Skip to content

Comparison of CPAP Machines With Reusable vs Disposable Circuits

Randomised Trial Comparing CPAP Machines With Reusable vs Disposable Circuits

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03121612
Enrollment
51
Registered
2017-04-20
Start date
2017-08-01
Completion date
2018-10-15
Last updated
2019-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn

Keywords

RDS

Brief summary

The study aims to assess the basic functionality of a newly designed CPAP machine with reusable circuits to existing machines with disposable circuits, for treatment of newborn infants diagnosed with respiratory distress syndrome. The assessment will compare a comprehensive list of physiological parameters over the first 72 hours of treatment, and will also monitor rates of side effects and adverse events. The null hypothesis is that infants treated on the two categories of machine (reusable vs disposable) will not differ in relation to key physiological parameters by more than 0.63 standard deviations.

Detailed description

One of the commonest sources of serious newborn morbidity and mortality is difficulty with breathing. When this occurs, three main types of supportive therapy are available to increase the provision of oxygen to cells: a) passive provision of oxygen-enriched gases (i.e., higher than the 21% O2 found in the earth's atmosphere) through tubes in the nostrils, or by putting a hood over the baby's head and enriching the gases under that hood; b) provision of room air or oxygen-enriched gasses under pressure, frequently performed using a method called continuous positive airway pressure \[CPAP\] therapy; and/or c) by using a machine that is able to breath on behalf of the baby, most commonly referred to as mechanical ventilation \[MV\]. Passive therapy is the least invasive method but is also of limited benefit, particularly for infants born preterm. CPAP is more effective than passive methods because continuous distending pressure to the lungs allows better oxygen exchange; however, the distending pressure increases the risk of damage to the lung. MV is the only method that can be used on babies without a neurological impulse to breath, but the mechanical breathing action can damage the lungs, and MV is usually provided through a tube inserted into the lungs which increases the risk of lung infection; MV machines are also significantly more expensive than CPAP machines. In high resource settings, CPAP is now the preferred method of providing oxygen for infants where passive therapy is insufficient, because of the lower infection risk, lower risk of lung damage, and relative ease of clinical care. CPAP is increasingly recommended for low resource settings, but the CPAP machines used in high resource settings are too expensive for low resource settings due to high-priced consumables ($US50-200/baby), and are usually unusable in low resource settings because they require 'medical air' (clean air in a cylinder, or through a piped wall system) with which to blend 100% oxygen. Low cost 'indigenous' machines ('jury-rigged' by hospital staff) have also been developed, but these do not provide the heated, humidified and blended gasses, that are recommended for CPAP. This study seeks to evaluate a novel CPAP machine that provides heated, humidified, blended gasses, in line with recommendations for high-resource settings, while massively reducing costs by including re-usable tube sets and humidifiers that can be autoclaved, and with an on-board air-compressor to allow use in a broader range of clinical settings. By reducing the cost per CPAP treatment, such a machine can dramatically increase the number of hospitals in low resource settings that can provide high quality CPAP treatment.

Interventions

DEVICECPAP

CPAP therapy

Sponsors

MS Ramaiah Medical College & Hospitals
CollaboratorOTHER
Wellcome Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Medical Technology Transfer and Services Hong Kong Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

As the machines are physically distinct, blinding of participants, care providers and investigators is not feasible. The assessment of most outcomes cannot therefore be blinded, with one exception: x-rays for neonates with suspected pneumothorax will be provided to a radiologist for independent verification; the radiologist will not be in the nursery and will therefore be blinded to treatment allocation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Minutes to 24 Hours
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Infants born at Ramaiah Medical College hospital ('inborn infants'); 2. Infants born elsewhere, and admitted to Ramaiah Medical College hospital under 6 hours of age (outborn infants); 3. Infants with a gestational age at birth (weeks +days) in the range ≥ 28+0 to ≤ 36+6; 4. Infants thought to have RDS (clinically diagnosed after onset of respiratory distress \<6 hours of age, sometimes confirmed by X-ray showing homogenous bilateral opacity) who would routinely be provided CPAP therapy; and 5. Infants \<24 hours old at the time of fulfilling other inclusion criteria.

Exclusion criteria

1. Infants with a 1-minute Apgar score \<3 (as a marker of severe birth asphyxia); 2. Infants who received MV prior to randomisation; 3. Infants with suspected meconium aspiration syndrome will be excluded to avoid any imbalance in this condition across groups; 4. Infants clinically suspected to have another specified serious condition as their main disease process, diagnosed prior to randomisation, specifically: cardiac anomaly, other congenital malformation with respiratory sequelae, septicaemia, pulmonary haemorrhage, pneumothorax, meningitis, poor respiratory effort or recurrent apnoea, or brain haemorrhage (IVH Grades III or IV); 5. Infants who have an airway abnormality precluding the use of the standard CPAP interface proposed for this study (e.g., Pierre-Robin sequence, cleft lip or cleft palate) or who have a neuromuscular condition that interferes with respiration; 6. Any infant whose treating clinician believes should not be randomised due to some other condition, or for any other reason (reason to be documented).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
FiO26, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment commencementFraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), measured as a change from baseline as shown on the two machines. Note. Outcome contaminated. An SpO2 target of 90-95% reflects currently recommended practice for neonates; when SpO2 exceeds the target, FiO2 should be reduced. The majority of readings were at SpO2 \> 95%, so FiO2 for these SpO2 readings reflects oxygen provided, not oxygen required to achieve the recommended SpO2 target range (i.e., the FiO2 provided was excessive, by an unknown amount).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Respiratory Rate6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment commencementRespiratory rate (breaths/minute), measured as a change from baseline
Arterial pH6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment commencement (where available)pH measured as a change from baseline (where measured)
Partial Pressure of Arterial Oxygen (PaO2)6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment commencement (where available)PaO2 measured as a change from baseline (where measured)
Partial Pressure of Arterial Carbon Dioxide (PaCO2)6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment commencement (where available)PaCO2 measured as a change from baseline (where measured)
Number of Participants Who Died or Needed Intubation and/or Mechanical Ventilation, as a Measure of CPAP Failure, Measured to Date and Time of Cessation of CPAP TreatmentFrom date and time of randomization to date and time of cessation of CPAP treatment, or until date and time of hospital discharge, if infant is on CPAP treatment until discharged (i.e., dies or is transferred), assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.Death or need for intubation and mechanical ventilation as demonstrated by an FiO2 requirement ≥ 60% for ≥ 1 hour to maintain SpO2 at 90-95% Note. An SpO2 target of 90-95% reflects currently recommended practice for neonates. FiO2 and SpO2 at time of intubation and ventilation not separately recorded, so we report this endpoint as recorded by clinicians, assuming that they have verified FiO2 \[≥ 60% for ≥ 1 hour\] and SpO2 \[targeting 90-95%\] requirements at the time of intubation and ventilation. If SpO2 was actually \>95% (not 90-95%) at the time of intubation and ventilation, then FiO2 would be higher than required to meet the target range, by an unknown amount (possibly not meeting the FiO2 threshold of ≥ 60% for ≥ 1 hour, required to justify intubation and ventilation). We note this potential source of contamination because the results of Outcome #2 show that the majority of SpO2 readings were \>95%.
Surfactant Provided When FiO2 > 40% to Maintain SpO2 at 90-95% for ≥ 30 Minutes, With Respiratory Distress Syndrome Confirmed by Chest X-RayFrom date and time of randomization to date and time of cessation of CPAP treatment, or until date and time of hospital discharge, if infant is on CPAP treatment until discharged (i.e., dies or is transferred), assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.Surfactant provided when FiO2 \> 40% to maintain SpO2 at 90-95% for ≥ 30 minutes, with Respiratory Distress Syndrome confirmed by chest X-Ray Note that endpoint likely corrupted because SpO2 was not routinely targeting 90-95%, and large number of infants received surfactant before achieving \>40% or without having x-ray confirmation of RDS.
CPAP Failure or Surfactant ProvisionFrom date and time of randomization to date and time of cessation of CPAP treatment, or until date and time of hospital discharge, if infant is on CPAP treatment until discharged (i.e., dies or is transferred), assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.Outcomes 6 or 7 Note that endpoint likely corrupted because SpO2 was not routinely targeting 90-95%, and large number of infants received surfactant before achieving \>40% or without having x-ray confirmation of RDS.
CPAP DurationFrom date and time of randomization to date and time of cessation of CPAP treatment, or until date and time of hospital discharge, if infant is on CPAP treatment until discharged (i.e., dies or is transferred), assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.Duration of CPAP treatment (hours) in infants that do not fail CPAP
SpO26, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment commencementOxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2), measured as a change from baseline Note. Outcome contaminated. An SpO2 target of 90-95% reflects currently recommended practice for neonates. The majority of readings were at SpO2 \> 95%, above SpO2 target (90-95%).
Sentinel Outcome #1From date and time of randomization to date and time of CPAP cessation, assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.Damage to the nasal septum
Sentinel Outcome #2From date and time of randomization to date and time of CPAP cessation, assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.Damage to the nares of the infant
Sentinel Outcome #3From date and time of randomization to date and time of CPAP cessation, assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.Pneumothorax as diagnosed by X-ray
Sentinel Outcome #4From date and time of randomization to date and time of CPAP cessation, assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.Intra-ventricular haemorrhage (IVH), intra-cranial haemorrhage (ICH), or periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) as diagnosed by cranial ultrasound scan
Sentinel Outcome #5From date and time of randomization to date and time of CPAP cessation, assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.FiO2 ≥ 60% to maintain SpO2 at 90-95% for one hour or more, during CPAP treatment
Sentinel Outcome #6From date and time of randomization to date and time of CPAP cessation, assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.Intubation and mechanical ventilation Note. An SpO2 target of 90-95% reflects currently recommended practice for neonates. FiO2 and SpO2 at time of intubation and ventilation not separately recorded, so we report this endpoint as recorded by clinicians, assuming that they have verified FiO2 \[≥ 60% for ≥ 1 hour\] and SpO2 \[targeting 90-95%\] requirements at the time of intubation and ventilation. If SpO2 was actually \>95% (not 90-95%) at the time of intubation and ventilation, then FiO2 would be higher than required to meet the target range, by an unknown amount (possibly not meeting the FiO2 threshold of ≥ 60% for ≥ 1 hour, required to justify intubation and ventilation). We note this potential source of contamination because the results of Outcome #2 show that the majority of SpO2 readings were \>95%.
Sentinel Outcome #7From date and time of randomization to date and time of CPAP cessation, assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.For infants born at 28+0 to 33+6 weeks' gestation, oxygen dependent at 36 weeks' gestation
Sentinel Outcome #8From date and time of randomization to date and time of hospital discharge, assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.Death of the infant before hospitals discharge
Serious Adverse EventFrom date and time of birth to date and time of hospital discharge, assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.A Serious adverse Event (SAEs) is any untoward medial occurrence that: * Results in death; * Is life-threatening; \[NOTE: the term life-threatening in the definition of serious refers to an event in which the patient was at risk of death at the time of the event; it does not refer to an event which hypothetically might have caused death if it were more severe.\] * Requires inpatient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation; * Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or * Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect

Countries

India

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

There were no wash-out or run-in procedures. No enrolled participant was excluded from the study before randomisation.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dolphin Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine with oxygen intake and an on-board air compressor, and integrated blender and humidifier, delivering heated humidified blended gases through a Fisher-Paykel nasal mask. \[Also includes built-in Massimo pulse oximeter, though this is not used for this study, to prevent differential measurement error in SpO2 measurement\] CPAP: CPAP therapy
26
Fisher-Paykel Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Fisher-Paykel (F&P) Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) machine with separate oxygen and medical air intakes, with third-party FP-compliant blender, and F&P blender, delivering heated humidified blended gases through a Fisher-Paykel nasal mask. CPAP: CPAP therapy
25
Total51

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFisher-Paykel Continuous Positive Airway PressureTotalDolphin Continuous Positive Airway Pressure
Age, Customized
Gestational age
31.57 Weeks31.71 Weeks31.86 Weeks
Birthweight1434 Grams
STANDARD_DEVIATION 417
1421 Grams
STANDARD_DEVIATION 363
1409 Grams
STANDARD_DEVIATION 311
FiO2 at baseline40 Percentage of inspired oxygen40 Percentage of inspired oxygen40 Percentage of inspired oxygen
Partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide at baseline27.5 Torr37.2 Torr38.9 Torr
Partial pressure of arterial oxygen at baseline139 Torr115 Torr115 Torr
pH at baseline7.34 pH7.29 pH7.29 pH
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
India
26 Participants51 Participants25 Participants
Respiratory rate at baseline43 Breaths/minute43 Breaths/minute42.5 Breaths/minute
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants17 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants34 Participants18 Participants
SpO2 at baseline97 Percentage capillary oxygen saturation97 Percentage capillary oxygen saturation96 Percentage capillary oxygen saturation

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 260 / 25
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 262 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 260 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

FiO2

Fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), measured as a change from baseline as shown on the two machines. Note. Outcome contaminated. An SpO2 target of 90-95% reflects currently recommended practice for neonates; when SpO2 exceeds the target, FiO2 should be reduced. The majority of readings were at SpO2 \> 95%, so FiO2 for these SpO2 readings reflects oxygen provided, not oxygen required to achieve the recommended SpO2 target range (i.e., the FiO2 provided was excessive, by an unknown amount).

Time frame: 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment commencement

Population: Number missing at each time point:~6 hrs: 1 Dolphin (failed), 0 FP~12 hrs: 1 Dolphin (failed), 1 FP (recovered)~24 hrs: 6 Dolphin (2 failed + 4 recovered), 4 FP (all recovered)~48 hrs: 16 Dolphin (3 failed + 13 recovered), 11 FP (1 failed + 10 recovered)~72 hrs: 21 Dolphin (3 failed + 18 recovered), 21 FP (1 failed + 20 recovered)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Dolphin CPAPFiO2Change at 12 hours0 Percentage of inspired oxygen
Dolphin CPAPFiO2Change at 48 hours-14.5 Percentage of inspired oxygen
Dolphin CPAPFiO2Change at 24 hours-10 Percentage of inspired oxygen
Dolphin CPAPFiO2Change at 72 hours-10 Percentage of inspired oxygen
Dolphin CPAPFiO2Change at 6 hours0 Percentage of inspired oxygen
Fisher-Paykel CPAPFiO2Change at 72 hours-7.5 Percentage of inspired oxygen
Fisher-Paykel CPAPFiO2Change at 6 hours0 Percentage of inspired oxygen
Fisher-Paykel CPAPFiO2Change at 12 hours0 Percentage of inspired oxygen
Fisher-Paykel CPAPFiO2Change at 24 hours-15 Percentage of inspired oxygen
Fisher-Paykel CPAPFiO2Change at 48 hours-12.5 Percentage of inspired oxygen
Comparison: Analysis restricted to change at 6 hours, as least affected by missing data.~Distribution non-normal, so non-parametric test (Wilcoxon) used.p-value: 0.65van Elteren's extension to Wilcoxon
Comparison: Planned sub-group analysis for infants born at 28-33 gestational weeks (n=41). No adjustment for multiple comparisons.p-value: 0.64Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Comparison: Planned sub-group analysis for infants born at 34-36 gestational weeks (n=10). No adjustment for multiple comparisons.p-value: 1Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Arterial pH

pH measured as a change from baseline (where measured)

Time frame: 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment commencement (where available)

Population: Only 31/51 infants had a baseline blood gas taken, and only 7 of these had a second or subsequent test, with five of them at 6 hours, two each at 12 and 24 hours and one each at 48 and 72 hours. No statistical testing performed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Dolphin CPAPArterial pHChange at 24 hours0.015 pH
Dolphin CPAPArterial pHChange at 12 hours0.19 pH
Dolphin CPAPArterial pHChange at 6 hours0.135 pH
Fisher-Paykel CPAPArterial pHChange at 72 hours-0.01 pH
Fisher-Paykel CPAPArterial pHChange at 12 hours0.23 pH
Fisher-Paykel CPAPArterial pHChange at 6 hours0.05 pH
Fisher-Paykel CPAPArterial pHChange at 48 hours0.01 pH
Secondary

CPAP Duration

Duration of CPAP treatment (hours) in infants that do not fail CPAP

Time frame: From date and time of randomization to date and time of cessation of CPAP treatment, or until date and time of hospital discharge, if infant is on CPAP treatment until discharged (i.e., dies or is transferred), assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.

Population: Excludes 3 Dolphin and 2 FP randomised infants that failed treatment (escalated to mechanical ventilation)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Dolphin CPAPCPAP Duration46.9 Hours
Fisher-Paykel CPAPCPAP Duration56.5 Hours
p-value: 0.81van Elteren's extension to Wilcoxon
Secondary

CPAP Failure or Surfactant Provision

Outcomes 6 or 7 Note that endpoint likely corrupted because SpO2 was not routinely targeting 90-95%, and large number of infants received surfactant before achieving \>40% or without having x-ray confirmation of RDS.

Time frame: From date and time of randomization to date and time of cessation of CPAP treatment, or until date and time of hospital discharge, if infant is on CPAP treatment until discharged (i.e., dies or is transferred), assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolphin CPAPCPAP Failure or Surfactant Provision6 Participants
Fisher-Paykel CPAPCPAP Failure or Surfactant Provision3 Participants
p-value: 0.31Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Died or Needed Intubation and/or Mechanical Ventilation, as a Measure of CPAP Failure, Measured to Date and Time of Cessation of CPAP Treatment

Death or need for intubation and mechanical ventilation as demonstrated by an FiO2 requirement ≥ 60% for ≥ 1 hour to maintain SpO2 at 90-95% Note. An SpO2 target of 90-95% reflects currently recommended practice for neonates. FiO2 and SpO2 at time of intubation and ventilation not separately recorded, so we report this endpoint as recorded by clinicians, assuming that they have verified FiO2 \[≥ 60% for ≥ 1 hour\] and SpO2 \[targeting 90-95%\] requirements at the time of intubation and ventilation. If SpO2 was actually \>95% (not 90-95%) at the time of intubation and ventilation, then FiO2 would be higher than required to meet the target range, by an unknown amount (possibly not meeting the FiO2 threshold of ≥ 60% for ≥ 1 hour, required to justify intubation and ventilation). We note this potential source of contamination because the results of Outcome #2 show that the majority of SpO2 readings were \>95%.

Time frame: From date and time of randomization to date and time of cessation of CPAP treatment, or until date and time of hospital discharge, if infant is on CPAP treatment until discharged (i.e., dies or is transferred), assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolphin CPAPNumber of Participants Who Died or Needed Intubation and/or Mechanical Ventilation, as a Measure of CPAP Failure, Measured to Date and Time of Cessation of CPAP Treatment3 Participants
Fisher-Paykel CPAPNumber of Participants Who Died or Needed Intubation and/or Mechanical Ventilation, as a Measure of CPAP Failure, Measured to Date and Time of Cessation of CPAP Treatment2 Participants
p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Partial Pressure of Arterial Carbon Dioxide (PaCO2)

PaCO2 measured as a change from baseline (where measured)

Time frame: 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment commencement (where available)

Population: Only 31/51 infants had a baseline blood gas taken, and only 7 of these had a second or subsequent test, with five of them at 6 hours, two each at 12 and 24 hours and one each at 48 and 72 hours. No statistical testing performed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Dolphin CPAPPartial Pressure of Arterial Carbon Dioxide (PaCO2)Change at 24 hours-12 Torr
Dolphin CPAPPartial Pressure of Arterial Carbon Dioxide (PaCO2)Change at 12 hours-18.6 Torr
Dolphin CPAPPartial Pressure of Arterial Carbon Dioxide (PaCO2)Change at 6 hours-17 Torr
Fisher-Paykel CPAPPartial Pressure of Arterial Carbon Dioxide (PaCO2)Change at 72 hours6.4 Torr
Fisher-Paykel CPAPPartial Pressure of Arterial Carbon Dioxide (PaCO2)Change at 12 hours-5.9 Torr
Fisher-Paykel CPAPPartial Pressure of Arterial Carbon Dioxide (PaCO2)Change at 6 hours-9 Torr
Fisher-Paykel CPAPPartial Pressure of Arterial Carbon Dioxide (PaCO2)Change at 48 hours-0.1 Torr
Secondary

Partial Pressure of Arterial Oxygen (PaO2)

PaO2 measured as a change from baseline (where measured)

Time frame: 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment commencement (where available)

Population: Only 31/51 infants had a baseline blood gas taken, and only 7 of these had a second or subsequent test, with five of them at 6 hours, two each at 12 and 24 hours and one each at 48 and 72 hours. No statistical testing performed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Dolphin CPAPPartial Pressure of Arterial Oxygen (PaO2)Change at 24 hours-42.5 Torr
Dolphin CPAPPartial Pressure of Arterial Oxygen (PaO2)Change at 12 hours-60.2 Torr
Dolphin CPAPPartial Pressure of Arterial Oxygen (PaO2)Change at 6 hours-138 Torr
Fisher-Paykel CPAPPartial Pressure of Arterial Oxygen (PaO2)Change at 72 hours15.6 Torr
Fisher-Paykel CPAPPartial Pressure of Arterial Oxygen (PaO2)Change at 12 hours12.1 Torr
Fisher-Paykel CPAPPartial Pressure of Arterial Oxygen (PaO2)Change at 6 hours-47 Torr
Fisher-Paykel CPAPPartial Pressure of Arterial Oxygen (PaO2)Change at 48 hours-9.3 Torr
Secondary

Respiratory Rate

Respiratory rate (breaths/minute), measured as a change from baseline

Time frame: 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment commencement

Population: Number missing (and thus imputed):~6 hrs: 1 Dolphin (failed), 0 FP~12 hrs: 1 Dolphin (failed), 1 FP (recovered)~24 hrs: 6 Dolphin (2 failed + 4 recovered), 4 FP (all recovered)~48 hrs: 16 Dolphin (3 failed + 13 recovered), 11 FP (1 failed + 10 recovered)~72 hrs: 21 Dolphin (3 failed + 18 recovered), 21 FP (1 failed + 20 recovered)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Dolphin CPAPRespiratory RateChange at 6 hours-2 Breaths per minute
Dolphin CPAPRespiratory RateChange at 48 hours-1 Breaths per minute
Dolphin CPAPRespiratory RateChange at 12 hours0 Breaths per minute
Dolphin CPAPRespiratory RateChange at 72 hours0 Breaths per minute
Dolphin CPAPRespiratory RateChange at 24 hours-2 Breaths per minute
Fisher-Paykel CPAPRespiratory RateChange at 72 hours0 Breaths per minute
Fisher-Paykel CPAPRespiratory RateChange at 24 hours0 Breaths per minute
Fisher-Paykel CPAPRespiratory RateChange at 6 hours0 Breaths per minute
Fisher-Paykel CPAPRespiratory RateChange at 12 hours0 Breaths per minute
Fisher-Paykel CPAPRespiratory RateChange at 48 hours0 Breaths per minute
Comparison: Analysis restricted to change at 6 hours, as least affected by missing data.~Distribution non-normal, so non-parametric test (Wilcoxon) used.p-value: 0.86van Elteren's extension to Wilcoxon
Secondary

Sentinel Outcome #1

Damage to the nasal septum

Time frame: From date and time of randomization to date and time of CPAP cessation, assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolphin CPAPSentinel Outcome #10 Participants
Fisher-Paykel CPAPSentinel Outcome #10 Participants
Secondary

Sentinel Outcome #2

Damage to the nares of the infant

Time frame: From date and time of randomization to date and time of CPAP cessation, assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolphin CPAPSentinel Outcome #20 Participants
Fisher-Paykel CPAPSentinel Outcome #20 Participants
Secondary

Sentinel Outcome #3

Pneumothorax as diagnosed by X-ray

Time frame: From date and time of randomization to date and time of CPAP cessation, assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolphin CPAPSentinel Outcome #30 Participants
Fisher-Paykel CPAPSentinel Outcome #30 Participants
Secondary

Sentinel Outcome #4

Intra-ventricular haemorrhage (IVH), intra-cranial haemorrhage (ICH), or periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) as diagnosed by cranial ultrasound scan

Time frame: From date and time of randomization to date and time of CPAP cessation, assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolphin CPAPSentinel Outcome #40 Participants
Fisher-Paykel CPAPSentinel Outcome #40 Participants
Secondary

Sentinel Outcome #5

FiO2 ≥ 60% to maintain SpO2 at 90-95% for one hour or more, during CPAP treatment

Time frame: From date and time of randomization to date and time of CPAP cessation, assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolphin CPAPSentinel Outcome #50 Participants
Fisher-Paykel CPAPSentinel Outcome #50 Participants
Secondary

Sentinel Outcome #6

Intubation and mechanical ventilation Note. An SpO2 target of 90-95% reflects currently recommended practice for neonates. FiO2 and SpO2 at time of intubation and ventilation not separately recorded, so we report this endpoint as recorded by clinicians, assuming that they have verified FiO2 \[≥ 60% for ≥ 1 hour\] and SpO2 \[targeting 90-95%\] requirements at the time of intubation and ventilation. If SpO2 was actually \>95% (not 90-95%) at the time of intubation and ventilation, then FiO2 would be higher than required to meet the target range, by an unknown amount (possibly not meeting the FiO2 threshold of ≥ 60% for ≥ 1 hour, required to justify intubation and ventilation). We note this potential source of contamination because the results of Outcome #2 show that the majority of SpO2 readings were \>95%.

Time frame: From date and time of randomization to date and time of CPAP cessation, assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolphin CPAPSentinel Outcome #63 Participants
Fisher-Paykel CPAPSentinel Outcome #62 Participants
p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Sentinel Outcome #7

For infants born at 28+0 to 33+6 weeks' gestation, oxygen dependent at 36 weeks' gestation

Time frame: From date and time of randomization to date and time of CPAP cessation, assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolphin CPAPSentinel Outcome #70 Participants
Fisher-Paykel CPAPSentinel Outcome #70 Participants
Secondary

Sentinel Outcome #8

Death of the infant before hospitals discharge

Time frame: From date and time of randomization to date and time of hospital discharge, assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.

Population: The infant that died recovered after CPAP but was subsequently treated for apnoeas and a patent ductus arteriosus. Twelve days after CPAP cessation the infant commenced antibiotics for elevated CRP and was intubated and ventilated and died. The Data Safety Monitoring Committee determined that the death was unrelated to treatment group.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolphin CPAPSentinel Outcome #81 Participants
Fisher-Paykel CPAPSentinel Outcome #80 Participants
p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Serious Adverse Event

A Serious adverse Event (SAEs) is any untoward medial occurrence that: * Results in death; * Is life-threatening; \[NOTE: the term life-threatening in the definition of serious refers to an event in which the patient was at risk of death at the time of the event; it does not refer to an event which hypothetically might have caused death if it were more severe.\] * Requires inpatient hospitalisation or prolongation of existing hospitalisation; * Results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or * Is a congenital anomaly/birth defect

Time frame: From date and time of birth to date and time of hospital discharge, assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.

Population: The infant that died recovered after CPAP but was subsequently treated for apnea and a patent ductus arteriosus. Twelve days after CPAP cessation the infant commenced antibiotics for elevated CRP and was intubated and ventilated and died. The Data Safety Monitoring Committee determined that the death was unrelated to treatment group.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolphin CPAPSerious Adverse Event1 Participants
Fisher-Paykel CPAPSerious Adverse Event0 Participants
p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

SpO2

Oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2), measured as a change from baseline Note. Outcome contaminated. An SpO2 target of 90-95% reflects currently recommended practice for neonates. The majority of readings were at SpO2 \> 95%, above SpO2 target (90-95%).

Time frame: 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after treatment commencement

Population: Number missing:~6 hrs: 1 Dolphin (failed), 0 FP~12 hrs: 1 Dolphin (failed), 1 FP (recovered)~24 hrs: 6 Dolphin (2 failed + 4 recovered), 4 FP (all recovered)~48 hrs: 16 Dolphin (3 failed + 13 recovered), 11 FP (1 failed + 10 recovered)~72 hrs: 21 Dolphin (3 failed + 18 recovered), 21 FP (1 failed + 20 recovered)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Dolphin CPAPSpO2Change at 12 hours2 Percentage capillary oxygen saturation
Dolphin CPAPSpO2Change at 48 hours1 Percentage capillary oxygen saturation
Dolphin CPAPSpO2Change at 24 hours1 Percentage capillary oxygen saturation
Dolphin CPAPSpO2Change at 72 hours-1 Percentage capillary oxygen saturation
Dolphin CPAPSpO2Change at 6 hours2 Percentage capillary oxygen saturation
Fisher-Paykel CPAPSpO2Change at 72 hours-0.5 Percentage capillary oxygen saturation
Fisher-Paykel CPAPSpO2Change at 6 hours1 Percentage capillary oxygen saturation
Fisher-Paykel CPAPSpO2Change at 12 hours1 Percentage capillary oxygen saturation
Fisher-Paykel CPAPSpO2Change at 24 hours0 Percentage capillary oxygen saturation
Fisher-Paykel CPAPSpO2Change at 48 hours-0.5 Percentage capillary oxygen saturation
Comparison: Analysis restricted to change at 6 hours, as least affected by missing data.~Distribution not normal by visual examination, so non-parametric test (Wilcoxon) used.p-value: 0.8van Elteren's extension to Wilcoxon
Secondary

Surfactant Provided When FiO2 > 40% to Maintain SpO2 at 90-95% for ≥ 30 Minutes, With Respiratory Distress Syndrome Confirmed by Chest X-Ray

Surfactant provided when FiO2 \> 40% to maintain SpO2 at 90-95% for ≥ 30 minutes, with Respiratory Distress Syndrome confirmed by chest X-Ray Note that endpoint likely corrupted because SpO2 was not routinely targeting 90-95%, and large number of infants received surfactant before achieving \>40% or without having x-ray confirmation of RDS.

Time frame: From date and time of randomization to date and time of cessation of CPAP treatment, or until date and time of hospital discharge, if infant is on CPAP treatment until discharged (i.e., dies or is transferred), assessed to a maximum of 2 months of age.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Dolphin CPAPSurfactant Provided When FiO2 > 40% to Maintain SpO2 at 90-95% for ≥ 30 Minutes, With Respiratory Distress Syndrome Confirmed by Chest X-Ray3 Participants
Fisher-Paykel CPAPSurfactant Provided When FiO2 > 40% to Maintain SpO2 at 90-95% for ≥ 30 Minutes, With Respiratory Distress Syndrome Confirmed by Chest X-Ray1 Participants
p-value: 0.33Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026