Skip to content

A Long Term Extension Study of Ixekizumab (LY2439821) in Participants With Axial Spondyloarthritis

A Multicenter, Long-Term Extension Study of 104 Weeks, Including a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled 40-Week Randomized Withdrawal-Retreatment Period, to Evaluate the Maintenance of Treatment Effect of Ixekizumab (LY2439821) in Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03129100
Enrollment
773
Registered
2017-04-26
Start date
2017-05-09
Completion date
2021-05-27
Last updated
2022-06-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Axial Spondyloarthritis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate, in participants having achieved a state of sustained remission, if the ixekizumab treatment groups are superior to the placebo group in maintaining response during the randomized withdrawal-retreatment period in participants with axial spondyloarthritis.

Interventions

DRUGIxekizumab

Administered SC

DRUGPlacebo

Administered SC

Sponsors

Eli Lilly and Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Have completed the final study visit in Study RHBV (NCT02696785), RHBW (NCT02696798), or RHBX (NCT02757352). (Note: Participants from Study RHBX are not eligible if they permanently discontinued ixekizumab and were receiving a tumor necrosis factor \[TNF\] inhibitor). * Must agree to use a reliable method of birth control.

Exclusion criteria

* Have significant uncontrolled disorders or abnormal laboratory values that, in the opinion of the investigator, pose an unacceptable risk to the participant if investigational product continues to be administered. * Have a known hypersensitivity to ixekizumab or any component of this investigational product. * Had investigational product permanently discontinued during a previous ixekizumab study. * Had temporary investigational product interruption at any time during or at the final study visit of a previous ixekizumab study and, in the opinion of the investigator, restarting ixekizumab poses an unacceptable risk for the participant's participation in the study. * Have any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, renders the participant unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study or precludes the participant from following and completing the protocol. * Are currently enrolled in any other clinical trial involving an investigational product or any other type of medical research judged not to be scientifically or medically compatible with this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who do Not Experience a Flare (Combined Ixekizumab Treatment)Week 64A flare is defined as Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS ≥2.1) at 2 consecutive visits, or ASDAS \>3.5 at any visit during Period 2. ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) as acute phase reactant) are total back pain, patient global, peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness and CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS)Baseline, 2 YearsThe mSASSS is a four-point scoring system for lateral radiographs of the lumbar and cervical spine and has been shown to reliably track disease progression over time, where: 0 = normal; 1 = sclerosis, squaring or erosion; 2 = syndesmophyte; 3 = bony bridge. By the scoring system of mSASSS of the spinal x-rays, a total of 24 sites were scored on the lateral cervical and lumbar spine: the anterior corners of the vertebrae from lower border of C2 to upper border T1 (inclusive), and from lower border of T12 to upper border of S1 (inclusive). Each corner was scored from 0 to 3, resulting in a range from 0 \[no change\] to 72 \[progression\].
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS)20 ResponseWeek 64ASAS20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement and an absolute improvement from baseline of ≥1 units (range 0 to 10) in ≥3 of 4 domains, and no worsening of ≥20% and ≥1 unit (range 0 to 10) in the remaining domain. The following ASAS domains are used: Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI): Participant asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participant response was captured using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. Inflammation based on mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Q5 & Q6 (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe).
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS40 ResponseWeek 64ASAS40 is defined as a ≥40% improvement and an absolute improvement from baseline of ≥2 units (range of 0 to 10) in at least 3 of the following 4 domains without any worsening in the remaining domain. The following ASAS domains are used: Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI): Participant asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participant response was captured using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. Inflammation based on mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Q5 & Q6 (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe).
Percentage of Participants With Change of Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) ≥1.1 UnitsWeek 64ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are total back pain, patient global, peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness and CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness +0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.
Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease on the ASDAS (<1.3 Units)Week 64ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are total back pain, patient global, peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness and CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.
Change From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS CriteriaBaseline, Week 64Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI): Participant asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participant response was captured using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. Inflammation based on Q5 & Q6 mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe). LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) ResponseWeek 64The BASDAI is a participant-reported assessment consisting of 6 questions that relate to 5 major symptoms relevant to radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA): 1) Fatigue, 2) Spinal pain, 3) Peripheral arthritis, 4) Enthesitis, 5) Intensity, and 6) Duration of morning stiffness. Participants need to score each item with a score from 0 to 10 (NRS). Total score is obtained from the average of symptom scores ranging 0 (no problem) to 10 (worst problem), with a higher score indicating more severe AS symptom. BASDAI50 represents an improvement of ≥50% of the BASDAI score from baseline.
Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)Baseline, Week 64High sensitivity CRP is the measure of acute phase reactant. It was measured with a high sensitivity assay at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of ixekizumab on disease activity. High sensitivity CRP is a sensitive laboratory assay for serum levels of C-Reactive Protein, which is a biomarker of inflammation. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)Baseline, Week 64BASMI is a combined index comprising of the following 5 clinical measurements of spinal mobility in participants with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA). 1. Lateral Spinal Flexion 2. Tragus-to-wall distance 3. Lumbar Flexion (modified Schober) 4. Maximal intermalleolar distance and 5. Cervical rotation. The BASMI linear result is the average of the 5 assessments and ranges from 0 to 10. The higher the BASMI score the more severe the participant's limitation of movement due to their AS. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion in CentimetersBaseline, Week 64Chest expansion is the difference, in centimeter (cm), between the circumference of the chest in maximal inspiration and maximal expiration. While participants have their hands resting on or behind the head, the assessor will measure the chest encircled length by centimeter (cm) at the fourth intercostal level anteriorly. Two tries were recorded. The better measurement (larger difference) of 2 tries (in centimeters) was used for analyses. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall DistanceBaseline, Week 64The participant is to make a maximum effort to touch the head against the wall when standing with heels and back against the wall (occiput). Then the distance from occiput to wall is measured. Two tries will be recorded. The better (smaller) measurement of 2 tries (in centimeters) will be used for analyses. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)Baseline, Week 64The MASES is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The MASES assesses 13 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include costochondral 1 (right/left), costochondral 7 (right/left), spinal iliaca anterior superior (right/left), crista iliaca (right/left), spina iliaca posterior (right/left), processus spinosus L5, and Achilles tendon proximal insertion (right/left). The MASES is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 13); higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis ScoreBaseline, Week 64The SPARCC enthesitis is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The SPARCC assesses 16 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include Medial epicondyle (left/right \[L/R\]), Lateral epicondyle (L/R), Supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (L/R), Greater trochanter (L/R), Quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (L/R), Patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (L/R), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (L/R), and Plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (L/R). The SPARCC is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 16). Higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Percentage of Participants Who do Not Experience a FlareWeek 64A flare is defined as Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS ≥2.1) at 2 consecutive visits, or ASDAS \>3.5 at any visit during Period 2. ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) as acute phase reactant) are total back pain, patient global, peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness and CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.
Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Score of 44 JointsBaseline, Week 64The number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 44 joints (22 joints on each side of the body). The 44 joints were assessed and classified as swollen or not swollen. Sum of all joints checked to be swollen divided by number of evaluable joints which was multiplied by 44 to obtain SJC score. The SJC score ranges from 0 (no swollen joints) to 44 (all joints swollen). LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Percentage of Participants With Anterior Uveitis or Uveitis FlaresWeek 64Anterior uveitis is an inflammation of the middle layer of the eye. which includes the iris (colored part of the eye) and the adjacent tissue, known as the ciliary body.
Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ScoreBaseline, Week 64The fatigue severity NRS is a participant administered single-item 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no fatigue and 10 representing as bad as you can imagine. Participants rate their fatigue (feeling tired or worn out) by circling the 1 number that describes their worst level of fatigue during the previous 24 hours. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report-16 (QIDS-SR16)Baseline, Week 64The 16-item QIDS-SR16 version is a widely used validated scale designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The participant was asked to rate the severity and frequency of specific symptoms present over the last 7 days. The QIDS-SR16 total scores range from 0 to 27, where higher scores indicate higher severity of symptoms. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) ScoreBaseline, Week 64The SF-36 is a 36-item participant administered measure designed to be a short, multipurpose assessment of health in the areas of physical functioning, role - physical, role - emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. The 2 overarching domains of mental well- being and physical well-being are captured by the Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores. T-scores are used for analysis. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) ScoreBaseline, Week 64The SF-36 is a 36-item participant administered measure designed to be a short, multipurpose assessment of health in the areas of physical functioning, role - physical, role - emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. The 2 overarching domains of mental well- being and physical well-being are captured by the Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores. T-scores are used for analysis. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)Baseline, Week 64The ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI) is a disease specific health-index instrument designed to assess the impact of interventions for SpA, including axSpA. The 17 item instrument has scores ranging from 0 (good Health) to 17 (poor Health). Each item consists of 1 question that the participant needs to respond to with either I agree (score 1) or I do not agree (score 0). A score of 1 is given where the item is affirmed, indicating adverse health. All item scores are summed to give a total score or index. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) UK Population-based Index ScoreBaseline, Week 64The European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) is a standardized measure of health status used to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 components: a descriptive system of the respondent's health and a rating of his/her current health state using a 0- to 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). The descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) ScoresBaseline, Week 64The WPAI-SpA consists of 6 questions to determine employment status, hours missed from work because of SpA, hours missed from work for other reasons, hours actually worked, the degree to which SpA affected work productivity while at work, and the degree to which SpA affected activities outside of work. The WPAI-SpA has been validated in the rad-axSpA participant population. Four scores are derived: percentage of absenteeism, percentage of presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score that combines absenteeism and presenteeism, and percentage of impairment in activities performed outside of work. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale was from 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater impairment and less productivity. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)Baseline, Week 64The Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) is a 4 item scale designed to estimate sleep problems in clinical research. The JSEQ assesses the frequency of sleep disturbance in 4 categories: 1) trouble falling asleep, 2) waking up several times during the night, 3) having trouble staying asleep (including waking up far too early), and 4) waking up after the usual amount of sleep feeling tired and worn out. Participants report the numbers of days they experience each of these problems in the past month on a 6 point Likert Scale ranging from 0 = no days to 5 = 22-30 days. The total JSEQ score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater sleep disturbance. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.
Percentage of Participants With No New Syndesmophyte FormationWeek 56Percentage of participants with no new syndesmophyte formation was measured using the average of 2 selected readers of 3 readers.
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Ixekizumab AntibodiesBaseline, Week 64A treatment emergent - antidrug antibody (TE-ADA) positive participant is defined as: a) a participant with a \>= 4-fold increase over a positive baseline antibody titer; or b) for a negative baseline titer, a participant with an increase from the baseline to a level of \>= 1:10. Percentage was calculated based on the number of evaluable participants and was calculated by number of participants with treatment-emergent positive anti-ixekizumab antibodies / number of evaluable participants \* 100%.
Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender Joint Count (TJC) Score of 46 JointsBaseline, Week 64The number of tender and painful joints was determined by examination of 46 joints (23 joints on each side of the body). The 46 joints were assessed and classified as tender or not tender. Sum of all joints checked to be tender/painful divided by number of evaluable joints which was multiplied by 46 to obtain TJC score. The scores ranges from 0 (no tender/painful joints) to 46 (all joints tender/painful). LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.

Countries

Argentina, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, Poland, Puerto Rico, Romania, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

* Lead-In (Period 1): 24 weeks (Week 0 to Week 24) * Extension Period including Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Withdrawal-Retreatment (RWR) (Period 2): 40 weeks (Week 24 to Week 64) * Long-Term Extension Period (Period 3): 40 weeks (Week 64 to Week 104) * Post-Treatment Follow-Up (Period 4): at least 12 weeks and up to 24 weeks after the date of the participant's ETV or last regularly scheduled visit.

Pre-assignment details

In Period 2, participants who did not achieve sustained remission were assigned to Group A and continued to receive the ixekizumab(IXE) dose regimen that they were receiving during Period 1. Participants who did achieve sustained remission were assigned to Group B (Randomized Withdrawal Extension(RWE) period) and were randomized 2:1 to either continue their IXE dose or to withdraw to placebo. Participants who experienced a flare in group B were retreated with IXE in Retreatment Extension Period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
IXE80Q4W-Group A Extension Period
Participants received 80 mg of Ixekizumab subcutaneously every four weeks (Q4W) for up to week 24.
255
IXE80Q2W-Group A Extension Period
Participants received 80 mg of Ixekizumab subcutaneously every two weeks (Q2W) for up to week 24.
318
IXE80Q4W-Group B-Randomized Withdrawal Extension Period
Participants in the Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W treatment group (Lead-in) were re randomized to receive Ixekizumab 80 mg Q4W subcutaneous dose at Week 24 in the randomized withdrawal extension period.
48
IXE80Q2W-Group B-Randomized Withdrawal Extension Period
Participants in the Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W treatment group (Lead-in) were re randomized to receive subcutaneous dose of Ixekizumab 80 mg Q2W at Week 24 in the randomized withdrawal extension period.
54
Placebo-Group B-Randomized Withdrawal Extension Period
Participants were re-randomized to receive subcutaneous dose of placebo at Week 24 in the randomized withdrawal extension period.
53
Total728

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008FG009FG010FG011FG012FG013FG014FG015FG016FG017FG018FG019FG020FG021FG022FG023FG024FG025
Lead-In Period (Period 1)Adverse Event26000000000000000000000000
Lead-In Period (Period 1)Lack of Efficacy32000000000000000000000000
Lead-In Period (Period 1)Lost to Follow-up20000000000000000000000000
Lead-In Period (Period 1)Surgery Programmed01000000000000000000000000
Lead-In Period (Period 1)Withdrawal by Subject88000000000000000000000000
Period2 Extension Period (Group A and B)Adverse Event00210200000000000000000000
Period2 Extension Period (Group A and B)Death00100000000000000000000000
Period2 Extension Period (Group A and B)Experienced Flare000056190000000000000000000
Period2 Extension Period (Group A and B)Lack of Efficacy00200000000000000000000000
Period2 Extension Period (Group A and B)Lost to Follow-up00200000000000000000000000
Period2 Extension Period (Group A and B)Physician Decision00100000000000000000000000
Period2 Extension Period (Group A and B)Withdrawal by Subject001351120000000000000000000
Period 2 (Retreatment Extension Period)Withdrawal by Subject00000000010000000000000000
Period 3 (Dose Escalation)Lack of Efficacy00000000000000000000100000
Period 3 (Dose Escalation)Physician Decision00000000000000000000100000
Period 3 (Dose Escalation)Withdrawal by Subject00000000000000000000200000
Period 3 (Flare)Escalated to IXE80Q2W00000000000000000203000000
Period3-Long-Term Extension Period A & BAdverse Event00000000000600000000000000
Period3-Long-Term Extension Period A & BEscalated to IXE80Q2W000000000000240280000000000
Period3-Long-Term Extension Period A & BLack of Efficacy00000000000000010000000000
Period3-Long-Term Extension Period A & BLost to Follow-up00000000000101100000000000
Period3-Long-Term Extension Period A & BWithdrawal by Subject000000000001274200000000000
Period 4 (Post Treatment Follow-up)COVID 19 Restrictions00000000000000000000000020
Period 4 (Post Treatment Follow-up)Death00000000000000000000000010
Period 4 (Post Treatment Follow-up)Lost to Follow-up00000000000000000000000022
Period 4 (Post Treatment Follow-up)Missed follow-up00000000000000000000000001
Period 4 (Post Treatment Follow-up)Other00000000000000000000000002
Period 4 (Post Treatment Follow-up)Withdrawal by Subject0000000000000000000000032037

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIXE80Q4W-Group A Extension PeriodIXE80Q2W-Group A Extension PeriodIXE80Q4W-Group B-Randomized Withdrawal Extension PeriodIXE80Q2W-Group B-Randomized Withdrawal Extension PeriodPlacebo-Group B-Randomized Withdrawal Extension PeriodTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
15 Participants16 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants33 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
240 Participants302 Participants48 Participants53 Participants52 Participants695 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
61 Participants86 Participants7 Participants14 Participants11 Participants179 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
166 Participants204 Participants31 Participants35 Participants39 Participants475 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
28 Participants28 Participants10 Participants5 Participants3 Participants74 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
14 Participants11 Participants2 Participants5 Participants4 Participants36 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
54 Participants50 Participants15 Participants15 Participants13 Participants147 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants8 Participants0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
183 Participants247 Participants31 Participants31 Participants35 Participants527 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
11 Participants18 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants33 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
7 Participants16 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants23 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
37 Participants35 Participants5 Participants4 Participants4 Participants85 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Finland
0 Participants5 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
4 Participants4 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants7 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Israel
5 Participants3 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
7 Participants9 Participants1 Participants3 Participants1 Participants21 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
40 Participants38 Participants5 Participants11 Participants8 Participants102 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
50 Participants67 Participants13 Participants7 Participants13 Participants150 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
1 Participants3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
16 Participants30 Participants6 Participants7 Participants6 Participants65 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
28 Participants23 Participants10 Participants7 Participants8 Participants76 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
5 Participants4 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Taiwan
17 Participants16 Participants3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants43 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
4 Participants6 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 Participants30 Participants1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
68 Participants95 Participants10 Participants14 Participants15 Participants202 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
187 Participants223 Participants38 Participants40 Participants38 Participants526 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
EG011
affected / at risk
EG012
affected / at risk
EG013
affected / at risk
EG014
affected / at risk
EG015
affected / at risk
EG016
affected / at risk
EG017
affected / at risk
EG018
affected / at risk
EG019
affected / at risk
EG020
affected / at risk
EG021
affected / at risk
EG022
affected / at risk
EG023
affected / at risk
EG024
affected / at risk
EG025
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3480 / 4232 / 2550 / 3180 / 470 / 540 / 530 / 60 / 50 / 90 / 100 / 3060 / 1770 / 450 / 420 / 300 / 60 / 40 / 110 / 150 / 770 / 50 / 40 / 251 / 2230 / 453
other
Total, other adverse events
79 / 348108 / 42362 / 25582 / 3188 / 4717 / 5416 / 530 / 64 / 52 / 91 / 1052 / 30637 / 1778 / 456 / 429 / 300 / 63 / 46 / 115 / 156 / 772 / 50 / 40 / 2514 / 22327 / 453
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 34812 / 42312 / 25511 / 3182 / 472 / 541 / 531 / 60 / 50 / 90 / 1015 / 3063 / 1771 / 451 / 420 / 300 / 60 / 40 / 110 / 151 / 770 / 50 / 40 / 253 / 2232 / 453

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who do Not Experience a Flare (Combined Ixekizumab Treatment)

A flare is defined as Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS ≥2.1) at 2 consecutive visits, or ASDAS \>3.5 at any visit during Period 2. ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) as acute phase reactant) are total back pain, patient global, peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness and CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.

Time frame: Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the nonresponder imputation (NRI) method.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Combined IXEPercentage of Participants Who do Not Experience a Flare (Combined Ixekizumab Treatment)83.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who do Not Experience a Flare (Combined Ixekizumab Treatment)54.7 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.03, 9.35]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score

The SF-36 is a 36-item participant administered measure designed to be a short, multipurpose assessment of health in the areas of physical functioning, role - physical, role - emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. The 2 overarching domains of mental well- being and physical well-being are captured by the Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores. T-scores are used for analysis. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Combined IXEChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score13.2954 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.121
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score13.1030 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.0457
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score10.6934 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.0366
p-value: 0.07995% CI: [-0.3011, 5.5053]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.08795% CI: [-0.3541, 5.1734]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)

The ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI) is a disease specific health-index instrument designed to assess the impact of interventions for SpA, including axSpA. The 17 item instrument has scores ranging from 0 (good Health) to 17 (poor Health). Each item consists of 1 question that the participant needs to respond to with either I agree (score 1) or I do not agree (score 0). A score of 1 is given where the item is affirmed, indicating adverse health. All item scores are summed to give a total score or index. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Combined IXEChange From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)-4.64 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.393
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)-4.37 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.368
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ASAS Health Index (ASAS HI)-3.64 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
p-value: 0.05895% CI: [-2.02, 0.04]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.14795% CI: [-1.71, 0.26]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)

BASMI is a combined index comprising of the following 5 clinical measurements of spinal mobility in participants with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA). 1. Lateral Spinal Flexion 2. Tragus-to-wall distance 3. Lumbar Flexion (modified Schober) 4. Maximal intermalleolar distance and 5. Cervical rotation. The BASMI linear result is the average of the 5 assessments and ranges from 0 to 10. The higher the BASMI score the more severe the participant's limitation of movement due to their AS. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Combined IXEChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)-0.69 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.08
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)-0.73 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.075
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index (BASMI)-0.50 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.073
p-value: 0.06295% CI: [-0.4, 0.01]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.01895% CI: [-0.43, -0.04]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Chest Expansion in Centimeters

Chest expansion is the difference, in centimeter (cm), between the circumference of the chest in maximal inspiration and maximal expiration. While participants have their hands resting on or behind the head, the assessor will measure the chest encircled length by centimeter (cm) at the fourth intercostal level anteriorly. Two tries were recorded. The better measurement (larger difference) of 2 tries (in centimeters) was used for analyses. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Combined IXEChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion in Centimeters0.77 centimeter (cm)Standard Error 0.256
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion in Centimeters0.53 centimeter (cm)Standard Error 0.243
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Chest Expansion in Centimeters0.67 centimeter (cm)Standard Error 0.236
p-value: 0.75795% CI: [-0.56, 0.77]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.6795% CI: [-0.77, 0.5]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)

The MASES is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The MASES assesses 13 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include costochondral 1 (right/left), costochondral 7 (right/left), spinal iliaca anterior superior (right/left), crista iliaca (right/left), spina iliaca posterior (right/left), processus spinosus L5, and Achilles tendon proximal insertion (right/left). The MASES is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 13); higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B), and with Baseline MASES score \>0. Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Combined IXEChange From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)-3.55 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.352
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)-3.62 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.315
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Maastricht Ankylosing Spondylitis Enthesitis Score (MASES)-3.48 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.302
p-value: 0.88595% CI: [-0.98, 0.85]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.73595% CI: [-0.95, 0.68]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS)

The mSASSS is a four-point scoring system for lateral radiographs of the lumbar and cervical spine and has been shown to reliably track disease progression over time, where: 0 = normal; 1 = sclerosis, squaring or erosion; 2 = syndesmophyte; 3 = bony bridge. By the scoring system of mSASSS of the spinal x-rays, a total of 24 sites were scored on the lateral cervical and lumbar spine: the anterior corners of the vertebrae from lower border of C2 to upper border T1 (inclusive), and from lower border of T12 to upper border of S1 (inclusive). Each corner was scored from 0 to 3, resulting in a range from 0 \[no change\] to 72 \[progression\].

Time frame: Baseline, 2 Years

Population: Ixekizumab structure population who have been treated with ixekizumab for at least 24 months.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Combined IXEChange From Baseline in Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS)0.41 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.102
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS)0.23 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.387
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS)0.32 Units on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.779
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance

The participant is to make a maximum effort to touch the head against the wall when standing with heels and back against the wall (occiput). Then the distance from occiput to wall is measured. Two tries will be recorded. The better (smaller) measurement of 2 tries (in centimeters) will be used for analyses. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Combined IXEChange From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance-0.78 cmStandard Error 0.26
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance-0.66 cmStandard Error 0.239
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Occiput to Wall Distance-0.38 cmStandard Error 0.235
p-value: 0.23695% CI: [-1.07, 0.27]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.37395% CI: [-0.92, 0.35]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Score of 44 Joints

The number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 44 joints (22 joints on each side of the body). The 44 joints were assessed and classified as swollen or not swollen. Sum of all joints checked to be swollen divided by number of evaluable joints which was multiplied by 44 to obtain SJC score. The SJC score ranges from 0 (no swollen joints) to 44 (all joints swollen). LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B), and with baseline SJC \>0. Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Combined IXEChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Score of 44 Joints-3.6 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.67
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Score of 44 Joints-3.9 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.59
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Swollen Joint Count (SJC) Score of 44 Joints-2.7 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.73
p-value: 0.33495% CI: [-2.7, 0.9]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.16895% CI: [-3, 0.5]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender Joint Count (TJC) Score of 46 Joints

The number of tender and painful joints was determined by examination of 46 joints (23 joints on each side of the body). The 46 joints were assessed and classified as tender or not tender. Sum of all joints checked to be tender/painful divided by number of evaluable joints which was multiplied by 46 to obtain TJC score. The scores ranges from 0 (no tender/painful joints) to 46 (all joints tender/painful). LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B), and with baseline TJC \>0. Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Combined IXEChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender Joint Count (TJC) Score of 46 Joints-6.1 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.76
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender Joint Count (TJC) Score of 46 Joints-5.3 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.74
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Severity of Peripheral Arthritis by Tender Joint Count (TJC) Score of 46 Joints-4.0 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.85
p-value: 0.06395% CI: [-4.3, 0.1]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.21195% CI: [-3.3, 0.7]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score

The SF-36 is a 36-item participant administered measure designed to be a short, multipurpose assessment of health in the areas of physical functioning, role - physical, role - emotional, bodily pain, vitality, social functioning, mental health, and general health. The 2 overarching domains of mental well- being and physical well-being are captured by the Mental Component Summary and Physical Component Summary scores. T-scores are used for analysis. The summary scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better levels of function and/or better health. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Combined IXEChange From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score3.1766 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8968
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score4.6404 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8369
PlaceboChange From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score2.3396 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.8314
p-value: 0.47795% CI: [-1.4864, 3.1605]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.04295% CI: [0.088, 4.5138]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Score

The SPARCC enthesitis is an index used to measure the severity of enthesitis. The SPARCC assesses 16 sites for enthesitis using a score of 0 for no activity or 1 for activity. Sites assessed include Medial epicondyle (left/right \[L/R\]), Lateral epicondyle (L/R), Supraspinatus insertion into greater tuberosity of humerus (L/R), Greater trochanter (L/R), Quadriceps insertion into superior border of patella (L/R), Patellar ligament insertion into inferior pole of patella or tibial tubercle (L/R), Achilles tendon insertion into calcaneum (L/R), and Plantar fascia insertion into calcaneum (L/R). The SPARCC is the sum of all site scores (range 0 to 16). Higher scores indicate more severe enthesitis. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B), and with baseline SPARCC score \>0. Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Combined IXEChange From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Score-3.23 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.388
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Score-3.34 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.338
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) Enthesitis Score-2.71 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.335
p-value: 0.29495% CI: [-1.53, 0.47]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.16495% CI: [-1.54, 0.27]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) UK Population-based Index Score

The European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) is a standardized measure of health status used to provide a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal. The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 components: a descriptive system of the respondent's health and a rating of his/her current health state using a 0- to 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS). The descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Combined IXEChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) UK Population-based Index Score0.2877 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0252
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) UK Population-based Index Score0.2847 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0235
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) UK Population-based Index Score0.2459 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.0237
p-value: 0.21395% CI: [-0.0329, 0.1164]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.22595% CI: [-0.0324, 0.1101]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score

The fatigue severity NRS is a participant administered single-item 11-point horizontal scale anchored at 0 and 10, with 0 representing no fatigue and 10 representing as bad as you can imagine. Participants rate their fatigue (feeling tired or worn out) by circling the 1 number that describes their worst level of fatigue during the previous 24 hours. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Combined IXEChange From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score-4.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score-4.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Fatigue Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Score-3.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
p-value: 0.195% CI: [-1.5, 0.1]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.04795% CI: [-1.5, 0]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS Criteria

Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI): Participant asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participant response was captured using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. Inflammation based on Q5 & Q6 mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe). LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Combined IXEChange From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS CriteriaSpinal Pain-5.1 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.39
Combined IXEChange From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS CriteriaPatient Global-5.1 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Combined IXEChange From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS CriteriaBASFI-4.35 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.316
Combined IXEChange From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS CriteriaInflammation-5.20 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.336
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS CriteriaInflammation-4.83 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.319
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS CriteriaBASFI-4.19 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.301
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS CriteriaPatient Global-5.0 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS CriteriaSpinal Pain-4.8 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS CriteriaPatient Global-3.0 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS CriteriaSpinal Pain-3.0 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS CriteriaBASFI-2.79 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.301
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Individual Components of the ASAS CriteriaInflammation-3.03 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.317
Comparison: Patient Globalp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3.1, -1.1]ANCOVA
Comparison: Patient Globalp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.9, -1]ANCOVA
Comparison: Spinal Painp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3.1, -1]ANCOVA
Comparison: Spinal Painp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.8, -0.8]ANCOVA
Comparison: BASFIp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.39, -0.72]ANCOVA
Comparison: BASFIp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.2, -0.59]ANCOVA
Comparison: Inflammationp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3.05, -1.28]ANCOVA
Comparison: Inflammationp-value: <0.00195% CI: [-2.66, -0.95]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)

The Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ) is a 4 item scale designed to estimate sleep problems in clinical research. The JSEQ assesses the frequency of sleep disturbance in 4 categories: 1) trouble falling asleep, 2) waking up several times during the night, 3) having trouble staying asleep (including waking up far too early), and 4) waking up after the usual amount of sleep feeling tired and worn out. Participants report the numbers of days they experience each of these problems in the past month on a 6 point Likert Scale ranging from 0 = no days to 5 = 22-30 days. The total JSEQ score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater sleep disturbance. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Combined IXEChange From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)-4.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)-3.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.47
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Jenkins Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (JSEQ)-3.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.47
p-value: 0.53195% CI: [-1.7, 0.9]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.74395% CI: [-1.4, 1]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

High sensitivity CRP is the measure of acute phase reactant. It was measured with a high sensitivity assay at the central laboratory to help assess the effect of ixekizumab on disease activity. High sensitivity CRP is a sensitive laboratory assay for serum levels of C-Reactive Protein, which is a biomarker of inflammation. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Combined IXEChange From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-12.952 milligram per liter (mg/L)Standard Error 1.4666
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-11.074 milligram per liter (mg/L)Standard Error 1.3861
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Measure of High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-5.094 milligram per liter (mg/L)Standard Error 1.3696
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-11.729, -3.987]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.00295% CI: [-9.655, -2.304]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores

The WPAI-SpA consists of 6 questions to determine employment status, hours missed from work because of SpA, hours missed from work for other reasons, hours actually worked, the degree to which SpA affected work productivity while at work, and the degree to which SpA affected activities outside of work. The WPAI-SpA has been validated in the rad-axSpA participant population. Four scores are derived: percentage of absenteeism, percentage of presenteeism (reduced productivity while at work), an overall work impairment score that combines absenteeism and presenteeism, and percentage of impairment in activities performed outside of work. The computed percentage range for each sub-scale was from 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater impairment and less productivity. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Combined IXEChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores-43.58 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.329
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores-40.10 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.115
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Work Productivity Activity Impairment Spondyloarthritis (WPAI-SpA) Scores-32.96 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.099
Comparison: Percentage of Activity Impairmentp-value: 0.01795% CI: [-19.28, -1.95]ANCOVA
Comparison: Percentage of Activity Impairmentp-value: 0.09195% CI: [-15.44, 1.16]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report-16 (QIDS-SR16)

The 16-item QIDS-SR16 version is a widely used validated scale designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The participant was asked to rate the severity and frequency of specific symptoms present over the last 7 days. The QIDS-SR16 total scores range from 0 to 27, where higher scores indicate higher severity of symptoms. LS mean was determined by ANCOVA with treatment, geographic region, originating study, baseline value and Week 24 value as fixed factors.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the modified baseline observation carried forward (mBOCF) method.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Combined IXEChange From Baseline on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report-16 (QIDS-SR16)-3.68 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.362
PlaceboChange From Baseline on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report-16 (QIDS-SR16)-3.28 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.344
PlaceboChange From Baseline on the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report-16 (QIDS-SR16)-2.80 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.342
p-value: 0.06895% CI: [-1.83, 0.06]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.30795% CI: [-1.4, 0.44]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS40 Response

ASAS40 is defined as a ≥40% improvement and an absolute improvement from baseline of ≥2 units (range of 0 to 10) in at least 3 of the following 4 domains without any worsening in the remaining domain. The following ASAS domains are used: Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI): Participant asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participant response was captured using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. Inflammation based on mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Q5 & Q6 (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe).

Time frame: Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the nonresponder imputation (NRI) method.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Combined IXEPercentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS40 Response79.2 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS40 Response79.6 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving an ASAS40 Response43.4 Percentage of Participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.11, 12.69]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.2, 12.47]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS)20 Response

ASAS20 response is defined as a ≥20% improvement and an absolute improvement from baseline of ≥1 units (range 0 to 10) in ≥3 of 4 domains, and no worsening of ≥20% and ≥1 unit (range 0 to 10) in the remaining domain. The following ASAS domains are used: Patient Global: How active was your spondylitis on average during the last week? score ranges 0 (not active) to 10 (very active). Spinal Pain: How much Pain of your spine due to Ankylosing spondylitis? score ranges 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI): Participant asked to rate the difficulty associated with 10 individual basic functional activities. Participant response was captured using Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0 to 10) with a higher score indicating worse function. Inflammation based on mean of Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) Q5 & Q6 (mean of intensity & duration of stiffness): Score ranges from 0 (none) and 10 (very severe).

Time frame: Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the nonresponder imputation (NRI) method.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Combined IXEPercentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS)20 Response81.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS)20 Response81.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving an Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS)20 Response50.9 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [1.78, 11.41]Regression, Logistic
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.88, 11.31]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response

The BASDAI is a participant-reported assessment consisting of 6 questions that relate to 5 major symptoms relevant to radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (rad-axSpA): 1) Fatigue, 2) Spinal pain, 3) Peripheral arthritis, 4) Enthesitis, 5) Intensity, and 6) Duration of morning stiffness. Participants need to score each item with a score from 0 to 10 (NRS). Total score is obtained from the average of symptom scores ranging 0 (no problem) to 10 (worst problem), with a higher score indicating more severe AS symptom. BASDAI50 represents an improvement of ≥50% of the BASDAI score from baseline.

Time frame: Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the nonresponder imputation (NRI) method.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Combined IXEPercentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response81.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response75.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Achieving Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) Response45.3 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.13, 13.35]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [1.75, 9.45]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who do Not Experience a Flare

A flare is defined as Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS ≥2.1) at 2 consecutive visits, or ASDAS \>3.5 at any visit during Period 2. ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with high sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) as acute phase reactant) are total back pain, patient global, peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness and CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.

Time frame: Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the nonresponder imputation (NRI) method.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Combined IXEPercentage of Participants Who do Not Experience a Flare83.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who do Not Experience a Flare83.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who do Not Experience a Flare54.7 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [1.66, 11.03]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.00195% CI: [1.77, 11.02]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Anterior Uveitis or Uveitis Flares

Anterior uveitis is an inflammation of the middle layer of the eye. which includes the iris (colored part of the eye) and the adjacent tissue, known as the ciliary body.

Time frame: Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B), and regardless of history of anterior uveitis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Combined IXEPercentage of Participants With Anterior Uveitis or Uveitis Flares4.2 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Anterior Uveitis or Uveitis Flares5.6 Percentage of Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Anterior Uveitis or Uveitis Flares5.7 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies

A treatment emergent - antidrug antibody (TE-ADA) positive participant is defined as: a) a participant with a \>= 4-fold increase over a positive baseline antibody titer; or b) for a negative baseline titer, a participant with an increase from the baseline to a level of \>= 1:10. Percentage was calculated based on the number of evaluable participants and was calculated by number of participants with treatment-emergent positive anti-ixekizumab antibodies / number of evaluable participants \* 100%.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 64

Population: All randomized participants from Group B, who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Combined IXEPercentage of Participants With Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies4.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies2.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Anti-Ixekizumab Antibodies20.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Change of Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) ≥1.1 Units

ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are total back pain, patient global, peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness and CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness +0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.

Time frame: Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the nonresponder imputation (NRI) method.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Combined IXEPercentage of Participants With Change of Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) ≥1.1 Units79.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Change of Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) ≥1.1 Units74.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Change of Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) ≥1.1 Units45.3 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.9, 11.17]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [1.56, 8.09]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Inactive Disease on the ASDAS (<1.3 Units)

ASDAS is a composite index to assess disease activity in AS. The parameters used for the ASDAS (with CRP as acute phase reactant) are total back pain, patient global, peripheral pain/swelling, duration of morning stiffness and CRP in mg/L. The ASDAScrp is calculated with the following equation: 0.121×total back pain+0.110×patient global+0.073×peripheral pain/swelling+0.058×duration of morning stiffness+0.579×Ln(CRP+1). (CRP is in mg/liter, the range of other variables is from 0(normal) to 10(very severe); Ln represents the natural logarithm). Data from five variables combined to yield a score (0.6361 to no defined upper limit), where higher the score worse the disease activity.

Time frame: Week 64

Population: Participants who achieved a state of sustained remission and were randomized to 40-week double-blind placebo controlled RWR period (Group B). Missing data was imputed using the nonresponder imputation (NRI) method.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Combined IXEPercentage of Participants With Inactive Disease on the ASDAS (<1.3 Units)60.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Inactive Disease on the ASDAS (<1.3 Units)53.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Inactive Disease on the ASDAS (<1.3 Units)24.5 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [2.07, 11.72]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [1.57, 8.32]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With No New Syndesmophyte Formation

Percentage of participants with no new syndesmophyte formation was measured using the average of 2 selected readers of 3 readers.

Time frame: Week 56

Population: Ixekizumab structure population who have been treated with Ixekizumab for at least 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Combined IXEPercentage of Participants With No New Syndesmophyte Formation80.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With No New Syndesmophyte Formation87.8 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026