Skip to content

Short Versus Long Axis Ultrasound Guided Approach for Internal Jugular Vein Cannulations

Short Versus Long Axis Ultrasound Guided Approach for Internal Jugular Vein Cannulations: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03130660
Enrollment
100
Registered
2017-04-26
Start date
2017-04-20
Completion date
2018-04-19
Last updated
2018-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Central Line Complication, Ultrasonography

Keywords

central line, Central Line Complication

Brief summary

We plan to compare single person short axis view with two person long axis view

Detailed description

Introduction: The guidelines for the use of bedside ultrasonography in the evaluation of critically ill patients published by the society of critical care medicine recommends short-axis view be used during insertion of central venous catheter (CVC) in internal jugular vein (IJV) to improve success rate1. The long axis view is considered better for cannulations as it helps in preventing posterior wall puncture but in the trials it has been found to be inconvenient for a single user2,3. We hypothesise that if two persons perform long axis cannulations i.e. one person will image the vein while the other punctures it will be equally convenient to single person doing the cannulations in short axis. The advantage we expect to see is lesser complications in long axis group. Methodology: Inclusion criteria: Any patient getting admitted to ICU and requiring central venous cannulations. Exclusion: Lack of consent. Randomization: At a 1:1 ratio, to be achieved using a computer-generated random number sequence for 100 consecutive subjects Study intervention: Eligible patients will be randomized to a short-axis or long axis technique for ultrasound guided IJV cannulations. Ultrasound guidance will be performed dynamically using a single-operator technique for short axis and double operator technique for long axis view. Cannulations and USG is to be carried out by 2 trained Anaesthesiologists. Definition: 1. Insertion time: Time taken from 1st puncture of skin to insertion of guide wire into the vein. 2. Total Procedure time: Time from when Ultrasound scan was started to complete suturing of the CVC line. 3. Number of needle sticks: Number of time punctures were done in the skin. Complications were noted as hematoma formation, posterior wall puncture, arterial puncture, extravasations of blood and pneumothorax. All the times are to be noted by a bedside nurse who is not involved in the trial or knows the study hypothesis. Statistical Analysis: An intention-to-treat analysis was performed. Insertion time, overall procedure time and number of needle sticks, and will be compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. The success rate and complication rate will be compared using Fisher exact tests. All statistical analyses will be performed with SPSS 20.0

Interventions

DEVICEUltrasonography

Ultrasound guidance for central line

Sponsors

Institute of Medical Sciences and SUM Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

patient to be randomized to two groups

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Any patient getting admitted to ICU and requiring central venous cannulations.

Exclusion criteria

* Lack of consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
time to insertion15 minutestime from skin puncture to insertion of guidewire

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Complications48 hourshematoma formation, posterior wall puncture, arterial puncture, extravasations of blood and pneumothorax
Total Procedure time15 minutesTime from when Ultrasound scan was started to complete suturing of the CVC line.
Number of needle sticks15 minutesNumber of time punctures were done in the skin

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026