Skip to content

High-voltage Pulsed Radiofrequency on Gasserian Ganglion to Treat Patients With Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia

Effectiveness and Safety of High-voltage Pulsed Radiofrequency on Gasserian Ganglion to Treat Patients With Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03131466
Enrollment
134
Registered
2017-04-27
Start date
2017-04-28
Completion date
2021-09-03
Last updated
2021-10-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Idiopathic Trigeminal Neuralgia

Keywords

Trigeminal Neuralgia, Pulsed Radiofrequency, Gasserian Ganglion

Brief summary

The study is designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of high-voltage Pulsed radiofrequency and nerve block for the treatment of primary Trigeminal Neuralgia patients with ineffective conservative treatment and explore better non-surgical treatment methods for Trigeminal Neuralgia patients.

Detailed description

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a paroxysmal, lightning-like, severe pain in the facial area innervated by trigeminal nerve. Patients who have failed to achieve benefits from drug treatment could try to undergo nerve block, a traditional conservative treatment. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) is a noninvasive pain intervention technique for the treatment of TN. However, its treatment effectiveness has rarely been reported and remains controversial among scholars. A recent single-center preliminary clinical study showed that high-voltage PRF had significant effectiveness in the treatment of TN. However, whether high-voltage PRF treatment can become an optional treatment for TN patients who have failed to achieve benefits from drug treatment still needs to be confirmed with standardized clinical studies by utilizing conservative nerve block treatment as a control. The study is designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of high-voltage PRF and nerve block for the treatment of primary TN patients with ineffective conservative treatment and explore better non-surgical treatment methods for TN patients.

Interventions

The manual PRF mode of the pain treatment generator will be turned on, the upper temperature limit will be set at 42°C, the PRF output voltage will be gradually increased to the highest voltage the patient can tolerate, and the patient will be treated for 360 s. After the treatment, 1.4 ml of a mixture of 0.4 mL of normal saline and 1 mL of 1% plain lidocaine will be injected through the needle of the cannula, and before the needle being removed, 0.5 mL of normal saline will be injected.

DRUGNerve block

The radiofrequency generator will be set at the sensory stimulating mode, and the lowest frequency of 0.2 V will be used for 360s-sham PRF treatment, after which 1.4 mL of a mixture of 2 mg of dexamethasone sodium phosphate and 1 mL of 1% plain lidocaine will be slowly injected through the radiofrequency treatment cannula needle. Before the needle being removed, 0.5 mL of normal saline will be injected.

Sponsors

Beijing Friendship Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Beijing Ditan Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia meets the criteria of the International Classification of Headache Disorders. * 18-75 years old. * Response to drug treatment poorly or unable to tolerate the side effects of drugs. * A BNI pain intensity scale score of IV-V. * Supposed to undergo neurosurgical intervention according to Trigeminal Neuralgia treatment guidelines. * Agree to participate in this trial and have signed the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Abnormal routine blood, liver or kidney functions, abnormal blood biochemistry test, or coagulation disorders. * Abnormal electrocardiogram or chest X-ray results. * Severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction. * Infection at the puncture site. * History of mental illness, or history of narcotic drug abuse. * Allergy to local anesthetic drugs or steroids. * Cannot cooperate with the treatment. * History of invasive treatments, such as radiofrequency thermocoagulation, chemical ablation, balloon compression surgery, gamma knife treatment, peripheral denervation or microvascular decompression.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effective rate of Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia treatment1 year after operationThe Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain intensity score will be used to assess pain degree. Pain relief degree will be evaluated as excellent (BNI pain score I-II), good (BNI pain score III), and poor (BNI pain score IV-V). The effective rate=excellent and good pain relief (BNI I - III)/total number of cases \* 100%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient satisfaction1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after operationPatient satisfaction score (PSS) score will be used to evaluate patient satisfaction: 0 point indicates unsatisfactory, while 10 points indicates very satisfactory.
Dosage of adjuvant antiepileptic drugs1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after operation
Data regarding patients with a BNI of IV or V who switch to other treatments1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after operation
Adverse events1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years after opeartionData regarding intraoperative and postoperative adverse events.
The postoperative response rate1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 2 years after opeartionThe Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain intensity score will be used to assess pain degree. Pain relief degree will be evaluated as excellent (BNI pain score I-II), good (BNI pain score III), and poor (BNI pain score IV-V). The effective rate=excellent and good pain relief (BNI I - III)/total number of cases \* 100%.

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026