Skip to content

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Elafibranor in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) and Inadequate Response to Ursodeoxycholic Acid

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Elafibranor at Doses of 80 mg and 120mg After 12 Weeks of Treatment in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis and Inadequate Response to Ursodeoxycholic Acid

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03124108
Enrollment
45
Registered
2017-04-21
Start date
2017-04-05
Completion date
2018-10-31
Last updated
2019-09-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC)

Keywords

Elafibranor, Primary Biliary Cholangitis, Alkaline phosphatase

Brief summary

The primary objective of the study is to compare the effect of daily oral administration of elafibranor 80mg and 120 mg on change in serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) to that of placebo in patients with PBC and inadequate response to Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA).

Interventions

Two coated tablets daily for 12 weeks

Two coated tablets daily for 12 weeks

DRUGPlacebo

Two coated tablets daily for 12 weeks

Sponsors

Genfit
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Must have provided written informed consent 2. Definite or probable PBC diagnosis as demonstrated by the presence of at least 2 of the following 3 diagnostic factors: * History of elevated ALP levels for at least 6 months prior to Day 0 (randomization visit) * Positive Anti-Mitochondrial Antibodies (AMA) titers (\> 1/40 on immunofluorescence or M2 positive by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or positive PBC-specific antinuclear antibodies * Liver biopsy consistent with PBC 3. ALP \>= 1.67x upper limit of normal (ULN) 4. Taking UDCA for at least 12 months (stable dose for ≥ 6 months) prior to screening visit 5. Contraception: Females participating in this study must be of non-childbearing potential or must be using highly efficient contraception for the full duration of the study and for 1 month after the end of treatment.

Exclusion criteria

1. History or presence of other concomitant liver diseases 2. Screening creatine phosphokinase (CPK) \> upper limits of normal (ULN) 3. Screening alanine transaminase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \> 5 ULN 4. Screening total bilirubin \> 2 ULN 5. Screening serum creatinine \> 1.5 mg/dl 6. Significant renal disease, including nephritic syndrome, chronic kidney disease (defined as patients with markers of kidney damage or estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] of less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2). 7. Patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment (defined as Child-Pugh B/C) 8. Platelet count \<150 X 10\^3/microliter 9. Albumin \<3.5 g/dL 10. Presence of clinical complications of PBC or clinically significant hepatic decompensation 11. If female: known pregnancy, or has a positive urine pregnancy test (confirmed by a positive serum pregnancy test), or lactating 12. Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection 13. Medical conditions that may cause non-hepatic increases in ALP (e.g., Paget's disease)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relative Change From Baseline in Serum Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Levels at Week 12 (Endpoint)Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Relative change from baseline is in serum ALP levels at Week 12 (endpoint) were reported. Relative change from baseline is defined as percentage (%) change from baseline to endpoint.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP < 2 * Upper Limit of Normal at Endpoint, Total Bilirubin Within Normal Limits at Endpoint, and > 40% ALP Reduction From Baseline to Endpoint)Up to Week 12 (Endpoint)Percentage of participants with response defined by composite risk scores (ALP \< 2 \* ULN at endpoint, Total BIL within normal limits at endpoint, and \> 40% ALP reduction from baseline to endpoint) was reported.
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on PARIS I Risk Score at EndpointAt Week 12 (Endpoint)Percentage of participants with response based on Paris I risk score was defined as ALP less than or equal to (\<=) 3 \* ULN and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \<= 2 \* ULN and bilirubin within normal limits.
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on PARIS II Risk Score at EndpointAt Week 12 (Endpoint)Percentage of participants with response based on Paris II risk score was defined as ALP \<= 1.5 \* ULN and AST \<= 1.5 \* ULN and bilirubin within normal limits.
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Toronto I Risk Score at EndpointAt Week 12 (Endpoint)Percentage of participants with response based on Toronto I risk score was defined as ALP \<= 1.67 \*ULN.
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Toronto II Risk Score at EndpointAt Week 12 (Endpoint)Percentage of participants with response based on Toronto II risk scores was defined as ALP \<= 1.75 \* ULN.
Median Percentage Risk as Assessed by United Kingdom-Primary Biliary Cholangitis (UK-PBC) Risk Total Score at EndpointAt Week 12 (Endpoint)UK-PBC risk score at endpoint estimated that the median percentage risk that a participant treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) will develop liver failure requiring liver transplant in 5, 10 and 15 years. UK-PBC score was calculated at each of the 3 survivor functions 1-baseline survival function\^exp(0.0287854\*\[alpEPxuln-1.722136304\] - 0.0422873\*\[{(altastEPxuln/10)\^-1} - 8.675729006\] + 1.4199 \* \[ln{bilEPxuln /10}+2.709607778\] -1.960303\*\[albxlln -1.17673001\]-0.4161954\*\[ pltxlln -1.873564875\]). Where: Baseline survivor function=0. 982 (at 5 years); 0. 941 (at 10 years); 0.893 (at 15 years). alpEPxuln = ALP at endpoint/upper level normal ALP; altastEPxuln=(ALT, AST) at endpoint/upper level normal of the value; bilEPxuln=bilirubin at endpoint/upper level normal bilirubin; albxlln=albumin at baseline/albumin lower level normal; pltxlln=platelet count at baseline/ platelet count lower level normal.
Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by 10, 20 and 40 Percent Reduction in Alkaline PhosphataseAt Week 12 (Endpoint)Percentage of participants with response (defined by at least 10%, 20%, and 40% decrease in ALP from baseline to Endpoint) reported.
Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Alkaline Phosphatase Levels at EndpointAt Week 12 (Endpoint)The response was defined by normalized ALP levels (ALP ULN 105 units per liter \[U/L\] for females, 129 U/L for males) at endpoint.
Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Bilirubin (BIL) at EndpointAt Week 12 (Endpoint)The response was defined by normalized BIL levels (BIL ULN \<1.20 milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\]) at endpoint.
Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Albumin (ALB) Levels at EndpointAt Week 12 (Endpoint)The response was defined by normalized ALB levels (3.5-5.2 gram per deciliter \[g/dL\] for ages 18-60 years; 3.2-4.6 g/dL for ages 61-91 years) at endpoint.
Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in ALT levels at endpoint was reported.
Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in AST levels at endpoint was reported.
Change From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in GGT levels at endpoint was reported.
Change From Baseline in 5 Prime (') Nucleotidase Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in 5' nucleotidase levels at endpoint was reported. 5' nucleotidase is an enzyme used as a biomarker of hepatobiliary cholestasis and is less sensitive but more specific than GGT and ALP.
Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin (BIL) Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in total BIL levels at endpoint was reported.
Change From Baseline in Conjugated Bilirubin Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in conjugated bilirubin levels at endpoint was reported.
Change From Baseline in Albumin Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in albumin levels at endpoint was reported.
Change From Baseline in Cholesterol Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in cholesterol levels at endpoints was reported.
Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in LDL-cholesterol at endpoint was reported.
Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in HDL-cholesterol levels at endpoint was reported.
Change From Baseline in Triglycerides Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in triglycerides levels at endpoint was reported.
Change From Baseline in Total Free Bile Acid Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in total free bile acid levels at endpoint was reported.
Change From Baseline in Total Conjugated Bile Acid Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in total conjugated bile acid levels at endpoint was reported.
Change From Baseline in Total Bile Acid Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in total bile acid levels at endpoint was reported.
Change From Baseline in 7 Alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in 7 alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one levels at endpoint was reported.
Change From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor-19 Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in fibroblast growth factor-19 levels at endpoint was reported.
Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin M (IgM) Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in IgM levels at endpoint was reported.
Change From Baseline in Tumor Necrosis Factor Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in tumor necrosis factor levels at endpoint was reported.
Change From Baseline in Transforming Growth Factor Beta Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in transforming growth factor beta levels at endpoint was reported,
Change From Baseline in Interleukin 6 Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in interleukin 6 levels at endpoint was reported.
Change From Baseline in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Antigen (AG) Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 AG levels at endpoint was reported.
Change From Baseline in Cytokeratin-18 Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in cytokeratin-18 (M30 and M65) levels at endpoint was reported.
Change From Baseline in Autotaxin Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in autotaxin levels at endpoint was reported.
C-reactive Protein Level at EndpointWeek 12 (Endpoint)C-reactive protein level at endpoint was reported.
Change From Baseline in Haptoglobin Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in haptoglobin levels at endpoint was reported.
Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP< 1.67 * Upper Limit of Normal [ULN] at Endpoint, Total Bilirubin [BIL] Within Normal Limits at Endpoint, and Greater Than [>] 15% ALP Reduction From Baseline to Endpoint)Up to Week 12 (Endpoint)Percentage of participants with response defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP Less than \[\<\] 1.67 \* ULN at endpoint, Total BIL within normal limits at endpoint, and \> 15% ALP reduction from baseline to Endpoint) was reported.
Change From Baseline in 5D-Itch Scale Total ScoreBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)5 dimensional (5D)-Itch Scale is a reliable, multidimensional measure of itching that has been validated in participants with chronic pruritus to detect changes over time. It consists of 5 domains: duration, degree, direction, disability, and distribution. The duration, degree and direction domains each include one item, while the disability domain has four items (sleep, leisure/social, housework/errands, work/school). All items of the first four domains were measured on a 5-point Likert scale. The distribution domain included 16 potential locations of itch, including 15 body part items (head/scalp, soles, face, palms, chest, abdomen, back, buttocks, thighs, lower legs, tops of feet/toes, tops of hands/fingers, upper arms, groin, forearms) and one point of contact with clothing or bandages. Scores of each of five domains are achieved separately and then summed together to obtain a total 5-D score. 5-D scores can potentially range between 5 (no pruritus) and 25 (most severe pruritus).
Change From Baseline in Pruritus as Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Total ScoreBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)The VAS is a reliable and validated method of pruritus assessment. The VAS is adequate in assessing the severity of the symptom; it does not take into account other aspects of pruritus, such as the relative impact of pruritus on quality of life. The VAS, for pruritus assessment, requires the participant to use abstract thought processes to convert their itch severity to a mark on a continuum. A participant draws a line anywhere on the scale ranging from 0 to 10 (where 0 represents 'no itching' and 10 represents 'worst possible itching') that best represents the severity of participant's itching and the scoring involves manual measuring of the mark with a ruler on range of 0 to 100 millimeter (mm). Higher scores indicate worse itching.
Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)PBC-40 QoL Questionnaire is a patient-derived, disease-specific QoL measure developed and validated for use in PBC. It consists of 9 domains with total 40 questions as: 1) digestion and diet (questions 1-3, total score range: 3-15); 2) experiences (questions 4-7, total score range: 4-20); 3) itching (questions 8-10, total score range: 3-15); 4) fatigue (questions 11-18, total score range: 8-40); 5) effort and planning (questions 19-21, total score range: 3-15); 6) memory and concentration (questions 22-27, total score range: 6-30); 7) affects you as a person (questions 28-33, total score range: 6-30); 8) affects your social life (questions 34-37, total score range: 4-20); 9) overall impact on your life (questions 38-40, total score range: 3-15). PBC-40 QoL Questionnaire has 40 questions, each scored on scale of 1-5 (1 = least impact, 5 = greatest impact). For each domain, scoring involved summing individual question response scores. Higher scores indicate poorer quality of life.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsUp to Week 12An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation patient administered a pharmaceutical (investigational) product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A Serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is another medically important condition. TEAEs is defined as (1) it is not present when active phase of study (time of first dose) begins and is not a chronic condition that is part of patient's medical history, or it is present at start of active phase or as part of patient's medical history, but severity/frequency increases during active phase.
Change From Baseline in Fibrinogen Levels at EndpointBaseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)Change from baseline in fibrinogen levels at endpoint was reported.

Countries

France, Germany, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 68 participants were screened, out of which 45 participants were randomized, 15 participants in each of the 3 treatment groups.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Elafibranor 80mg
Participants received elafibranor 80 milligram (mg) tablets orally once daily for 12 weeks.
15
Elafibranor 120mg
Participants received elafibranor 120 mg tablets orally once daily for 12 weeks.
15
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once daily for 12 weeks.
15
Total45

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event010

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicElafibranor 80mgElafibranor 120mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants5 Participants4 Participants11 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
13 Participants10 Participants11 Participants34 Participants
Age, Continuous56.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
60.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9
60.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
59.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
12 Participants13 Participants10 Participants35 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants15 Participants14 Participants44 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants15 Participants14 Participants43 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
13 / 1513 / 1512 / 15
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 1513 / 1512 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 152 / 150 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Relative Change From Baseline in Serum Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Levels at Week 12 (Endpoint)

Relative change from baseline is in serum ALP levels at Week 12 (endpoint) were reported. Relative change from baseline is defined as percentage (%) change from baseline to endpoint.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgRelative Change From Baseline in Serum Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Levels at Week 12 (Endpoint)-48.264 Percent changeStandard Deviation 14.7676
Elafibranor 120mgRelative Change From Baseline in Serum Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Levels at Week 12 (Endpoint)-40.640 Percent changeStandard Deviation 17.3624
PlaceboRelative Change From Baseline in Serum Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Levels at Week 12 (Endpoint)3.190 Percent changeStandard Deviation 14.8059
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-62.5, -41.5]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-55.7, -32.1]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 5D-Itch Scale Total Score

5 dimensional (5D)-Itch Scale is a reliable, multidimensional measure of itching that has been validated in participants with chronic pruritus to detect changes over time. It consists of 5 domains: duration, degree, direction, disability, and distribution. The duration, degree and direction domains each include one item, while the disability domain has four items (sleep, leisure/social, housework/errands, work/school). All items of the first four domains were measured on a 5-point Likert scale. The distribution domain included 16 potential locations of itch, including 15 body part items (head/scalp, soles, face, palms, chest, abdomen, back, buttocks, thighs, lower legs, tops of feet/toes, tops of hands/fingers, upper arms, groin, forearms) and one point of contact with clothing or bandages. Scores of each of five domains are achieved separately and then summed together to obtain a total 5-D score. 5-D scores can potentially range between 5 (no pruritus) and 25 (most severe pruritus).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint. Here 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in 5D-Itch Scale Total Score-2.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.15
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in 5D-Itch Scale Total Score-0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 5D-Itch Scale Total Score0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.93
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 5 Prime (') Nucleotidase Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in 5' nucleotidase levels at endpoint was reported. 5' nucleotidase is an enzyme used as a biomarker of hepatobiliary cholestasis and is less sensitive but more specific than GGT and ALP.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in 5 Prime (') Nucleotidase Levels at Endpoint-7.81 U/LStandard Deviation 8.279
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in 5 Prime (') Nucleotidase Levels at Endpoint-4.59 U/LStandard Deviation 13.067
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 5 Prime (') Nucleotidase Levels at Endpoint-0.47 U/LStandard Deviation 3.491
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 7 Alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in 7 alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one levels at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in 7 Alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one Levels at Endpoint-16.29 10^-9 mol/LStandard Deviation 27.584
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in 7 Alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one Levels at Endpoint-10.04 10^-9 mol/LStandard Deviation 28.606
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 7 Alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one Levels at Endpoint5.22 10^-9 mol/LStandard Deviation 10.848
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in ALT levels at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at Endpoint-0.5 U/LStandard Deviation 57.38
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at Endpoint7.3 U/LStandard Deviation 29.13
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at Endpoint-1.2 U/LStandard Deviation 8.57
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Albumin Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in albumin levels at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Albumin Levels at Endpoint2.2 gram per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 2.54
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Albumin Levels at Endpoint2.3 gram per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 2.73
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Albumin Levels at Endpoint0.0 gram per liter (g/L)Standard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in AST levels at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Levels at Endpoint6.0 U/LStandard Deviation 55.29
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Levels at Endpoint11.1 U/LStandard Deviation 27.96
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Levels at Endpoint-4.3 U/LStandard Deviation 7.97
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Autotaxin Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in autotaxin levels at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Autotaxin Levels at Endpoint4.6 mcg/LStandard Deviation 156.92
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Autotaxin Levels at Endpoint49.9 mcg/LStandard Deviation 77.25
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Autotaxin Levels at Endpoint35.1 mcg/LStandard Deviation 161.58
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in cholesterol levels at endpoints was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint-0.455 millimole per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.7479
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint-0.387 millimole per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.6308
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint0.043 millimole per liter (mmol/L)Standard Deviation 0.3706
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Conjugated Bilirubin Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in conjugated bilirubin levels at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Conjugated Bilirubin Levels at Endpoint0.34 mcmol/LStandard Deviation 2.229
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Conjugated Bilirubin Levels at Endpoint-0.06 mcmol/LStandard Deviation 0.596
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Conjugated Bilirubin Levels at Endpoint0.45 mcmol/LStandard Deviation 1.526
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Cytokeratin-18 Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in cytokeratin-18 (M30 and M65) levels at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Cytokeratin-18 Levels at EndpointCytokeratin-18 M3026.12 picomole per liter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 472.247
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Cytokeratin-18 Levels at EndpointCytokeratin-18 M65114.31 picomole per liter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 627.068
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Cytokeratin-18 Levels at EndpointCytokeratin-18 M30163.33 picomole per liter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 499.5
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Cytokeratin-18 Levels at EndpointCytokeratin-18 M65238.97 picomole per liter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 611.52
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cytokeratin-18 Levels at EndpointCytokeratin-18 M3017.93 picomole per liter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 307.531
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Cytokeratin-18 Levels at EndpointCytokeratin-18 M65-53.16 picomole per liter (pmol/L)Standard Deviation 131.934
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fibrinogen Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in fibrinogen levels at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Fibrinogen Levels at Endpoint-0.865 g/LStandard Deviation 0.9472
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Fibrinogen Levels at Endpoint-0.452 g/LStandard Deviation 0.578
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fibrinogen Levels at Endpoint-0.072 g/LStandard Deviation 1.0936
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor-19 Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in fibroblast growth factor-19 levels at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor-19 Levels at Endpoint-21.67 nanogram per liter (ng/L)Standard Deviation 52.588
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor-19 Levels at Endpoint-16.96 nanogram per liter (ng/L)Standard Deviation 38.933
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor-19 Levels at Endpoint-47.08 nanogram per liter (ng/L)Standard Deviation 69.56
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in GGT levels at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Levels at Endpoint-91.5 U/LStandard Deviation 95.3
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Levels at Endpoint-61.9 U/LStandard Deviation 70.82
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Levels at Endpoint0.6 U/LStandard Deviation 54.4
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Haptoglobin Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in haptoglobin levels at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Haptoglobin Levels at Endpoint-0.265 g/LStandard Deviation 0.4271
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Haptoglobin Levels at Endpoint-0.254 g/LStandard Deviation 0.1088
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Haptoglobin Levels at Endpoint0.025 g/LStandard Deviation 0.2244
Secondary

Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in HDL-cholesterol levels at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint-0.017 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.3898
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint0.059 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.3391
PlaceboChange From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint-0.007 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.2988
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin M (IgM) Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in IgM levels at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Immunoglobulin M (IgM) Levels at Endpoint-0.339 g/LStandard Deviation 0.5846
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Immunoglobulin M (IgM) Levels at Endpoint-0.472 g/LStandard Deviation 0.5507
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Immunoglobulin M (IgM) Levels at Endpoint-0.076 g/LStandard Deviation 0.7227
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Interleukin 6 Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in interleukin 6 levels at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Interleukin 6 Levels at Endpoint-0.021 ng/LStandard Deviation 0.8337
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Interleukin 6 Levels at Endpoint-0.261 ng/LStandard Deviation 0.5213
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Interleukin 6 Levels at Endpoint-0.165 ng/LStandard Deviation 0.5624
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in LDL-cholesterol at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint-0.366 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.5919
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint-0.334 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.4848
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint0.061 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.3272
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Antigen (AG) Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 AG levels at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Antigen (AG) Levels at Endpoint-0.483 microgram per liter (mcg/L)Standard Deviation 2.9839
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Antigen (AG) Levels at Endpoint-1.739 microgram per liter (mcg/L)Standard Deviation 4.6587
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Antigen (AG) Levels at Endpoint-1.456 microgram per liter (mcg/L)Standard Deviation 4.6448
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores

PBC-40 QoL Questionnaire is a patient-derived, disease-specific QoL measure developed and validated for use in PBC. It consists of 9 domains with total 40 questions as: 1) digestion and diet (questions 1-3, total score range: 3-15); 2) experiences (questions 4-7, total score range: 4-20); 3) itching (questions 8-10, total score range: 3-15); 4) fatigue (questions 11-18, total score range: 8-40); 5) effort and planning (questions 19-21, total score range: 3-15); 6) memory and concentration (questions 22-27, total score range: 6-30); 7) affects you as a person (questions 28-33, total score range: 6-30); 8) affects your social life (questions 34-37, total score range: 4-20); 9) overall impact on your life (questions 38-40, total score range: 3-15). PBC-40 QoL Questionnaire has 40 questions, each scored on scale of 1-5 (1 = least impact, 5 = greatest impact). For each domain, scoring involved summing individual question response scores. Higher scores indicate poorer quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresAffects your Social Life1.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.08
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresDigestion and Diet-0.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.74
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresExperiences0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.64
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresItching-0.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.19
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresFatigue-1.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresEffort and Planning-0.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.03
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresMemory and concentration0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.26
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresAffecting you as a Person-1.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.78
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresImpact on your Life-0.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.04
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresEffort and Planning-0.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.31
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresImpact on your Life0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.63
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresDigestion and Diet-0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.24
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresAffects your Social Life0.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.47
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresExperiences-1.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.77
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresAffecting you as a Person-2.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.85
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresFatigue-1.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.71
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresMemory and concentration-1.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.33
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresItching-4.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.56
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresMemory and concentration-0.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.25
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresFatigue-1.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.04
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresAffects your Social Life1.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.79
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresEffort and Planning-0.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.98
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresImpact on your Life-1.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresItching2.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.78
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresDigestion and Diet-0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresExperiences-0.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.69
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire ScoresAffecting you as a Person-1.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.22
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pruritus as Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Total Score

The VAS is a reliable and validated method of pruritus assessment. The VAS is adequate in assessing the severity of the symptom; it does not take into account other aspects of pruritus, such as the relative impact of pruritus on quality of life. The VAS, for pruritus assessment, requires the participant to use abstract thought processes to convert their itch severity to a mark on a continuum. A participant draws a line anywhere on the scale ranging from 0 to 10 (where 0 represents 'no itching' and 10 represents 'worst possible itching') that best represents the severity of participant's itching and the scoring involves manual measuring of the mark with a ruler on range of 0 to 100 millimeter (mm). Higher scores indicate worse itching.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Pruritus as Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Total Score-4.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.8
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Pruritus as Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Total Score-4.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.81
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Pruritus as Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Total Score9.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.93
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in total bile acid levels at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Total Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint4760.11 10^-9 mol/LStandard Deviation 18919.661
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Total Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint-3953.86 10^-9 mol/LStandard Deviation 12008.62
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint1738.02 10^-9 mol/LStandard Deviation 26521.746
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin (BIL) Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in total BIL levels at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Total Bilirubin (BIL) Levels at Endpoint-0.23 micromole per liter (mcmol/L)Standard Deviation 3.425
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Total Bilirubin (BIL) Levels at Endpoint-0.51 micromole per liter (mcmol/L)Standard Deviation 2.821
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Bilirubin (BIL) Levels at Endpoint-0.01 micromole per liter (mcmol/L)Standard Deviation 3.548
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Conjugated Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in total conjugated bile acid levels at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Total Conjugated Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint5008.99 10^-9 mol/LStandard Deviation 17844.304
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Total Conjugated Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint-3280.16 10^-9 mol/LStandard Deviation 10941.769
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Conjugated Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint1873.22 10^-9 mol/LStandard Deviation 21795.349
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Total Free Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in total free bile acid levels at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Total Free Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint-248.88 10^-9 mole per liter (mol/L)Standard Deviation 2496.672
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Total Free Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint-673.71 10^-9 mole per liter (mol/L)Standard Deviation 2962.097
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Total Free Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint-135.20 10^-9 mole per liter (mol/L)Standard Deviation 6777.727
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Transforming Growth Factor Beta Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in transforming growth factor beta levels at endpoint was reported,

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Transforming Growth Factor Beta Levels at Endpoint734.7 ng/LStandard Deviation 2103.75
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Transforming Growth Factor Beta Levels at Endpoint297.2 ng/LStandard Deviation 2762.61
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Transforming Growth Factor Beta Levels at Endpoint-1163.0 ng/LStandard Deviation 4295.49
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Triglycerides Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in triglycerides levels at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Triglycerides Levels at Endpoint-0.155 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.346
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Triglycerides Levels at Endpoint-0.253 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.2085
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Triglycerides Levels at Endpoint-0.019 mmol/LStandard Deviation 0.3776
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Tumor Necrosis Factor Levels at Endpoint

Change from baseline in tumor necrosis factor levels at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Elafibranor 80mgChange From Baseline in Tumor Necrosis Factor Levels at Endpoint0.066 ng/LStandard Deviation 0.7829
Elafibranor 120mgChange From Baseline in Tumor Necrosis Factor Levels at Endpoint0.154 ng/LStandard Deviation 1.1374
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Tumor Necrosis Factor Levels at Endpoint0.053 ng/LStandard Deviation 0.8329
Secondary

C-reactive Protein Level at Endpoint

C-reactive protein level at endpoint was reported.

Time frame: Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Elafibranor 80mgC-reactive Protein Level at Endpoint2.74 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Elafibranor 120mgC-reactive Protein Level at Endpoint2.84 milligram per liter (mg/L)
PlaceboC-reactive Protein Level at Endpoint4.01 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Secondary

Median Percentage Risk as Assessed by United Kingdom-Primary Biliary Cholangitis (UK-PBC) Risk Total Score at Endpoint

UK-PBC risk score at endpoint estimated that the median percentage risk that a participant treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) will develop liver failure requiring liver transplant in 5, 10 and 15 years. UK-PBC score was calculated at each of the 3 survivor functions 1-baseline survival function\^exp(0.0287854\*\[alpEPxuln-1.722136304\] - 0.0422873\*\[{(altastEPxuln/10)\^-1} - 8.675729006\] + 1.4199 \* \[ln{bilEPxuln /10}+2.709607778\] -1.960303\*\[albxlln -1.17673001\]-0.4161954\*\[ pltxlln -1.873564875\]). Where: Baseline survivor function=0. 982 (at 5 years); 0. 941 (at 10 years); 0.893 (at 15 years). alpEPxuln = ALP at endpoint/upper level normal ALP; altastEPxuln=(ALT, AST) at endpoint/upper level normal of the value; bilEPxuln=bilirubin at endpoint/upper level normal bilirubin; albxlln=albumin at baseline/albumin lower level normal; pltxlln=platelet count at baseline/ platelet count lower level normal.

Time frame: At Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Elafibranor 80mgMedian Percentage Risk as Assessed by United Kingdom-Primary Biliary Cholangitis (UK-PBC) Risk Total Score at Endpoint10 year risk at Week 122.60 Percentage risk
Elafibranor 80mgMedian Percentage Risk as Assessed by United Kingdom-Primary Biliary Cholangitis (UK-PBC) Risk Total Score at Endpoint5 year risk at Week 120.80 Percentage risk
Elafibranor 80mgMedian Percentage Risk as Assessed by United Kingdom-Primary Biliary Cholangitis (UK-PBC) Risk Total Score at Endpoint15 year risk at Week 124.70 Percentage risk
Elafibranor 120mgMedian Percentage Risk as Assessed by United Kingdom-Primary Biliary Cholangitis (UK-PBC) Risk Total Score at Endpoint10 year risk at Week 123.05 Percentage risk
Elafibranor 120mgMedian Percentage Risk as Assessed by United Kingdom-Primary Biliary Cholangitis (UK-PBC) Risk Total Score at Endpoint5 year risk at Week 120.95 Percentage risk
Elafibranor 120mgMedian Percentage Risk as Assessed by United Kingdom-Primary Biliary Cholangitis (UK-PBC) Risk Total Score at Endpoint15 year risk at Week 125.55 Percentage risk
PlaceboMedian Percentage Risk as Assessed by United Kingdom-Primary Biliary Cholangitis (UK-PBC) Risk Total Score at Endpoint5 year risk at Week 121.30 Percentage risk
PlaceboMedian Percentage Risk as Assessed by United Kingdom-Primary Biliary Cholangitis (UK-PBC) Risk Total Score at Endpoint15 year risk at Week 128.00 Percentage risk
PlaceboMedian Percentage Risk as Assessed by United Kingdom-Primary Biliary Cholangitis (UK-PBC) Risk Total Score at Endpoint10 year risk at Week 124.40 Percentage risk
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation patient administered a pharmaceutical (investigational) product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A Serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is another medically important condition. TEAEs is defined as (1) it is not present when active phase of study (time of first dose) begins and is not a chronic condition that is part of patient's medical history, or it is present at start of active phase or as part of patient's medical history, but severity/frequency increases during active phase.

Time frame: Up to Week 12

Population: The Safety Set included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Elafibranor 80mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsTEAEs12 Participants
Elafibranor 80mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsSerious TEAEs0 Participants
Elafibranor 120mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsTEAEs13 Participants
Elafibranor 120mgNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsSerious TEAEs2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsTEAEs12 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse EventsSerious TEAEs0 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response Based on PARIS II Risk Score at Endpoint

Percentage of participants with response based on Paris II risk score was defined as ALP \<= 1.5 \* ULN and AST \<= 1.5 \* ULN and bilirubin within normal limits.

Time frame: At Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80mgPercentage of Participants With Response Based on PARIS II Risk Score at Endpoint53.3 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 120mgPercentage of Participants With Response Based on PARIS II Risk Score at Endpoint50.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response Based on PARIS II Risk Score at Endpoint0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response Based on PARIS I Risk Score at Endpoint

Percentage of participants with response based on Paris I risk score was defined as ALP less than or equal to (\<=) 3 \* ULN and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \<= 2 \* ULN and bilirubin within normal limits.

Time frame: At Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80mgPercentage of Participants With Response Based on PARIS I Risk Score at Endpoint80.0 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 120mgPercentage of Participants With Response Based on PARIS I Risk Score at Endpoint78.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response Based on PARIS I Risk Score at Endpoint53.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Toronto II Risk Score at Endpoint

Percentage of participants with response based on Toronto II risk scores was defined as ALP \<= 1.75 \* ULN.

Time frame: At Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80mgPercentage of Participants With Response Based on Toronto II Risk Score at Endpoint66.7 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 120mgPercentage of Participants With Response Based on Toronto II Risk Score at Endpoint78.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response Based on Toronto II Risk Score at Endpoint6.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Toronto I Risk Score at Endpoint

Percentage of participants with response based on Toronto I risk score was defined as ALP \<= 1.67 \*ULN.

Time frame: At Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80mgPercentage of Participants With Response Based on Toronto I Risk Score at Endpoint66.7 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 120mgPercentage of Participants With Response Based on Toronto I Risk Score at Endpoint78.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response Based on Toronto I Risk Score at Endpoint6.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by 10, 20 and 40 Percent Reduction in Alkaline Phosphatase

Percentage of participants with response (defined by at least 10%, 20%, and 40% decrease in ALP from baseline to Endpoint) reported.

Time frame: At Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80mgPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by 10, 20 and 40 Percent Reduction in Alkaline Phosphatase20 Percent Reduction93.3 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 80mgPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by 10, 20 and 40 Percent Reduction in Alkaline Phosphatase10 Percent Reduction93.3 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 80mgPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by 10, 20 and 40 Percent Reduction in Alkaline Phosphatase40 Percent Reduction86.7 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 120mgPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by 10, 20 and 40 Percent Reduction in Alkaline Phosphatase20 Percent Reduction92.9 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 120mgPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by 10, 20 and 40 Percent Reduction in Alkaline Phosphatase10 Percent Reduction92.9 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 120mgPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by 10, 20 and 40 Percent Reduction in Alkaline Phosphatase40 Percent Reduction57.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by 10, 20 and 40 Percent Reduction in Alkaline Phosphatase10 Percent Reduction13.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by 10, 20 and 40 Percent Reduction in Alkaline Phosphatase40 Percent Reduction0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by 10, 20 and 40 Percent Reduction in Alkaline Phosphatase20 Percent Reduction6.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP< 1.67 * Upper Limit of Normal [ULN] at Endpoint, Total Bilirubin [BIL] Within Normal Limits at Endpoint, and Greater Than [>] 15% ALP Reduction From Baseline to Endpoint)

Percentage of participants with response defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP Less than \[\<\] 1.67 \* ULN at endpoint, Total BIL within normal limits at endpoint, and \> 15% ALP reduction from baseline to Endpoint) was reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80mgPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP< 1.67 * Upper Limit of Normal [ULN] at Endpoint, Total Bilirubin [BIL] Within Normal Limits at Endpoint, and Greater Than [>] 15% ALP Reduction From Baseline to Endpoint)66.7 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 120mgPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP< 1.67 * Upper Limit of Normal [ULN] at Endpoint, Total Bilirubin [BIL] Within Normal Limits at Endpoint, and Greater Than [>] 15% ALP Reduction From Baseline to Endpoint)78.6 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP< 1.67 * Upper Limit of Normal [ULN] at Endpoint, Total Bilirubin [BIL] Within Normal Limits at Endpoint, and Greater Than [>] 15% ALP Reduction From Baseline to Endpoint)6.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP < 2 * Upper Limit of Normal at Endpoint, Total Bilirubin Within Normal Limits at Endpoint, and > 40% ALP Reduction From Baseline to Endpoint)

Percentage of participants with response defined by composite risk scores (ALP \< 2 \* ULN at endpoint, Total BIL within normal limits at endpoint, and \> 40% ALP reduction from baseline to endpoint) was reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80mgPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP < 2 * Upper Limit of Normal at Endpoint, Total Bilirubin Within Normal Limits at Endpoint, and > 40% ALP Reduction From Baseline to Endpoint)73.3 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 120mgPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP < 2 * Upper Limit of Normal at Endpoint, Total Bilirubin Within Normal Limits at Endpoint, and > 40% ALP Reduction From Baseline to Endpoint)42.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP < 2 * Upper Limit of Normal at Endpoint, Total Bilirubin Within Normal Limits at Endpoint, and > 40% ALP Reduction From Baseline to Endpoint)0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Albumin (ALB) Levels at Endpoint

The response was defined by normalized ALB levels (3.5-5.2 gram per deciliter \[g/dL\] for ages 18-60 years; 3.2-4.6 g/dL for ages 61-91 years) at endpoint.

Time frame: At Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80mgPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Albumin (ALB) Levels at Endpoint100 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 120mgPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Albumin (ALB) Levels at Endpoint100 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Albumin (ALB) Levels at Endpoint100 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Alkaline Phosphatase Levels at Endpoint

The response was defined by normalized ALP levels (ALP ULN 105 units per liter \[U/L\] for females, 129 U/L for males) at endpoint.

Time frame: At Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80mgPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Alkaline Phosphatase Levels at Endpoint13.3 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 120mgPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Alkaline Phosphatase Levels at Endpoint21.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Alkaline Phosphatase Levels at Endpoint0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Bilirubin (BIL) at Endpoint

The response was defined by normalized BIL levels (BIL ULN \<1.20 milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\]) at endpoint.

Time frame: At Week 12 (Endpoint)

Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Elafibranor 80mgPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Bilirubin (BIL) at Endpoint86.7 Percentage of participants
Elafibranor 120mgPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Bilirubin (BIL) at Endpoint92.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Bilirubin (BIL) at Endpoint93.3 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026