Skip to content

Pivotal Study of VNS During Rehab After Stroke (VNS-REHAB)

A Pivotal Randomized Study Assessing Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) During Rehabilitation for Improved Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke (VNS-REHAB)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03131960
Acronym
VNS-REHAB
Enrollment
108
Registered
2017-04-27
Start date
2017-07-01
Completion date
2022-06-30
Last updated
2022-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebrovascular Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis

Brief summary

This is a pivotal phase study of up to 120 subjects and 15 clinical sites. All subjects are implanted with the Vivistim System® and then randomized to either study treatment or active-control treatment. The randomization will be stratified by age (\<30, \>30) and baseline FMA UE (20 to \<35; \>35 to 50). Study treatment is vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) delivered during rehabilitation. Active control treatment is rehabilitation (standard-of-care treatment) with only a minimal amount of VNS at the start of each session intended to support blinding.

Detailed description

This study has three distinct stages: Stage I, an acute blinded stage, Stage II, an unblinded stage through one year of standard VNS, and Stage III, an unblinded stage for yearly follow-up after one year of VNS. The Control group crosses over to VNS treatment at Stage II. For Stage I, subjects have: * consent and evaluation (screening), * one pre-implant evaluation, * surgical implant of the device system and randomization into one of the treatment arms, * one baseline evaluation after device implant surgery but before initiation of treatment, * 6 weeks of treatment (standard-of-care rehabilitation + standard VNS or standard-of-care rehabilitation + active control VNS), and then * post-acute therapy evaluations at 1, 30 and 90 days after the 6 weeks of treatment. * Between Day 1 (V5) and Day 30 (V6) post-acute therapy, both groups will receive in-home, self-directed rehabilitation (30 minutes of daily rehabilitation as assigned by the therapist) with either in-home activated VNS (VNS group) or no VNS (Control group). This means that the control subjects will not have the in-home activated VNS until they complete the second 6-week session of in-clinic rehabilitation with follow-up assessments as described below in Stage II. At this point (Day 30) subjects start scheduling for their continuing long-term follow-up. * Between Day 30 and Day 90 post-acute therapy, both groups continue in-home, self-directed rehabilitation (30 minutes of daily rehabilitation as assigned by the therapist). The VNS group continues to receive in-home VNS with magnet use; the Control group continues to use the magnet but does not receive any VNS. The Day 90 post-acute therapy visit is V7; it is the first quarterly visit (3 months after study therapy) for the VNS group and is the re-baseline visit (visit just prior to the initiation of standard VNS therapy) for the Control group. Stage II: * VNS subjects will continue to have quarterly assessments through the end of the first year (6m, 9m, 12m). * Subjects in the control group will crossover for a second 6-week in-clinic rehabilitation period where they will now receive rehabilitation with standard VNS. * Control subjects will then have the three post therapy assessments (1, 30 and 90 days after therapy ends); in-home VNS initiated by a magnet swipe starts at the Post-1 visit (LT1). Thereafter, control subjects will follow the same schedule as VNS subjects for the remainder of the study (6m, 9m, 12m follow-ups, plus yearly visits thereafter). * Subjects in both groups will receive booster in-clinic rehabilitation plus VNS therapy sessions one month prior to their 6- and 12-month assessment visits. These sessions occur on three days over a one-week period (typically Mon, Wed, Fri). Stage III: • After one year of standard VNS therapy (\ 13.5 months after implant for VNS group subjects and \ 18 months after implant for Control group subjects), subjects who wish to keep their device for further use will have annual follow-up assessments until commercial approval.

Interventions

Stimulation of the vagus nerve that is paired with upper limb rehabilitation movements.

OTHERRehabilitation

Rehabilitation movements to improve upper limb function after stroke

Sponsors

ResearchPoint Global
CollaboratorOTHER
MicroTransponder Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants, therapists (care providers), investigators, and outcomes assessors do not know which group (VNS or control VNS) the patients are randomized. Only one person at the site - the programmer who programs the device settings - knows which group the subject is randomized into.

Intervention model description

Double blind, randomized, parallel study with partial crossover (control subjects crossover to treatment after randomized portion)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
22 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. History of unilateral supratentorial ischemic stroke that occurred at least 9 months but not more than ten 10 years prior to enrollment. 2. Age \>22 years and \<80 years. 3. FMA-UE score of 20 to 50 (inclusive of 20 and 50). 4. Ability to communicate, understand, and give appropriate consent. Subjects should be able to follow two-step commands. 5. Right- or left-sided weakness of upper extremity. 6. Active wrist flexion/extension; active abduction/extension of thumb and at least two additional digits.

Exclusion criteria

1. History of hemorrhagic stroke 2. Presence of ongoing dysphagia or aspiration difficulties. 3. Subject receiving medication that may significantly interfere with the actions of VNS on neurotransmitter systems at study entry. A list of excluded medications will be provided to Investigators. 4. Prior injury to vagus nerve, either bilateral or unilateral (e.g., injury during carotid endarterectomy). 5. Severe or worse depression (Beck Depression Scale \> 29) (Beck et al., 1961) 6. Unfavorable candidacy for device implant surgery (e.g., history of adverse reactions to anesthetics, poor surgical candidate in surgeon's opinion, etc.) 7. Current use of any other stimulation device, such as a pacemaker or other neurostimulator; current use of any other investigational device or drug. 8. Medical or mental instability (diagnosis of personality disorder, psychosis, or substance abuse) that would prevent subject from meeting protocol timeline. 9. Pregnancy or plans to become pregnant or to breastfeed during the study period. 10. Current requirement, or likely future requirement, of diathermy during the study duration. 11. Active rehabilitation within 4 weeks prior to consent. 12. Botox injections or any other non-study active rehabilitation of the upper extremity within 4 weeks prior to therapy through the post-30 day visit (Visit 6). 13. Severe spasticity of the upper limb (Modified Ashworth ≥3) (Bohannon and Smith, 1987). 14. Significant sensory loss. Sensory loss will be measured using the Upper Extremity sensory section of the Fugl Meyer Assessment of Physical Performance. The assessment addresses light touch (2 items) and proprioception (4 items).The highest points attained is 12; subjects with scores less than 6 will be excluded from the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Average ChangeV5, One day after 6-weeks of therapyThe Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) was analyzed for difference in average change at 1-day after 6-weeks of therapy compared to baseline (Difference in average change in FM-A from baseline \[V4\] to one day after therapy \[V5\]). The upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) was collected at each visit. The FMA-UE is a common scale used to measure motor impairment after a stroke. The range is 0 (more impairment) to 66 (no impairment).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Average ChangeV7, 90 days after 6-weeks of therapyThe Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) was analyzed for change in average score at 90-days after 6-weeks of therapy (change in average FMA-UE from baseline \[V4\] to 90 days after therapy \[V7\]). The upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) was collected at each visit. The FMA-UE is a common scale used to measure motor impairment after a stroke. The range is 0 (more impairment) to 66 (no impairment).
Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) ResponseV7, 90 days after 6-weeks of therapyThe Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Response is the percent of patients with a 6 point or greater improvement on the (FMA-UE). The percent of patients with the 6-point change is calculated at 90-days after 6-weeks of therapy compared to baseline (V4). The upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) was collected at each visit. The FMA-UE is a common scale used to measure motor impairment after a stroke. The range is 0 (more impairment) to 66 (no impairment).
Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) Average ChangeV7, 90 days after 6-weeks of therapyThe Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) is an assessment scale of upper extremity functional level after stroke. The functional assessment range is an average of 15 sub-items with a range from 0 to 5, with 0 (meaning did not attempt) to 5 (meaning normal). WMFT 90-day - is a measure of the functional assessment change from baseline to 90 days after 6-weeks of therapy.

Countries

United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
VNS + Rehabilitation (1)
Study treatment is vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) delivered during rehabilitation. Paired Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Stimulation of the vagus nerve that is paired with upper limb rehabilitation movements. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation movements to improve upper limb function after stroke
53
Control VNS
Active control treatment is rehabilitation (standard-of-care treatment) with only a minimal amount of VNS at the start of each session intended to support blinding. Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation movements to improve upper limb function after stroke
55
Total108

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalControl VNSVNS + Rehabilitation (1)
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
43 Participants20 Participants23 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
65 Participants35 Participants30 Participants
Age, Continuous60.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
61.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
59.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
FMA-UE Baseline Score35.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
35.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
34.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
18 Participants9 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
84 Participants42 Participants42 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
34 participants17 participants17 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
74 participants38 participants36 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
38 Participants19 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
70 Participants36 Participants34 Participants
WMFT Baseline Score2.76 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.67
2.83 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.65
2.71 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 530 / 55
other
Total, other adverse events
43 / 5342 / 55
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 533 / 55

Outcome results

Primary

Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Average Change

The Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) was analyzed for difference in average change at 1-day after 6-weeks of therapy compared to baseline (Difference in average change in FM-A from baseline \[V4\] to one day after therapy \[V5\]). The upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) was collected at each visit. The FMA-UE is a common scale used to measure motor impairment after a stroke. The range is 0 (more impairment) to 66 (no impairment).

Time frame: V5, One day after 6-weeks of therapy

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VNS + Rehabilitation (1)Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Average Change5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.4
Control VNSFugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Average Change2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.8
p-value: 0.0014ANCOVA
Secondary

Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Average Change

The Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) was analyzed for change in average score at 90-days after 6-weeks of therapy (change in average FMA-UE from baseline \[V4\] to 90 days after therapy \[V7\]). The upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) was collected at each visit. The FMA-UE is a common scale used to measure motor impairment after a stroke. The range is 0 (more impairment) to 66 (no impairment).

Time frame: V7, 90 days after 6-weeks of therapy

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VNS + Rehabilitation (1)Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Average Change5.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6
Control VNSFugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Average Change2.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.2
Comparison: ANCOVAp-value: 0.0077ANCOVA
Secondary

Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Response

The Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Response is the percent of patients with a 6 point or greater improvement on the (FMA-UE). The percent of patients with the 6-point change is calculated at 90-days after 6-weeks of therapy compared to baseline (V4). The upper extremity portion of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA-UE) was collected at each visit. The FMA-UE is a common scale used to measure motor impairment after a stroke. The range is 0 (more impairment) to 66 (no impairment).

Time frame: V7, 90 days after 6-weeks of therapy

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
VNS + Rehabilitation (1)Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Response25 Participants
Control VNSFugl-Meyer Assessment, Upper Limb (FMA-UE) Response13 Participants
p-value: 0.0098Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) Average Change

The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) is an assessment scale of upper extremity functional level after stroke. The functional assessment range is an average of 15 sub-items with a range from 0 to 5, with 0 (meaning did not attempt) to 5 (meaning normal). WMFT 90-day - is a measure of the functional assessment change from baseline to 90 days after 6-weeks of therapy.

Time frame: V7, 90 days after 6-weeks of therapy

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
VNS + Rehabilitation (1)Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) Average Change0.46 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4
Control VNSWolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) Average Change0.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
p-value: <0.0001ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 16, 2026