Axial Spondyloarthritis
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate, in participants having achieved a state of sustained remission, if the ixekizumab treatment groups are superior to the placebo group in maintaining response during the randomized withdrawal-retreatment period in participants with axial spondyloarthritis.
Interventions
Administered SC
Administered SC
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Have completed the final study visit in Study RHBV (NCT02696785), RHBW (NCT02696798), or RHBX (NCT02757352). (Note: Participants from Study RHBX are not eligible if they permanently discontinued ixekizumab and were receiving a tumor necrosis factor \[TNF\] inhibitor). * Must agree to use a reliable method of birth control.
Exclusion criteria
* Have significant uncontrolled disorders or abnormal laboratory values that, in the opinion of the investigator, pose an unacceptable risk to the participant if investigational product continues to be administered. * Have a known hypersensitivity to ixekizumab or any component of this investigational product. * Had investigational product permanently discontinued during a previous ixekizumab study. * Had temporary investigational product interruption at any time during or at the final study visit of a previous ixekizumab study and, in the opinion of the investigator, restarting ixekizumab poses an unacceptable risk for the participant's participation in the study. * Have any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, renders the participant unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study or precludes the participant from following and completing the protocol. * Are currently enrolled in any other clinical trial involving an investigational product or any other type of medical research judged not to be scientifically or medically compatible with this study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who do Not Experience a Flare (Combined Ixekizumab Treatment) | Week 64 | A flare is defined as Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS ≥2.1) at 2 consecutive visits, or ASDAS \>3.5 at any visit during Period 2. ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) as acute phase reactant) are total back pain, patient global, peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness and CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS) | Baseline, 2 Years | The mSASSS is a four-point scoring system for lateral radiographs of the lumbar and cervical spine and has been shown to reliably track disease progression over time, where: 0 = normal; 1 = sclerosis, squaring or erosion; 2 = syndesmophyte; 3 = bony bridge. By the scoring system of mSASSS of the spinal x-rays, a total of 24 sites were scored on the lateral cervical and lumbar spine: the anterior corners of the vertebrae from lower border of C2 to upper border T1 (inclusive), and from lower border of T12 to upper border of S1 (inclusive). Each corner was scored from 0 to 3, resulting in a range from 0 \[no change\] to 72 \[progression\]. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS)20 Response | Week 64 | ASAS20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement and an absolute improvement from baseline of ≥1 units (range 0 to 10) in ≥3 of 4 domains, and no worsening of ≥20% and ≥1 unit (range 0 to 10) in the remaining domain. The following ASAS domains are used: Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI): Participant asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participant response was captured using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. Inflammation based on mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Q5 & Q6 (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe). |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS40 Response | Week 64 | ASAS40 is defined as a ≥40% improvement and an absolute improvement from baseline of ≥2 units (range of 0 to 10) in at least 3 of the following 4 domains without any worsening in the remaining domain. The following ASAS domains are used: Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI): Participant asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participant response was captured using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. Inflammation based on mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Q5 & Q6 (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe). |
| Percentage of Participants With Change of Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) ≥1.1 Units | Week 64 | ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are total back pain, patient global, peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness and CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness +0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity. |
| Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease on the ASDAS (<1.3 Units) | Week 64 | ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are total back pain, patient global, peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness and CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity. |
| Change From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS Criteria | Baseline, Week 64 | Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI): Participant asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participant response was captured using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. Inflammation based on Q5 & Q6 mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe). LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response | Week 64 | The BASDAI is a participant-reported assessment consisting of 6 questions that relate to 5 major symptoms relevant to radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA): 1) Fatigue, 2) Spinal pain, 3) Peripheral arthritis, 4) Enthesitis, 5) Intensity, and 6) Duration of morning stiffness. Participants need to score each item with a score from 0 to 10 (NRS). Total score is obtained from the average of symptom scores ranging 0 (no problem) to 10 (worst problem), with a higher score indicating more severe AS symptom. BASDAI50 represents an improvement of ≥50% of the BASDAI score from baseline. |
| Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP) | Baseline, Week 64 | High sensitivity CRP is the measure of acute phase reactant. It was measured with a high sensitivity assay at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of ixekizumab on disease activity. High sensitivity CRP is a sensitive laboratory assay for serum levels of C-Reactive Protein, which is a biomarker of inflammation. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) | Baseline, Week 64 | BASMI is a combined index comprising of the following 5 clinical measurements of spinal mobility in participants with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA). 1. Lateral Spinal Flexion 2. Tragus-to-wall distance 3. Lumbar Flexion (modified Schober) 4. Maximal intermalleolar distance and 5. Cervical rotation. The BASMI linear result is the average of the 5 assessments and ranges from 0 to 10. The higher the BASMI score the more severe the participant's limitation of movement due to their AS. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion in Centimeters | Baseline, Week 64 | Chest expansion is the difference, in centimeter (cm), between the circumference of the chest in maximal inspiration and maximal expiration. While participants have their hands resting on or behind the head, the assessor will measure the chest encircled length by centimeter (cm) at the fourth intercostal level anteriorly. Two tries were recorded. The better measurement (larger difference) of 2 tries (in centimeters) was used for analyses. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance | Baseline, Week 64 | The participant is to make a maximum effort to touch the head against the wall when standing with heels and back against the wall (occiput). Then the distance from occiput to wall is measured. Two tries will be recorded. The better (smaller) measurement of 2 tries (in centimeters) will be used for analyses. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) | Baseline, Week 64 | The MASES is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The MASES assesses 13 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include costochondral 1 (right/left), costochondral 7 (right/left), spinal iliaca anterior superior (right/left), crista iliaca (right/left), spina iliaca posterior (right/left), processus spinosus L5, and Achilles tendon proximal insertion (right/left). The MASES is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 13); higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Score | Baseline, Week 64 | The SPARCC enthesitis is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The SPARCC assesses 16 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include Medial epicondyle (left/right \[L/R\]), Lateral epicondyle (L/R), Supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (L/R), Greater trochanter (L/R), Quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (L/R), Patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (L/R), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (L/R), and Plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (L/R). The SPARCC is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 16). Higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors. |
| Percentage of Participants Who do Not Experience a Flare | Week 64 | A flare is defined as Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS ≥2.1) at 2 consecutive visits, or ASDAS \>3.5 at any visit during Period 2. ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) as acute phase reactant) are total back pain, patient global, peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness and CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity. |
| Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Score of 44 Joints | Baseline, Week 64 | The number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 44 joints (22 joints on each side of the body). The 44 joints were assessed and classified as swollen or not swollen. Sum of all joints checked to be swollen divided by number of evaluable joints which was multiplied by 44 to obtain SJC score. The SJC score ranges from 0 (no swollen joints) to 44 (all joints swollen). LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors. |
| Percentage of Participants With Anterior Uveitis or Uveitis Flares | Week 64 | Anterior uveitis is an inflammation of the middle layer of the eye. which includes the iris (colored part of the eye) and the adjacent tissue, known as the ciliary body. |
| Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score | Baseline, Week 64 | The fatigue severity NRS is a participant administered single-item 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no fatigue and 10 representing as bad as you can imagine. Participants rate their fatigue (feeling tired or worn out) by circling the 1 number that describes their worst level of fatigue during the previous 24 hours. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report-16 (QIDS-SR16) | Baseline, Week 64 | The 16-item QIDS-SR16 version is a widely used validated scale designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The participant was asked to rate the severity and frequency of specific symptoms present over the last 7 days. The QIDS-SR16 total scores range from 0 to 27, where higher scores indicate higher severity of symptoms. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score | Baseline, Week 64 | The SF-36 is a 36-item participant administered measure designed to be a short, multipurpose assessment of health in the areas of physical functioning, role - physical, role - emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. The 2 overarching domains of mental well- being and physical well-being are captured by the Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores. T-scores are used for analysis. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score | Baseline, Week 64 | The SF-36 is a 36-item participant administered measure designed to be a short, multipurpose assessment of health in the areas of physical functioning, role - physical, role - emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. The 2 overarching domains of mental well- being and physical well-being are captured by the Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores. T-scores are used for analysis. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI) | Baseline, Week 64 | The ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI) is a disease specific health-index instrument designed to assess the impact of interventions for SpA, including axSpA. The 17 item instrument has scores ranging from 0 (good Health) to 17 (poor Health). Each item consists of 1 question that the participant needs to respond to with either I agree (score 1) or I do not agree (score 0). A score of 1 is given where the item is affirmed, indicating adverse health. All item scores are summed to give a total score or index. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) UK Population-based Index Score | Baseline, Week 64 | The European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) is a standardized measure of health status used to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 components: a descriptive system of the respondent's health and a rating of his/her current health state using a 0- to 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). The descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores | Baseline, Week 64 | The WPAI-SpA consists of 6 questions to determine employment status, hours missed from work because of SpA, hours missed from work for other reasons, hours actually worked, the degree to which SpA affected work productivity while at work, and the degree to which SpA affected activities outside of work. The WPAI-SpA has been validated in the rad-axSpA participant population. Four scores are derived: percentage of absenteeism, percentage of presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score that combines absenteeism and presenteeism, and percentage of impairment in activities performed outside of work. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale was from 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater impairment and less productivity. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors. |
| Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) | Baseline, Week 64 | The Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) is a 4 item scale designed to estimate sleep problems in clinical research. The JSEQ assesses the frequency of sleep disturbance in 4 categories: 1) trouble falling asleep, 2) waking up several times during the night, 3) having trouble staying asleep (including waking up far too early), and 4) waking up after the usual amount of sleep feeling tired and worn out. Participants report the numbers of days they experience each of these problems in the past month on a 6 point Likert Scale ranging from 0 = no days to 5 = 22-30 days. The total JSEQ score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater sleep disturbance. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors. |
| Percentage of Participants With No New Syndesmophyte Formation | Week 56 | Percentage of participants with no new syndesmophyte formation was measured using the average of 2 selected readers of 3 readers. |
| Percentage of Participants With Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies | Baseline, Week 64 | A treatment emergent - antidrug antibody (TE-ADA) positive participant is defined as: a) a participant with a \>= 4-fold increase over a positive baseline antibody titer; or b) for a negative baseline titer, a participant with an increase from the baseline to a level of \>= 1:10. Percentage was calculated based on the number of evaluable participants and was calculated by number of participants with treatment-emergent positive anti-ixekizumab antibodies / number of evaluable participants \* 100%. |
| Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender Joint Count (TJC) Score of 46 Joints | Baseline, Week 64 | The number of tender and painful joints was determined by examination of 46 joints (23 joints on each side of the body). The 46 joints were assessed and classified as tender or not tender. Sum of all joints checked to be tender/painful divided by number of evaluable joints which was multiplied by 46 to obtain TJC score. The scores ranges from 0 (no tender/painful joints) to 46 (all joints tender/painful). LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors. |
Countries
Argentina, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Puerto Rico, Romania, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
* Lead-In (Period 1): 24 weeks (Week 0 to Week 24) * Extension Period including Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Withdrawal-Retreatment (RWR) (Period 2): 40 weeks (Week 24 to Week 64) * Long-Term Extension Period (Period 3): 40 weeks (Week 64 to Week 104) * Post-Treatment Follow-Up (Period 4): at least 12 weeks and up to 24 weeks after the date of the participant's ETV or last regularly scheduled visit.
Pre-assignment details
In Period 2, participants who did not achieve sustained remission were assigned to Group A and continued to receive the ixekizumab(IXE) dose regimen that they were receiving during Period 1. Participants who did achieve sustained remission were assigned to Group B (Randomized Withdrawal Extension(RWE) period) and were randomized 2:1 to either continue their IXE dose or to withdraw to placebo. Participants who experienced a flare in group B were retreated with IXE in Retreatment Extension Period.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| IXE80Q4W-Group A Extension Period Participants received 80 mg of Ixekizumab subcutaneously every four weeks (Q4W) for up to week 24. | 255 |
| IXE80Q2W-Group A Extension Period Participants received 80 mg of Ixekizumab subcutaneously every two weeks (Q2W) for up to week 24. | 318 |
| IXE80Q4W-Group B-Randomized Withdrawal Extension Period Participants in the Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W treatment group (Lead-in) were re randomized to receive Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W subcutaneous dose at Week 24 in the randomized withdrawal extension period. | 48 |
| IXE80Q2W-Group B-Randomized Withdrawal Extension Period Participants in the Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W treatment group (Lead-in) were re randomized to receive subcutaneous dose of Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W at Week 24 in the randomized withdrawal extension period. | 54 |
| Placebo-Group B-Randomized Withdrawal Extension Period Participants were re-randomized to receive subcutaneous dose of placebo at Week 24 in the randomized withdrawal extension period. | 53 |
| Total | 728 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 | FG005 | FG006 | FG007 | FG008 | FG009 | FG010 | FG011 | FG012 | FG013 | FG014 | FG015 | FG016 | FG017 | FG018 | FG019 | FG020 | FG021 | FG022 | FG023 | FG024 | FG025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead-In Period (Period 1) | Adverse Event | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lead-In Period (Period 1) | Lack of Efficacy | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lead-In Period (Period 1) | Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lead-In Period (Period 1) | Surgery Programmed | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lead-In Period (Period 1) | Withdrawal by Subject | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Period2 Extension Period (Group A and B) | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Period2 Extension Period (Group A and B) | Death | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Period2 Extension Period (Group A and B) | Experienced Flare | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Period2 Extension Period (Group A and B) | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Period2 Extension Period (Group A and B) | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Period2 Extension Period (Group A and B) | Physician Decision | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Period2 Extension Period (Group A and B) | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Period 2 (Retreatment Extension Period) | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Period 3 (Dose Escalation) | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Period 3 (Dose Escalation) | Physician Decision | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Period 3 (Dose Escalation) | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Period 3 (Flare) | Escalated to IXE80Q2W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Period3-Long-Term Extension Period A & B | Adverse Event | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Period3-Long-Term Extension Period A & B | Escalated to IXE80Q2W | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Period3-Long-Term Extension Period A & B | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Period3-Long-Term Extension Period A & B | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Period3-Long-Term Extension Period A & B | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Period 4 (Post Treatment Follow-up) | COVID 19 Restrictions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Period 4 (Post Treatment Follow-up) | Death | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Period 4 (Post Treatment Follow-up) | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Period 4 (Post Treatment Follow-up) | Missed follow-up | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Period 4 (Post Treatment Follow-up) | Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Period 4 (Post Treatment Follow-up) | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 20 | 37 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | IXE80Q4W-Group A Extension Period | IXE80Q2W-Group A Extension Period | IXE80Q4W-Group B-Randomized Withdrawal Extension Period | IXE80Q2W-Group B-Randomized Withdrawal Extension Period | Placebo-Group B-Randomized Withdrawal Extension Period | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 15 Participants | 16 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 33 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 240 Participants | 302 Participants | 48 Participants | 53 Participants | 52 Participants | 695 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 61 Participants | 86 Participants | 7 Participants | 14 Participants | 11 Participants | 179 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 166 Participants | 204 Participants | 31 Participants | 35 Participants | 39 Participants | 475 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 28 Participants | 28 Participants | 10 Participants | 5 Participants | 3 Participants | 74 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 14 Participants | 11 Participants | 2 Participants | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 36 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 54 Participants | 50 Participants | 15 Participants | 15 Participants | 13 Participants | 147 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 3 Participants | 8 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 183 Participants | 247 Participants | 31 Participants | 31 Participants | 35 Participants | 527 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Argentina | 11 Participants | 18 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 33 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Austria | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Brazil | 7 Participants | 16 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 23 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Canada | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Czechia | 37 Participants | 35 Participants | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 85 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Finland | 0 Participants | 5 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment France | 4 Participants | 4 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Germany | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Hungary | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Israel | 5 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Italy | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Japan | 7 Participants | 9 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 21 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Mexico | 40 Participants | 38 Participants | 5 Participants | 11 Participants | 8 Participants | 102 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Netherlands | 0 Participants | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Poland | 50 Participants | 67 Participants | 13 Participants | 7 Participants | 13 Participants | 150 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Romania | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Russia | 16 Participants | 30 Participants | 6 Participants | 7 Participants | 6 Participants | 65 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment South Korea | 28 Participants | 23 Participants | 10 Participants | 7 Participants | 8 Participants | 76 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Spain | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Taiwan | 17 Participants | 16 Participants | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 2 Participants | 43 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United Kingdom | 4 Participants | 6 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 14 Participants | 30 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 50 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 68 Participants | 95 Participants | 10 Participants | 14 Participants | 15 Participants | 202 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 187 Participants | 223 Participants | 38 Participants | 40 Participants | 38 Participants | 526 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk | EG005 affected / at risk | EG006 affected / at risk | EG007 affected / at risk | EG008 affected / at risk | EG009 affected / at risk | EG010 affected / at risk | EG011 affected / at risk | EG012 affected / at risk | EG013 affected / at risk | EG014 affected / at risk | EG015 affected / at risk | EG016 affected / at risk | EG017 affected / at risk | EG018 affected / at risk | EG019 affected / at risk | EG020 affected / at risk | EG021 affected / at risk | EG022 affected / at risk | EG023 affected / at risk | EG024 affected / at risk | EG025 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 348 | 0 / 423 | 2 / 255 | 0 / 318 | 0 / 47 | 0 / 54 | 0 / 53 | 0 / 6 | 0 / 5 | 0 / 9 | 0 / 10 | 0 / 306 | 0 / 177 | 0 / 45 | 0 / 42 | 0 / 30 | 0 / 6 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 11 | 0 / 15 | 0 / 77 | 0 / 5 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 25 | 1 / 223 | 0 / 453 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 79 / 348 | 108 / 423 | 62 / 255 | 82 / 318 | 8 / 47 | 17 / 54 | 16 / 53 | 0 / 6 | 4 / 5 | 2 / 9 | 1 / 10 | 52 / 306 | 37 / 177 | 8 / 45 | 6 / 42 | 9 / 30 | 0 / 6 | 3 / 4 | 6 / 11 | 5 / 15 | 6 / 77 | 2 / 5 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 25 | 14 / 223 | 27 / 453 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 10 / 348 | 12 / 423 | 12 / 255 | 11 / 318 | 2 / 47 | 2 / 54 | 1 / 53 | 1 / 6 | 0 / 5 | 0 / 9 | 0 / 10 | 15 / 306 | 3 / 177 | 1 / 45 | 1 / 42 | 0 / 30 | 0 / 6 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 11 | 0 / 15 | 1 / 77 | 0 / 5 | 0 / 4 | 0 / 25 | 3 / 223 | 2 / 453 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants Who do Not Experience a Flare (Combined Ixekizumab Treatment)
A flare is defined as Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS ≥2.1) at 2 consecutive visits, or ASDAS \>3.5 at any visit during Period 2. ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) as acute phase reactant) are total back pain, patient global, peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness and CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.
Time frame: Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the nonresponder imputation (NRI) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Percentage of Participants Who do Not Experience a Flare (Combined Ixekizumab Treatment) | 83.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Who do Not Experience a Flare (Combined Ixekizumab Treatment) | 54.7 Percentage of participants |
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score
The SF-36 is a 36-item participant administered measure designed to be a short, multipurpose assessment of health in the areas of physical functioning, role - physical, role - emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. The 2 overarching domains of mental well- being and physical well-being are captured by the Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores. T-scores are used for analysis. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score | 13.2954 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.121 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score | 13.1030 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.0457 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score | 10.6934 units on a scale | Standard Error 1.0366 |
Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)
The ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI) is a disease specific health-index instrument designed to assess the impact of interventions for SpA, including axSpA. The 17 item instrument has scores ranging from 0 (good Health) to 17 (poor Health). Each item consists of 1 question that the participant needs to respond to with either I agree (score 1) or I do not agree (score 0). A score of 1 is given where the item is affirmed, indicating adverse health. All item scores are summed to give a total score or index. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI) | -4.64 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.393 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI) | -4.37 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.368 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI) | -3.64 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.37 |
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)
BASMI is a combined index comprising of the following 5 clinical measurements of spinal mobility in participants with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA). 1. Lateral Spinal Flexion 2. Tragus-to-wall distance 3. Lumbar Flexion (modified Schober) 4. Maximal intermalleolar distance and 5. Cervical rotation. The BASMI linear result is the average of the 5 assessments and ranges from 0 to 10. The higher the BASMI score the more severe the participant's limitation of movement due to their AS. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) | -0.69 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.08 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) | -0.73 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.075 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI) | -0.50 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.073 |
Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion in Centimeters
Chest expansion is the difference, in centimeter (cm), between the circumference of the chest in maximal inspiration and maximal expiration. While participants have their hands resting on or behind the head, the assessor will measure the chest encircled length by centimeter (cm) at the fourth intercostal level anteriorly. Two tries were recorded. The better measurement (larger difference) of 2 tries (in centimeters) was used for analyses. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion in Centimeters | 0.77 centimeter (cm) | Standard Error 0.256 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion in Centimeters | 0.53 centimeter (cm) | Standard Error 0.243 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion in Centimeters | 0.67 centimeter (cm) | Standard Error 0.236 |
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)
The MASES is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The MASES assesses 13 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include costochondral 1 (right/left), costochondral 7 (right/left), spinal iliaca anterior superior (right/left), crista iliaca (right/left), spina iliaca posterior (right/left), processus spinosus L5, and Achilles tendon proximal insertion (right/left). The MASES is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 13); higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B), and with Baseline MASES score \>0. Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) | -3.55 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.352 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) | -3.62 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.315 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES) | -3.48 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.302 |
Change From Baseline in Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS)
The mSASSS is a four-point scoring system for lateral radiographs of the lumbar and cervical spine and has been shown to reliably track disease progression over time, where: 0 = normal; 1 = sclerosis, squaring or erosion; 2 = syndesmophyte; 3 = bony bridge. By the scoring system of mSASSS of the spinal x-rays, a total of 24 sites were scored on the lateral cervical and lumbar spine: the anterior corners of the vertebrae from lower border of C2 to upper border T1 (inclusive), and from lower border of T12 to upper border of S1 (inclusive). Each corner was scored from 0 to 3, resulting in a range from 0 \[no change\] to 72 \[progression\].
Time frame: Baseline, 2 Years
Population: Ixekizumab structure population who have been treated with ixekizumab for at least 24 months.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Change From Baseline in Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS) | 0.41 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 2.102 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS) | 0.23 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 1.387 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS) | 0.32 Units on a Scale | Standard Deviation 1.779 |
Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance
The participant is to make a maximum effort to touch the head against the wall when standing with heels and back against the wall (occiput). Then the distance from occiput to wall is measured. Two tries will be recorded. The better (smaller) measurement of 2 tries (in centimeters) will be used for analyses. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance | -0.78 cm | Standard Error 0.26 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance | -0.66 cm | Standard Error 0.239 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance | -0.38 cm | Standard Error 0.235 |
Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Score of 44 Joints
The number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 44 joints (22 joints on each side of the body). The 44 joints were assessed and classified as swollen or not swollen. Sum of all joints checked to be swollen divided by number of evaluable joints which was multiplied by 44 to obtain SJC score. The SJC score ranges from 0 (no swollen joints) to 44 (all joints swollen). LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B), and with baseline SJC \>0. Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Score of 44 Joints | -3.6 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.67 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Score of 44 Joints | -3.9 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.59 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Score of 44 Joints | -2.7 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.73 |
Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender Joint Count (TJC) Score of 46 Joints
The number of tender and painful joints was determined by examination of 46 joints (23 joints on each side of the body). The 46 joints were assessed and classified as tender or not tender. Sum of all joints checked to be tender/painful divided by number of evaluable joints which was multiplied by 46 to obtain TJC score. The scores ranges from 0 (no tender/painful joints) to 46 (all joints tender/painful). LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B), and with baseline TJC \>0. Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender Joint Count (TJC) Score of 46 Joints | -6.1 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.76 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender Joint Count (TJC) Score of 46 Joints | -5.3 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.74 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender Joint Count (TJC) Score of 46 Joints | -4.0 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.85 |
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score
The SF-36 is a 36-item participant administered measure designed to be a short, multipurpose assessment of health in the areas of physical functioning, role - physical, role - emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. The 2 overarching domains of mental well- being and physical well-being are captured by the Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores. T-scores are used for analysis. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score | 3.1766 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.8968 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score | 4.6404 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.8369 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score | 2.3396 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.8314 |
Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Score
The SPARCC enthesitis is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The SPARCC assesses 16 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include Medial epicondyle (left/right \[L/R\]), Lateral epicondyle (L/R), Supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (L/R), Greater trochanter (L/R), Quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (L/R), Patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (L/R), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (L/R), and Plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (L/R). The SPARCC is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 16). Higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B), and with baseline SPARCC score \>0. Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Score | -3.23 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.388 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Score | -3.34 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.338 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Score | -2.71 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.335 |
Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) UK Population-based Index Score
The European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) is a standardized measure of health status used to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 components: a descriptive system of the respondent's health and a rating of his/her current health state using a 0- to 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). The descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) UK Population-based Index Score | 0.2877 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0252 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) UK Population-based Index Score | 0.2847 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0235 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) UK Population-based Index Score | 0.2459 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.0237 |
Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score
The fatigue severity NRS is a participant administered single-item 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no fatigue and 10 representing as bad as you can imagine. Participants rate their fatigue (feeling tired or worn out) by circling the 1 number that describes their worst level of fatigue during the previous 24 hours. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score | -4.2 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.31 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score | -4.3 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.29 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score | -3.5 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.28 |
Change From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS Criteria
Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI): Participant asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participant response was captured using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. Inflammation based on Q5 & Q6 mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe). LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Change From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS Criteria | Spinal Pain | -5.1 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.39 |
| Combined IXE | Change From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS Criteria | Patient Global | -5.1 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.38 |
| Combined IXE | Change From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS Criteria | BASFI | -4.35 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.316 |
| Combined IXE | Change From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS Criteria | Inflammation | -5.20 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.336 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS Criteria | Inflammation | -4.83 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.319 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS Criteria | BASFI | -4.19 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.301 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS Criteria | Patient Global | -5.0 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.36 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS Criteria | Spinal Pain | -4.8 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.37 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS Criteria | Patient Global | -3.0 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.36 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS Criteria | Spinal Pain | -3.0 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.36 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS Criteria | BASFI | -2.79 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.301 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS Criteria | Inflammation | -3.03 Units on a scale | Standard Error 0.317 |
Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)
The Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) is a 4 item scale designed to estimate sleep problems in clinical research. The JSEQ assesses the frequency of sleep disturbance in 4 categories: 1) trouble falling asleep, 2) waking up several times during the night, 3) having trouble staying asleep (including waking up far too early), and 4) waking up after the usual amount of sleep feeling tired and worn out. Participants report the numbers of days they experience each of these problems in the past month on a 6 point Likert Scale ranging from 0 = no days to 5 = 22-30 days. The total JSEQ score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater sleep disturbance. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) | -4.0 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.5 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) | -3.8 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.47 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) | -3.6 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.47 |
Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
High sensitivity CRP is the measure of acute phase reactant. It was measured with a high sensitivity assay at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of ixekizumab on disease activity. High sensitivity CRP is a sensitive laboratory assay for serum levels of C-Reactive Protein, which is a biomarker of inflammation. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP) | -12.952 milligram per liter (mg/L) | Standard Error 1.4666 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP) | -11.074 milligram per liter (mg/L) | Standard Error 1.3861 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP) | -5.094 milligram per liter (mg/L) | Standard Error 1.3696 |
Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores
The WPAI-SpA consists of 6 questions to determine employment status, hours missed from work because of SpA, hours missed from work for other reasons, hours actually worked, the degree to which SpA affected work productivity while at work, and the degree to which SpA affected activities outside of work. The WPAI-SpA has been validated in the rad-axSpA participant population. Four scores are derived: percentage of absenteeism, percentage of presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score that combines absenteeism and presenteeism, and percentage of impairment in activities performed outside of work. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale was from 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater impairment and less productivity. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores | -43.58 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.329 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores | -40.10 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.115 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores | -32.96 units on a scale | Standard Error 3.099 |
Change From Baseline on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report-16 (QIDS-SR16)
The 16-item QIDS-SR16 version is a widely used validated scale designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The participant was asked to rate the severity and frequency of specific symptoms present over the last 7 days. The QIDS-SR16 total scores range from 0 to 27, where higher scores indicate higher severity of symptoms. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Change From Baseline on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report-16 (QIDS-SR16) | -3.68 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.362 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report-16 (QIDS-SR16) | -3.28 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.344 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report-16 (QIDS-SR16) | -2.80 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.342 |
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS40 Response
ASAS40 is defined as a ≥40% improvement and an absolute improvement from baseline of ≥2 units (range of 0 to 10) in at least 3 of the following 4 domains without any worsening in the remaining domain. The following ASAS domains are used: Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI): Participant asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participant response was captured using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. Inflammation based on mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Q5 & Q6 (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe).
Time frame: Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the nonresponder imputation (NRI) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS40 Response | 79.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS40 Response | 79.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS40 Response | 43.4 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS)20 Response
ASAS20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement and an absolute improvement from baseline of ≥1 units (range 0 to 10) in ≥3 of 4 domains, and no worsening of ≥20% and ≥1 unit (range 0 to 10) in the remaining domain. The following ASAS domains are used: Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI): Participant asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participant response was captured using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. Inflammation based on mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Q5 & Q6 (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe).
Time frame: Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the nonresponder imputation (NRI) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS)20 Response | 81.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS)20 Response | 81.5 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS)20 Response | 50.9 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response
The BASDAI is a participant-reported assessment consisting of 6 questions that relate to 5 major symptoms relevant to radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA): 1) Fatigue, 2) Spinal pain, 3) Peripheral arthritis, 4) Enthesitis, 5) Intensity, and 6) Duration of morning stiffness. Participants need to score each item with a score from 0 to 10 (NRS). Total score is obtained from the average of symptom scores ranging 0 (no problem) to 10 (worst problem), with a higher score indicating more severe AS symptom. BASDAI50 represents an improvement of ≥50% of the BASDAI score from baseline.
Time frame: Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the nonresponder imputation (NRI) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response | 81.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response | 75.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response | 45.3 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who do Not Experience a Flare
A flare is defined as Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS ≥2.1) at 2 consecutive visits, or ASDAS \>3.5 at any visit during Period 2. ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) as acute phase reactant) are total back pain, patient global, peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness and CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.
Time frame: Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the nonresponder imputation (NRI) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Percentage of Participants Who do Not Experience a Flare | 83.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Who do Not Experience a Flare | 83.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Who do Not Experience a Flare | 54.7 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Anterior Uveitis or Uveitis Flares
Anterior uveitis is an inflammation of the middle layer of the eye. which includes the iris (colored part of the eye) and the adjacent tissue, known as the ciliary body.
Time frame: Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B), and regardless of history of anterior uveitis.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Percentage of Participants With Anterior Uveitis or Uveitis Flares | 4.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Anterior Uveitis or Uveitis Flares | 5.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Anterior Uveitis or Uveitis Flares | 5.7 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies
A treatment emergent - antidrug antibody (TE-ADA) positive participant is defined as: a) a participant with a \>= 4-fold increase over a positive baseline antibody titer; or b) for a negative baseline titer, a participant with an increase from the baseline to a level of \>= 1:10. Percentage was calculated based on the number of evaluable participants and was calculated by number of participants with treatment-emergent positive anti-ixekizumab antibodies / number of evaluable participants \* 100%.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 64
Population: All randomized participants from Group B, who received at least one dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Percentage of Participants With Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies | 4.7 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies | 2.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies | 20.0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Change of Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) ≥1.1 Units
ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are total back pain, patient global, peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness and CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness +0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.
Time frame: Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the nonresponder imputation (NRI) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Percentage of Participants With Change of Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) ≥1.1 Units | 79.2 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Change of Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) ≥1.1 Units | 74.1 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Change of Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) ≥1.1 Units | 45.3 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease on the ASDAS (<1.3 Units)
ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are total back pain, patient global, peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness and CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.
Time frame: Week 64
Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the nonresponder imputation (NRI) method.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease on the ASDAS (<1.3 Units) | 60.4 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease on the ASDAS (<1.3 Units) | 53.7 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease on the ASDAS (<1.3 Units) | 24.5 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With No New Syndesmophyte Formation
Percentage of participants with no new syndesmophyte formation was measured using the average of 2 selected readers of 3 readers.
Time frame: Week 56
Population: Ixekizumab structure population who have been treated with Ixekizumab for at least 24 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Combined IXE | Percentage of Participants With No New Syndesmophyte Formation | 80.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With No New Syndesmophyte Formation | 87.8 Percentage of participants |