Skip to content

Intraestromal Corneal Ring in Mild Keratoconus

Intrastromal Corneal Ring Was Effective for the Treatment of Mild Keratoconus

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03127163
Enrollment
65
Registered
2017-04-25
Start date
2015-01-10
Completion date
2017-01-10
Last updated
2017-04-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cornea, Eye Diseases, Keratoconus, Ophthalmological Disorder

Brief summary

To determine whether the implantation of an intrastromal corneal ring is an effective treatment for a homogeneous group of mild keratoconus patients.

Detailed description

A group of 65 patients with mild keratoconus were implanted with a Ferrara ring in a single eye. Six months after surgery, the aberrations were measured and the visual function was determined using clinical indices. The aberrations, especially comatic aberration (coma), were measured independently.

Interventions

DEVICEIntraestromal corneal ring

The patients underwent surgery to implant the intrastromal corneal ring (Ferrara Ophthalmics, Belo Horizonte, Brazil) using a manual technique. The procedures were performed by a single surgeon with extensive training in corneal surgery. All patients received the same ring, and the number (1 or 2 segments), thickness, and arc size were calculated using the nomogram provided by the manufacturer.

Sponsors

University of Sao Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Intraestromal corneal ring

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
17 Years to 47 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Investigators used the Amsler-Krumeich classification and included only patients classified as grade I or II.

Exclusion criteria

* Investigators excluded patients with central corneal scarring, with other eye disorders, or with previous ocular surgery. We also excluded patients with a history of herpes infection, keratitis, corneal dystrophies, diagnoses of autoimmune diseases, systemic connective tissue disorders, or acute keratoconus.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Aberrations were measured and the visual function was determined using clinical indices.3 months after surgeryWave front data

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
UCVA3 months after surgeryUncorrected visual acuity
BCVA3 months after surgeryBest corrected visual acuity

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026