Skip to content

Predictive Diagnostic Criteria for Diagnosis of Transbronchial Biopsies, Echo-guided by Mini-probe in Peripheral Lung Lesions

Predictive Diagnostic Criteria for Diagnosis of Transbronchial Biopsies, Echo-guided by Mini-probe in Peripheral Lung Lesions

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03132870
Acronym
EBUS-R-PTB
Enrollment
66
Registered
2017-04-28
Start date
2017-02-01
Completion date
2017-06-01
Last updated
2018-10-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Lung Lesion, Transbronchial Biopsies

Brief summary

The diagnosis of nodules and peripheral lung masses (lesions not accessible in classical bronchial endoscopy) is a challenge for the pulmonologist especially when these lesions are not accessible to the transparietal aspirate under scanner. The overall sensitivity of flexible fibroscopy for peripheral lesions is 69% (bronchial brushing, transbronchial biopsies, bronchoalveolar lavage and blind trans-mucosal aspiration). This sensitivity varies from 33% when the lesion is less than 2 cm, to 62% when it is greater than 2 cm. The puncture under scan of these lesions remains the gold standard. In the meta-analysis of Schreiber G et al., The diagnostic sensitivity of transparietal aspirate for peripheral lung lesions is 90%. On the other hand, the complication rate of this technique is not negligible, with in the study of Boskovic et al, a pneumothorax rate varying from 8 to 64%. In the literature, the only risk factor actually found is the existence of emphysema. However, thoracic drainage is rarely necessary. Bronchial echo-endoscopy using a radial mini-probe was developed in 1992 by Thomas Hürter and Peter Hanrath to produce ultrasound guided specimens of these peripheral lung lesions. In the meta-analysis of Steinfort et al., The overall sensitivity of this mini-probe technique is 73% for the histological diagnosis. From the same author, a randomized trial compared the diagnostic sensitivity of transparietal aspirate undergoing ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy with a radial mini-probe: this was 93.3% versus 87.5% with no significant difference (p = 1 ), Whereas post-procedure complications are less frequent in the ultrasound procedure (27% versus 3%, p = 0.03). Steinfort also showed that the economic cost of bronchial echo-endoscopy by radial mini-probe and transthoracic puncture under CT was similar both to the success or failure of the first procedure requiring further investigations . Mini-probe-guided specimens are therefore an efficient diagnostic alternative to obtain a histological diagnosis of these peripheral lung lesions

Interventions

OTHERDefine predictive criteria for the diagnostic performance of echo-guide samples by mini-probe in peripheral lung lesions

Define predictive criteria for the diagnostic performance of echo-guide samples by mini-probe in peripheral lung lesions

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients who underwent mini-probe fibroscopy at Amiens University Hospital from January 2013 to March 2016

Exclusion criteria

* No

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Analyze predictive criteria of the performance diagnosis by echo-guide sampling by mini-probe39 months

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026