Skip to content

Patient Satisfaction of Glazed IPS Empress CAD Versus Glazed Celtra Duo Ceramic Laminate Veneers

Patient Satisfaction and One Year Clinical Evaluation of Glazed IPS Empress CAD Versus Glazed Celtra Duo Ceramic Laminate Veneers

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03129711
Enrollment
36
Registered
2017-04-26
Start date
2017-08-31
Completion date
2018-09-30
Last updated
2017-05-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tooth Discoloration, Tooth Fractures

Brief summary

The most frequent reason for failure of laminate veneers made of glass ceramics (feldspathic, leucite based and lithium silicate based ceramics) was fracture of the ceramic, Therefore, ceramic materials that have higher fracture resistance, especially for patients suffering from abnormal occlusion, are needed.

Detailed description

IPS Empress CAD is a leucite glass-ceramic of the SiO2-Al2-O3-K2O material systems with leucite crystal ranging from 5 to 10 µm in size. The leucite crystals increase the material strength and interferes with crack propagation, while the fracture energy is absorbed by the crystalline phase. The resistance and flexural strength (160 Mpa) is improved by the difference in the coefficient of thermal expansion between the glass phase and the crystalline phase and the cooling process following sintering phase. CELTRA DUO: is a new generation of glass ceramic material. With the aid of a new manufacturing process, the glass ceramic is infiltrated with 10% zirconia by weight, producing zirconia reinforced lithium silicate ceramic (ZLS). The material is characterized by a unique homogenous structure with fine grains that provides excellent material quality and consistency, high strength properties and long term performance. In addition, the material offers satisfying processing characteristics which can be milled and polished easily. After milling the restorations are shaded correctly shaded, with no need for crystallization step 10. The milled restorations have a flexural strength of 210 MPa. After stain and glaze firing the restoration will exhibit a flexural strength up to 370 MPa.

Interventions

OTHERglazed Celtra Duo

zirconia reinforced lithium silicate

Standard etchable glass ceramic for laminate veneers

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All subjects are required to be 1. From 18-50 years old, be able to read and sign the informed consent document. 2. Physically and psychologically able to tolerate conventional restorative procedures 3. have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations 4. Patients with teeth problems indicated for laminate veneer: 1. Discoloration 2. Fracture not involving more than 50% enamel loss 3. Mild malposition 4. Diastema 5. Enamel fluorosis 6. Stained or defective restorations 5. Willing to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation

Exclusion criteria

* 1\. Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth 2. Patient with fractured teeth of more than 50% enamel loss 3. Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation 4. Pregnant women's 5. Patient with post and core endodontically treated teeth 6. Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations 7. Lack of opposite occluding dentition in the area intended for restoration 8. Patients involved in contact sports 9. Teeth with deep discoloration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
fracture resistance1 yearscores

Contacts

Primary ContactOmnia Wafik El mesallamy, MDS
omniawafik@gmail.com01006595375
Backup ContactJylan El Guindy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026