Skip to content

Comparison Between One-stage Hybrid Ablation and Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation for Intractable Atrial Fibrillation

Comparison Between One-stage Hybrid Ablation and Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation for Intractable Atrial Fibrillation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03127423
Enrollment
100
Registered
2017-04-25
Start date
2016-12-31
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2023-04-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

Hybrid ablation, Thoracoscope

Brief summary

Previous evidence indicated that the outcomes of both video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical ablation and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation therapy for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) were unsatisfied. Recently, hybrid ablation therapy for AF had encouraging outcomes. However, there were no randomized, controlled clinical studies to prove the effectiveness of this new strategy. This study is aimed to compare the outcomes of hybrid ablation with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical ablation for persistent AF with enlarged left atrium.

Detailed description

This study is aimed to compare the outcomes of hybrid ablation with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical ablation for persistent AF with enlarged left atrium.

Interventions

This intervention includes totally thoracoscopic surgical ablation and percutaneous catheter ablation simultaneously.

This intervention only includes totally thoracoscopic surgical ablation without percutaneous catheter ablation.

Sponsors

China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with at least one anti-arrhythmic drugs * Persistent AF lasting more than 1 year or with a left atrial diameter\>50mm

Exclusion criteria

* Previous percutaneous catheter ablation or surgical ablation * Presence of significant structural heart disease (dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, untreated coronary artery disease) * Left atrial diameter\>60mm * Previous thoracic or lung operation * Left atrial thrombosis or left atrial appendage thrombosis * Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/Forced vital capacity (FVC)\<70%、FEV1\<50% anticipated value) * Bilateral carotid artery stenosis\>80% * Refuse to participate in this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survival rate without any recurrence of AFAt 12-month after interventionWithout detections of AF (episodes longer than 30 seconds)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of life scorepreoperative and 12-month after interventionMeasured with questionnaire of AF effect on Quality of Life
Adverse events12 months follow upMajor adverse cardiovascular events; Major bleeding events; Major thromboembolic events.
Burden of AFAt 12-month after interventionBurden of AF according to Tele-ECG-Card lasting for one week
postoperative complications30 days after operationperioperative complication of catheter ablation and thoracoscopic surgical abaltion
Survival rate without any recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmiaAt 12-month after interventionSurvival rate without AF, atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia will be defined by absence of any of these electrocardiographically documented events lasting \> 30 seconds.
Left atrial functionpreoperative and postoperativeleft atrial ejection fraction and left atrial expansion index

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026