Skip to content

Comparison of The Success Rates of Four Different Pulpotomy Techniques

Comparison of The Success Rates of Four Different Pulpotomy Techniques

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03135626
Enrollment
38
Registered
2017-05-01
Start date
2013-03-15
Completion date
2016-02-15
Last updated
2017-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Extensive Decay in Primary Molars

Keywords

Pulpotomy, Primary molars

Brief summary

This randomized clinical trial was conducted to examine and compare the effectiveness of pulpotomy in primary molars treated with calcium silicate based materials including Biodentine and two different mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) products (white ProRoot® MTA and MTA Plus®). Ferric sulfate pulpotomy was selected to represent the control group. 116 primary molars in 29 children were treated by pulpotomy and followed for a period of 24 months.

Interventions

DRUGBiodentine
DRUGMTA Plus
DRUGFerric Sulfate 20 % Dental Gel

Sponsors

Istanbul University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Split-mouth study design was used

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 7 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients were eligible if they were 5 to 7 years old, healthy and cooperative, and had at least four carious primary molars, each of which was in a different quadrant and required a pulpotomy. The criteria for the selection of the teeth to be included in the study were presence of deep caries, presence of at least two-thirds of the root length radiographically and being restorable.

Exclusion criteria

* The

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total success rate6 months after pulpotomy treatmentNumber of molars with both clinically and radiographically successful

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026