Skip to content

Accelerated TMS to a Novel Brain Target in MDD and PTSD

Accelerated TMS to a Novel Brain Target in MDD and PTSD

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03114891
Enrollment
50
Registered
2017-04-14
Start date
2017-04-20
Completion date
2021-12-01
Last updated
2023-05-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depressive Disorder, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

Keywords

post-traumatic stress, depression, ptsd, tms

Brief summary

This is a Clinical Trial designed to evaluate novel transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) methods for treating depression/PTSD. TMS is an FDA-approved procedure for treatment-resistant depression. The use of the stimulation in this current study is considered experimental. The purpose of this research study is to compare the effects of TMS at two different brain regions. This information will help the investigators to determine which treatment strategies provide the greatest clinical benefit to patients. Results of the study will provide brain and behavior measures for future work, which may be critical to developing effective disease markers and novel treatments for psychiatric conditions.

Detailed description

Non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is now FDA-approved for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). However, there is growing evidence that the targeting strategy for delivering TMS treatment would yield superior clinical outcomes if it were more tailored to individual neuroanatomy. The current study take this idea one step further and suggest that functional MRI guided TMS might yield an even greater leap forward in promoting optimal clinical outcomes. The sgACC has been well established as a brain area sensitive to negative mood inductions and implicated in neural abnormalities associated with affective and stress disorders. It is therefore one of the primary targets for deep brain stimulation (DBS) treatment of MDD using surgically implanted DBS devices. Recent posthoc imaging studies of patients who have undergone TMS treatment for depression suggest that treatment outcomes tended to be better when patients were by chance stimulated in an area of lateral prefrontal cortex that had high levels of functional connectivity with sgACC. Based on this finding and on interleaved TMS/fMRI probe data, the investigators contend that targeting delivery of TMS to the brain surface non-invasively as indicated by sgACC resting functional connectivity may be especially effective in downregulating sgACC and thereby producing superior clinical outcomes. Researchers have used TMS/fMRI to better understand causal communication among circuits typically examined with resting fMRI alone. Recent work suggests that there are specific sites that, when stimulated, influence subcortical brain areas implicated in affective disorders such as the sgACC. Previously, TMS targets were based on brain atlases mapped onto individual brain surfaces. This proposal will utilize more individualized targeting from participants' own resting connectivity data to guide stimulation that we show is especially effective in influencing downstream brain areas of interest. The investigators will focus on a target region of the lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) that data suggest is particularly effective at influencing the sgACC. As an alternative brain target, we will also test the efficacy of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex as a target given its precedence in the literature as an effective stimulation site for remediating depressive symptoms. The target will be chosen based on an atlas and will adjust the target coordinates based on the inverse of a nonlinear normalization of each participant's brain to standard brain space. Thus, individual anatomical differences will be taken account with this target though without guidance from individual functional imaging data. To increase generalizability to other disorders and to patients with comorbid anxiety and depression (the typical clinical profile), the investigators will recruit patients who are diagnosed PTSD and have symptoms of depression or those who experience trauma-induced MDD. Participants will be scanned in an MRI to get anatomical and resting fMRI data to guide TMS, then participants will be invited to participate in two rounds of two week TMS treatment to each site (order counterbalanced) with one month between treatments. Participants will be monitored to assess PTSD symptoms, depressive symptoms,and quality of life before, acutely after, and one month following TMS treatments to evaluate the effectiveness of each site in mitigating symptoms or improving functioning.

Interventions

DEVICETranscranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS)

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive form of brain stimulation. TMS can influence activity in various brain regions, and it allows researchers to test or modify brain circuit communication. In this study, we used administered theta burst TMS stimulation.

BEHAVIORALTask

Subject completes a working memory task (Letter Nback) between the two rounds of theta burst stimulation.

PROCEDUREfMRI-guided TMS target

Administration of TMS to individualized targeting from the participant's fMRI scans. Our preliminary data suggest this target region is particularly effective at influencing the sgACC.

Sponsors

Cures Within Reach
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Pennsylvania
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Masking description

The patients will be blinded as to whether or not their site of stimulation is based on the standard targeting method or our novel fMRI-guided targeting method. In addition, staff members administering TMS will not know if the site of stimulation was created based on the standard targeting method or novel fMRI method.

Intervention model description

This is a randomized study. All subjects will receive active TMS, so there is no placebo or sham condition. However, the patients will be blinded as to whether or not their site of stimulation is based on the standard targeting method or our novel fMRI-guided targeting method. TMS is administered over to one of these two sites over a two week period, and then TMS will be administered to the other site over a subsequent two-week period. All subjects will receive TMS to both sites as a part of the study, but the order is randomized and counterbalanced.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. 18-60 years old, male or female, any race 2. Patients must currently meet sufficient DSM criteria for PTSD and have symptoms of depression; or meet criteria for trauma-induced MDD 3. Capacity to give informed consent and follow study procedures 4. English speaking

Exclusion criteria

1. Outside age range 2. Patient does not meet sufficient DSM criteria for PTSD or MDD 3. Psychiatric medication use 4. Significant handicaps (e.g. mental handicap) that would interfere with testing procedures 5. MRI contraindications 6. Additional TMS contraindications 7. Medication use that substantially reduces seizure threshold to TMS (olanzapine, chlorpromazine, lithium) 8. Opiate medication 9. Known neurological disorders including multiple sclerosis, encephalopathy, seizure disorder, brain tumors 10. Current alcohol or substance abuse disorder (moderate or severe) 11. Current schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder, or current bipolar disorder 12. Refusal to abstain from illicit drug use for the duration of the study 13. Refusal to abstain from alcohol within 24 hours of the MRI scan 14. Pregnancy 15. Newly initiated psychotherapy (less than 6 weeks)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in Depression Severity of TMS at fMRI-guided Brain Target vs Standard Brain TargetBefore and after the first round of two weeks of TMS treatment (two daily iTBS sessions over 10 consecutive weekdays)We used the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) to measure depression severity after TMS at fMRI-guided brain target vs standard brain target. The MADRS is clinician-rated and consists of 10 items; each item is rated on a 0-6 scale, resulting in a maximum total score of 60 points. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression. For this outcome, we calculated the change (percent decrease) from the participant's baseline MADRS score to their MADRS score after the first round of TMS (to either fMRI-guided brain target or standard brain target). If the outcome is positive, there was a reduction in the MADRS total score, or a reduction in the presence of depressive symptoms after TMS. If the change is negative, there was an increase in the MADRS total score, or an increase in the presence of depressive symptoms after TMS. Higher positive values means better outcome (or more symptom reduction).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Of the 87 subjects screened for the study, 37 did not start treatment (19 were deemed ineligible,15 withdrew, 3 lost to follow up) and 50 enrolled in the study (assigned to an intervention group).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
First Round: fMRI-guided Target/Video
First round: This site of stimulation will be created from participants' individualized resting connectivity data. We will identify a cortical target in the left prefrontal cortex (LPFC) that influences the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC). Two daily sessions (\ 10min apart) of intermittent theta-burst stimulation will be administered to this fMRI-guided target for 10 consecutive weekdays. Between the two iTBS sessions, participants will watch a relaxing nature video. Second round: After 3 weeks, participants will undergo another set of two daily iTBS sessions for 10 consecutive weekdays to their 'standard' target (6cm anterior of their hand knob). Between the two iTBS sessions, participants will complete a working memory task.
12
First Round: 6cm Target/Video
First round: This 'standard' target will be identified by measuring 6cm anterior of the hand knob. Two daily sessions (\ 10min apart) of intermittent theta-burst stimulation will be administered to this to this target for 10 consecutive weekdays. Between the two iTBS sessions, participants will watch a relaxing nature video. Second round: After 3 weeks, participants will undergo another set of two daily iTBS sessions for 10 consecutive weekdays to their fMRI-guided target (cortical target influencing sgACC). Between the two iTBS sessions, participants will complete a working memory task.
14
First Round: fMRI-guided Target/Task
First round: This site of stimulation will be created from participants' individualized resting connectivity data. We will identify a cortical target in the left prefrontal cortex (LPFC) that influences the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC). Two daily sessions (\ 10min apart) of intermittent theta-burst stimulation will be administered to this fMRI-guided target for 10 consecutive weekdays. Between the two iTBS sessions, participants will complete a working memory task. Second round: After 3 weeks, participants will undergo another set of two daily iTBS sessions for 10 consecutive weekdays to their 'standard' target (6cm anterior of their hand knob). Between the two iTBS sessions, participants will watch a relaxing nature video.
11
First Round: 6cm Target/Task
First round: This 'standard' target will be identified by measuring 6cm anterior of the hand knob. Two daily sessions (\ 10min apart) of intermittent theta-burst stimulation will be administered to this to this target for 10 consecutive weekdays. Between the two iTBS sessions, participants will complete a working memory task. Second round: After 3 weeks, participants will undergo another set of two daily iTBS sessions for 10 consecutive weekdays to their fMRI-guided target (cortical target influencing sgACC). Between the two iTBS sessions, participants will watch a relaxing nature video.
13
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
3 Week BreakLost to Follow-up1001
3 Week BreakWithdrawal by Subject0100
First Treatment RoundLost to Follow-up0110
First Treatment RoundWithdrawal by Subject0201
Second Treatment RoundLost to Follow-up1000
Second Treatment RoundPhysician Decision1000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFirst Round: fMRI-guided Target/VideoFirst Round: 6cm Target/VideoFirst Round: fMRI-guided Target/TaskFirst Round: 6cm Target/TaskTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
12 Participants14 Participants11 Participants13 Participants50 Participants
Age, Continuous35.25 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.79
36.42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.06
29.27 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.45
36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.56
34.46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.45
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants12 Participants8 Participants11 Participants42 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
PHQ-915.08 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.21
15.43 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.69
16 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.77
17.85 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.21
16.10 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.51
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants1 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
8 Participants8 Participants5 Participants9 Participants30 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants7 Participants8 Participants8 Participants31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants7 Participants3 Participants5 Participants19 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 230 / 240 / 210 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 237 / 242 / 210 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 230 / 240 / 210 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change in Depression Severity of TMS at fMRI-guided Brain Target vs Standard Brain Target

We used the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) to measure depression severity after TMS at fMRI-guided brain target vs standard brain target. The MADRS is clinician-rated and consists of 10 items; each item is rated on a 0-6 scale, resulting in a maximum total score of 60 points. Higher MADRS score indicates more severe depression. For this outcome, we calculated the change (percent decrease) from the participant's baseline MADRS score to their MADRS score after the first round of TMS (to either fMRI-guided brain target or standard brain target). If the outcome is positive, there was a reduction in the MADRS total score, or a reduction in the presence of depressive symptoms after TMS. If the change is negative, there was an increase in the MADRS total score, or an increase in the presence of depressive symptoms after TMS. Higher positive values means better outcome (or more symptom reduction).

Time frame: Before and after the first round of two weeks of TMS treatment (two daily iTBS sessions over 10 consecutive weekdays)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
First Round: fMRI-guided Target/Video, Second Round: 6cm Target/TaskPercent Change in Depression Severity of TMS at fMRI-guided Brain Target vs Standard Brain Target49.11 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 25.42
First Round: 6cm Target/Video, Second Round: fMRI-guided Target/TaskPercent Change in Depression Severity of TMS at fMRI-guided Brain Target vs Standard Brain Target24.94 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 37.97
First Round: fMRI-guided Target/Task, Second Round: 6cm Target/VideoPercent Change in Depression Severity of TMS at fMRI-guided Brain Target vs Standard Brain Target36.47 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 33.91
First Round: 6cm Target/Task, Second Round: fMRI-guided Target/TaskPercent Change in Depression Severity of TMS at fMRI-guided Brain Target vs Standard Brain Target42.56 percentage of changeStandard Deviation 30.75

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026