Healthy
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study was to conduct a side by side comparison of the accuracy of respiratory rate (RR) between our investigational Rainbow Acoustic Monitoring (RAM) small sensor and the FDA-cleared RAM Revision D sensor in healthy volunteers under controlled conditions.
Interventions
Noninvasive acoustic monitoring device
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Male or female * Physical status of ASA I or II * Must be able to read and communicate in English * Has signed written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* ASA physical status of III, IV, and V * Subject has any medical condition which in the judgement of the investigator, renders them inappropriate for participating in this study * Inability to tolerate sitting still or minimal movement for at least 30 minutes
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Performance comparison of RAM sensors by ARMS calculation | 50 minutes | Performance comparison was determined by comparing the noninvasive respiration rate measurement of the RAM sensors and calculating the arithmetic root mean square (Arms) error value. |
Countries
United States