Skip to content

The Effects of Anesthesia Type on the Prognosis of Hip Fracture Surgery on Elderly Patients

The Comparative Effects of Regional or General Anesthesia on the Prognosis of Hip Fracture Surgery on Elderly Patients

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03116490
Enrollment
600
Registered
2017-04-17
Start date
2026-01-16
Completion date
2028-12-31
Last updated
2024-07-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Complications, Postoperative Mortality

Keywords

morbidity, mortality, hip fracture, anesthesia type, POSSUM

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to figure out whether anesthesia type have an influence on the prognosis of hip fracture surgery.30-day mortality and morbidity after the surgery are our main observational index,and according to literature and our experience,regional anesthesia may have a better prognosis after hip fracture surgery compared with general anesthesia.

Detailed description

Hip fracture is a common disease among elderly people,and has a high mortality and morbidity.But,seldom practice can be done to improve this condition.For a long time,whether anesthesia type could influence the prognosis after surgery is controversial.Several studies have confirmed regional anesthesia may be better for patients for its fewer complications.But most studies are retrospective,and information may be less convincing .Besides,as a matter of fact,patients of different anesthesia type may have different status,so,a scoring system may be need for comparing the status of patients of different groups. Our study is a prospective observational trial.Patients needing hip fracture surgery are divided into two groups according to the anesthesia type during surgery:Regional Anesthesia group(RA),General Anesthesia group(GA).To evaluate the status of patients before surgery,we use Orthopedic POSSUM scoring system.It consists of 12 physiological factors and 6 operative severity factors.Then,we will observe outcome of the two groups and record every complication after surgery.Finally,the initial and adjusted morbidity and mortality according to Orthopedic POSSUM scoring system of the two groups are compared.

Interventions

RA group uses regional anesthesia(epidural, spinal, combined spinal and epidural anesthesia or nerve block) ,and GA group uses general anesthesia(general anesthesia combined with peripheral nerve blockade, general anesthesia combined with spinal/epidural anesthesia or single general anesthesia) .

Sponsors

Wenzhou Medical University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with hip fracture; * Need surgery; * Anesthesia type is regional anesthesia or general anesthesia; * Age≥60 years.

Exclusion criteria

* Choosing conservative treatment; * Other types of anesthesia or without anesthesia.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mortality30-day after surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
VAS pain scoreeveryday after surgery,record for 7 days
Morbidity30-day after surgery

Other

MeasureTime frame
The Orthopedic POSSUM scorebaseline

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactTing Li, M.D.
liting1021@aliyun.com00447570150148
Backup ContactYahe Ge, Medical Student
770736428@qq.com008615330056542

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026