Skip to content

CT and Radiologist RCT

How Important is a Clinical Data for a Radiologist? A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial of Radiologic Interpretation of Ventral Hernias Following Selectively-Provided Clinical Information

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03121131
Enrollment
7
Registered
2017-04-19
Start date
2017-05-05
Completion date
2020-04-10
Last updated
2020-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hernia

Brief summary

The use of computed tomography (CT) imaging is rapidly increasing in healthcare. Despite physicians' growing reliance on radiological assessments, however, the reliability and accuracy of reads are highly variable. Inconsistencies may result from multiple factors. The researchers hypothesize that the presence and quality of clinical information will affect radiologist's assessment of CT scans for the presence/absence of a ventral hernia.

Interventions

OTHERClinical Exam Findings

Findings found on clinical exam of a patient the radiologist will be reading CT scans of.

OTHERInaccurate Clinical Exam Findings

Inaccurate findings are given to the radiologists

OTHERNo clinical exam findings

No clinical exam findings are given to the radiologists

Sponsors

The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Participants are radiologists at LBJ Hospital.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hernia detected on CTCT taken within 1 yearproportion of hernias detected on CT

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026