Skip to content

Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation and Substance Use

Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation and Substance Use

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03122587
Enrollment
38
Registered
2017-04-21
Start date
2017-05-15
Completion date
2019-02-01
Last updated
2020-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Substance Use Disorders

Keywords

tACS, Brain Stimulation, Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation, Substance Use

Brief summary

The will investigate the feasibility and effectiveness and initial efficacy of non-invasive transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on distress tolerance and inhibitory control among treatment seeking substance users.

Detailed description

Disruptions in inhibitory control (IC) and distress tolerance (DT) are implicated in the development and maintenance of substance use disorders. Findings suggest that differential DLPFC engagement during affective and cognitive processing, and in particular, distress tolerance, in substance use disorder may be malleable, providing a promising intervention. Modulating neural oscillations with non-invasive, safe brain stimulation by targeting regions such as the DLPFC may provide an avenue to improve distress tolerance and inhibitory control in SUD. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) may be a particularly promising approach as it is a safe and non-invasive method of electric stimulation that has the potential to effectively modulate neural network and circuit dynamics, more closely aligning with a network-based conceptualization of affective and cognitive processesThis study will test the effects of tACS on distress tolerance and inhibitory control among treatment-seeking adults with substance use disorder.

Interventions

DEVICETranscranial Alternating Current Stimulation at 10 Hz

Non-invasive, safe transcranial alternating current stimulation administered at 10 Hz to target alpha oscillatory activity

DEVICETranscranial Alternating Current Stimulation at 40 Hz

Non-invasive, safe transcranial alternating current stimulation administered at 40 Hz to target gamma oscillatory activity

DEVICEActive sham transcranial alternating current stimulation

Active sham (placebo)

Sponsors

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V) Substance Use Disorder * Current smoker * Abstinent from all substances (except nicotine) for at least the past 2 weeks

Exclusion criteria

* Current use of antiepileptic drugs and/or benzodiazepines * Less than 6 months since an electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) session * Current DSM-V Psychotic Disorder * Pregnancy and/or nursing * Ongoing or history of traumatic brain injury (TBI), reoccurring seizures, stroke, or brain tumors * Medical or neurological illness * Brain devices and/or implants

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Distress Tolerance (Mean Latency to Quit the PASAT-C)From Session 1 to Session 2, up to 6 daysThe Computerized Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT-C) is a psychological distress-inducing task. Numbers are presented sequentially on a computer screen and participants are asked to add the currently presented number to the previously presented number before the next number is presented. Participants select the answer using a computer mouse on a number pad displayed on the computer screen below the presented numbers. The speed of the number presentations is individually titrated in order to account for some individual differences in cognitive capacity, but not to secure equal performance among individuals. Incorrect or delayed responses are met with an aversive explosion sound. Distress tolerance is the latency to task termination (i.e., time until quit in minutes).
Change in Inhibitory Control (Mean D-prime on the Go/No-Go)From Session 1 to Session 2, up to 6 daysDuring the computerized Go/No-Go task, participants view a serial stream of pictures and are instructed to continuously press a button on the computer keyboard, but inhibit responses when stimuli are presented consecutively. Inhibitory control will be calculated as d-prime \[z(hit rate) - z(false alarm rate)\]. Each z-score of 0 is equal to the mean of the reference population, with a standard deviation of 1. Positive d-prime values indicate more inhibitory control, and negative values indicate less inhibitory control.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active Sham Stimulation (Session 1 and Session 2)
Active sham transcranial alternating current stimulation: Active sham (placebo)
13
Active Sham (Session 1) and tACS at 10 Hz (Session 2)
Active Sham during Session 1 and Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation at 10 Hz during Session 2 Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation at 10 Hz: Non-invasive, safe transcranial alternating current stimulation administered at 10 Hz to target alpha oscillatory activity
12
Active Sham (Session 1) and tACS at 40 Hz (Session 2)
Active Sham during Session 1 and Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation at 40 Hz during Session 2 Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation at 40 Hz: Non-invasive, safe transcranial alternating current stimulation administered at 40 Hz to target gamma oscillatory activity
13
Total38

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive Sham Stimulation (Session 1 and Session 2)TotalActive Sham (Session 1) and tACS at 40 Hz (Session 2)Active Sham (Session 1) and tACS at 10 Hz (Session 2)
Age, Continuous43.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
43.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
42.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
43.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants11 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
3 Participants5 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
7 Participants22 Participants7 Participants8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
13 Participants38 Participants13 Participants12 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants13 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants25 Participants8 Participants9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 130 / 120 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 130 / 120 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 130 / 120 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Distress Tolerance (Mean Latency to Quit the PASAT-C)

The Computerized Paced Auditory Serial Addition Task (PASAT-C) is a psychological distress-inducing task. Numbers are presented sequentially on a computer screen and participants are asked to add the currently presented number to the previously presented number before the next number is presented. Participants select the answer using a computer mouse on a number pad displayed on the computer screen below the presented numbers. The speed of the number presentations is individually titrated in order to account for some individual differences in cognitive capacity, but not to secure equal performance among individuals. Incorrect or delayed responses are met with an aversive explosion sound. Distress tolerance is the latency to task termination (i.e., time until quit in minutes).

Time frame: From Session 1 to Session 2, up to 6 days

Population: 3 participants did not have data due to impedance issues, behavioral noncompliance, and technology error

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Sham Stimulation (Session 1 and Session 2)Change in Distress Tolerance (Mean Latency to Quit the PASAT-C)11.2 minutesStandard Deviation 5.5
Active Sham (Session 1) and tACS at 10 Hz (Session 2)Change in Distress Tolerance (Mean Latency to Quit the PASAT-C)9.8 minutesStandard Deviation 6.4
Active Sham (Session 1) and tACS at 40 Hz (Session 2)Change in Distress Tolerance (Mean Latency to Quit the PASAT-C)9.4 minutesStandard Deviation 6.2
Primary

Change in Inhibitory Control (Mean D-prime on the Go/No-Go)

During the computerized Go/No-Go task, participants view a serial stream of pictures and are instructed to continuously press a button on the computer keyboard, but inhibit responses when stimuli are presented consecutively. Inhibitory control will be calculated as d-prime \[z(hit rate) - z(false alarm rate)\]. Each z-score of 0 is equal to the mean of the reference population, with a standard deviation of 1. Positive d-prime values indicate more inhibitory control, and negative values indicate less inhibitory control.

Time frame: From Session 1 to Session 2, up to 6 days

Population: 3 participants did not have data due to impedance issues, behavioral noncompliance, and technology error

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active Sham Stimulation (Session 1 and Session 2)Change in Inhibitory Control (Mean D-prime on the Go/No-Go)-0.6 z-scoreStandard Deviation 2
Active Sham (Session 1) and tACS at 10 Hz (Session 2)Change in Inhibitory Control (Mean D-prime on the Go/No-Go)0.9 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.7
Active Sham (Session 1) and tACS at 40 Hz (Session 2)Change in Inhibitory Control (Mean D-prime on the Go/No-Go)-0.3 z-scoreStandard Deviation 1.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026