Skip to content

Pentax Videolaryngoscopy in Children

A Comparison of Pentax AWS Videolaryngoscopy and Macintosh Laryngoscopy for Orotracheal Intubation in Children: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03118622
Acronym
Pentax
Enrollment
136
Registered
2017-04-18
Start date
2017-05-31
Completion date
2018-01-08
Last updated
2018-01-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation;Difficult

Brief summary

Comparison of Intubation using Pentax (Pentas AWS, Pentax, Tokyo, Japan) and Macintoch in pediatric patients

Detailed description

Pentax video laryngoscope (Pentas AWS, Pentax, Tokyo, Japan) is one of indirect optical laryngoscopes which is recently developed. Several studies have shown that the Pentax-AWS® provides full views of the glottis in the majority of patients. It makes successful tracheal intubation in patients after failed intubation using a Macintosh laryngoscope. In pediatric patients who is expected to be difficult to intubate, Pentax makes successful intubation.

Interventions

DEVICEPentax

Intubation using Pentax video laryngoscope in Pentax group

Sponsors

Ajou University School of Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ASA 1, 2 * Scheduled surgery under general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

* Intraoral disease * Congenital anomaly * C-spine injury * Patients who need Rapid sequence induction

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intubation timeless than 10 minutefrom laryngoscope pass incisors to end tidal CO2 appears

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intubation difficulty scoreless than 10 minuteIDS parameter is Number of attempts \> 1 = N1 Number of operators \>1 = N2 Number of alternative techniques = N3 Cormack and Lehane grade minus 1 = N4 Operator perception of lifting force required Normal N5 = 0 Greater than in routine practice N5=1 Laryngeal pressure applied Not applied N6=0 Applied N6=1 Vocal core mobility Abduction N7=0 Adduction &/or impending tube passage N7=1 Total IDS = sum of scores N1\ N7

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026