Skip to content

Amflow-device Can Help Proper Ambu-bag Ventilation

Evaluation of an Amflow-device Assist Ambu-bagging to Improve Accuracy of Tidal Volumes Delivered.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03119935
Enrollment
80
Registered
2017-04-19
Start date
2017-03-01
Completion date
2017-09-01
Last updated
2017-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ventilation Therapy; Complications

Keywords

ambu bag, ventilation, tidal volume

Brief summary

This is a simulation study with a prospective randomized cross-over design. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether Amflow-assisted ambu-bag can delivery the accurate tidal volume compare to ordinary ambu-bag

Detailed description

Ambu-bag ventilation is an essential skill to the patients who needed ventilatory support. However, the delivery of appropriate amount of tidal volume by ordinary manual bag ventilation may be difficult. In addition, it require adequate training to rescurer. We hypothesised that an Amflow assist ambu bag may be helpful to delivery accurate tidal volumes to the patients. Participants performed bag-valve ventilation to manikin by ordinary technique and Amflow assist technique in our simulation centre. We measured each ventilation rate and ventilation volume in simulated scenario and we compare those between two technique.

Interventions

DEVICEAmflow

Amflow deviced was developed for monitoring ventiation rate and ventilation volume. Participants ventilated the simulated patients by Amflow-device assist ambu bag

DEVICEAmbu bag

Participants ventilated the simulated patients by ambu bag

Sponsors

Konkuk University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* A healthy senior medical students who agree attend this study.

Exclusion criteria

* A participants who does not agree attend this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tidal volume6 minutesWe compared mean tidal volume delivered to manikins between two techniques

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ventilation Rate6 minutesWe compared mean ventilation rate between two techniques

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026