Atrial Fibrillation
Conditions
Brief summary
The present study has been designed to describe the health-related quality of life in patients with non valvular atrial fibrillation who have been prescribed a specific anticoagulant treatment for their non valvular atrial fibrilation at least 6 months prior to study initiation. It will be conducted in Departments of Internal Medicine from approximately 50 centers in Spain. It consists of an only visit that will coincide with one of those performed by the patients as part of routine follow-up of their disease. 500 patients seen in internal medicine are planned to be included in the study
Interventions
6 months - 2 years
6 months - 2 years
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* The patient is willing and provides written informed consent to participate in this study. * The patient is at least 18 years of age * The patient has a diagnosis of non-valvular atrial fibrillation * The patient is on the same anticoagulant therapy (VKA or DOAC) during at least 6 months and maximum 2 years. * If treated with VKA, availability of % Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) in past analytical records or enough amount of International Normalized Ratio (INR) measures to calculate it.
Exclusion criteria
* Current participation in any clinical trial of a drug or device * Contraindication to the use of DOAC or VKA as described in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Health Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki Questionnaire | The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018 | Sawicki questionnaire includes 32 items grouped in 5 dimensions: 1) general treatment satisfaction, 2) self-efficacy, 3) strained social network, 4) daily hassles and 5) distress. Patients estimated the impact of each item on their self-perceived treatment-related QoL on a scale of 1 (total disagreement) to 6 (total agreement). Response options for each question were: 1=not at all, 2=very little, 3=a little, 4=somewhat, 5=a lot, 6=very much. High scores in general treatment satisfaction and self-efficacy dimensions indicate high perceived HRQoL. Low scores in the strained social network, daily hassles and distress dimensions indicate high perceived HRQoL. The summary score for each dimension was calculated by dividing the total score of the sum of the items that comprise each dimension into the number of items included in that dimension. For the general treatment satisfaction dimension, the scores of individual questions have to be inverted first to calculate the dimension score. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Height of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018 | Height of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented. |
| Weight of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018 | Weight of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented. |
| Body Mass Index (BMI) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018 | BMI of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented. |
| Kidney Function (Creatinine Clearance) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018 | Kidney function of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients measured by creatinine clearance is presented. |
| History of Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) - Time Since Diagnosis | The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018 | Analysis of data regarding the specific NVAF profile of uncontrolled patients indicated that the average (± SD) time since diagnosis (calculated as the time from the date of diagnosis to the date of the baseline visit). |
| History of Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) - Age at Diagnosis | The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018 | Age at diagnosis of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented. |
| Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018 | Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented. |
| Percentage of Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Depression of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018 | Percentage of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) depression (% of LVEF depression) of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented qualitatively. |
| CHA2DS2-VASc Score of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018 | CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score is calculated based on the following conditions: Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age (≥ 75), Diabetes Mellitus, Stroke/ Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA), Vascular disease, Age 65-74, Sex category. CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome. |
| Demographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018 | Age group, work status and life status of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented. |
| Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Thromboembolic Events by Categories | The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018 | Percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with history of thromboembolic events by categories are presented. |
| Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Haemorrhagic Events by Categories | The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018 | Percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with history of haemorrhagic events by categories are presented. |
| Number of Visits to the Physician of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018 | Number of visits to the internal medicine specialist per year of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented. |
| Therapeutic Time in Range (TTR%) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018 | Therapeutic time in range (TTR%) of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients determined by the Rosendaal method (poor control \< 65%) or by the direct method (poor control \< 60%). |
| Time Since Treatment Initiation of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018 | Time since treatment initiation of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients was calculated as the time from the start date of treatment to the date of the baseline visit. |
| Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients Received Type of VKA Treatment | The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018 | Percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients received type VKA treatment is presented. |
| The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant Diseases | The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018 | The percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with at least one other concomitant diseases recorded in the medical history. |
| The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit Day | The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018 | The percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with active concomitant diseases on visit day. The percentage was calculated on total patients who presented each of the diseases. |
| The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant Treatment | The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018 | The percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with concomitant treatment is presented. |
| HAS-BLED Score of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018 | HAS-BLED bleeding risk score is calculated based on the following conditions: Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile International Normalized Ratio (INR), Elderly (\>65 years), Drugs and Alcohol. HAS-BLED bleeding risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome. |
Countries
Spain
Participant flow
Recruitment details
This was an observational, multicentre and cross-sectional study conducted in Departments of Internal Medicine from 47 sites in Spain. The patient received the same anticoagulant treatment for at least 6 months and no more than 2 years.
Pre-assignment details
Data were obtained from a single visit that coincided with one of those performed by the patients as part of routine follow-up of their disease, without interfering with usual clinical practice of the investigator. 535 patients were enrolled and 34 excluded from analysis due to being screening failure and not meeting inclusion/ exclusion criteria.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Group Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) receiving conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment for at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included in this group. | 171 |
| Controlled Group Patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) or direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment for at least 6 months and up to 2 years with controlled anticoagulation status, were included in this group. | 330 |
| Total | 501 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Not meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria | 3 |
| Overall Study | Screen failure | 31 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Controlled Group | Total | Uncontrolled Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 79.3 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8 | 79.7 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7 | 80.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | — | 0 Participants | — |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | — | 0 Participants | — |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | — | 0 Participants | — |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 330 Participants | 501 Participants | 171 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 152 Participants | 247 Participants | 95 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 178 Participants | 254 Participants | 76 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 171 | 0 / 69 | 0 / 261 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 171 | 0 / 69 | 0 / 261 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 171 | 0 / 69 | 1 / 261 |
Outcome results
Health Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki Questionnaire
Sawicki questionnaire includes 32 items grouped in 5 dimensions: 1) general treatment satisfaction, 2) self-efficacy, 3) strained social network, 4) daily hassles and 5) distress. Patients estimated the impact of each item on their self-perceived treatment-related QoL on a scale of 1 (total disagreement) to 6 (total agreement). Response options for each question were: 1=not at all, 2=very little, 3=a little, 4=somewhat, 5=a lot, 6=very much. High scores in general treatment satisfaction and self-efficacy dimensions indicate high perceived HRQoL. Low scores in the strained social network, daily hassles and distress dimensions indicate high perceived HRQoL. The summary score for each dimension was calculated by dividing the total score of the sum of the items that comprise each dimension into the number of items included in that dimension. For the general treatment satisfaction dimension, the scores of individual questions have to be inverted first to calculate the dimension score.
Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018
Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) with uncontrolled anticoagulation status and those with controlled anticoagulation status receiving VKA or direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years were included.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled Group | Health Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki Questionnaire | Self-efficacy | 4.3 Unit on scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Controlled Group | Health Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki Questionnaire | Daily hassles | 2.1 Unit on scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Controlled Group | Health Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki Questionnaire | Distress | 3.1 Unit on scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Controlled Group | Health Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki Questionnaire | Strained social network | 1.8 Unit on scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Controlled Group | Health Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki Questionnaire | Treatment satisfaction | 4.9 Unit on scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Uncontrolled Group | Health Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki Questionnaire | Strained social network | 2.6 Unit on scale | Standard Deviation 1.2 |
| Uncontrolled Group | Health Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki Questionnaire | Treatment satisfaction | 3.6 Unit on scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
| Uncontrolled Group | Health Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki Questionnaire | Self-efficacy | 3.6 Unit on scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Uncontrolled Group | Health Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki Questionnaire | Distress | 3.9 Unit on scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Uncontrolled Group | Health Related Quality of Life (QoL) (HRQoL) Scores in the Spanish Adaptation of the Sawicki Questionnaire | Daily hassles | 3.0 Unit on scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
Body Mass Index (BMI) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients
BMI of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented.
Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018
Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included. The number of patients included in the analysis of this variable has been specified.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled Group | Body Mass Index (BMI) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | 28.7 Kilogram/meter^2 (kg/m^2) | Standard Deviation 5.4 |
CHA2DS2-VASc Score of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients
CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score is calculated based on the following conditions: Congestive heart failure, Hypertension, Age (≥ 75), Diabetes Mellitus, Stroke/ Transient Ischaemic Attack (TIA), Vascular disease, Age 65-74, Sex category. CHA2DS2-VASc stroke risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome.
Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018
Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled Group | CHA2DS2-VASc Score of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | 4.5 Unit on scale | Standard Deviation 1.4 |
Demographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients
Age group, work status and life status of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented.
Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018
Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled Group | Demographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | Work status - Employed | 3 Participants |
| Controlled Group | Demographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | Work status - Housewife | 40 Participants |
| Controlled Group | Demographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | Work status - Retired | 126 Participants |
| Controlled Group | Demographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | Work status - Other | 2 Participants |
| Controlled Group | Demographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | Life status - Single | 8 Participants |
| Controlled Group | Demographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | Life status - Married | 79 Participants |
| Controlled Group | Demographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | Life status - Widowed | 78 Participants |
| Controlled Group | Demographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | Life status - Divorced | 6 Participants |
| Controlled Group | Demographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | Age < 65 | 10 Participants |
| Controlled Group | Demographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | Age 65 - 75 | 32 Participants |
| Controlled Group | Demographic Data of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | Age ≥ 75 | 129 Participants |
HAS-BLED Score of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients
HAS-BLED bleeding risk score is calculated based on the following conditions: Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile International Normalized Ratio (INR), Elderly (\>65 years), Drugs and Alcohol. HAS-BLED bleeding risk score may range from 0 to 9 with 0 being the best outcome.
Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018
Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled Group | HAS-BLED Score of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | 3.6 Unit on scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
Height of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients
Height of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented.
Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018
Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included. The number of patients included in the analysis of this variable has been specified.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled Group | Height of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | 163.1 Centimeter (cm) | Standard Deviation 8.8 |
History of Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) - Age at Diagnosis
Age at diagnosis of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented.
Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018
Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled Group | History of Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) - Age at Diagnosis | 77.3 Years | Standard Deviation 8.7 |
History of Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) - Time Since Diagnosis
Analysis of data regarding the specific NVAF profile of uncontrolled patients indicated that the average (± SD) time since diagnosis (calculated as the time from the date of diagnosis to the date of the baseline visit).
Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018
Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled Group | History of Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) - Time Since Diagnosis | 2.5 Years | Standard Deviation 3.2 |
Kidney Function (Creatinine Clearance) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients
Kidney function of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients measured by creatinine clearance is presented.
Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018
Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included. The number of patients included in the analysis of this variable has been specified.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled Group | Kidney Function (Creatinine Clearance) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | 57.2 Millilitre/minute (ml/min) | Standard Deviation 26.6 |
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented.
Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018
Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled Group | Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | 56.1 Percentage (%) | Standard Deviation 11.2 |
Number of Visits to the Physician of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients
Number of visits to the internal medicine specialist per year of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented.
Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018
Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled Group | Number of Visits to the Physician of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | 3.1 Visits per year | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
Percentage of Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Depression of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients
Percentage of patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) depression (% of LVEF depression) of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented qualitatively.
Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018
Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled Group | Percentage of Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Depression of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | Normal (≥ 50%) | 87.0 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | Percentage of Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Depression of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | Slightly depressed (41-49%) | 3.1 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | Percentage of Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Depression of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | Moderately depressed (31-40%) | 6.2 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | Percentage of Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Depression of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | Severely depressed (≤ 30%) | 3.7 Percentage of patients (%) |
Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients Received Type of VKA Treatment
Percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients received type VKA treatment is presented.
Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018
Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled Group | Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients Received Type of VKA Treatment | Acenocoumarol | 97.7 Percentage of patients (%) | 6.3 |
| Controlled Group | Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients Received Type of VKA Treatment | Warfarin | 2.3 Percentage of patients (%) | — |
Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Haemorrhagic Events by Categories
Percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with history of haemorrhagic events by categories are presented.
Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018
Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled Group | Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Haemorrhagic Events by Categories | Gastrointestinal | 68.0 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Haemorrhagic Events by Categories | Genitourinary | 12.0 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Haemorrhagic Events by Categories | Pulmonary | 4.0 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Haemorrhagic Events by Categories | Articular-muscular | 4.0 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Haemorrhagic Events by Categories | Intracranial | 4.0 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Haemorrhagic Events by Categories | Conjunctival | 4.0 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Haemorrhagic Events by Categories | Nasal | 4.0 Percentage of patients (%) |
Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Thromboembolic Events by Categories
Percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with history of thromboembolic events by categories are presented.
Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018
Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled Group | Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Thromboembolic Events by Categories | Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction | 31.7 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Thromboembolic Events by Categories | Cerebral infarction | 28.3 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Thromboembolic Events by Categories | TIA | 21.7 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Thromboembolic Events by Categories | Pulmonary embolism | 8.3 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Thromboembolic Events by Categories | Stable angina pectoris | 6.7 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Thromboembolic Events by Categories | ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction | 6.7 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Thromboembolic Events by Categories | Unstable angina | 6.7 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Thromboembolic Events by Categories | Deep vein thrombosis | 5.0 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With History of Thromboembolic Events by Categories | Systemic embolism | 1.7 Percentage of patients (%) |
The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit Day
The percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with active concomitant diseases on visit day. The percentage was calculated on total patients who presented each of the diseases.
Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018
Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled Group | The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit Day | Hypertension | 72.5 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit Day | Congestive heart failure | 35.7 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit Day | Diabetes mellitus | 33.9 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit Day | Kidney failure | 28.1 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit Day | Anaemia | 25.1 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit Day | Arterial vascular disease | 10.5 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit Day | Previous stroke/TIA | 7.6 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit Day | Liver failure | 1.2 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit Day | Venous thromboembolism | 0.6 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Active Concomitant Diseases on Visit Day | Other | 23.4 Percentage of patients (%) |
The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant Diseases
The percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with at least one other concomitant diseases recorded in the medical history.
Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018
Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled Group | The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant Diseases | Hypertension | 85.8 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant Diseases | Congestive heart failure | 48.5 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant Diseases | Diabetes mellitus | 38.5 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant Diseases | Renal failure | 34.3 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant Diseases | Anaemia | 32.5 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant Diseases | Arterial vascular disease | 19.5 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant Diseases | Previous stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) | 17.8 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant Diseases | Venous thromboembolism | 4.7 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant Diseases | Liver failure | 1.8 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant Diseases | Other | 33.1 Percentage of patients (%) |
The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant Treatment
The percentage of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients with concomitant treatment is presented.
Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018
Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled Group | The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant Treatment | Yes | 97.1 Percentage of patients (%) |
| Controlled Group | The Percentage of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients With Concomitant Treatment | No | 2.9 Percentage of patients (%) |
Therapeutic Time in Range (TTR%) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients
Therapeutic time in range (TTR%) of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients determined by the Rosendaal method (poor control \< 65%) or by the direct method (poor control \< 60%).
Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018
Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled Group | Therapeutic Time in Range (TTR%) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | Rosendaal method (poor control < 65%) | 49.1 Percentage (%) | Standard Deviation 10.8 |
| Controlled Group | Therapeutic Time in Range (TTR%) of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | The direct method (poor control < 60%) | 35.0 Percentage (%) | Standard Deviation 15.2 |
Time Since Treatment Initiation of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients
Time since treatment initiation of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients was calculated as the time from the start date of treatment to the date of the baseline visit.
Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018
Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled Group | Time Since Treatment Initiation of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | 14.8 Months | Standard Deviation 6.3 |
Weight of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients
Weight of uncontrolled non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients is presented.
Time frame: The study consisted of a single visit between April 2017 and January 2018
Population: All patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), who received conventional vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment at least 6 months and up to 2 years with uncontrolled anticoagulation status were included. The number of patients included in the analysis of this variable has been specified.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Controlled Group | Weight of Uncontrolled Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation (NVAF) Patients | 76.5 Kilogram (kg) | Standard Deviation 16.1 |