Acute Cholecystitis
Conditions
Keywords
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Delayed Cholecystectomy
Brief summary
This study examines complications, mortality rates, cost-effectiveness and safety of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC). Group L (n:88) patients treated surgically with laparoscopic cholecystectomy immediately or Group D (n:88) patients first treated medically and than treated surgically with delayed (4-8 weeks later) laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Detailed description
There is only few knowledge about the comparison of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC) for the treatment of acute cholecystitis considering the surgeon's work experience. This study examines complications, mortality rates, cost-effectiveness and safety of DLC versus ELC. This prospective randomized clinical trial was performed between November 2015-2016 in our General Surgery Clinic. Patients suffering acute cholecystitis in their first 72 hours of pain were enrolled in one of the two study groups: Group L (n:88) patients treated surgically with laparoscopic cholecystectomy immediately or Group D (n:88) patients first treated medically and than treated surgically with delayed (4-8 weeks later) laparoscopic cholecystectomy. All operations and medical treatments were done by surgeons having work experience \<2 years.
Interventions
PROCEDURElaparoscopic cholecystectomy
First trocar was inserted with Hasson method (Subumbilical 1 cm vertical incision was made and first 10-mm trocar (VersaportTM plus V2, Covidien, USA) inserted under direct vision) and pneumoperitoneum was created with 12 mm Hg pressure. Second 10-mm trocar was inserted from subxyphoid area. Two 5-mm trocars were inserted in the right upper quadrant area. After general intrabdominal exploration, dissection was started to ensure safe-view of Calot triangle. In case of quite tough gallbladder for griping, gallbladder was drained with a gray intravenous cannula. Cystic artery and cystic duct were separately dissected and twice ligated with Endo Clip™ II ML (Covidien, USA). Gallbladder was dissected from liver bed carefully. Gallbladder was taken out from abdomen through the subumbilical incision.
Sponsors
Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
patients suffering acute pain because of acute cholecystitis
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* patients suffering acute cholecystitis in their first 72 hours of pain
Exclusion criteria
* clinical duration longer than 72 hours, complicated acute cholecystitis (bilirubin \>2gr/dl, elevated transaminases (\>100 u/l), and cholestatic enzymes (gamma glutamyl transferase \>50 u/l), ultrasonographically confirmed dilated intrahepatic or extrahepatic bile ducts, and elevated amylase levels three times more than normal range
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Hospital stay | 4 to 8 weeks | time spent totally in the hospital; time from admission to discharge from hospital in days |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Costs of treatment | 4 to 8 weeks | costs of treatment spent for surgery and hospital stay in days; costs of treatment from admission to discharge from hospital in USD |
Outcome results
None listed