Skip to content

Shivering Treatment After Cesarean Delivery: Meperidine vs. Dexmedetomidine

Traitement Des Frissons Lors de la césarienne Sous anesthésie péridurale Durant le Travail - un Essai Clinique randomisé Comparant la dexmédétomidine et la mépéridine

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03115047
Enrollment
80
Registered
2017-04-14
Start date
2017-05-07
Completion date
2020-08-20
Last updated
2022-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cesarean Section Complications

Brief summary

Comparing two treatments for shivering after cesarean delivery for labor dystocia under epidural anesthesia.

Detailed description

It is a double blinded randomized control trial. Study population: parturients undergoing a cesarean delivery for labor dystocia under epidural anesthesia experiencing shivering grade III or IV on the standardized shivering scale of Crossley and Mahajan Experimental group: dexmedetomidine 0.35 mcg/kg IV in 2 minutes Control group: meperidine 0.35 mg/kg IV in 2 minutes Primary outcome : Time to stop level III and IV shivering on the Crossley and Mahajan standardized shivering scale after the administration of the study drug Secondary outcome: Response rate, incidence of nausea, vomiting, hypotension, bradycardia, maternal satisfaction and a cost-benefit analysis. The hypothesis is that dexmedetomidine will act faster, will have a superior response rate with less adverse effects.

Interventions

DRUGDexmedetomidine Injection

0.35 mcg/kg intravenous in 2 minutes if shivering 5 minutes after delivery

DRUGMeperidine Injection

0.35 mg/kg intravenous in 2 minutes if shivering 5 minutes after delivery

Sponsors

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Double-blinded randomized study: meperidine and dexmedetomidine will be prepared at the hospital pharmacy in a 10 mL seringue with equivalent dilution in order to gave mL/kg.

Intervention model description

Comparing two groups: experimental (dexmedetomidine) versus control (meperidine)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Term \> 37 weeks * American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) I, II * Weight \< 115 kg * Functional epidural in situ * In labor requiring cesarean delivery * Class III or IV shivering on the Crossley and Mahajan standardized shivering scale between five minutes after the baby's birth to the end of the cesarean section

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal of the patient and/or the anesthesiologist * Misunderstanding of the protocol * Known allergy or contraindication to one of the study drugs * Emergency cesarean delivery * American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status III, IV, V * Severe heart, liver or kidney disease, * Preeclampsia * Patient taking monoamine oxydase inhibitors * Sleep apnea * General anesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Stop time15 minutesTime to stop class III or IV shivering on the Crossley and Mahajan standardized shivering scale after the administration of the study drug (meperidine versus dexmedetomidine)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
incidence of adverse effects24 hourssedation, nausea, vomiting, hypotension and bradycardia
maternal satisfactionat 24 hourssatisfaction (yes or no) regarding experience with study drug
response rate15 minutespercentage of patient responding when the drug is given
cost benefice analysis24 hourscomparing cost of the drug

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026