Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC)
Conditions
Keywords
Elafibranor, Primary Biliary Cholangitis, Alkaline phosphatase
Brief summary
The primary objective of the study is to compare the effect of daily oral administration of elafibranor 80mg and 120 mg on change in serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) to that of placebo in patients with PBC and inadequate response to Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA).
Interventions
Two coated tablets daily for 12 weeks
Two coated tablets daily for 12 weeks
Two coated tablets daily for 12 weeks
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Must have provided written informed consent 2. Definite or probable PBC diagnosis as demonstrated by the presence of at least 2 of the following 3 diagnostic factors: * History of elevated ALP levels for at least 6 months prior to Day 0 (randomization visit) * Positive Anti-Mitochondrial Antibodies (AMA) titers (\> 1/40 on immunofluorescence or M2 positive by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or positive PBC-specific antinuclear antibodies * Liver biopsy consistent with PBC 3. ALP \>= 1.67x upper limit of normal (ULN) 4. Taking UDCA for at least 12 months (stable dose for ≥ 6 months) prior to screening visit 5. Contraception: Females participating in this study must be of non-childbearing potential or must be using highly efficient contraception for the full duration of the study and for 1 month after the end of treatment.
Exclusion criteria
1. History or presence of other concomitant liver diseases 2. Screening creatine phosphokinase (CPK) \> upper limits of normal (ULN) 3. Screening alanine transaminase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \> 5 ULN 4. Screening total bilirubin \> 2 ULN 5. Screening serum creatinine \> 1.5 mg/dl 6. Significant renal disease, including nephritic syndrome, chronic kidney disease (defined as patients with markers of kidney damage or estimated glomerular filtration rate \[eGFR\] of less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m\^2). 7. Patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment (defined as Child-Pugh B/C) 8. Platelet count \<150 X 10\^3/microliter 9. Albumin \<3.5 g/dL 10. Presence of clinical complications of PBC or clinically significant hepatic decompensation 11. If female: known pregnancy, or has a positive urine pregnancy test (confirmed by a positive serum pregnancy test), or lactating 12. Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection 13. Medical conditions that may cause non-hepatic increases in ALP (e.g., Paget's disease)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Change From Baseline in Serum Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Levels at Week 12 (Endpoint) | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Relative change from baseline is in serum ALP levels at Week 12 (endpoint) were reported. Relative change from baseline is defined as percentage (%) change from baseline to endpoint. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP < 2 * Upper Limit of Normal at Endpoint, Total Bilirubin Within Normal Limits at Endpoint, and > 40% ALP Reduction From Baseline to Endpoint) | Up to Week 12 (Endpoint) | Percentage of participants with response defined by composite risk scores (ALP \< 2 \* ULN at endpoint, Total BIL within normal limits at endpoint, and \> 40% ALP reduction from baseline to endpoint) was reported. |
| Percentage of Participants With Response Based on PARIS I Risk Score at Endpoint | At Week 12 (Endpoint) | Percentage of participants with response based on Paris I risk score was defined as ALP less than or equal to (\<=) 3 \* ULN and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \<= 2 \* ULN and bilirubin within normal limits. |
| Percentage of Participants With Response Based on PARIS II Risk Score at Endpoint | At Week 12 (Endpoint) | Percentage of participants with response based on Paris II risk score was defined as ALP \<= 1.5 \* ULN and AST \<= 1.5 \* ULN and bilirubin within normal limits. |
| Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Toronto I Risk Score at Endpoint | At Week 12 (Endpoint) | Percentage of participants with response based on Toronto I risk score was defined as ALP \<= 1.67 \*ULN. |
| Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Toronto II Risk Score at Endpoint | At Week 12 (Endpoint) | Percentage of participants with response based on Toronto II risk scores was defined as ALP \<= 1.75 \* ULN. |
| Median Percentage Risk as Assessed by United Kingdom-Primary Biliary Cholangitis (UK-PBC) Risk Total Score at Endpoint | At Week 12 (Endpoint) | UK-PBC risk score at endpoint estimated that the median percentage risk that a participant treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) will develop liver failure requiring liver transplant in 5, 10 and 15 years. UK-PBC score was calculated at each of the 3 survivor functions 1-baseline survival function\^exp(0.0287854\*\[alpEPxuln-1.722136304\] - 0.0422873\*\[{(altastEPxuln/10)\^-1} - 8.675729006\] + 1.4199 \* \[ln{bilEPxuln /10}+2.709607778\] -1.960303\*\[albxlln -1.17673001\]-0.4161954\*\[ pltxlln -1.873564875\]). Where: Baseline survivor function=0. 982 (at 5 years); 0. 941 (at 10 years); 0.893 (at 15 years). alpEPxuln = ALP at endpoint/upper level normal ALP; altastEPxuln=(ALT, AST) at endpoint/upper level normal of the value; bilEPxuln=bilirubin at endpoint/upper level normal bilirubin; albxlln=albumin at baseline/albumin lower level normal; pltxlln=platelet count at baseline/ platelet count lower level normal. |
| Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by 10, 20 and 40 Percent Reduction in Alkaline Phosphatase | At Week 12 (Endpoint) | Percentage of participants with response (defined by at least 10%, 20%, and 40% decrease in ALP from baseline to Endpoint) reported. |
| Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Alkaline Phosphatase Levels at Endpoint | At Week 12 (Endpoint) | The response was defined by normalized ALP levels (ALP ULN 105 units per liter \[U/L\] for females, 129 U/L for males) at endpoint. |
| Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Bilirubin (BIL) at Endpoint | At Week 12 (Endpoint) | The response was defined by normalized BIL levels (BIL ULN \<1.20 milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\]) at endpoint. |
| Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Albumin (ALB) Levels at Endpoint | At Week 12 (Endpoint) | The response was defined by normalized ALB levels (3.5-5.2 gram per deciliter \[g/dL\] for ages 18-60 years; 3.2-4.6 g/dL for ages 61-91 years) at endpoint. |
| Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in ALT levels at endpoint was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in AST levels at endpoint was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in GGT levels at endpoint was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in 5 Prime (') Nucleotidase Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in 5' nucleotidase levels at endpoint was reported. 5' nucleotidase is an enzyme used as a biomarker of hepatobiliary cholestasis and is less sensitive but more specific than GGT and ALP. |
| Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin (BIL) Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in total BIL levels at endpoint was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in Conjugated Bilirubin Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in conjugated bilirubin levels at endpoint was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in Albumin Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in albumin levels at endpoint was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in cholesterol levels at endpoints was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in LDL-cholesterol at endpoint was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in HDL-cholesterol levels at endpoint was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in Triglycerides Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in triglycerides levels at endpoint was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in Total Free Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in total free bile acid levels at endpoint was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in Total Conjugated Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in total conjugated bile acid levels at endpoint was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in Total Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in total bile acid levels at endpoint was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in 7 Alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in 7 alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one levels at endpoint was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor-19 Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in fibroblast growth factor-19 levels at endpoint was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin M (IgM) Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in IgM levels at endpoint was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in Tumor Necrosis Factor Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in tumor necrosis factor levels at endpoint was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in Transforming Growth Factor Beta Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in transforming growth factor beta levels at endpoint was reported, |
| Change From Baseline in Interleukin 6 Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in interleukin 6 levels at endpoint was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Antigen (AG) Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 AG levels at endpoint was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in Cytokeratin-18 Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in cytokeratin-18 (M30 and M65) levels at endpoint was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in Autotaxin Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in autotaxin levels at endpoint was reported. |
| C-reactive Protein Level at Endpoint | Week 12 (Endpoint) | C-reactive protein level at endpoint was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in Haptoglobin Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in haptoglobin levels at endpoint was reported. |
| Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP< 1.67 * Upper Limit of Normal [ULN] at Endpoint, Total Bilirubin [BIL] Within Normal Limits at Endpoint, and Greater Than [>] 15% ALP Reduction From Baseline to Endpoint) | Up to Week 12 (Endpoint) | Percentage of participants with response defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP Less than \[\<\] 1.67 \* ULN at endpoint, Total BIL within normal limits at endpoint, and \> 15% ALP reduction from baseline to Endpoint) was reported. |
| Change From Baseline in 5D-Itch Scale Total Score | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | 5 dimensional (5D)-Itch Scale is a reliable, multidimensional measure of itching that has been validated in participants with chronic pruritus to detect changes over time. It consists of 5 domains: duration, degree, direction, disability, and distribution. The duration, degree and direction domains each include one item, while the disability domain has four items (sleep, leisure/social, housework/errands, work/school). All items of the first four domains were measured on a 5-point Likert scale. The distribution domain included 16 potential locations of itch, including 15 body part items (head/scalp, soles, face, palms, chest, abdomen, back, buttocks, thighs, lower legs, tops of feet/toes, tops of hands/fingers, upper arms, groin, forearms) and one point of contact with clothing or bandages. Scores of each of five domains are achieved separately and then summed together to obtain a total 5-D score. 5-D scores can potentially range between 5 (no pruritus) and 25 (most severe pruritus). |
| Change From Baseline in Pruritus as Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Total Score | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | The VAS is a reliable and validated method of pruritus assessment. The VAS is adequate in assessing the severity of the symptom; it does not take into account other aspects of pruritus, such as the relative impact of pruritus on quality of life. The VAS, for pruritus assessment, requires the participant to use abstract thought processes to convert their itch severity to a mark on a continuum. A participant draws a line anywhere on the scale ranging from 0 to 10 (where 0 represents 'no itching' and 10 represents 'worst possible itching') that best represents the severity of participant's itching and the scoring involves manual measuring of the mark with a ruler on range of 0 to 100 millimeter (mm). Higher scores indicate worse itching. |
| Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | PBC-40 QoL Questionnaire is a patient-derived, disease-specific QoL measure developed and validated for use in PBC. It consists of 9 domains with total 40 questions as: 1) digestion and diet (questions 1-3, total score range: 3-15); 2) experiences (questions 4-7, total score range: 4-20); 3) itching (questions 8-10, total score range: 3-15); 4) fatigue (questions 11-18, total score range: 8-40); 5) effort and planning (questions 19-21, total score range: 3-15); 6) memory and concentration (questions 22-27, total score range: 6-30); 7) affects you as a person (questions 28-33, total score range: 6-30); 8) affects your social life (questions 34-37, total score range: 4-20); 9) overall impact on your life (questions 38-40, total score range: 3-15). PBC-40 QoL Questionnaire has 40 questions, each scored on scale of 1-5 (1 = least impact, 5 = greatest impact). For each domain, scoring involved summing individual question response scores. Higher scores indicate poorer quality of life. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events | Up to Week 12 | An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation patient administered a pharmaceutical (investigational) product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A Serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is another medically important condition. TEAEs is defined as (1) it is not present when active phase of study (time of first dose) begins and is not a chronic condition that is part of patient's medical history, or it is present at start of active phase or as part of patient's medical history, but severity/frequency increases during active phase. |
| Change From Baseline in Fibrinogen Levels at Endpoint | Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint) | Change from baseline in fibrinogen levels at endpoint was reported. |
Countries
France, Germany, Spain, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
A total of 68 participants were screened, out of which 45 participants were randomized, 15 participants in each of the 3 treatment groups.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg Participants received elafibranor 80 milligram (mg) tablets orally once daily for 12 weeks. | 15 |
| Elafibranor 120mg Participants received elafibranor 120 mg tablets orally once daily for 12 weeks. | 15 |
| Placebo Participants received matching placebo tablets orally once daily for 12 weeks. | 15 |
| Total | 45 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Elafibranor 80mg | Elafibranor 120mg | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 2 Participants | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 13 Participants | 10 Participants | 11 Participants | 34 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 56.5 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7 | 60.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9 | 60.5 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6 | 59.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 5 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 12 Participants | 13 Participants | 10 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 15 Participants | 15 Participants | 14 Participants | 44 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 14 Participants | 15 Participants | 14 Participants | 43 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 13 / 15 | 13 / 15 | 12 / 15 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 12 / 15 | 13 / 15 | 12 / 15 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 15 | 2 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
Outcome results
Relative Change From Baseline in Serum Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Levels at Week 12 (Endpoint)
Relative change from baseline is in serum ALP levels at Week 12 (endpoint) were reported. Relative change from baseline is defined as percentage (%) change from baseline to endpoint.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Relative Change From Baseline in Serum Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Levels at Week 12 (Endpoint) | -48.264 Percent change | Standard Deviation 14.7676 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Relative Change From Baseline in Serum Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Levels at Week 12 (Endpoint) | -40.640 Percent change | Standard Deviation 17.3624 |
| Placebo | Relative Change From Baseline in Serum Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) Levels at Week 12 (Endpoint) | 3.190 Percent change | Standard Deviation 14.8059 |
Change From Baseline in 5D-Itch Scale Total Score
5 dimensional (5D)-Itch Scale is a reliable, multidimensional measure of itching that has been validated in participants with chronic pruritus to detect changes over time. It consists of 5 domains: duration, degree, direction, disability, and distribution. The duration, degree and direction domains each include one item, while the disability domain has four items (sleep, leisure/social, housework/errands, work/school). All items of the first four domains were measured on a 5-point Likert scale. The distribution domain included 16 potential locations of itch, including 15 body part items (head/scalp, soles, face, palms, chest, abdomen, back, buttocks, thighs, lower legs, tops of feet/toes, tops of hands/fingers, upper arms, groin, forearms) and one point of contact with clothing or bandages. Scores of each of five domains are achieved separately and then summed together to obtain a total 5-D score. 5-D scores can potentially range between 5 (no pruritus) and 25 (most severe pruritus).
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint. Here 'N' (overall number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in 5D-Itch Scale Total Score | -2.1 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.15 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in 5D-Itch Scale Total Score | -0.1 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.19 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in 5D-Itch Scale Total Score | 0.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.93 |
Change From Baseline in 5 Prime (') Nucleotidase Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in 5' nucleotidase levels at endpoint was reported. 5' nucleotidase is an enzyme used as a biomarker of hepatobiliary cholestasis and is less sensitive but more specific than GGT and ALP.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in 5 Prime (') Nucleotidase Levels at Endpoint | -7.81 U/L | Standard Deviation 8.279 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in 5 Prime (') Nucleotidase Levels at Endpoint | -4.59 U/L | Standard Deviation 13.067 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in 5 Prime (') Nucleotidase Levels at Endpoint | -0.47 U/L | Standard Deviation 3.491 |
Change From Baseline in 7 Alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in 7 alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one levels at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in 7 Alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one Levels at Endpoint | -16.29 10^-9 mol/L | Standard Deviation 27.584 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in 7 Alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one Levels at Endpoint | -10.04 10^-9 mol/L | Standard Deviation 28.606 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in 7 Alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one Levels at Endpoint | 5.22 10^-9 mol/L | Standard Deviation 10.848 |
Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in ALT levels at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at Endpoint | -0.5 U/L | Standard Deviation 57.38 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at Endpoint | 7.3 U/L | Standard Deviation 29.13 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at Endpoint | -1.2 U/L | Standard Deviation 8.57 |
Change From Baseline in Albumin Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in albumin levels at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Albumin Levels at Endpoint | 2.2 gram per liter (g/L) | Standard Deviation 2.54 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Albumin Levels at Endpoint | 2.3 gram per liter (g/L) | Standard Deviation 2.73 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Albumin Levels at Endpoint | 0.0 gram per liter (g/L) | Standard Deviation 2.2 |
Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in AST levels at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Levels at Endpoint | 6.0 U/L | Standard Deviation 55.29 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Levels at Endpoint | 11.1 U/L | Standard Deviation 27.96 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Levels at Endpoint | -4.3 U/L | Standard Deviation 7.97 |
Change From Baseline in Autotaxin Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in autotaxin levels at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Autotaxin Levels at Endpoint | 4.6 mcg/L | Standard Deviation 156.92 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Autotaxin Levels at Endpoint | 49.9 mcg/L | Standard Deviation 77.25 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Autotaxin Levels at Endpoint | 35.1 mcg/L | Standard Deviation 161.58 |
Change From Baseline in Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in cholesterol levels at endpoints was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint | -0.455 millimole per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.7479 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint | -0.387 millimole per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.6308 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint | 0.043 millimole per liter (mmol/L) | Standard Deviation 0.3706 |
Change From Baseline in Conjugated Bilirubin Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in conjugated bilirubin levels at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Conjugated Bilirubin Levels at Endpoint | 0.34 mcmol/L | Standard Deviation 2.229 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Conjugated Bilirubin Levels at Endpoint | -0.06 mcmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.596 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Conjugated Bilirubin Levels at Endpoint | 0.45 mcmol/L | Standard Deviation 1.526 |
Change From Baseline in Cytokeratin-18 Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in cytokeratin-18 (M30 and M65) levels at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Cytokeratin-18 Levels at Endpoint | Cytokeratin-18 M30 | 26.12 picomole per liter (pmol/L) | Standard Deviation 472.247 |
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Cytokeratin-18 Levels at Endpoint | Cytokeratin-18 M65 | 114.31 picomole per liter (pmol/L) | Standard Deviation 627.068 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Cytokeratin-18 Levels at Endpoint | Cytokeratin-18 M30 | 163.33 picomole per liter (pmol/L) | Standard Deviation 499.5 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Cytokeratin-18 Levels at Endpoint | Cytokeratin-18 M65 | 238.97 picomole per liter (pmol/L) | Standard Deviation 611.52 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Cytokeratin-18 Levels at Endpoint | Cytokeratin-18 M30 | 17.93 picomole per liter (pmol/L) | Standard Deviation 307.531 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Cytokeratin-18 Levels at Endpoint | Cytokeratin-18 M65 | -53.16 picomole per liter (pmol/L) | Standard Deviation 131.934 |
Change From Baseline in Fibrinogen Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in fibrinogen levels at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Fibrinogen Levels at Endpoint | -0.865 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.9472 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Fibrinogen Levels at Endpoint | -0.452 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.578 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Fibrinogen Levels at Endpoint | -0.072 g/L | Standard Deviation 1.0936 |
Change From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor-19 Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in fibroblast growth factor-19 levels at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor-19 Levels at Endpoint | -21.67 nanogram per liter (ng/L) | Standard Deviation 52.588 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor-19 Levels at Endpoint | -16.96 nanogram per liter (ng/L) | Standard Deviation 38.933 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor-19 Levels at Endpoint | -47.08 nanogram per liter (ng/L) | Standard Deviation 69.56 |
Change From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in GGT levels at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Levels at Endpoint | -91.5 U/L | Standard Deviation 95.3 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Levels at Endpoint | -61.9 U/L | Standard Deviation 70.82 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Levels at Endpoint | 0.6 U/L | Standard Deviation 54.4 |
Change From Baseline in Haptoglobin Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in haptoglobin levels at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Haptoglobin Levels at Endpoint | -0.265 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.4271 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Haptoglobin Levels at Endpoint | -0.254 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.1088 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Haptoglobin Levels at Endpoint | 0.025 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.2244 |
Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in HDL-cholesterol levels at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint | -0.017 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.3898 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint | 0.059 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.3391 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint | -0.007 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.2988 |
Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin M (IgM) Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in IgM levels at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin M (IgM) Levels at Endpoint | -0.339 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.5846 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin M (IgM) Levels at Endpoint | -0.472 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.5507 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Immunoglobulin M (IgM) Levels at Endpoint | -0.076 g/L | Standard Deviation 0.7227 |
Change From Baseline in Interleukin 6 Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in interleukin 6 levels at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Interleukin 6 Levels at Endpoint | -0.021 ng/L | Standard Deviation 0.8337 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Interleukin 6 Levels at Endpoint | -0.261 ng/L | Standard Deviation 0.5213 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Interleukin 6 Levels at Endpoint | -0.165 ng/L | Standard Deviation 0.5624 |
Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in LDL-cholesterol at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint | -0.366 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.5919 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint | -0.334 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.4848 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Levels at Endpoint | 0.061 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.3272 |
Change From Baseline in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Antigen (AG) Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 AG levels at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Antigen (AG) Levels at Endpoint | -0.483 microgram per liter (mcg/L) | Standard Deviation 2.9839 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Antigen (AG) Levels at Endpoint | -1.739 microgram per liter (mcg/L) | Standard Deviation 4.6587 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Antigen (AG) Levels at Endpoint | -1.456 microgram per liter (mcg/L) | Standard Deviation 4.6448 |
Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores
PBC-40 QoL Questionnaire is a patient-derived, disease-specific QoL measure developed and validated for use in PBC. It consists of 9 domains with total 40 questions as: 1) digestion and diet (questions 1-3, total score range: 3-15); 2) experiences (questions 4-7, total score range: 4-20); 3) itching (questions 8-10, total score range: 3-15); 4) fatigue (questions 11-18, total score range: 8-40); 5) effort and planning (questions 19-21, total score range: 3-15); 6) memory and concentration (questions 22-27, total score range: 6-30); 7) affects you as a person (questions 28-33, total score range: 6-30); 8) affects your social life (questions 34-37, total score range: 4-20); 9) overall impact on your life (questions 38-40, total score range: 3-15). PBC-40 QoL Questionnaire has 40 questions, each scored on scale of 1-5 (1 = least impact, 5 = greatest impact). For each domain, scoring involved summing individual question response scores. Higher scores indicate poorer quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Affects your Social Life | 1.3 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.08 |
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Digestion and Diet | -0.3 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.74 |
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Experiences | 0.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.64 |
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Itching | -0.9 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.19 |
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Fatigue | -1.9 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.1 |
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Effort and Planning | -0.9 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.03 |
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Memory and concentration | 0.1 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.26 |
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Affecting you as a Person | -1.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.78 |
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Impact on your Life | -0.1 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.04 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Effort and Planning | -0.8 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.31 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Impact on your Life | 0.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.63 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Digestion and Diet | -0.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.24 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Affects your Social Life | 0.0 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.47 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Experiences | -1.3 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.77 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Affecting you as a Person | -2.5 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.85 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Fatigue | -1.4 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.71 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Memory and concentration | -1.5 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.33 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Itching | -4.1 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 6.56 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Memory and concentration | -0.5 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.25 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Fatigue | -1.5 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.04 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Affects your Social Life | 1.4 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.79 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Effort and Planning | -0.9 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.98 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Impact on your Life | -1.0 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Itching | 2.1 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.78 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Digestion and Diet | -0.6 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Experiences | -0.7 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.69 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Primary Biliary Cholangitis -40 (PBC-40) Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire Scores | Affecting you as a Person | -1.3 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.22 |
Change From Baseline in Pruritus as Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Total Score
The VAS is a reliable and validated method of pruritus assessment. The VAS is adequate in assessing the severity of the symptom; it does not take into account other aspects of pruritus, such as the relative impact of pruritus on quality of life. The VAS, for pruritus assessment, requires the participant to use abstract thought processes to convert their itch severity to a mark on a continuum. A participant draws a line anywhere on the scale ranging from 0 to 10 (where 0 represents 'no itching' and 10 represents 'worst possible itching') that best represents the severity of participant's itching and the scoring involves manual measuring of the mark with a ruler on range of 0 to 100 millimeter (mm). Higher scores indicate worse itching.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies number of participants evaluable for this outcome measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Pruritus as Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Total Score | -4.4 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.8 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Pruritus as Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Total Score | -4.7 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.81 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Pruritus as Assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Total Score | 9.3 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 35.93 |
Change From Baseline in Total Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in total bile acid levels at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Total Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint | 4760.11 10^-9 mol/L | Standard Deviation 18919.661 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Total Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint | -3953.86 10^-9 mol/L | Standard Deviation 12008.62 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Total Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint | 1738.02 10^-9 mol/L | Standard Deviation 26521.746 |
Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin (BIL) Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in total BIL levels at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin (BIL) Levels at Endpoint | -0.23 micromole per liter (mcmol/L) | Standard Deviation 3.425 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin (BIL) Levels at Endpoint | -0.51 micromole per liter (mcmol/L) | Standard Deviation 2.821 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin (BIL) Levels at Endpoint | -0.01 micromole per liter (mcmol/L) | Standard Deviation 3.548 |
Change From Baseline in Total Conjugated Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in total conjugated bile acid levels at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Total Conjugated Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint | 5008.99 10^-9 mol/L | Standard Deviation 17844.304 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Total Conjugated Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint | -3280.16 10^-9 mol/L | Standard Deviation 10941.769 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Total Conjugated Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint | 1873.22 10^-9 mol/L | Standard Deviation 21795.349 |
Change From Baseline in Total Free Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in total free bile acid levels at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Total Free Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint | -248.88 10^-9 mole per liter (mol/L) | Standard Deviation 2496.672 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Total Free Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint | -673.71 10^-9 mole per liter (mol/L) | Standard Deviation 2962.097 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Total Free Bile Acid Levels at Endpoint | -135.20 10^-9 mole per liter (mol/L) | Standard Deviation 6777.727 |
Change From Baseline in Transforming Growth Factor Beta Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in transforming growth factor beta levels at endpoint was reported,
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Transforming Growth Factor Beta Levels at Endpoint | 734.7 ng/L | Standard Deviation 2103.75 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Transforming Growth Factor Beta Levels at Endpoint | 297.2 ng/L | Standard Deviation 2762.61 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Transforming Growth Factor Beta Levels at Endpoint | -1163.0 ng/L | Standard Deviation 4295.49 |
Change From Baseline in Triglycerides Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in triglycerides levels at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Triglycerides Levels at Endpoint | -0.155 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.346 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Triglycerides Levels at Endpoint | -0.253 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.2085 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Triglycerides Levels at Endpoint | -0.019 mmol/L | Standard Deviation 0.3776 |
Change From Baseline in Tumor Necrosis Factor Levels at Endpoint
Change from baseline in tumor necrosis factor levels at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Change From Baseline in Tumor Necrosis Factor Levels at Endpoint | 0.066 ng/L | Standard Deviation 0.7829 |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Change From Baseline in Tumor Necrosis Factor Levels at Endpoint | 0.154 ng/L | Standard Deviation 1.1374 |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Tumor Necrosis Factor Levels at Endpoint | 0.053 ng/L | Standard Deviation 0.8329 |
C-reactive Protein Level at Endpoint
C-reactive protein level at endpoint was reported.
Time frame: Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (GEOMETRIC_MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | C-reactive Protein Level at Endpoint | 2.74 milligram per liter (mg/L) |
| Elafibranor 120mg | C-reactive Protein Level at Endpoint | 2.84 milligram per liter (mg/L) |
| Placebo | C-reactive Protein Level at Endpoint | 4.01 milligram per liter (mg/L) |
Median Percentage Risk as Assessed by United Kingdom-Primary Biliary Cholangitis (UK-PBC) Risk Total Score at Endpoint
UK-PBC risk score at endpoint estimated that the median percentage risk that a participant treated with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) will develop liver failure requiring liver transplant in 5, 10 and 15 years. UK-PBC score was calculated at each of the 3 survivor functions 1-baseline survival function\^exp(0.0287854\*\[alpEPxuln-1.722136304\] - 0.0422873\*\[{(altastEPxuln/10)\^-1} - 8.675729006\] + 1.4199 \* \[ln{bilEPxuln /10}+2.709607778\] -1.960303\*\[albxlln -1.17673001\]-0.4161954\*\[ pltxlln -1.873564875\]). Where: Baseline survivor function=0. 982 (at 5 years); 0. 941 (at 10 years); 0.893 (at 15 years). alpEPxuln = ALP at endpoint/upper level normal ALP; altastEPxuln=(ALT, AST) at endpoint/upper level normal of the value; bilEPxuln=bilirubin at endpoint/upper level normal bilirubin; albxlln=albumin at baseline/albumin lower level normal; pltxlln=platelet count at baseline/ platelet count lower level normal.
Time frame: At Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Median Percentage Risk as Assessed by United Kingdom-Primary Biliary Cholangitis (UK-PBC) Risk Total Score at Endpoint | 10 year risk at Week 12 | 2.60 Percentage risk |
| Elafibranor 80mg | Median Percentage Risk as Assessed by United Kingdom-Primary Biliary Cholangitis (UK-PBC) Risk Total Score at Endpoint | 5 year risk at Week 12 | 0.80 Percentage risk |
| Elafibranor 80mg | Median Percentage Risk as Assessed by United Kingdom-Primary Biliary Cholangitis (UK-PBC) Risk Total Score at Endpoint | 15 year risk at Week 12 | 4.70 Percentage risk |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Median Percentage Risk as Assessed by United Kingdom-Primary Biliary Cholangitis (UK-PBC) Risk Total Score at Endpoint | 10 year risk at Week 12 | 3.05 Percentage risk |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Median Percentage Risk as Assessed by United Kingdom-Primary Biliary Cholangitis (UK-PBC) Risk Total Score at Endpoint | 5 year risk at Week 12 | 0.95 Percentage risk |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Median Percentage Risk as Assessed by United Kingdom-Primary Biliary Cholangitis (UK-PBC) Risk Total Score at Endpoint | 15 year risk at Week 12 | 5.55 Percentage risk |
| Placebo | Median Percentage Risk as Assessed by United Kingdom-Primary Biliary Cholangitis (UK-PBC) Risk Total Score at Endpoint | 5 year risk at Week 12 | 1.30 Percentage risk |
| Placebo | Median Percentage Risk as Assessed by United Kingdom-Primary Biliary Cholangitis (UK-PBC) Risk Total Score at Endpoint | 15 year risk at Week 12 | 8.00 Percentage risk |
| Placebo | Median Percentage Risk as Assessed by United Kingdom-Primary Biliary Cholangitis (UK-PBC) Risk Total Score at Endpoint | 10 year risk at Week 12 | 4.40 Percentage risk |
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation patient administered a pharmaceutical (investigational) product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A Serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is another medically important condition. TEAEs is defined as (1) it is not present when active phase of study (time of first dose) begins and is not a chronic condition that is part of patient's medical history, or it is present at start of active phase or as part of patient's medical history, but severity/frequency increases during active phase.
Time frame: Up to Week 12
Population: The Safety Set included all randomized participants who were administered at least one dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events | TEAEs | 12 Participants |
| Elafibranor 80mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events | Serious TEAEs | 0 Participants |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events | TEAEs | 13 Participants |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events | Serious TEAEs | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events | TEAEs | 12 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Treatment Emergent Adverse Events | Serious TEAEs | 0 Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on PARIS II Risk Score at Endpoint
Percentage of participants with response based on Paris II risk score was defined as ALP \<= 1.5 \* ULN and AST \<= 1.5 \* ULN and bilirubin within normal limits.
Time frame: At Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Based on PARIS II Risk Score at Endpoint | 53.3 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Based on PARIS II Risk Score at Endpoint | 50.0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response Based on PARIS II Risk Score at Endpoint | 0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on PARIS I Risk Score at Endpoint
Percentage of participants with response based on Paris I risk score was defined as ALP less than or equal to (\<=) 3 \* ULN and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \<= 2 \* ULN and bilirubin within normal limits.
Time frame: At Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Based on PARIS I Risk Score at Endpoint | 80.0 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Based on PARIS I Risk Score at Endpoint | 78.6 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response Based on PARIS I Risk Score at Endpoint | 53.3 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Toronto II Risk Score at Endpoint
Percentage of participants with response based on Toronto II risk scores was defined as ALP \<= 1.75 \* ULN.
Time frame: At Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Toronto II Risk Score at Endpoint | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Toronto II Risk Score at Endpoint | 78.6 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Toronto II Risk Score at Endpoint | 6.7 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Toronto I Risk Score at Endpoint
Percentage of participants with response based on Toronto I risk score was defined as ALP \<= 1.67 \*ULN.
Time frame: At Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Toronto I Risk Score at Endpoint | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Toronto I Risk Score at Endpoint | 78.6 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response Based on Toronto I Risk Score at Endpoint | 6.7 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by 10, 20 and 40 Percent Reduction in Alkaline Phosphatase
Percentage of participants with response (defined by at least 10%, 20%, and 40% decrease in ALP from baseline to Endpoint) reported.
Time frame: At Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by 10, 20 and 40 Percent Reduction in Alkaline Phosphatase | 20 Percent Reduction | 93.3 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 80mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by 10, 20 and 40 Percent Reduction in Alkaline Phosphatase | 10 Percent Reduction | 93.3 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 80mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by 10, 20 and 40 Percent Reduction in Alkaline Phosphatase | 40 Percent Reduction | 86.7 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by 10, 20 and 40 Percent Reduction in Alkaline Phosphatase | 20 Percent Reduction | 92.9 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by 10, 20 and 40 Percent Reduction in Alkaline Phosphatase | 10 Percent Reduction | 92.9 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by 10, 20 and 40 Percent Reduction in Alkaline Phosphatase | 40 Percent Reduction | 57.1 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by 10, 20 and 40 Percent Reduction in Alkaline Phosphatase | 10 Percent Reduction | 13.3 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by 10, 20 and 40 Percent Reduction in Alkaline Phosphatase | 40 Percent Reduction | 0 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by 10, 20 and 40 Percent Reduction in Alkaline Phosphatase | 20 Percent Reduction | 6.7 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP< 1.67 * Upper Limit of Normal [ULN] at Endpoint, Total Bilirubin [BIL] Within Normal Limits at Endpoint, and Greater Than [>] 15% ALP Reduction From Baseline to Endpoint)
Percentage of participants with response defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP Less than \[\<\] 1.67 \* ULN at endpoint, Total BIL within normal limits at endpoint, and \> 15% ALP reduction from baseline to Endpoint) was reported.
Time frame: Up to Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP< 1.67 * Upper Limit of Normal [ULN] at Endpoint, Total Bilirubin [BIL] Within Normal Limits at Endpoint, and Greater Than [>] 15% ALP Reduction From Baseline to Endpoint) | 66.7 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP< 1.67 * Upper Limit of Normal [ULN] at Endpoint, Total Bilirubin [BIL] Within Normal Limits at Endpoint, and Greater Than [>] 15% ALP Reduction From Baseline to Endpoint) | 78.6 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP< 1.67 * Upper Limit of Normal [ULN] at Endpoint, Total Bilirubin [BIL] Within Normal Limits at Endpoint, and Greater Than [>] 15% ALP Reduction From Baseline to Endpoint) | 6.7 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP < 2 * Upper Limit of Normal at Endpoint, Total Bilirubin Within Normal Limits at Endpoint, and > 40% ALP Reduction From Baseline to Endpoint)
Percentage of participants with response defined by composite risk scores (ALP \< 2 \* ULN at endpoint, Total BIL within normal limits at endpoint, and \> 40% ALP reduction from baseline to endpoint) was reported.
Time frame: Up to Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP < 2 * Upper Limit of Normal at Endpoint, Total Bilirubin Within Normal Limits at Endpoint, and > 40% ALP Reduction From Baseline to Endpoint) | 73.3 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP < 2 * Upper Limit of Normal at Endpoint, Total Bilirubin Within Normal Limits at Endpoint, and > 40% ALP Reduction From Baseline to Endpoint) | 42.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Composite Risk Scores (ALP < 2 * Upper Limit of Normal at Endpoint, Total Bilirubin Within Normal Limits at Endpoint, and > 40% ALP Reduction From Baseline to Endpoint) | 0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Albumin (ALB) Levels at Endpoint
The response was defined by normalized ALB levels (3.5-5.2 gram per deciliter \[g/dL\] for ages 18-60 years; 3.2-4.6 g/dL for ages 61-91 years) at endpoint.
Time frame: At Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Albumin (ALB) Levels at Endpoint | 100 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Albumin (ALB) Levels at Endpoint | 100 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Albumin (ALB) Levels at Endpoint | 100 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Alkaline Phosphatase Levels at Endpoint
The response was defined by normalized ALP levels (ALP ULN 105 units per liter \[U/L\] for females, 129 U/L for males) at endpoint.
Time frame: At Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Alkaline Phosphatase Levels at Endpoint | 13.3 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Alkaline Phosphatase Levels at Endpoint | 21.4 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Alkaline Phosphatase Levels at Endpoint | 0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Bilirubin (BIL) at Endpoint
The response was defined by normalized BIL levels (BIL ULN \<1.20 milligram per deciliter \[mg/dL\]) at endpoint.
Time frame: At Week 12 (Endpoint)
Population: The mITT analysis set included all randomized participants who received at least one study drug dose with available baseline value and at least one post baseline value for the primary endpoint.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Elafibranor 80mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Bilirubin (BIL) at Endpoint | 86.7 Percentage of participants |
| Elafibranor 120mg | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Bilirubin (BIL) at Endpoint | 92.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Response Defined by Normalized Bilirubin (BIL) at Endpoint | 93.3 Percentage of participants |