Skip to content

An Open Label-study to Compare the Efficacy of Aflibercept Monotherapy for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

An Open Label-study to Compare the Efficacy of Aflibercept Monotherapy for Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy Using a Modified Intensive Treat and Extend Regime to a Fixed Dosing Regimen

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03117634
Enrollment
54
Registered
2017-04-18
Start date
2017-12-01
Completion date
2021-01-31
Last updated
2021-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Age Related Macular Degeneration, Polypoidal Choroidal Vasculopathy

Keywords

anti vegf, aflibercept, treat and extend

Brief summary

Polypoidal choroidal neovasculopathy (PCV) is a subtype of wet age related macula degeneration (AMD) occuring more commonly in the Asian population. Besides the phenotypic differences, PCV is thought to have a lesser response to anti VEGF therapy which is the mainstay of treatment for other typical wet AMD. Recent trial data suggest that a combination with photodynamic therapy may help in the visual and anatomical outcome of PCV, and emerging evidence shows favourable outcomes the newer anti VEGF agent, aflibercept 2mg monotherapy. These trials however, have assessed aflibercept in a strict 2mg every 8 weekly regime. In the clinical setting, a significant an unmet need in the management of PCV is a tailored treatment regime. Here we propose a treatment regimen based on disease activity for PCV with aflibercept mono therapy. A limitation of the 2q8 regime is that it is fixed and does not vary regardless of polyp closure or anatomical outcome at the first time point of assessment (month 3). We hypothesize that after the initial 3 monthly injections of aflibercept, about 50% of PCV will close and become quiescent, and in the remaining 50%, a further 3 monthly injections will increase overall polyp closure rate. After a loadings phase of either 3 or 6 months, all eyes will start on a treat and extend regime (T&E), with a minimum period of 8 weeks and a maximum of 12 weeks between treatments with 2 week increments if PCV remains quiescent. The proposed study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a modified treat and extend regime based on disease activity with aflibercept monotherapy for PCV.

Detailed description

Age related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the leading causes of blindness worldwide. In its exudative or wet form, choroidal neovascularization (CNV) causes an exudative maculopathy resulting in sudden loss of vision with severe effects on patients' quality of life.1,2 Intra vitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents (anti-VEGF) agents have become the mainstay of treatment for AMD CNV and have been shown to have favorable outcomes in most AMD CNV subtypes.3,4 In the Asian population however, a particular subtype called polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), which affects about 50% of exudative maculopathy, has been shown to have less favorable response to anti-VEGF therapy.5,6 The EVEREST trial, a randomized controlled trial which compares the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) with or without ranibizumab for treatment of PCV showed that PDT with or without anti VEGF improved polyp closure rate on angiographic assessment but this trial did not take into account vision as a primary end point.7 PDT appears work through its effects on choroidal vasculature, hence making it relevant to PCV which is increasingly thought to be a condition on the pachychoroid spectrum.8 PDT however, as a treatment modality presents several disadvantages. Firstly, PCV often presents as a widely distributed lesion, making it difficult to treat, with a single beam of PDT. Secondly, PDT is limited in its ability to treat lesions in the peripapillary area as there is risk of damage to the optic nerve. Thirdly, features commonly associated with PCV such as a large pigment epithelial detachment (PED) or extensive submacular hemorrhages are not usually suitable for PDT. Fourthly, there is a risk of long-term choroidal atrophy especially if repeated treatments are administered.8,9 There is emerging evidence for the use of aflibercept monotherapy in PCV. Reports range from small case series and retrospective studies to larger prospective studies. Recent data from the PLANET study showed that monotherapy of aflibercept resulted in similar letter gains in visual acuity as compared to combination treatment with PDT at 1 year. Polyp closure rate was also similar between the two groups at 38.9% with monotherapy and 44.8% with combination therapy. The VAULT and APOLLO studies suggest vision and anatomical improvements with 66-72% polyp closure in 1 year.10 These trials however, use a fixed dosing regimen (3 monthly loading doses of 2mg aflibercept followed by fixed dosing every 8 weeks (2q8) totaling 7 injections in 1 year). In addition to resolution of subretinal fluid, recent studies using the novel OCT-angiography (OCT-A) to evaluate choroidal vasculature suggests re-modelling of choroidal vasculature may also be an important therapeutic effect. We reported more prominent reduction in choroidal vessel calibre after combination treatment with PDT and bevacizumab compared to bevacizumab monotherapy. The effect of Aflibercept on choroidal vasculature has been less well studied. Some evidence however, suggested aflibercept may have more profound effect on choroidal vasculature with the reducing choroidal thickness than ranibizumab or bevacizumab. A significant unmet need in the management of PCV with anti VEGF monotherapy is a practical way of treating patients in the real world setting that maximizes efficacy with minimal number of visits and injections. Clinical trial regimes follow a rigid treatment algorithm that aim to maximize response. In the clinical setting, these regimes are impractical in real world patients. Regular intensive course of treatment involves lengthy visits which include consultation time, clinical examination, retinal imaging, and often an intra vitreal injection. In clinical practice this often result in treatment fatigue and in a co-payment healthcare environment in Singapore, may also result in significant financial burden to the patient and society. While aflibercept affords an 8 weekly treatment regime which is better than other monthly anti VEGF therapy regimes, trial regimes still do not take into account individual patients' disease patterns. This study aims to take disease activity into account to tailor treatment regimes specific for patients. In addition, it aims to provide insight into the outcomes of patients on a more clinically relevant treat and extend (T&E) regime which changes the treatment tempo in relation to disease activity.

Interventions

DRUGTreat and Extend with Aflibercept 2mg

Drug treatment regime which allows extension of treatment interval based on disease activity

DRUGFixed Dosing with Aflibercept 2mg

Fixed 8 weekly dosing regime throughout the study duration

Sponsors

Bayer
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Singapore National Eye Centre
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Prospective, 2-arm, Non-inferiority, interventional study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participant 1. Male or female study participants, age \>=45 years of age at the time of informed consent. 2. Best corrected ETDRS visual acuity score \<= 78 (ie 20/32 or worse) 3. Diagnosis of PCV based on ICGA 1. Presence of intra retinal or subretinal fluid/blood at the fovea as seen on OCT 2. Treatment naïve 4. Media clarity, pupillary dilation and individual cooperation sufficient for study procedure including fundus photography. 5. Able and willing to provide informed consent. 1.2.

Exclusion criteria

Participant 1. Medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the study (e.g.unstable medical status including blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and glycemic control). 2. Participation in an investigational trial within 30 days of enrolment which involves treatment with unapproved investigational drug 3. Known allergy to any component of the study drug. 4. Blood pressure \> 180/110 (systolic above 180 OR diastolic above 110 on repeated measurements). If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, individual can become eligible. 5. Myocardial infarction, other acute cardiac event requiring hospitalization, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or treatment for acute congestive heart failure within 4 months prior to randomization. 6. Systemic anti-VEGF or pro-VEGF treatment within four months prior to randomization or anticipated use during the study. Study Eye 1. Eye with intra retinal or subretinal fluid due to other causes than PCV 2. An ocular condition is present (other than PCV) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect intra or sub retinal fluid or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., diabetic macula edema (DME), vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, etc.) 3. Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by more than three lines (i.e., cataract would be reducing acuity to worse than 20/40 if eye was otherwise normal). 4. Any intraocular surgery within 3 months of enrollment 5. Treatment with intra vitreal corticosteroids 6. History of retinal detachment or surgery for retinal detachment 7. History of vitrectomy 8. History of macular hole 9. Evidence of vitreomacular traction that may preclude resolution of macular edema \> 4 disc areas of intra/sub retinal hemorrhage 10. Aphakia 11. Exam evidence of external ocular infection, including conjunctivitis, chalazion, or significant blepharitis Other Eye 1. Active intraocular inflammation 2. History of uveitis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)From Baseline to Week 52Mean Change in Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to week 52 for personalized and fixed regimen. it is a Non-inferiority of personalized to fixed regimen for mean change in BCVA from baseline to week 52 (Non-inferiority is considered as -5 ETDRS Letters difference )

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change in Central Sub Field ThicknessFrom Baseline to Week 52central sub field thickness (CSFT) was defined as the average thickness of the macula in the central 1 mm ETDRS grid. Defined as the thickness from the inner retinal boundary at the location of the inner limiting membrane (ILM) to the outer retinal boundary at Bruch's membrane (BM). Change in the central sub field thickness (CSFT) after the treatment was assessed , the measurement was done by optical coherence tomography (OCT). the measures were taken at baseline and week 52, the change between the two measurements ( baseline to week 52) were assessed in both groups to understand the effect of treatment on CSFT
Number of Participants With Complete Polypoidal Lesion ClosureAt Week 52This measure reports the Number of participants with complete polypoidal lesion closure defined as those showing no late leakage on Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA).
Number of InjectionsFrom Baseline to Week 52number of aflibercept injections administered in personalised and fixed groups

Countries

Singapore

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Personalised Group
The participants received an induction phase of treatment defined as 4 weekly intravitreal aflibercept 2mg/0.05ml at week 0, week 4 and week 8. At week 12, the participants had repeat ICGA and OCT. At week 12, participants in this group, in whom, polypoidal lesions had completely regressed on ICGA would enter into the treat and extend (TNE)phase. Participants with presence of polypoidal lesions (PL) on ICGA (with or without fluid on OCT) would continue three 4-weekly injections till week 24, and enter TNE phase from week 24 onwards.
39
Fixed Group
All Study participants received an induction phase of treatment defined as 4 weekly intravitreal aflibercept 2mg/0.05ml at week 0, week 4 and week 8. At week 12, all participants had repeat ICGA and OCT. Participants in the fixed group went on to receive fix doses of 8-weekly aflibercept 2mn/0.05ml after the induction phase for the remaining duration of the study.
13
Total52

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFixed GroupTotalPersonalised Group
Age, Continuous69.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
69.25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
69.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
Best Corrected Visual Acuity(BCVA)62.8 ETDRS Letters (units on a scale)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
60.4 ETDRS Letters (units on a scale)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
58 ETDRS Letters (units on a scale)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2
Central sub field thickness (CSFT)483.2 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 189.3
464.85 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 183.5
446.5 microns
STANDARD_DEVIATION 181.6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
13 Participants52 Participants39 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Singapore
13 participants52 participants39 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants19 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants33 Participants25 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 390 / 13
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 394 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 390 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)

Mean Change in Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to week 52 for personalized and fixed regimen. it is a Non-inferiority of personalized to fixed regimen for mean change in BCVA from baseline to week 52 (Non-inferiority is considered as -5 ETDRS Letters difference )

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 52

Population: Mean Change in Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline to week 52 for personalized and fixed regimen.~it is a Non-inferiority of personalized to fixed regimen for mean change in BCVA from baseline to week 52

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Personalised GroupMean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)8.1 ETDRS Letters
Fixed GroupMean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)7.9 ETDRS Letters
Secondary

Mean Change in Central Sub Field Thickness

central sub field thickness (CSFT) was defined as the average thickness of the macula in the central 1 mm ETDRS grid. Defined as the thickness from the inner retinal boundary at the location of the inner limiting membrane (ILM) to the outer retinal boundary at Bruch's membrane (BM). Change in the central sub field thickness (CSFT) after the treatment was assessed , the measurement was done by optical coherence tomography (OCT). the measures were taken at baseline and week 52, the change between the two measurements ( baseline to week 52) were assessed in both groups to understand the effect of treatment on CSFT

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 52

Population: change in the central sub field thickness (CSFT) assessed by OCT from baseline to week 52 between personalised and fixed group

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Personalised GroupMean Change in Central Sub Field Thickness-248.8 umStandard Deviation 169.9
Fixed GroupMean Change in Central Sub Field Thickness-164.8 umStandard Deviation 148.9
Secondary

Number of Injections

number of aflibercept injections administered in personalised and fixed groups

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 52

Population: number of aflibercept injections administered in the induction phase in both groups

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Personalised GroupNumber of Injections8.2 InjectionsStandard Deviation 0.9
Fixed GroupNumber of Injections8 InjectionsStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Number of Participants With Complete Polypoidal Lesion Closure

This measure reports the Number of participants with complete polypoidal lesion closure defined as those showing no late leakage on Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA).

Time frame: At Week 52

Population: number of participants with complete polypoidal lesion closure as detected on Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) as no leakage on late ICGA stage between personalised and fixed groups

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Personalised GroupNumber of Participants With Complete Polypoidal Lesion Closure21 Participants
Fixed GroupNumber of Participants With Complete Polypoidal Lesion Closure5 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 16, 2026