Skip to content

Health-related Quality of Life in Patients on Anticoagulants

Non-Interventional, Cross-sectional Study to Describe Health-related Quality of Life Among Controlled and Uncontrolled Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation on Anticoagulants. RE-QUOL Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03134911
Acronym
RE-QUOL
Enrollment
535
Registered
2017-05-01
Start date
2017-04-24
Completion date
2018-01-31
Last updated
2019-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

The present study has been designed to describe the health-related quality of life in patients with non valvular atrial fibrillation who have been prescribed a specific anticoagulant treatment for their non valvular atrial fibrilation at least 6 months prior to study initiation. It will be conducted in Departments of Internal Medicine from approximately 50 centers in Spain. It consists of an only visit that will coincide with one of those performed by the patients as part of routine follow-up of their disease. 500 patients seen in internal medicine are planned to be included in the study

Interventions

DRUGDOAC or VKA

6 months - 2 years

DRUGVKA

6 months - 2 years

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patient is willing and provides written informed consent to participate in this study. * The patient is at least 18 years of age * The patient has a diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation * The patient is on the same anticoagulant therapy (VKA or DOAC) during at least 6 months and maximum 2 years. * If treated with VKA, availability of % Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) in past analytical records or enough amount of International Normalized Ratio (INR) measures to calculate it.

Exclusion criteria

* Current participation in any clinical trial of a drug or device * Contraindication to the use of DOAC or VKA as described in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Health Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki QuestionnaireThe study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018Sawicki questionnaire includes 32 items grouped in 5 dimensions: 1) general treatment satisfaction, 2) self-efficacy, 3) strained social network, 4) daily hassles and 5) distress. Patients estimated the impact of each item on their self-perceived treatment-related QoL on a scale of 1 (total disagreement) to 6 (total agreement). Response options for each question were: 1=not at all, 2=very little, 3=a little, 4=somewhat, 5=a lot, 6=very much. High scores in general treatment satisfaction and self-efficacy dimensions indicate high perceived HRQoL. Low scores in the strained social network, daily hassles and distress dimensions indicate high perceived HRQoL. The summary score for each dimension was calculated by dividing the total score of the sum of the items that comprise each dimension into the number of items included in that dimension. For the general treatment satisfaction dimension, the scores of individual questions have to be inverted first to calculate the dimension score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Height of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsThe study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018Height of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented.
Weight of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsThe study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018Weight of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented.
Body Mass Index (BMI) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsThe study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018BMI of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented.
Kidney Function (Creatinine Clearance) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsThe study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018Kidney function of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients measured by creatinine clearance is presented.
History of Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) - Time Since DiagnosisThe study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018Analysis of data regarding the specific NVAF profile of uncontrolled patients indicated that the average (± SD) time since diagnosis (calculated as the time from the date of diagnosis to the date of the baseline visit).
History of Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) - Age at DiagnosisThe study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018Age at diagnosis of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented.
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsThe study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented.
Percentage of Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Depression of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsThe study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018Percentage of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) depression (% of LVEF depression) of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented qualitatively.
CHA2DS2-VASc Score of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsThe study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score is calculated based on the following conditions: Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age (≥ 75), Diabetes Mellitus, Stroke/ Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA), Vascular disease, Age 65-74, Sex category. CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome.
Demographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsThe study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018Age group, work status and life status of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented.
Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Thromboembolic Events by CategoriesThe study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018Percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with history of thromboembolic events by categories are presented.
Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Haemorrhagic Events by CategoriesThe study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018Percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with history of haemorrhagic events by categories are presented.
Number of Visits to the Physician of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsThe study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018Number of visits to the internal medicine specialist per year of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented.
Therapeutic Time in Range (TTR%) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsThe study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018Therapeutic time in range (TTR%) of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients determined by the Rosendaal method (poor control \< 65%) or by the direct method (poor control \< 60%).
Time Since Treatment Initiation of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsThe study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018Time since treatment initiation of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients was calculated as the time from the start date of treatment to the date of the baseline visit.
Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients Received Type of VKA TreatmentThe study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018Percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients received type VKA treatment is presented.
The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant DiseasesThe study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018The percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with at least one other concomitant diseases recorded in the medical history.
The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit DayThe study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018The percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with active concomitant diseases on visit day. The percentage was calculated on total patients who presented each of the diseases.
The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant TreatmentThe study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018The percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with concomitant treatment is presented.
HAS-BLED Score of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsThe study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018HAS-BLED bleeding risk score is calculated based on the following conditions: Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile International Normalized Ratio (INR), Elderly (\>65 years), Drugs and Alcohol. HAS-BLED bleeding risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome.

Countries

Spain

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This was an observational, multicentre and cross-sectional study conducted in Departments of Internal Medicine from 47 sites in Spain. The patient received the same anticoagulant treatment for at least 6 months and no more than 2 years.

Pre-assignment details

Data were obtained from a single visit that coincided with one of those performed by the patients as part of routine follow-up of their disease, without interfering with usual clinical practice of the investigator. 535 patients were enrolled and 34 excluded from analysis due to being screening failure and not meeting inclusion/ exclusion criteria.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Uncontrolled Group
Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) receiving conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment for at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included in this group.
171
Controlled Group
Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment for at least 6 months and up to 2 years with controlled anticoagulation status, were included in this group.
330
Total501

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyNot meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria3
Overall StudyScreen failure31

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlled GroupTotalUncontrolled Group
Age, Continuous79.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
79.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
80.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
330 Participants501 Participants171 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
152 Participants247 Participants95 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
178 Participants254 Participants76 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1710 / 690 / 261
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1710 / 690 / 261
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1710 / 691 / 261

Outcome results

Primary

Health Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki Questionnaire

Sawicki questionnaire includes 32 items grouped in 5 dimensions: 1) general treatment satisfaction, 2) self-efficacy, 3) strained social network, 4) daily hassles and 5) distress. Patients estimated the impact of each item on their self-perceived treatment-related QoL on a scale of 1 (total disagreement) to 6 (total agreement). Response options for each question were: 1=not at all, 2=very little, 3=a little, 4=somewhat, 5=a lot, 6=very much. High scores in general treatment satisfaction and self-efficacy dimensions indicate high perceived HRQoL. Low scores in the strained social network, daily hassles and distress dimensions indicate high perceived HRQoL. The summary score for each dimension was calculated by dividing the total score of the sum of the items that comprise each dimension into the number of items included in that dimension. For the general treatment satisfaction dimension, the scores of individual questions have to be inverted first to calculate the dimension score.

Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018

Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) with uncontrolled anticoagulation status and those with controlled anticoagulation status receiving VKA or direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Controlled GroupHealth Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki QuestionnaireSelf-efficacy4.3 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 1
Controlled GroupHealth Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki QuestionnaireDaily hassles2.1 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Controlled GroupHealth Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki QuestionnaireDistress3.1 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Controlled GroupHealth Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki QuestionnaireStrained social network1.8 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Controlled GroupHealth Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki QuestionnaireTreatment satisfaction4.9 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 1
Uncontrolled GroupHealth Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki QuestionnaireStrained social network2.6 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Uncontrolled GroupHealth Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki QuestionnaireTreatment satisfaction3.6 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Uncontrolled GroupHealth Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki QuestionnaireSelf-efficacy3.6 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 1
Uncontrolled GroupHealth Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki QuestionnaireDistress3.9 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Uncontrolled GroupHealth Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki QuestionnaireDaily hassles3.0 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Body Mass Index (BMI) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients

BMI of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented.

Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018

Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included. The number of patients included in the analysis of this variable has been specified.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Controlled GroupBody Mass Index (BMI) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients28.7 Kilogram/meter^2 (kg/m^2)Standard Deviation 5.4
Secondary

CHA2DS2-VASc Score of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients

CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score is calculated based on the following conditions: Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age (≥ 75), Diabetes Mellitus, Stroke/ Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA), Vascular disease, Age 65-74, Sex category. CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome.

Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018

Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Controlled GroupCHA2DS2-VASc Score of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients4.5 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 1.4
Secondary

Demographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients

Age group, work status and life status of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented.

Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018

Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Controlled GroupDemographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsWork status - Employed3 Participants
Controlled GroupDemographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsWork status - Housewife40 Participants
Controlled GroupDemographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsWork status - Retired126 Participants
Controlled GroupDemographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsWork status - Other2 Participants
Controlled GroupDemographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsLife status - Single8 Participants
Controlled GroupDemographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsLife status - Married79 Participants
Controlled GroupDemographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsLife status - Widowed78 Participants
Controlled GroupDemographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsLife status - Divorced6 Participants
Controlled GroupDemographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsAge < 6510 Participants
Controlled GroupDemographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsAge 65 - 7532 Participants
Controlled GroupDemographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsAge ≥ 75129 Participants
Secondary

HAS-BLED Score of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients

HAS-BLED bleeding risk score is calculated based on the following conditions: Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile International Normalized Ratio (INR), Elderly (\>65 years), Drugs and Alcohol. HAS-BLED bleeding risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome.

Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018

Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Controlled GroupHAS-BLED Score of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients3.6 Unit on scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Secondary

Height of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients

Height of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented.

Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018

Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included. The number of patients included in the analysis of this variable has been specified.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Controlled GroupHeight of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients163.1 Centimeter (cm)Standard Deviation 8.8
Secondary

History of Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) - Age at Diagnosis

Age at diagnosis of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented.

Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018

Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Controlled GroupHistory of Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) - Age at Diagnosis77.3 YearsStandard Deviation 8.7
Secondary

History of Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) - Time Since Diagnosis

Analysis of data regarding the specific NVAF profile of uncontrolled patients indicated that the average (± SD) time since diagnosis (calculated as the time from the date of diagnosis to the date of the baseline visit).

Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018

Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Controlled GroupHistory of Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) - Time Since Diagnosis2.5 YearsStandard Deviation 3.2
Secondary

Kidney Function (Creatinine Clearance) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients

Kidney function of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients measured by creatinine clearance is presented.

Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018

Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included. The number of patients included in the analysis of this variable has been specified.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Controlled GroupKidney Function (Creatinine Clearance) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients57.2 Millilitre/minute (ml/min)Standard Deviation 26.6
Secondary

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented.

Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018

Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Controlled GroupLeft Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients56.1 Percentage (%)Standard Deviation 11.2
Secondary

Number of Visits to the Physician of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients

Number of visits to the internal medicine specialist per year of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented.

Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018

Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Controlled GroupNumber of Visits to the Physician of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients3.1 Visits per yearStandard Deviation 1.9
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Depression of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients

Percentage of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) depression (% of LVEF depression) of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented qualitatively.

Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018

Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Controlled GroupPercentage of Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Depression of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsNormal (≥ 50%)87.0 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupPercentage of Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Depression of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsSlightly depressed (41-49%)3.1 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupPercentage of Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Depression of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsModerately depressed (31-40%)6.2 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupPercentage of Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Depression of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsSeverely depressed (≤ 30%)3.7 Percentage of patients (%)
Secondary

Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients Received Type of VKA Treatment

Percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients received type VKA treatment is presented.

Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018

Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
Controlled GroupPercentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients Received Type of VKA TreatmentAcenocoumarol97.7 Percentage of patients (%) 6.3
Controlled GroupPercentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients Received Type of VKA TreatmentWarfarin2.3 Percentage of patients (%)
Secondary

Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Haemorrhagic Events by Categories

Percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with history of haemorrhagic events by categories are presented.

Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018

Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Controlled GroupPercentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Haemorrhagic Events by CategoriesGastrointestinal68.0 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupPercentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Haemorrhagic Events by CategoriesGenitourinary12.0 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupPercentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Haemorrhagic Events by CategoriesPulmonary4.0 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupPercentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Haemorrhagic Events by CategoriesArticular-muscular4.0 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupPercentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Haemorrhagic Events by CategoriesIntracranial4.0 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupPercentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Haemorrhagic Events by CategoriesConjunctival4.0 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupPercentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Haemorrhagic Events by CategoriesNasal4.0 Percentage of patients (%)
Secondary

Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Thromboembolic Events by Categories

Percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with history of thromboembolic events by categories are presented.

Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018

Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Controlled GroupPercentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Thromboembolic Events by CategoriesNon-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction31.7 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupPercentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Thromboembolic Events by CategoriesCerebral infarction28.3 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupPercentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Thromboembolic Events by CategoriesTIA21.7 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupPercentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Thromboembolic Events by CategoriesPulmonary embolism8.3 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupPercentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Thromboembolic Events by CategoriesStable angina pectoris6.7 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupPercentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Thromboembolic Events by CategoriesST-segment elevation myocardial infarction6.7 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupPercentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Thromboembolic Events by CategoriesUnstable angina6.7 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupPercentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Thromboembolic Events by CategoriesDeep vein thrombosis5.0 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupPercentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Thromboembolic Events by CategoriesSystemic embolism1.7 Percentage of patients (%)
Secondary

The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit Day

The percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with active concomitant diseases on visit day. The percentage was calculated on total patients who presented each of the diseases.

Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018

Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Controlled GroupThe Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit DayHypertension72.5 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupThe Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit DayCongestive heart failure35.7 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupThe Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit DayDiabetes mellitus33.9 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupThe Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit DayKidney failure28.1 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupThe Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit DayAnaemia25.1 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupThe Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit DayArterial vascular disease10.5 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupThe Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit DayPrevious stroke/TIA7.6 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupThe Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit DayLiver failure1.2 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupThe Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit DayVenous thromboembolism0.6 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupThe Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit DayOther23.4 Percentage of patients (%)
Secondary

The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant Diseases

The percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with at least one other concomitant diseases recorded in the medical history.

Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018

Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Controlled GroupThe Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant DiseasesHypertension85.8 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupThe Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant DiseasesCongestive heart failure48.5 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupThe Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant DiseasesDiabetes mellitus38.5 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupThe Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant DiseasesRenal failure34.3 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupThe Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant DiseasesAnaemia32.5 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupThe Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant DiseasesArterial vascular disease19.5 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupThe Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant DiseasesPrevious stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA)17.8 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupThe Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant DiseasesVenous thromboembolism4.7 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupThe Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant DiseasesLiver failure1.8 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupThe Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant DiseasesOther33.1 Percentage of patients (%)
Secondary

The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant Treatment

The percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with concomitant treatment is presented.

Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018

Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Controlled GroupThe Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant TreatmentYes97.1 Percentage of patients (%)
Controlled GroupThe Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant TreatmentNo2.9 Percentage of patients (%)
Secondary

Therapeutic Time in Range (TTR%) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients

Therapeutic time in range (TTR%) of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients determined by the Rosendaal method (poor control \< 65%) or by the direct method (poor control \< 60%).

Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018

Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Controlled GroupTherapeutic Time in Range (TTR%) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsRosendaal method (poor control < 65%)49.1 Percentage (%)Standard Deviation 10.8
Controlled GroupTherapeutic Time in Range (TTR%) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) PatientsThe direct method (poor control < 60%)35.0 Percentage (%)Standard Deviation 15.2
Secondary

Time Since Treatment Initiation of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients

Time since treatment initiation of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients was calculated as the time from the start date of treatment to the date of the baseline visit.

Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018

Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Controlled GroupTime Since Treatment Initiation of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients14.8 MonthsStandard Deviation 6.3
Secondary

Weight of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients

Weight of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented.

Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018

Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included. The number of patients included in the analysis of this variable has been specified.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Controlled GroupWeight of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients76.5 Kilogram (kg)Standard Deviation 16.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026