Skip to content

Study of ACE-083 in Patients With Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease

A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of ACE-083 in Patients With Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Types 1 and X

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03124459
Enrollment
63
Registered
2017-04-21
Start date
2017-07-31
Completion date
2020-03-11
Last updated
2022-09-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease

Keywords

CMT1 / CMTX

Brief summary

This is a multicenter, phase 2 study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics (PD), efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ACE-083 in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 1 and Type X (CMT1 and CMTX), to be conducted in two parts. Part 1 is non-randomized, open-label, dose-escalation and Part 2 is randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled.

Detailed description

Part 1 (non-randomized, open-label, dose-escalation) Part 1 will consist of up to 3 cohorts of 6 patients each and will evaluate multiple ascending dose levels of ACE-083 administered bilaterally once every 3 weeks for up to 5 doses in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle. Patients in each cohort will be enrolled in a 4-week screening period before beginning treatment. Part 2 (randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled) Prior to the initiation of Part 2, a review of safety and efficacy data from Part 1 will be conducted by the Safety Review Team (SRT) to determine the recommended dose level (maximum 250 mg/muscle). A total of up to 40 new patients may be enrolled and randomized (1:1 randomization) to receive either ACE 083 (n=20) or placebo (n=20) bilaterally by injection into both TA muscles once every 3 weeks for up to 17 doses. Study duration for Parts 1 and 2 for each patient will be approximately 24 weeks, including a 4-week screening period, a 12-week treatment period, and an 8-week follow-up period after the last dose. Study duration for Part 2 will be 15 months, including 4-week screening, 6 months double blind placebo-controlled, 6 months open-label and 8 week follow-up.

Interventions

Part 1 - Recombinant fusion protein. Part 2 - Recombinant fusion protein or buffer solution.

DRUGPlacebo

Recombinant fusion protein or buffer solution

Sponsors

Acceleron Pharma, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ USA
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria 1. Age ≥ 18 years 2. Diagnosis of CMT1 or CMTX confirmed by: 1. Clinical presentation and electrodiagnostics 2. Genetically-confirmed CMT1 or CMTX for the patient or first-degree relative 3. Part 1: 1. Six-minute walk distance (6MWD) of at least 150 meters (without a brace or walker) 2. Independent ambulation for at least 10 meters, without a brace 3. Left and right ankle plantar flexion MRC grade 4+ to 5, inclusive Part 2: 1. 6MWD ≥ 150 and ≤ 500 meters (without a brace or walker); a maximum of 20% of enrolled patients with 6MWD ≥ 450 meters will be included 2. Left and right ankle plantar flexion MRC grade 4- to 5, inclusive 4. Left and right ankle dorsiflexion Medical Research Council (MRC) manual muscle testing (MMT) grade 3 to 4+ inclusive. No more than 12 of the 40 subjects may have a grade of 3 or 3+ on one or both sides. 5. Females of childbearing potential must have negative urine pregnancy test prior to enrollment and use highly effective birth control methods during study participation and for 8 weeks following the last dose of ACE-083. Males must agree to use a condom during any sexual contact with females of childbearing potential while participating in the study and for 8 weeks following the last dose of ACE-083, even if he has undergone a successful vasectomy. 6. Ability to adhere to the study visit schedule/procedures, and to understand and comply with protocol requirements 7. Signed written informed consent Key

Exclusion criteria

1. History of active malignancy, with the exception of fully excised or treated basal cell carcinoma, cervical carcinoma in-situ, or ≤ 2 squamous cell carcinomas of the skin 2. Symptomatic cardiopulmonary disease, significant functional impairment, significant orthopedic or neuropathic pain, or other co morbidities that in the opinion of the investigator would limit a patient's ability to complete strength and/or functional assessments on study 3. Type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus 4. Thyroid disorder unless condition is stable with no change in treatment for at least 4 weeks before the first dose and no expected change for duration of study 5. Renal impairment (serum creatinine ≥ 2 times the upper limit of normal (ULN\]) 6. Aspartate transaminase (AST) and/or alanine transaminase (ALT) ≥ 3 times ULN 7. Increased risk of bleeding (i.e., due to hemophilia, platelet disorders, or use of any anticoagulation/platelet modifying therapies up to 2 weeks prior to Study Day 1 and for duration of study; low dose aspirin \[≤ 100 mg daily\] is permitted) 8. Severe deformity or ankle fixation that would sufficiently limit passive range of motion to affect assessment of dorsiflexion strength 9. Major surgery within 4 weeks prior to Study Day 1 10. Chronic pharmacologic doses of systemic corticosteroids (≥ 2 weeks) within 4 weeks before Study Day 1 and for duration of study; intra-articular/topical/inhaled/intranasal physiologic doses of systemic corticosteroids are permitted 11. Androgens, growth hormone, insulin or oral hormone replacement therapy within 6 months before Study Day 1 and for duration of study; topical physiologic androgen replacement is permitted 12. Any change in medications potentially affecting muscle strength or function within 4 weeks of Study Day 1 and for duration of study (e.g., creatinine, CoQ10, systemic beta-adrenergic agonists) 13. Previous exposure to any investigational agent potentially affecting muscle volume, muscle strength, or muscle or nerve function within 5 half-lives of last dose plus an additional 8-week washout period (or 12 weeks prior to Study Day 1 if half-life is unknown) 14. Any previous or current exposure to ACE-083 15. Significant change in physical activity or exercise (e.g., significant increase or decrease in intensity or frequency) within 8 weeks before Study Day 1 or inability to maintain the baseline level of physical activity throughout the study 16. Any condition that would prevent MRI scanning or compromise the ability to obtain a clear and interpretable scan of the lower leg, as applicable (e.g., knee/hip replacement metallic implants) 17. Known active substance abuse, including alcohol 18. History of sensitivity to protein pharmaceuticals 19. Female that is lactating/breast-feeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part 1: Frequency of Adverse EventsFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period for Part 1 (Study Day 141).Number of subjects with at least one adverse event related to treatment intervention from Part 1 of this study. Since this outcome measure was only pre-specified for Part 1, only data from the Part 1 participants is reported.
Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Volume to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study.From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).The percent change from baseline in volume of injected muscle, by MRI compared to the Day 190 Assessment is reported. The pre-specified timepoint for this outcome was only for data collected from participants to the end of the double-blind placebo controlled portion of the study, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Function - Walk/Run Time to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).The percent change from baseline in functional assessments, as measured by 10-meter walk/run time when compared to Day 190 Assessment is reported. The pre-specified timepoint for this outcome was only for data collected from participants to the end of the double-blind placebo controlled portion of the study, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.
Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Function - Walk Distance Assessed at the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period for the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).Percent change from baseline in functional assessments, as measured by 6-minute walk distance when compared to Day 190 Assessment, is reported. The pre-specified timepoint for this outcome was only for data collected from participants to the end of the double-blind placebo controlled portion of the study, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.
Part 2: Change in Balance and Fall Risk at the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study.From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).Change from baseline in static and dynamic balance, as measured by the Berg Balance Scale, a 14-item scoring system to assess balance and fall risk in adults. The Berg balance scale is used to objectively determine a patient's ability (or inability) to safely balance during a series of predetermined tasks. It is a 14 item list with each item consisting of a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function. Total scores are used for reporting, with a range of 0-56, with higher scores mean a better demonstration of function. A score of 56 indicates functional balance. A score of \< 45 indicates individuals may be at greater risk of falling. The pre-specified timepoints for reporting are baseline Berg scale score and Day 190 score, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.
Part 2: Absolute Change in Amount of Intramuscular Fat Tissue to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).The absolute change from baseline in intramuscular fat fraction of the injected muscle, by MRI compared to Day 190 Assessment is reported. The pre-specified timepoint for this outcome was only for data collected from participants to the end of the double-blind placebo controlled portion of the study, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.
Part 2: Change in Clinical Examination Score From Baseline to End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).Change from baseline in the Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) Examination Score, version 2 (CMTES2), a composite scoring system to assess sensory and motor impairment in subjects with CMT. The total score is a subset of the following items from the CMT neuropathy score instrument: Sensory symptoms, Motor symptoms (legs), Motor symptoms (arms), Pinprick Sensibility, Vibration, Strength (legs), and Strength (arms). Each individual item is assessed using a rating from 0 to 4 inclusive. The range of CMTES2 scores is from 0 to 28 inclusive. A higher score means a greater degree of symptom severity. The Baseline score and score on the Day 190 Assessment are reported. The pre-specified timepoints for reporting are baseline Berg scale score and Day 190 score, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.
Part 2: Percent Change in Clinical Examination Score in Baseline to End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).Percent change was calculated for the difference in the Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) Examination Score (CMTES2) from baseline and Day 190 Assessment scores. The pre-specified timepoints for reporting are baseline Berg scale score and Day 190 score, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.
Part 2: Change in Patient-reported Quality of Life From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).The absolute change from baseline in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Health Index (CMT-HI), a disease-specific, patient-reported health index score from baseline and Day 190 Assessment scores. The pre-specified timepoints for reporting are baseline Berg scale score and Day 190 score, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.
Part 2: Percent Change in Balance and Fall Risk From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).Percent change was calculated for the difference from baseline and Day 190 Assessment scores on the Berg Balance Scale. The Berg Balance Scale, is a 14-item scoring system to assess balance and fall risk in adults. The Berg balance scale is used to objectively determine a patient's ability (or inability) to safely balance during a series of predetermined tasks. It is a 14 item list with each item consisting of a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function. Total scores are used for reporting, with a range of 0-56, with higher scores mean a better demonstration of function. A score of 56 indicates functional balance. A score of \< 45 indicates individuals may be at greater risk of falling. The pre-specified timepoints for reporting are baseline Berg scale score and Day 190 score, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.
Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Strength to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyFrom initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).Percent change from baseline in strength of the injected muscle, by Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) compared to Day 190 Assessment is reported. The pre-specified timepoint for this outcome was only for data collected from participants to the end of the double-blind placebo controlled portion of the study, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Part 1 Cohort 1
ACE-083 150 mg IM (tibialis anterior muscle), once every 3 weeks for up to 5 doses. ACE-083: Part 1 - Recombinant fusion protein.
6
Part 1 Cohort 2
ACE-083 200 mg IM, (tibialis anterior muscle), once every 3 weeks for up to 5 doses. ACE-083: Part 1 - Recombinant fusion protein.
6
Part 1 Cohort 3
ACE-083 240 mg IM (tibialis anterior muscle), once every 3 weeks for up to 5 doses. ACE-083: Part 1 - Recombinant fusion protein.
6
Part 2 (Double-blind Placebo Controlled) Placebo
Placebo once every 3 weeks for up to 9 doses ACE-083: Part 2 - buffer solution.
21
Part 2 (Double-blind Placebo Controlled) ACE-083
ACE-083 up to 250 mg IM (tibialis anterior muscle) once every 3 weeks for up to 9 doses ACE-083 Part 2 - Recombinant fusion protein
24
Part 2 (Open-label) ACE 083-03 Arm
ACE-083 up to 250 mg IM (tibialis anterior muscle) once every 3 weeks for up to 8 doses ACE-083 Part 2 - Recombinant fusion protein
40
Total103

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Part 2- Open Label ACE-083Study terminated by Sponsor0000022
Part 2- Open Label ACE-083Withdrawal by Subject000001
Phase 2- Randomized Doubled-blindAdverse Event000020
Phase 2- Randomized Doubled-blindLost to Follow-up000010
Phase 2- Randomized Doubled-blindStudy terminated by Sponsor00011120
Phase 2- Randomized Doubled-blindWithdrawal by Subject000140

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPart 1 Cohort 1Part 1 Cohort 2Part 1 Cohort 3Part 2 (Double-blind Placebo Controlled) PlaceboPart 2 (Double-blind Placebo Controlled) ACE-083TotalPart 2 (Open-label) ACE 083-03 Arm
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
6 Participants5 Participants6 Participants17 Participants23 Participants36 Participants36 Participants
Age, Continuous40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.1
39 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.8
49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7
47.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.3
45.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
47.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
47.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants6 Participants5 Participants19 Participants22 Participants37 Participants37 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants6 Participants6 Participants21 Participants20 Participants38 Participants38 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 Participants6 Participants6 Participants21 Participants24 Participants63 Participants40 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants3 Participants4 Participants13 Participants17 Participants40 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants3 Participants2 Participants8 Participants6 Participants22 Participants12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 60 / 60 / 60 / 210 / 230 / 40
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 66 / 66 / 619 / 2120 / 2336 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 60 / 61 / 61 / 210 / 231 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Part 1: Frequency of Adverse Events

Number of subjects with at least one adverse event related to treatment intervention from Part 1 of this study. Since this outcome measure was only pre-specified for Part 1, only data from the Part 1 participants is reported.

Time frame: From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period for Part 1 (Study Day 141).

Population: The Safety Set consists of all patients enrolled in the study who have received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Part 1 Cohort 1 (150 mg)Part 1: Frequency of Adverse Events6 Participants
Part 1 Cohort 2 (200 mg)Part 1: Frequency of Adverse Events5 Participants
Part 1 Cohort 3 (240 mg)Part 1: Frequency of Adverse Events6 Participants
Primary

Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Volume to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study.

The percent change from baseline in volume of injected muscle, by MRI compared to the Day 190 Assessment is reported. The pre-specified timepoint for this outcome was only for data collected from participants to the end of the double-blind placebo controlled portion of the study, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Time frame: From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).

Population: Per Protocol Set: All participants enrolled/randomized in the study who received at least 1 dose of the study drug (includes placebo) with no major protocol violations

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1 Cohort 1 (150 mg)Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Volume to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study.2.2 percent changeStandard Error 4.1
Part 1 Cohort 2 (200 mg)Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Volume to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study.15.8 percent changeStandard Error 4.3
p-value: 0.0190% CI: [4.9, 22.1]ANCOVA
Secondary

Part 2: Absolute Change in Amount of Intramuscular Fat Tissue to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study

The absolute change from baseline in intramuscular fat fraction of the injected muscle, by MRI compared to Day 190 Assessment is reported. The pre-specified timepoint for this outcome was only for data collected from participants to the end of the double-blind placebo controlled portion of the study, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Time frame: From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).

Population: Per Protocol Set: All participants enrolled/randomized in the study who received at least 1 dose of the study drug (includes placebo) with no major protocol violations

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1 Cohort 1 (150 mg)Part 2: Absolute Change in Amount of Intramuscular Fat Tissue to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study1 mm3Standard Error 1.8
Part 1 Cohort 2 (200 mg)Part 2: Absolute Change in Amount of Intramuscular Fat Tissue to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study-2.1 mm3Standard Error 1.9
p-value: 0.1690% CI: [-6.8, 0.6]ANCOVA
Secondary

Part 2: Change in Balance and Fall Risk at the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study.

Change from baseline in static and dynamic balance, as measured by the Berg Balance Scale, a 14-item scoring system to assess balance and fall risk in adults. The Berg balance scale is used to objectively determine a patient's ability (or inability) to safely balance during a series of predetermined tasks. It is a 14 item list with each item consisting of a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function. Total scores are used for reporting, with a range of 0-56, with higher scores mean a better demonstration of function. A score of 56 indicates functional balance. A score of \< 45 indicates individuals may be at greater risk of falling. The pre-specified timepoints for reporting are baseline Berg scale score and Day 190 score, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Time frame: From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).

Population: Per Protocol Set: All participants enrolled/randomized in the study who received at least 1 dose of the study drug (includes placebo) with no major protocol violations

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1 Cohort 1 (150 mg)Part 2: Change in Balance and Fall Risk at the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study.Baseline52.8 score on scaleStandard Deviation 1.99
Part 1 Cohort 1 (150 mg)Part 2: Change in Balance and Fall Risk at the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study.Day 19053 score on scaleStandard Deviation 2.77
Part 1 Cohort 2 (200 mg)Part 2: Change in Balance and Fall Risk at the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study.Baseline50.8 score on scaleStandard Deviation 5.58
Part 1 Cohort 2 (200 mg)Part 2: Change in Balance and Fall Risk at the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study.Day 19051.4 score on scaleStandard Deviation 5.6
Secondary

Part 2: Change in Clinical Examination Score From Baseline to End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study

Change from baseline in the Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) Examination Score, version 2 (CMTES2), a composite scoring system to assess sensory and motor impairment in subjects with CMT. The total score is a subset of the following items from the CMT neuropathy score instrument: Sensory symptoms, Motor symptoms (legs), Motor symptoms (arms), Pinprick Sensibility, Vibration, Strength (legs), and Strength (arms). Each individual item is assessed using a rating from 0 to 4 inclusive. The range of CMTES2 scores is from 0 to 28 inclusive. A higher score means a greater degree of symptom severity. The Baseline score and score on the Day 190 Assessment are reported. The pre-specified timepoints for reporting are baseline Berg scale score and Day 190 score, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Time frame: From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).

Population: Per Protocol Set: All participants enrolled/randomized in the study who received at least 1 dose of the study drug (includes placebo) with no major protocol violations

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1 Cohort 1 (150 mg)Part 2: Change in Clinical Examination Score From Baseline to End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyBaseline10.1 score on scaleStandard Deviation 3.4
Part 1 Cohort 1 (150 mg)Part 2: Change in Clinical Examination Score From Baseline to End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyDay 1909.5 score on scaleStandard Deviation 3.02
Part 1 Cohort 2 (200 mg)Part 2: Change in Clinical Examination Score From Baseline to End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyBaseline10.9 score on scaleStandard Deviation 3.67
Part 1 Cohort 2 (200 mg)Part 2: Change in Clinical Examination Score From Baseline to End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the StudyDay 19011.2 score on scaleStandard Deviation 4.77
Secondary

Part 2: Change in Patient-reported Quality of Life From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study

The absolute change from baseline in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Health Index (CMT-HI), a disease-specific, patient-reported health index score from baseline and Day 190 Assessment scores. The pre-specified timepoints for reporting are baseline Berg scale score and Day 190 score, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Time frame: From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).

Population: Per Protocol Set: All participants enrolled/randomized in the study who received at least 1 dose of the study drug (includes placebo) with no major protocol violations

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1 Cohort 1 (150 mg)Part 2: Change in Patient-reported Quality of Life From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study-0.2 absolute change in score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
Part 1 Cohort 2 (200 mg)Part 2: Change in Patient-reported Quality of Life From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study-2.2 absolute change in score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
p-value: 0.6390% CI: [-8.4, 4.6]ANCOVA
Secondary

Part 2: Percent Change in Balance and Fall Risk From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study

Percent change was calculated for the difference from baseline and Day 190 Assessment scores on the Berg Balance Scale. The Berg Balance Scale, is a 14-item scoring system to assess balance and fall risk in adults. The Berg balance scale is used to objectively determine a patient's ability (or inability) to safely balance during a series of predetermined tasks. It is a 14 item list with each item consisting of a five-point ordinal scale ranging from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating the lowest level of function and 4 the highest level of function. Total scores are used for reporting, with a range of 0-56, with higher scores mean a better demonstration of function. A score of 56 indicates functional balance. A score of \< 45 indicates individuals may be at greater risk of falling. The pre-specified timepoints for reporting are baseline Berg scale score and Day 190 score, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Time frame: From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).

Population: Per Protocol Set: All participants enrolled/randomized in the study who received at least 1 dose of the study drug (includes placebo) with no major protocol violations

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1 Cohort 1 (150 mg)Part 2: Percent Change in Balance and Fall Risk From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study0.4 percent change in score on scaleStandard Deviation 3.59
Part 1 Cohort 2 (200 mg)Part 2: Percent Change in Balance and Fall Risk From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study1.3 percent change in score on scaleStandard Deviation 3.13
Secondary

Part 2: Percent Change in Clinical Examination Score in Baseline to End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study

Percent change was calculated for the difference in the Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) Examination Score (CMTES2) from baseline and Day 190 Assessment scores. The pre-specified timepoints for reporting are baseline Berg scale score and Day 190 score, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Time frame: From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).

Population: Per Protocol Set: All participants enrolled/randomized in the study who received at least 1 dose of the study drug (includes placebo) with no major protocol violations.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1 Cohort 1 (150 mg)Part 2: Percent Change in Clinical Examination Score in Baseline to End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study-0.2 percent change in score on scaleStandard Deviation 34.63
Part 1 Cohort 2 (200 mg)Part 2: Percent Change in Clinical Examination Score in Baseline to End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study2.4 percent change in score on scaleStandard Deviation 24.26
Secondary

Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Function - Walk Distance Assessed at the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study

Percent change from baseline in functional assessments, as measured by 6-minute walk distance when compared to Day 190 Assessment, is reported. The pre-specified timepoint for this outcome was only for data collected from participants to the end of the double-blind placebo controlled portion of the study, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Time frame: From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period for the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).

Population: Per Protocol Set: All participants enrolled/randomized in the study who received at least 1 dose of the study drug (includes placebo) with no major protocol violations

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1 Cohort 1 (150 mg)Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Function - Walk Distance Assessed at the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study6 Percent changeStandard Error 4
Part 1 Cohort 2 (200 mg)Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Function - Walk Distance Assessed at the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study9.1 Percent changeStandard Error 3.8
p-value: 0.5190% CI: [-4.6, 10.9]ANCOVA
Secondary

Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Function - Walk/Run Time to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study

The percent change from baseline in functional assessments, as measured by 10-meter walk/run time when compared to Day 190 Assessment is reported. The pre-specified timepoint for this outcome was only for data collected from participants to the end of the double-blind placebo controlled portion of the study, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Time frame: From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).

Population: Per Protocol Set: All participants enrolled/randomized in the study who received at least 1 dose of the study drug (includes placebo) with no major protocol violations

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1 Cohort 1 (150 mg)Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Function - Walk/Run Time to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study-10.1 Percent changeStandard Error 4.7
Part 1 Cohort 2 (200 mg)Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Function - Walk/Run Time to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study-8.2 Percent changeStandard Error 4.7
p-value: 0.7390% CI: [-7.1, 10.9]ANCOVA
Secondary

Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Strength to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study

Percent change from baseline in strength of the injected muscle, by Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT) compared to Day 190 Assessment is reported. The pre-specified timepoint for this outcome was only for data collected from participants to the end of the double-blind placebo controlled portion of the study, therefore data for the open-label arm of the study is not reported.

Time frame: From initiation of treatment (Study Day 1) to end of follow-up period of the double-blind placebo-controlled portion of the study (Study Day 190).

Population: Per Protocol Set: All participants enrolled/randomized in the study who received at least 1 dose of the study drug (includes placebo) with no major protocol violations

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Part 1 Cohort 1 (150 mg)Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Strength to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study-3.4 percent changeStandard Error 19.8
Part 1 Cohort 2 (200 mg)Part 2: Percent Change in Muscle Strength to the End of the Double-blind Placebo-controlled Portion of the Study32.0 percent changeStandard Error 19.8
p-value: 0.1390% CI: [-3.2, 74]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026