Skip to content

PROMISE I Early Feasibility Trial of the LimFlow Stent Graft System

Pilot Study to Investigate Safety, Effectiveness and Feasibility of LimFlow Stent Graft System for Creating an AV Fistula for the Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03124875
Enrollment
32
Registered
2017-04-24
Start date
2017-07-05
Completion date
2021-01-05
Last updated
2024-05-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia, Critical Limb Ischemia

Keywords

Transcatheter Arterialization of Deep Veins, Percutaneous Deep Vein Arterialization, LimFlow System

Brief summary

This pilot study will investigate the safety, effectiveness and feasibility of the LimFlow Stent Graft System for creating an AV fistula in the Below The Knee (BTK) vascular system using an endovascular, minimally invasive approach for the treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI) in subjects ineligible for conventional endovascular or surgical limb salvage procedures.

Detailed description

The PROMISE I Trial was a prospective, multi-center, single-arm, investigational feasibility study assessing the LimFlow System for the treatment of chronic- limb-threatening ischemia by creating an arterio-venous fistula in the below-the-knee vasculature. The study was run under an investigational device exemption (IDE G160156, NCT03124875). Thirty-two subjects were enrolled under protocol revisions A, B, C, and D at seven sites in the United States between 5-July-2017 and 8-April-2019.

Interventions

Creation of an AV fistula in below-the-knee vasculature for the treatment of critical limb ischemia.

Sponsors

LimFlow, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective, multi-center pilot study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of critical limb ischemia with hemodynamic evidence of severely diminished arterial inflow of the index limb and Rutherford Classification 5 r 6 * Reviewed and approved for eligibility by the Investigator and the Independent Safety Committee (ISC)

Exclusion criteria

* Concomitant hepatic or renal insufficiency, thrombophlebitis, deep venous thrombus, coagulation disorder * Severe heart failure, recent MI or stroke * Significant peripheral edema or infection that may preclude insertion of a prosthesis or significantly impair wound healing * Known allergies or contraindications to anti platelet therapy or device materials * Immunodeficiency disorder or immunosuppressant therapy * Life expectancy \< 12 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Amputation-free Survival30 days post-procedurePercentage of subjects with freedom from above-ankle amputation of the index limb and freedom from all-cause mortality

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Primary Patency30 days post-procedurePercentage of patients with absence of total occlusion of the stent graft without prior clinically-driven major re-intervention of the stent graft. Total occlusion is defined as absence of flow on color doppler or angiogram and clinically-driven major re-intervention is defined as creation of a new surgical bypass, use of thrombectomy or thrombolysis, or major surgical revision performed for occlusion of the stent graft.
Secondary Patency6 months post-procedurePercentage of patients with absence of total occlusion of the stent graft with or without prior clinically-driven major re-intervention of the stent graft.Total occlusion is defined as absence of flow on color doppler or angiogram and clinically-driven major re-intervention is defined as creation of a new surgical bypass, use of thrombectomy or thrombolysis, or major surgical revision performed for occlusion of the stent graft.
Limb Salvage12 months post-procedurePercentage of subjects with freedom from above-ankle amputation of the index limb
Amputation-free Survival6 months post-procedurePercentage of subjects with freedom from above-ankle amputation of the index limb and freedom from all-cause mortality
Deterioration in Renal Function6 months post-procedurePercentage of subjects with a 25% increase in serum creatinine after using iodine contrast agents, without another clear cause for kidney injury.
Technical SuccessPost-procedure, immediatelyPercentage of subjects with completion of the endovascular procedure and immediate morphological success with successful placement of the arterial and venous catheters in the desired location in the limb, and ability to place the stent graft.
Procedural Success30 days post-procedurePercentage of subjects with a combination of Technical Success and absence of all-cause mortality, above-ankle amputation or clinically driven major re-intervention of the stent graft.
Wound Healing12 months post-procedurePercentage of subjects with full wound healing

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Treatment
Treated with the LimFlow System LimFlow System: Creation of an AV fistula in below-the-knee vasculature for the treatment of critical limb ischemia.
32
Total32

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTreatment
Age, Continuous70.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.61
Baseline Rutherford Class 528 Participants
Baseline Rutherford Class 64 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
15 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
11 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
19 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
32 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 32
other
Total, other adverse events
16 / 32
serious
Total, serious adverse events
19 / 32

Outcome results

Primary

Amputation-free Survival

Percentage of subjects with freedom from above-ankle amputation of the index limb and freedom from all-cause mortality

Time frame: 30 days post-procedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TreatmentAmputation-free Survival90.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Amputation-free Survival

Percentage of subjects with freedom from above-ankle amputation of the index limb and freedom from all-cause mortality

Time frame: 6 months post-procedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TreatmentAmputation-free Survival73.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Deterioration in Renal Function

Percentage of subjects with a 25% increase in serum creatinine after using iodine contrast agents, without another clear cause for kidney injury.

Time frame: 6 months post-procedure

Population: Population analyzed was those patients that successfully underwent the index procedure. One patient did not have procedural success resulting in n=31

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TreatmentDeterioration in Renal Function9.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Limb Salvage

Percentage of subjects with freedom from above-ankle amputation of the index limb

Time frame: 12 months post-procedure

Population: Population analyzed was those patients that successfully underwent the index procedure. One patient did not have procedural success resulting in n=31

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TreatmentLimb Salvage75.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Primary Patency

Percentage of patients with absence of total occlusion of the stent graft without prior clinically-driven major re-intervention of the stent graft.Total occlusion is defined as absence of flow on color doppler or angiogram and clinically-driven major re-intervention is defined as creation of a new surgical bypass, use of thrombectomy or thrombolysis, or major surgical revision performed for occlusion of the stent graft.

Time frame: 6 months post-procedure

Population: Population analyzed was those patients that successfully underwent the index procedure. One patient did not have procedural success resulting in n=31

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TreatmentPrimary Patency29.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Primary Patency

Percentage of patients with absence of total occlusion of the stent graft without prior clinically-driven major re-intervention of the stent graft. Total occlusion is defined as absence of flow on color doppler or angiogram and clinically-driven major re-intervention is defined as creation of a new surgical bypass, use of thrombectomy or thrombolysis, or major surgical revision performed for occlusion of the stent graft.

Time frame: 30 days post-procedure

Population: Population analyzed was those patients that successfully underwent the index procedure. One patient did not have procedural success resulting in n=31

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TreatmentPrimary Patency73.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Procedural Success

Percentage of subjects with a combination of Technical Success and absence of all-cause mortality, above-ankle amputation or clinically driven major re-intervention of the stent graft.

Time frame: 30 days post-procedure

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TreatmentProcedural Success77.4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Secondary Patency

Percentage of patients with absence of total occlusion of the stent graft with or without prior clinically-driven major re-intervention of the stent graft.Total occlusion is defined as absence of flow on color doppler or angiogram and clinically-driven major re-intervention is defined as creation of a new surgical bypass, use of thrombectomy or thrombolysis, or major surgical revision performed for occlusion of the stent graft.

Time frame: 6 months post-procedure

Population: Population analyzed was those patients that successfully underwent the index procedure. One patient did not have procedural success resulting in n=31

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TreatmentSecondary Patency49.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Technical Success

Percentage of subjects with completion of the endovascular procedure and immediate morphological success with successful placement of the arterial and venous catheters in the desired location in the limb, and ability to place the stent graft.

Time frame: Post-procedure, immediately

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TreatmentTechnical Success96.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Wound Healing

Percentage of subjects with full wound healing

Time frame: 12 months post-procedure

Population: Population analyzed was those patients that successfully underwent the index procedure. One patient did not have procedural success resulting in n=31

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TreatmentWound Healing58.7 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026