Skip to content

Comparison of Two Types of Biopsy in Suspicious Axillary Lymph Nodes

Comparison of the Accuracy and Safety of Biopsy in Suspicious Axillary Lymph Nodes With a Crypo-assisted Stick Freeze Biopsy Device or Fine Needle Aspiration

Status
Suspended
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03130946
Enrollment
135
Registered
2017-04-27
Start date
2017-05-01
Completion date
2023-12-01
Last updated
2022-10-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Neoplasms

Keywords

breast neoplasms, Ultrasonography, Interventional, Biopsy, Large-Core Needle, Biopsy, Fine-Needle

Brief summary

Axillary lymph node status is a vital prognostic factor in breast cancer patients and provides crucial information for making treatment decisions. Ultrasound test with subsequent fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy in nodes with suspicious features remains the standard of axillary lymph node workup. Insufficient sampling and limited diagnostic accuracy of cytological test compromise the outcome the preoperative lymph node staging strategy especially in patients with intermediate suspicious nodes. This prospective study is to compare the performance of a crpo-assisted core biopsy with FNA.

Detailed description

This prospective study was planned to evaluate the superiority of a core needle biopsy device with a special cryo-assisted rotational design (Cassi II, USA) compared with FNA for biopsy of intermediately suspicious lymph nodes. Eligible patients would be randomized to one of two arms by 1:2 : Core with FNA or FNA alone. The diagnostic accuracy and adverse outcome of core and FNA would be compared.

Interventions

DEVICECryo-assisted core needle biopsy

Rotational core needle biopsy would be done under local anesthesia. A small incision would be made in the axilla and core needle biopsy be performed using a special cryo-assisted stick freeze device (Cassi II, Scion Medical Technologies, USA). The cytological and histological specimens would be sent for diagnosis.

DEVICEFNA

FNA would be performed using a 10ml syringe with a 24 gauge needle without anesthesia.

Sponsors

Peking University People's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Two arm, prospective, open label study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer. * With axillary lymph node with thickened cortex. * Planned for sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary clearance.

Exclusion criteria

* Nodes ultrasonographically normal. * Nodes with hilar displacement . * Palpable matted nodes.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sensitivity of biopsyImmediate after pathological lymph node stage is availableTrue positive rate measures the proportion of positives that are correctly identified by Core needle or FNA

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse effect of surgery4 weeks after surgery.Hematoma, bleeding need , suture exposure and extrusion.
SpecificityImmediate after pathological lymph node stage is available.The true negative rate measures the proportion of negatives that are correctly identified.
Sample adequencyImmediate after biopsy specimen is evaluated by pathologists.The specimen amount or quality for diagnosis is adequate or not evaluated by pathologists

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026