Skip to content

Sepsis Associated Encephalopathy (SAE) Biomarkers

Serum Biomarkers in Sepsis Associated Encephalopathy (SAE)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03133208
Enrollment
90
Registered
2017-04-28
Start date
2017-06-01
Completion date
2026-12-15
Last updated
2025-10-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Altered Mental Status, Delirium, Sepsis Associated, Sepsis, Sepsis-Associated Delirium, Sepsis Associated Encephalopathy

Keywords

sepsis, sepsis associated encephalopathy, sepsis associated delirium, altered mental status

Brief summary

Sepsis associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a poorly understood acute cerebral dysfunction that frequently appears in the setting of sepsis induced systemic inflammation. In fact, altered mentation is recognized as an independent predictor of death and poor outcomes in patients with sepsis. SAE may be manifested by a number of symptoms characterized by a change in baseline behavior, attention, alertness, cognition, or executive functioning. It occurs in the absence of direct Central Nervous System (CNS) infection, and the exact pathophysiology is of SAE is unknown, but theoretically seems to encompass a constellation of mechanisms such as impairment of the blood brain barrier (BBB), endothelial dysfunction, alteration in cerebral blood flow and neurotransmission, circulating inflammatory mediators, cellular hypoxia, and metabolic disturbances, that ultimately result in neuronal dysfunction and cell death. SAE is characterized by an altered mental status (AMS) that ranges from delirium to coma, and can lead to long-term cognitive impairment. SAE may appear early in the course of sepsis, and is often underestimated as an independent factor of mortality, yet the pathophysiology of SAE remains unknown, and there is a lack of specific investigations available to clinicians. Studies have evaluated biomarkers as prognostic tools. The Investigator propose to measure neuron specific enolase (NSE), S-100B, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), Tau protein, Copeptin, spectrin breakdown products (SBDP 145, SBDP150), αII-spectrin N-terminal fragment (SNTF), neurofilament light and heavy chains (NF-L, NF-H), myelin basic protein (MBP), secretoneurin (SN), and other peptide levels in the serum of sepsis patients who develop altered mental status, to evaluate the kinetics of said biomarkers for 72 hours. The Investigator will monitor the course of the patients' hospitalization to determine whether there are biomarker correlates with survival and outcomes, including neurologic impairment. Finally, this investigation may provide a mechanistic pathway that defines the development of AMS in septic patients.

Detailed description

Sepsis associated encephalopathy (SAE) is a common neurological complication of sepsis that is often associated with worse prognosis, yet remains poorly understood. It occurs in the absence of direct brain infection or other types of disease-associated encephalopathy such as hepatic or renal encephalopathy, and is a result of systemic inflammation (1). Clinically, a diagnosis of SAE is made when there is an impaired mental state in the presence of an extracranial infection. Clinical features of SAE include change in mental status (altered mental status/ AMS), disturbances in mental processes, agitation, disorientation, impaired attention, hypersomnolence, delirium or coma. SAE may be an early sign of sepsis that is manifested prior to overt evidence of other organ failures (2), and is an independent prognosticator of morbidity and mortality (3). Moreover, sepsis survivors can suffer from long-term cognitive impairments that impact their quality of life. The pathophysiology of SAE is a complex constellation of proposed mechanisms that include direct insult to brain tissue from circulating inflammatory mediators that are overexpressed in sepsis, disturbances in metabolic pathways, cellular hypoxia, disruption of the BBB integrity, alterations in neurotransmission, impairment of regulation of the brain perfusion. The consequence of this combination of neuroinflammatory and ischemic processes is neuronal degeneration and cell death (apoptosis). It is difficult to diagnose SAE early, as sepsis is often a diagnosis of exclusion and can be occult in presentation. For example, emergency physicians may conduct diagnostic studies to evaluate for stroke, metabolic disturbance (i.e. hyponatremia, hypoglycemia, vitamin deficiency, medication reaction), toxicity, seizure or other acute neurologic condition. In addition, severe sepsis patients may be intubated and are often sedated, which poses a challenge to conducting a neurological assessment of their mental status. There may be changes in electroencephalography (EEG), somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP), or neuroimaging but these tests lack specificity and SAE remains a diagnosis of exclusion. Injured neurons release neuron specific proteins that diffuse across the disrupted BBB into the blood and could have diagnostic relevance in diagnosing SAE. Neuron specific enolase (NSE) and S100 beta (S100B) are biomarkers currently used in the setting of SAE and have been studied clinically. There is a lack of human studies on other proteins such as GFAP, co-peptin, Tau, neurofilament light/ heavy chain, UCH-L1, SBDP, MBP, and secretoneurin that have been proposed as potential biomarkers of neurological outcome for other causes of acute brain dysfunction such as traumatic brain injury (TBI) and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathies (HIE) and could potentially serve as candidate biomarkers to diagnose SAE. Most studies lack a control cohort. The Investigator intends to sample sepsis patients that present to the emergency department but do not develop altered mental status within our study as well. The Investigator therefore propose a prospective, observational study in which the study team will perform blood biomarker analysis from time of enrollment up to study day 3. This would be done by drawing blood at (0-30mins), and additional blood draws at hours 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, 72. The Investigator will then determine whether biomarker levels correlate with neurologic assessment in the Emergency Department (ED), degree of overall organ dysfunction, survival to hospital admission, survival to hospital discharge, and functional neurologic outcome at discharge and at 6 months.

Interventions

PROCEDUREBlood draws

Blood draws will be collected via venipuncture or IV at hours 0, 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, 72 (7 draws total). Each draw would be up to 20 mL of blood (but no less than 10 mL).

Sponsors

University of Florida
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Cohort 1: * ≥ 18 years old * Presented to the emergency department at Shands * Has not donated blood within the last 8 weeks * Willing to participate and follow up at 6 months after discharge from the hospital * Not anemic or have any other hematological disorders that requires transfusions Meets two or more Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria: * Temperature \>38°C or \<36°C * Heart rate (HR) \> 90bpm * Respiratory rate (RR) \> 20bpm or partial pressures of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) \<32mm mercury (HG) * White Blood Cell (WBC) \>12,000/µL or \< 4,000/µL or \>10% immature/ bands Clinical suspicion of sepsis (blood cultures ordered/ antibiotics started) Altered mental status Enrolled within 6 hours of ED presentation Cohort 2 * ≥ 18 years old * Presented to the emergency department at Shands * Has not donated blood within the last 8 weeks * Willing to participate and follow up at 6 months after discharge from the hospital * Not anemic or have any other hematological disorders that requires transfusions Meets two or more SIRS criteria: * Temperature \>38°C or \<36°C * HR \> 90bpm * RR \> 20bpm or PaCO 2 \<32mmHG * WBC \>12,000/µL or \< 4,000/µL or \>10% immature/ bands Clinical suspicion of sepsis (blood cultures ordered/ antibiotics started) No altered mental status Enrolled within 6 hours of ED presentation Cohort 3 (control) * Does not meet SIRS criteria * No clinical suspicion of sepsis (no cultures/ antibiotics ordered) * Not altered * Patient has admission orders

Exclusion criteria

(all cohorts): * Participating in another interventional, therapeutic study that may affect the results of this study * Subject has neurodegenerative disease or other neurological disorder (dementia, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, seizure disorder, or brain tumours) * History of neurosurgery within the last 30 days * Acute brain injury within the last 30 days (ischemic/ haemorrhagic stroke, traumatic brain injury) * Subject is anemic OR donated blood within the last 8 weeks OR has a hematological disorder that requires transfusions * Subject has history of liver failure OR renal failure * Pregnant or lactating female

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relationship between biomarkers and neurological outcome- Delirium1 yearAcute encephalopathy will be measured using the mental status assessment including the Delirium Triage Screen (DTS) Brief Confusion Assessment Method (bCAM). DTS-bCAM assessment is a flowchart that helps diagnose a patient who is altered.
Relationship between biomarkers and neurological outcome - Blessed1 yearAcute encephalopathy will be measured using the mental status assessment short blessed test (SBT). Sum Total (range 0-28) \[0-4 = normal cognition, 5-9 = questionable impairment, ≥ 10 = Impairment consistent with dementia\]

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relationship between biomarkers and organ dysfunction1 yearOrgan dysfunction will be assessed using Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) methodology, a mortality assessment tool that monitors the dynamics of cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, renal, hepatic, and hematological organ function.
Relationship between biomarkers and overall survival7-day, 28-day, and 6-months mortalityDate of death will be recorded for all patients who died during the study period. Rate of survival will be assessed.
Degree of neurological impairmentup to 2 weeksassessed using the Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) scoring \[CPC 1: A return to normal cerebral function and normal living, CPC 2: Cerebral disability but sufficient function for independent activities of daily living, CPC 3: Severe disability, limited cognition, inability to carry out independent existence, CPC 4: Coma, CPC 5: Brain death

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026