing dentition in the area of interest 8. Patients involved in contact sports 9. Teeth with deep discoloration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fracture1 yearnumber of fractured laminates

Contacts

Primary ContactHayat El-Banna, M.D.s
hayat.elbanna@dentistry.cu.edu.eg01001248734
Backup ContactJylan EL-Guindy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026