Skip to content

MICRO Study: Detecting Bacterial Infections Related to Orthopaedic Surgical Implants

Early Determination of Biofilm Formation on Orthopaedic Devices

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03132246
Acronym
MICRO
Enrollment
260
Registered
2017-04-27
Start date
2014-04-30
Completion date
2018-07-31
Last updated
2020-05-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Extremity Fractures

Keywords

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Infection, Biofilm Assay

Brief summary

A prospective trial conducted at Shock Trauma of patients between 18 years of age and older who have sustained a fracture with metal implanted. The investigators will be collecting between 1-3 routine blood draws for the purpose of laboratory analysis to assess biofilm growth. Patients may be infected or non-infected at the time of blood draw; they will be selected at random for purposes of this study. All patients will be followed as standard of care by their treating physician for all their follow up visits.

Detailed description

Surgical site infection in the orthopaedic surgery population is a significant public health issue. Wound infections result in both increased length of hospital stay and total cost of care. Surgical site infection (SSI) is the most common preventable adverse outcome after a major operation. The economic costs to the US healthcare system are enormous estimated to be in excess of $1.8 billion per year. For patients who develop an SSI, the cost may be even higher with length of stay and risk of death doubled. Thus the benefits of any intervention decreasing the risk of SSI are very tangible. A biofilm is a layer of bacteria that adheres to a surface; in Orthopaedics, this often means adherence to implanted metal after fracture surgery. The test that has been designed by one of the investigators on the study has been shown in an animal model to detect the formation of a biofilm up to 1 month prior to clinical detection. Having a blood assay such as this would allow earlier antibiotics and potentially prevent the need for further surgeries to remove metal implants and clean out the biofilm.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTBlood draws

The only intervention patients experience are non-standard of care blood draws. The blood is then tested in a basic science laboratory.

Sponsors

University of Maryland, Baltimore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Previous fracture fixation with an implant (intramedullary nail, plate, screws), or joint revisions, or periprosthetic fracture, or admitted from orthopaedic trauma clinic due to infection, or inpatient with a known infection. * English speaking

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with planned follow-up at another medical center * Patient lives outside of the hospital catchment area

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Blood Samples With High Levels of Absorbance Via ELISA for Patients (Greater Than 1.5 Ratio Compared to Control Human Serum)1 year of clinical follow-upA high level of absorbance via ELISA (greater than 1.5 ratio compared to control human serum) is a positive test result. The rate of not infected patient samples that return positive will demonstrate the false positive rate of the test.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Blood Samples With Low Levels of Absorbance Via ELISA for Patients (Greater Than 1.5 Ratio Compared to Control Human Serum)1 year of clinical follow-upA low level of absorbance via ELISA (greater than 1.5 ratio compared to control human serum) is a negative test result. The rate of infected patient samples that return negative will demonstrate the false negative rate of the test.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Patients were enrolled if presented as high risk but later separated into the Infected Group or the Not Infected Group based on whether or not they went on to develop an infection post surgery. Group assignment is unknown for patients that did not complete the study and therefore groups are combined for reporting overall study numbers.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Infected
Trauma patients that were considered at risk for infection after fracture fixation. Inclusion criteria included open fractures, proximal tibia fractures, pilon fractures, and calcaneus fractures treated with surgical fixation. All patients in this arm went on to develop an infection. Each patient enrolled in the study provides blood samples up to 10 times. These blood samples are to be tested using basic science techniques to determine the level of exposure to a staphylococcal biofilm each patient has experienced over a period of time. Blood draw: The only intervention patients experience is a non-standard of care blood draw. The blood is then tested in a basic science laboratory.
20
Not Infected
Trauma patients that were considered at risk for infection after fracture fixation. Inclusion criteria included open fractures, proximal tibia fractures, pilon fractures, and calcaneus fractures treated with surgical fixation. All patients in this arm did not go on to develop an infection. Each patient enrolled in the study provides blood samples up to 10 times. These blood samples are to be tested using basic science techniques to determine the level of exposure to a staphylococcal biofilm each patient has experienced over a period of time. Blood draw: The only intervention patients experience is a non-standard of care blood draw. The blood is then tested in a basic science laboratory.
136
Total156

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalInfectedNot Infected
Age, Continuous44 years45 years44 years
Body Mass Index28 kg/m227 kg/m228 kg/m2
Closed Fractures97 Participants12 Participants85 Participants
Follow up43 months58 months28 months
Open Fracture59 Participants8 Participants51 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
56 Participants5 Participants51 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
100 Participants15 Participants85 Participants
Smoker67 Participants12 Participants55 Participants
Time to Infection11 months11 months

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1041 / 203 / 136
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1040 / 200 / 136
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1040 / 200 / 136

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Blood Samples With High Levels of Absorbance Via ELISA for Patients (Greater Than 1.5 Ratio Compared to Control Human Serum)

A high level of absorbance via ELISA (greater than 1.5 ratio compared to control human serum) is a positive test result. The rate of not infected patient samples that return positive will demonstrate the false positive rate of the test.

Time frame: 1 year of clinical follow-up

Population: One to three blood sample tests were taken for each participant prior to the one-year post-operative clinical follow-up. Clinical cultures will also be monitored for the one-year post-operative period and compared to the blood sample test results to determine if the test is able to identify patients with positive staphylococcal infection cultures.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
InfectedNumber of Blood Samples With High Levels of Absorbance Via ELISA for Patients (Greater Than 1.5 Ratio Compared to Control Human Serum)48 blood draw samples
Not InfectedNumber of Blood Samples With High Levels of Absorbance Via ELISA for Patients (Greater Than 1.5 Ratio Compared to Control Human Serum)53 blood draw samples
Secondary

Number of Blood Samples With Low Levels of Absorbance Via ELISA for Patients (Greater Than 1.5 Ratio Compared to Control Human Serum)

A low level of absorbance via ELISA (greater than 1.5 ratio compared to control human serum) is a negative test result. The rate of infected patient samples that return negative will demonstrate the false negative rate of the test.

Time frame: 1 year of clinical follow-up

Population: One to three blood sample tests were taken for each participant prior to the one-year post-operative clinical follow-up. Clinical cultures will also be monitored for the one-year post-operative period and compared to the blood sample test results to determine if the test is able to identify patients with positive staphylococcal infection cultures.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
InfectedNumber of Blood Samples With Low Levels of Absorbance Via ELISA for Patients (Greater Than 1.5 Ratio Compared to Control Human Serum)4 blood draw samples
Not InfectedNumber of Blood Samples With Low Levels of Absorbance Via ELISA for Patients (Greater Than 1.5 Ratio Compared to Control Human Serum)92 blood draw samples

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026