Skip to content

Cognitive AppRoaches to coMbatting Suicidality

A Psychological Intervention for Suicide Applied to Patents With Psychosis: the CARMS Trial (Cognitive Approaches to Combatting Suicidality)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03114917
Acronym
CARMS
Enrollment
329
Registered
2017-04-14
Start date
2017-05-12
Completion date
2022-01-27
Last updated
2023-05-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psychosis, Suicidality, Suicide Prevention

Keywords

Suicide, Self-harm, Psychosis, Community, Suicide Prevention, CBT, CARMS, Randomised controlled trial

Brief summary

This is a randomised controlled trial which investigates the effectiveness of CARMS (Cognitive AppRoaches to coMbatting Suicidality) therapy in reducing suicidal thoughts and how well CARMS works in practice within the NHS. The trial will compare two groups of people with psychosis who are using NHS mental health services. One group will carry on with their usual treatment. The other group will be offered 24 weekly sessions of CARMS therapy, plus their usual treatment.

Detailed description

Estimates show that around 6% of people with experiences of psychosis die by suicide. Many more think about it and attempt suicide. A meta-analysis by the investigators illustrated that psychological therapies are effective in reducing suicidal thoughts and acts in people with psychosis as long as those therapies target suicidal thoughts, intentions and plans, and not the reduction of symptoms of mental illnesses. Based on this work, we have designed a psychological cognitive talking therapy (called CARMS) to reduce suicidal thoughts in people with experiences of psychosis which targets the psychological processes thought to underpin the pathways to suicidal thoughts and behaviours. An increasing body of work shows that many people with psychosis experience social isolation, emotional dysregulation, and poor interpersonal problem-solving. These appraisals can then induce and intensify perceptions of being hopeless, trapped and defeated, which in turn leads to suicidal thoughts and acts. CARMS aims to help people find practical ways to change these sorts of perceptions. Two of the investigators' pilot randomised trials have demonstrated that CARMS is feasible and acceptable to people experiencing psychosis and may have the potential to be effective at reducing key suicide outcomes. Hence, the investigators' next step is to test the efficacy of CARMS in the context of NHS mental health services and also to test whether the underlying psychological mechanisms on which CARMS is based are correct. The investigators will test CARMS using a medium sized randomised controlled trial (RCT), with two arms of CARMS plus treatment as usual versus just treatment as usual. The target sample size is 250, with approximately 125 randomised to each arm of the trial, and an assumption of up to 25% attrition. Hence, the overall recruitment target is up to 333. The investigators will use both quantitative and qualitative methods and analyses to assess CARMS.

Interventions

OTHERCognitive AppRoaches to coMbatting Suicidality (CARMS)

The investigators' psychological therapy is a recovery-focused, structured, time-limited, socio-cognitive intervention. It is based upon the investigators' recently developed treatment manual (Tarrier et al., 2013) and pilot RCTs in the community (Tarrier et al., 2014) and in prison (Tarrier et al., accepted). The intervention modifies negative appraisals of emotional regulation, social support, and interpersonal problem-solving. As a consequence, perceptions of defeat, entrapment, and hopelessness will be improved indirectly. In addition, perceptions of defeat, entrapment, and hopelessness will be worked on directly during the therapy.

Sponsors

Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Lancaster University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Manchester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

All Research Assistants will be blinded to treatment allocation. The Research Assistants will be carrying out outcomes assessments at baseline, 6 month and 12 month.

Intervention model description

Randomised-controlled trial with a qualitative component.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ICD-10 diagnosis of psychosis (i.e. F20 - F29) * suicidal thoughts and/or acts in the past three months * in contact with mental health services and under the care of a mental health services clinical team (i.e., community or inpatient mental health care teams) with a care coordinator * aged 18 or over * English-speaking (hence, not needing an interpreter) * able to give informed consent as assessed by either a responsible clinician or by trial RAs following the British Psychological Society's guidelines on gaining informed consent (http://www.bps.org.uk/sites/default/files/documents/code\_of\_human\_research\_ethics.pdf)

Exclusion criteria

* dementia, or an organic brain disorder * unable to complete assessments due to language barriers * currently taking part in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline Adult Suicide Ideation Questionnaire score at 6 and 12 monthsBaseline, 6 month and 12 month follow upSuicidal ideation valid measure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline Beck Scale for Suicidal ideation score at 6 and 12 monthsBaseline, 6 month and 12 month follow upAssess an individual's thoughts, attitudes and intentions regarding suicide
Change from Baseline Frequency of suicidal thoughts, plans and acts at 6 and 12 monthsBaseline, 6 month and 12 month follow upClinical interview to ascertain frequency of suicidal thoughts, plans and acts across six months
Change from Baseline Frequency of Suicide Attempts at 6 and 12 monthsBaseline, 6 month and 12 month follow upFrequency of suicide attempts will be collected from medical records
Change from Baseline Suicide Probability Scale score at 6 and 12 monthsBaseline, 6 month and 12 month follow upSuicide risk valid measure

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from Baseline Social Problem-Solving Inventory score at 6 and 12 monthsBaseline, 6 month and 12 month follow upThe questionnaire measures individual's social problem-solving skills
Change from Baseline Social Support Appraisals Scale score at 6 and 12 monthsBaseline, 6 month and 12 month follow upThe questionnaire measures individual's appraisals of social support
Change from Baseline Beck Hopelessness Scale score at 6 and 12 monthsBaseline, 6 month and 12 month follow upThe questionnaire measures three aspects of hopelessness: feelings about the future, loss of motivation, and expectations
Change from Baseline Drug use (self-reported) DAST score at 6 and 12 monthsBaseline, 6 month and 12 month follow upMeasure which identifies drug 'abuse'
Change from Baseline Defeat and Entrapment scale scores at 6 and 12 monthsBaseline, 6 month and 12 month follow upThe questionnaire measures how defeated and trapped individuals feel respectively
Change from Baseline Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale score at 6 and 12 monthsBaseline, 6 month and 12 month follow upClinical interview to assess symptom severity of individual's experiencing Schizophrenia
Change from Baseline Psychotic Symptoms Ratings Scale (PSYRATS) score at 6 and 12 monthsBaseline, 6 month and 12 month follow upClinical interview to assess symptoms of psychosis
Change from Baseline Personal and Social Performance Scale score at 6 and 12 monthsBaseline, 6 month and 12 month follow upClinical interview to assess personal and social functioning in individual's experiencing Schizophrenia
Change from Baseline Calgary Depression Scale score at 6 and 12 monthsBaseline, 6 month and 12 month follow upClinical interview to assess symptoms of depression in individual's experiencing Schizophrenia
Change from Baseline Frequency and Type of Substance Misuse as measured by the Timeline Follow Back at 6 and 12 monthsBaseline, 6 month and 12 month follow upClinical interview to ascertain frequency and type of substance misuse over 3 months
Change from Baseline Alcohol use (self-reported) AUDIT score at 6 and 12 monthsBaseline, 6 month and 12 month follow upGold standard measure which identifies alcohol use
Change from Baseline Reasons for substance Use Scale - Alcohol and Drugs scores at 6 and 12 monthsBaseline, 6 month and 12 month follow upQuestionnaire measure which identifies individual's reasons for using alcohol and drugs respectively
Change from Baseline Sleep Condition Indicator score at 6 and 12 monthsBaseline, 6 month and 12 month follow upThe questionnaire measures insomnia
Current medication for mental health problems as prescribed at baseline assessment time pointBaselineInformation regarding which anti-psychotic medication, if the medication is atypical, and the dosage will be collected from medical records
Change from Baseline Working Alliance Inventory - short form score at 6 and 12 monthsBaseline, 6 month and 12 month follow upThe questionnaire measure the client-therapist therapeutic alliance from the participant's and the therapist's perspective
Change from Baseline EQ-5D score at 12 monthsBaseline and 12 month follow upThe questionnaire measures health outcomes
Change from Baseline Client Service Use Receipt Inventory at 12 monthsBaseline and 12 month follow upThe questionnaire measures use of services
Change from Baseline Difficulties in Emotional Regulation Scale score at 6 and 12 monthsBaseline, 6 month and 12 month follow upThe questionnaire measures emotional dysregulation

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026