Skip to content

Use of Point-of-care Ultrasound in High Risk Surgical Patients

Effects of Perioperative Point-of-care Ultrasound Assessment on Postoperative Outcomes in High Risk Surgical Patients

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03123536
Enrollment
200
Registered
2017-04-21
Start date
2017-02-01
Completion date
2018-09-30
Last updated
2017-04-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiopulmonary, Outcomes, Ultrasonography

Keywords

high risk, complication, Ultrasonography

Brief summary

There is currently a lack of evidence to support the use of perioperative point-of-care ultrasound to assess the outcomes in high risk surgical patients. Thus, the purposes of this study were to evaluate whether perioperative use of point-of-care ultrasound can reduce the worse postoperative outcomes in high surgical patients.

Detailed description

Point-of-care ultrasound is increasingly established as a useful bedside tool when performed by the anesthesiologist for evaluation of cardiopulmonary dysfunction and other emergent situations. However, it remains unclear whether use of perioperative point-of-care ultrasound can reduce the worse postoperative outcomes in high surgical risk patients. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups. In the point-of-care ultrasound group, treatment was oriented by the findings of point-of-care ultrasound, while in the control group the decisions about the management of patients were made by the experience of the clinical team. The primary outcome measures were hospital mortality and 28-day mortality, and the secondary outcome measures were the complications and length of hospital stay.

Interventions

DEVICEPoint-of-care Ultrasound

Patients' management in the point-of-care ultrasound group will be adjusted according to the results of ultrasound, whereas patients in the control group the decisions about the management were made by the experience of clinical team.

Sponsors

Zhongda Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who have comprised cardiovascular,respiratory diseases,or other critical illness.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who decline to participate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HypotensionWithin 7 days after surgeryPatients who have hypotension which is defined by mean arterial pressure less than 60 mmHg

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026