Skip to content

Loteprednol vs. Prednisolone and Fluorometholone

Efficacy and Safety of Loteprednol 0.5% Gel for Routine Prophylaxis After Photorefractive Keratectomy Compared to Prednisolone Acetate 1% Suspension and Fluorometholone 0.1% Suspension

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03123614
Enrollment
131
Registered
2017-04-21
Start date
2014-09-19
Completion date
2018-07-31
Last updated
2021-05-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intraocular Pressure, Corneal Opacity

Keywords

Photorefractive keratectomy

Brief summary

Corneal haze, in which the cornea becomes cloudy, is a well-known and a potentially vision-threatening postoperative complication of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Topical ophthalmic corticosteroids are routinely prescribed by most surgeons postoperatively to help prevent this complication. Goals of topical steroids use after PRK include effective modulation of the healing response to prevent corneal haze while at the same time minimizing side effects, such as intraocular pressure elevation or cataract formation. Loteprednol etabonate is a corticosteroid that exerts its therapeutic effects and is then quickly changed into inactive metabolites. This relatively fast metabolism of loteprednol gives it a lower side effect profile than other steroids, including a smaller effect on intraocular pressure. In the ophthalmic literature, there is currently no consensus on a standard regimen or which type of corticosteroid should be used after PRK. Investigators are conducting a prospective, randomized trial to compare the incidence of intraocular pressure rise and visually significant postoperative corneal haze after PRK with the use of loteprednol 0.5% gel compared to the use of earlier generation steroids, prednisolone acetate 1% suspension and fluorometholone 0.1% suspension.

Interventions

DRUGLoteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Oph Gel

Sponsors

University of Utah
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Examiners are masked to the treatment arm when obtaining measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP) and grading corneal haze.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All subjects who are deemed suitable candidates for PRK after routine refractive surgery screening will be considered eligible for participation in this study. * Subjects must be at least 21 years of age and not pregnant or nursing (due to fluctuations in visual parameters during pregnancy).

Exclusion criteria

* Selection will be consistent with the current standard of care for PRK. Any patient that is not a suitable candidate for PRK will not be included.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline Through Month 3Baseline, 1 week post-op, 1 month post-op, 2 months post-op, 3 months post-opIntraocular pressure will be measured by applanation tonometry

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Eyes With Corneal Haze12 monthsAs determined by slit lamp examination
Uncorrected Visual Acuity3 monthsBest uncorrected visual acuity will be measured at 3 months
Best Corrected Visual Acuity at 3 Months3 monthsBest uncorrected visual acuity will be measured at 3 months

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Oph Gel
Group 1 will use loteprednol 0.5% gel in both eyes, starting at a frequency of four times per day for the first week and then tapered off based on clinical judgement of the corneal healing response. Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Oph Gel
57
Prednisolone Acetate 1% Oph Susp
Group 2 will use prednisolone acetate 1% suspension in both eyes, starting at a frequency of four times per day for the first week, then tapered down to a regimen of fluorometholone 0.1% suspension, which will then be tapered off based on clinical judgement of the corneal healing response. Prednisolone Acetate 1% Oph Susp
74
Total131

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLoteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Oph GelPrednisolone Acetate 1% Oph SuspTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
57 Participants74 Participants131 Participants
Age, Continuous34.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
35.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
35.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.3
Intraocular Pressure14.38 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.11
14.30 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.13
14.34 mmHg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.12
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
57 Participants74 Participants131 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants36 Participants60 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
33 Participants38 Participants71 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 570 / 74
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 577 / 74
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 570 / 74

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline Through Month 3

Intraocular pressure will be measured by applanation tonometry

Time frame: Baseline, 1 week post-op, 1 month post-op, 2 months post-op, 3 months post-op

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Oph GelChange in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline Through Month 3IOP 1 week postop13.67 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.34
Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Oph GelChange in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline Through Month 3IOP 2 months postop13.36 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.53
Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Oph GelChange in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline Through Month 3IOP 1 month postop14.15 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.88
Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Oph GelChange in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline Through Month 3IOP 3 months postop13.15 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.43
Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Oph GelChange in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline Through Month 3Baseline intraocular pressure (IOP)14.38 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.11
Prednisolone Acetate 1% Oph SuspChange in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline Through Month 3IOP 3 months postop12.22 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.38
Prednisolone Acetate 1% Oph SuspChange in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline Through Month 3Baseline intraocular pressure (IOP)14.30 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.13
Prednisolone Acetate 1% Oph SuspChange in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline Through Month 3IOP 1 week postop13.28 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.37
Prednisolone Acetate 1% Oph SuspChange in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline Through Month 3IOP 1 month postop14.60 mmHgStandard Deviation 4.2
Prednisolone Acetate 1% Oph SuspChange in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline Through Month 3IOP 2 months postop13.16 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.8
Secondary

Best Corrected Visual Acuity at 3 Months

Best uncorrected visual acuity will be measured at 3 months

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Oph GelBest Corrected Visual Acuity at 3 Months-0.120 logMARStandard Deviation 0.059
Prednisolone Acetate 1% Oph SuspBest Corrected Visual Acuity at 3 Months-0.114 logMARStandard Deviation 0.03
Secondary

Number of Eyes With Corneal Haze

As determined by slit lamp examination

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Oph GelNumber of Eyes With Corneal Haze3 Eyes
Prednisolone Acetate 1% Oph SuspNumber of Eyes With Corneal Haze7 Eyes
Secondary

Uncorrected Visual Acuity

Best uncorrected visual acuity will be measured at 3 months

Time frame: 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Oph GelUncorrected Visual Acuity-0.078 logMARStandard Deviation 0.1
Prednisolone Acetate 1% Oph SuspUncorrected Visual Acuity-0.075 logMARStandard Deviation 0.09

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026