Skip to content

70 vs 110 Degree Side-cut Angles in Femtosecond LASIK

70 Versus 110 Degrees Side-cut Angles in Femtosecond Laser-assisted in Situ Keratomileusis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03122535
Enrollment
115
Registered
2017-04-20
Start date
2014-10-07
Completion date
2019-03-21
Last updated
2021-05-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Operative Incision

Keywords

Femtosecond LASIK (FS--LASIK), Visual acuity, Refractive errors, Side-cut angles

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare 70 and 110 degree side-cut angles on the same patient undergoing Femtosecond Laser-assisted in Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK).

Detailed description

LASIK has become the preferred corneal procedure to correct certain refractive errors. One of the major advancements in LASIK has been the introduction of Femtosecond Laser technology for flap creation. Several studies have compared microkeratome and femtosecond laser technology, showing superior accuracy and precision of flap dimensions in the latter. The Femtosecond Laser technology provides different parameters and settings that can be changed according to the surgeon's preference. One of such parameters is the side-cut angle. Some of the most common side-cut angles used today include 45, 70, 90, and 110 degrees. Previous studies have reported on the visual outcomes of side-cut angles, but head to head comparisons are lacking. Currently, there are no studies comparing the safety and efficacy of the 70 and 110 side-cut angles in FS-LASIK. Information regarding the outcomes and complication rates between these side-cut angles will provide an objective measure that can be used when deciding which one is more suitable in FS-LASIK. One angle will be performed on the right eye and the other on the left eye. The study will evaluate uncorrected visual acuity, best corrected visual acuity, intraoperative, and postoperative complications. Performing different side-cut angles on the same individual will allow a direct comparison of outcomes, minimizing confounding variables.

Interventions

DEVICEFS-LASIK 70 degree side-cut angle

FS-LASIK surgical procedures will be performed according to the surgeons' standard practices. Patient will be masked as to the treatment they receive in either eye so as not to influence their subjective responses and visual measurements. Patients will be discontinued from the study if, on the day of surgery, both eyes cannot be randomized and operated as per protocol.

DEVICEFS-LASIK 110 degree side-cut angle

FS-LASIK surgical procedures will be performed according to the surgeons' standard practices. Patient will be masked as to the treatment they receive in either eye so as not to influence their subjective responses and visual measurements. Patients will be discontinued from the study if, on the day of surgery, both eyes cannot be randomized and operated as per protocol.

Sponsors

University of Utah
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Each participant will be masked as to which angle of cut is used in which eye. Each patient will receive a 70 degree cut in one eye and a 110 degree cut in the fellow eye

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects who are deemed suitable candidates for bilateral LASIK will be considered eligible for participation in this study. Correction will be distance for both eyes.

Exclusion criteria

* Selection will be consistent with current standard of care. Any patient that is not a suitable candidate for LASIK will not be included.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Uncorrected Visual Acuity at One Yearone yearVision testing without correction, both eyes using Snellen Eye chart

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Best Corrected Visual Acuity at Year Oneone yearVision testing with correction, both eyes using Snellen Eye chart

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
Each patient will be masked as to which angle of cut is used in which eye. Each patient will receive a 70 degree cut in one eye and a 110 degree cut in the fellow eye. FS-LASIK 70 degree side-cut angle: FS-LASIK surgical procedures will be performed according to the surgeons' standard practices. Patient will be masked as to the treatment they receive in either eye so as not to influence their subjective responses and visual measurements. Patients will be discontinued from the study if, on the day of surgery, both eyes cannot be randomized and operated as per protocol. FS-LASIK 110 degree side-cut angle: FS-LASIK surgical procedures will be performed according to the surgeons' standard practices. Patient will be masked as to the treatment they receive in either eye so as not to influence their subjective responses and visual measurements. Patients will be discontinued from the study if, on the day of surgery, both eyes cannot be randomized and operated as per protocol.
115
Total115

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up6868
Overall StudyPhysician Decision33
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
115 Participants
Age, Continuous31.96 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
93 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
50 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1150 / 115
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 1152 / 115
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1150 / 115

Outcome results

Primary

Uncorrected Visual Acuity at One Year

Vision testing without correction, both eyes using Snellen Eye chart

Time frame: one year

Population: This is a contralateral eye study of 115 subjects, each with one eye randomized to the two study groups.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FS-LASIK 70 Degree Side-cut AngleUncorrected Visual Acuity at One Year-0.082 logMAR Visual AcuityStandard Deviation 0.065
FS-LASIK 110 Degree Side-cut AngleUncorrected Visual Acuity at One Year-0.094 logMAR Visual AcuityStandard Deviation 0.072
Secondary

Best Corrected Visual Acuity at Year One

Vision testing with correction, both eyes using Snellen Eye chart

Time frame: one year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FS-LASIK 70 Degree Side-cut AngleBest Corrected Visual Acuity at Year One-0.109 logMAR Visual AcuityStandard Deviation 0.066
FS-LASIK 110 Degree Side-cut AngleBest Corrected Visual Acuity at Year One-0.116 logMAR Visual AcuityStandard Deviation 0.06

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026