Skip to content

BBOT: Bacterial Burden in Ortho Trauma Procedures

Prospective Evaluation of Bacterial Burden in Orthopaedic Trauma Procedures Using Highly Sensitive Assays

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03126448
Enrollment
142
Registered
2017-04-24
Start date
2015-12-21
Completion date
2018-08-15
Last updated
2020-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Orthopaedic Trauma Infections

Keywords

Infection, Nonunion, Fracture healing

Brief summary

The purpose of this research project is to improve understanding of the potential role of highly sensitive bacterial tests in diagnosing infected non-healing fractures compared to the current standard of care, microbiologic culture (growing bacteria from tissue specimens in the laboratory). In order to understand the validity of the highly sensitive tests, parameters of the test in different groups of patients must be established. This study is examining how two highly sensitive tests compare to each other and to the standard of care (microbiologic culture) in three groups of patients. Group 1 is clean broken bone surgery undergoing plate and screw fixation, intramedullary nailing fixation where the fracture site is accessible, or staged treatment of a broken bones initially treated by joint spanning external fixation device. Group 2 will include patients having a plate and screws removed without clinical evidence of infection. Group 3 will be patients undergoing an initial procedure for fracture nonunion.

Detailed description

Infected, broken bones that do not heal are a difficult clinical problem that significantly affect patient quality of life. Current methodology for detecting bacteria (growth in laboratory cultures) is inadequate to detect infections caused by bacteria existing in a biofilm, which is the layer of slime found in the presence of foreign bodies (eg, implanted metal devices to fix broken bones). Advances in molecular biology have allowed development of highly sensitive tests to detect bacteria in the biofilm state. However, the limited prior research has not included control groups or compared the performance of different highly sensitive tests. To address these limitations and further define the role of highly sensitive bacterial tests in clinical practice, the investigators hypothesize that there will be increasing bacterial burden when comparing clean broken bone surgery (1st surgery) to implanted metal device removal (2nd surgery, bone healed) to index nonunion surgery (subsequent surgery, bone not healed) as measured by percentage of cases being positive for bacteria using highly sensitive bacterial tests. Further, the highly sensitive bacterial tests (Illumina MiSeq system and Ibis T5000 biosensor) will have similar ability to quantify the number of bacteria and differentiate bacterial species. Eligible patients will consist of three groups. Group 1 is clean broken bone surgery undergoing plate and screw fixation, intramedullary nailing fixation where the fracture site is accessible, or staged treatment of a broken bones initially treated by joint spanning external fixation device. Group 2 will include patients having a plate and screws removed without clinical evidence of infection. Group 3 will be patients undergoing an initial procedure for fracture nonunion. Tissue obtained at the time of surgery will be sent to the research laboratory for culture and performance of the two highly sensitive tests. The tissue samples taken will be tissue normally removed and discarded in the course of these particular procedures. The rates of positivity for culture and the highly sensitive tests will be compared amongst the three groups. Investigators will also compare bacterial count and the distribution of bacterial species found using the two highly sensitive tests. These data will then undergo statistical analysis against clinical data gathered from review of the patients' charts. The overall project goal is to establish the clinical relevance of highly sensitive bacterial tests in diagnosing infected nonunions. The ability to more accurately identify patients with infection may lead to a change in clinical decision making with respect to surgical procedure or antibiotic treatment. This project will develop an improved understanding of the potential role of highly sensitive bacterial tests in diagnosing infected nonunions compared to the current standard of care, which is growing bacteria in the laboratory under artificial conditions.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTHighly Sensitive Assays

Tissue will be collected at the time of surgery from patients in each arm of the study. In addition to tissue stored in RNAlater and sent to a research laboratory, cultures will also be sent to Quest Diagnostics for independent culture results.

Sponsors

University of Maryland, Baltimore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Closed fracture undergoing open reduction internal fixation, intramedullary nailing (IMN) where the fracture site is accessible, or staged treatment of a pilon or plateau that was initially treated by joint spanning external fixation. * Plate and screw removal without clinical evidence of infection * Index procedure for fracture nonunion

Exclusion criteria

* Index fracture surgery for an open fracture or intramedullary nailing with fracture site not accessible * Hardware removal if fracture not already healed * Index nonunion surgery being bone grafting of a 'critical' defect * Pregnant females

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Tissue Samples Identified With Bacterial DNA According to Highly Sensitive Bacterial AssaysStudy surgery to 6-month clinical follow-upThe objective of this research is to see if highly sensitive bacterial assays are useful for determining whether fracture nonunions are infected

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group 1: Closed Index Fractures
Group 1 is clean, closed fractures undergoing index open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), intramedullary nailing (IMN) where the fracture site is accessible, or staged treatment of a pilon or plateau that was initially treated by joint spanning external fixation. Tissue obtained at the time of surgery will be sent to the research laboratory for culture and performance of the two highly sensitive assays. Highly Sensitive Assays: Tissue will be collected at the time of surgery from patients in each arm of the study. In addition to tissue stored in RNAlater and sent to a research laboratory, cultures will also be sent to Quest Diagnostics for independent culture results.
43
Group 2: Hardware Removal From Healed Fractures
Group 2 will include patients having a plate removed from a healed fracture without clinical evidence of infection and excluding history of open fracture. Tissue obtained at the time of surgery will be sent to the research laboratory for culture and performance of the two highly sensitive assays. Highly Sensitive Assays: Tissue will be collected at the time of surgery from patients in each arm of the study. In addition to tissue stored in RNAlater and sent to a research laboratory, cultures will also be sent to Quest Diagnostics for independent culture results.
41
Group 3: Index Treatment of Fracture Nonunions
Group 3 will be patients that are undergoing an index procedure for fracture nonunion at a site where prior surgery has been undertaken for the fracture. Exclusions include bone grafting of 'critical' defects, active clinical infection, or \< 3 months from index fracture fixation. Tissue obtained at the time of surgery will be sent to the research laboratory for culture and performance of the two highly sensitive assays. Highly Sensitive Assays: Tissue will be collected at the time of surgery from patients in each arm of the study. In addition to tissue stored in RNAlater and sent to a research laboratory, cultures will also be sent to Quest Diagnostics for independent culture results.
27
Total111

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup 1: Closed Index FracturesGroup 2: Hardware Removal From Healed FracturesGroup 3: Index Treatment of Fracture NonunionsTotal
Age, Continuous43 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19
46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15
47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21
ASA Physical Status Classification System2.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
2.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
2.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5
2.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
Compartment Syndrome0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
High Energy Injury32 Participants32 Participants17 Participants81 Participants
Open FractureNA Participants4 Participants18 ParticipantsNA Participants
Pre-operative Antibiotics Administered43 Participants40 Participants26 Participants109 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
29 participants31 participants21 participants81 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants21 Participants10 Participants50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants20 Participants17 Participants61 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 430 / 411 / 27
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 430 / 410 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 430 / 410 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Tissue Samples Identified With Bacterial DNA According to Highly Sensitive Bacterial Assays

The objective of this research is to see if highly sensitive bacterial assays are useful for determining whether fracture nonunions are infected

Time frame: Study surgery to 6-month clinical follow-up

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group 1: Closed Index FracturesNumber of Participants With Tissue Samples Identified With Bacterial DNA According to Highly Sensitive Bacterial Assays10 Participants
Group 2: Hardware Removal From Healed FracturesNumber of Participants With Tissue Samples Identified With Bacterial DNA According to Highly Sensitive Bacterial Assays24 Participants
Group 3: Index Treatment of Fracture NonunionsNumber of Participants With Tissue Samples Identified With Bacterial DNA According to Highly Sensitive Bacterial Assays20 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026