Skip to content

Outcome of 15 Versus 5 Fractions in Adjuvant Breast Radiotherapy in Women Over 65 Years

A Partially Randomized Patient Preference Trial, Comparing Adjuvant Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in 15 Versus 5 Fractions After Breast Conserving Surgery or Mastectomy for Early or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer in Women Above 65 Years

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03121248
Acronym
HAI-5-III
Enrollment
144
Registered
2017-04-20
Start date
2017-02-15
Completion date
2026-11-15
Last updated
2023-12-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breastcancer

Keywords

Accelerated radiotherapy, Older women, Hypo-fractonation

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the effect of highly accelerated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in 5 fractions over 10 days compared to 15 fractions over 3 weeks for early as well as locally-advanced stage breast cancer. Primary endpoint will be chronic toxicity (breast deformation and retraction). Secondary endpoints are acute toxicity, loco-regional and distant tumor control, patient reported QoL and cosmetic satisfaction. Patients with lymph node irradiation will be closely monitored for radiation induced plexopathy.

Detailed description

Over the age of 65, uptake of adjuvant radiotherapy after surgery for breast cancer declines, even in women with poor prognostic stage or adverse tumor characteristics. Lowering the number of fractions may reduce reluctancy for radiotherapy in this age group. In a preceding prospective phase I-II trial, evaluating EBRT over 10 days, results on technical feasibility and acute toxicity were positively evaluated. However, data on the chronic effects of breast irradiation using high doses per fraction are still sparse. This trial is developed to compare standard hypo-fractionation in 15 fractions (if needed with simultaneously integrated boost - SIB) with highly accelerated radiotherapy in 5 fractions. Patients referred for adjuvant radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery will preferably be randomized, depending on the indication, to a study-arm with whole breast irradiation (WBI) +/- SIB or to a study-arm with WBI+/- SIB and lymph node irradiation (LNI). If patients after breast conserving surgery (BCS) have a strong preference for 5 or 15 fractions, they will be invited to enter the parallel observational arm (patient preference). Patients referred for adjuvant radiotherapy after mastectomy +/- LNI accepting to participate, can choose a 5 or 15-fraction schedule. No randomization is foreseen in this last observational group.

Interventions

RADIATIONWBI 5 fractions

External beam radiotherapy in 5 fractions of 5,7Gy

RADIATIONWBI 15 fractions

External beam radiotherapy in 15 fractions of 2,67Gy

RADIATIONLNI 5 fractions

External beam radiotherapy in 5 fractions of 5,4Gy

RADIATIONLNI 15 fractions

External beam radiotherapy in 15 fractions of 2,67Gy

RADIATIONSIB 5 fractions if needed

Simultaneous boost of 5 x 6,2Gy (6,5Gy in case of involved resection margins) if needed

RADIATIONSIB 15 fractions if needed

Simultaneous boost of 15x3,12Gy (3,33Gy in case of involved resection margins) if needed

RADIATIONTWI 5 fractions

External beam radiotherapy in 5 fractions of 5,7Gy

RADIATIONTWI 15 fractions

External beam radiotherapy in 15 fractions of 2,67Gy

Sponsors

University Hospital, Ghent
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* breast conserving surgery or mastectomy for breast carcinoma * multidisciplinary decision of adjuvant irradiation * absence of distant metastases * informed consent obtained, signed and dated before specific protocol procedures

Exclusion criteria

* History of previous radiation treatment to the same region * Bilateral breast irradiation * Life expectancy of less than 2 years * Planned reconstructive breast surgery * Condition making toxicity evaluation difficult, e.g. skin disorders, pre-existing brachial plexus injury, … * Inability to respect constraints on skin, heart, lungs, esophagus, ribs, brachial plexus or any other organ at risk * Mental condition rendering the patient unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the study * Patient unlikely to comply with the protocol; i.e. uncooperative attitude, inability to return for follow-up visits or unlikely to complete the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Breast retraction (LENTSOMA)2-5 yearsBreast Cancer Conservative treatment.core (BCCT.core) objective measurement

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acute toxicity: number of patients with fatigue (MFI-20)1-8 weeksQuestionnaire (20 questions)
Chronic toxicity: prevalence of telangiectasia2 and 5 yearsLENT Soma: Score 0-3
Chronic toxicity: prevalence of lymphedema2 and 5 yearsLENT Soma: score 0-4
Chronic toxicity: prevalence of fatigue (MFI-20)2 and 5 yearsQuestionnaire (20 questions)
Chronic toxicity - prevalence of radiation induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP) (standardized screening questionnaire), confirmed by electromyogram (EMG)2 and 5 yearsIf a screening reveals unilateral pain, loss of function or muscular atrophy in the ipsilateral arm, an EMG will be performed to confirm/exclude RIBP
Loco-regional tumor control2 and 5 yearsIpsilateral or regional breast recurrence
Distant tumor control2 and 5 yearsDistant metastases free survival
Breast cancer specific survival2 and 5 yearsNumber of patients alive and without breast cancer recurrence at 2 and 5 years after adjuvant radiotherapy
Overall survival2 and 5 yearsNumber of patients alive, 2 and 5 years after adjuvant radiotherapy
Acute toxicity: number of patients with clinical relevant dermatitis (CTCAE v. 4.0)1-8 weeksAssessment of grade of dermatitis
Acute toxicity: number of patients with moist desquamation1-8 weeksCTCAE v. 4.0 (grade 3)
Acute toxicity: number of patients with pain (CTCAE v. 4.0)1-8 weeksGrade 1: mild; Grade 2: moderate, limiting activity of daily living (ADL); grade 3: severe, limiting ADL
Acute toxicity: number of patients with pruritus (CTCAE v. 4.0)1-8 weeksGrade 1: mild, localized topical intervention; Grade 2: intense, oral intervention, skin changes
Chronic toxicity: measurement of patient satisfaction with breast esthetic outcomeBefore radiotherapy and after 2 and 5 yearsBREAST-Q questionnaire: Patient reported outcome, evaluating satisfaction with esthetic outcome.
Chronic toxicity: prevalence of fibrosis2 and 5 yearsLENT Soma: fibrosis (score 0-3)
Chronic toxicity: prevalence of pain2 and 5 yearsLENT Soma: score 0-4

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
QoL within perspective of breast cancer patients4 weeks, 1, 2 and 5 yearsQLQ BR23 - standardised questionnaire
QoL within perspective of healthy patients4 weeks, 1, 2 and 5 yearsEQ-D5: standardised questionnaire
Number of patients evolving to higher frailty score after radiotherapy4 weeks, 1, 2 and 5 yearsMeasurement of frailty using G8 geriatric screening tool
Cost Effectiveness Analysis5 yearsCost effectiveness analysis comparing 5 with 15 fractions
Technical feasibility of prone positioningAt the moment of simulationPercentage of patients able to perform prone positioning on new breast board: yes or no.
Technical feasibility of deep inspirational breath-hold in prone positionAt the moment of simulationPercentage of patients able to perform breath-hold procedure in prone position: yes or no.
Patient preferenceMoment of intake, before allocation to study arm.Patients can accept clinical trial but refuse randomization. In this case they will be allocated to a patient preference study arm, existing also of a 5 or 15 fraction-schedule. The choice of the patient: acceptance or non-acceptance of study, acceptance or non-acceptance of randomization, in case of patient preference arm: acceptance or 5 or 15 fractions.
QoL within perspective of cancer patients4 weeks, 1, 2 and 5 yearsQLQ C30 - standardised questionnaire

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026