Atrial Fibrillation
Conditions
Keywords
ablation, atrioventricular node, microfidelity
Brief summary
The aim of our study is to investigate the comparative efficacy of high fidelity multi electrode ablation catheters vs the standard bipolar configuration in success of AV nodal ablation This study will provide insights on the use of new technology where application may increase efficacy, promote patient and physician safety and decrease costs.
Detailed description
Introduction In some elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), especially in combination with heart failure, a rate control strategy may be preferred. When pharmacological therapy is ineffective or not tolerated, it is reasonable to perform atrioventricular (AV) node ablation with ventricular pacing as a class IIA indication per current guidelines. Usually, the procedure is simple and straightforward and complete heart block can be achieved without any difficulty. However, this simple procedure can sometimes prove to be a most difficult case. The most common reason for failure to achieve complete heart block is the inability to localize the compact AV node using the His signal with standard intracardiac electrograms. As these patients come to the laboratory in AF, the His signal may be obscured by AF waves. In some patients with a deeper intramyocardial location of the His bundle and compact AV node it becomes necessary to produce deeper ablation lesions using an irrigated catheter to achieve block. In patients with AF, the target of ablation for the ablate and pace approach is the compact AV node, located at the apex of the triangle of Koch. Ideally, ablation is performed at the most proximal penetrating part of the His bundle in order to maintain a proximal automatic junctional rhythm and avoid pacemaker dependence. Para Hisian pacing is most commonly used to reveal the presence of a septal accessory pathway. The His bundle is a deep insulated structure and it is difficult to capture it at usual energy outputs. Using a high- output pacing (usually 20 mA at 2 msec) it is possible to directly capture the deeply situated His bundle, which is confirmed by a narrower QRS complex on the paced electrograms. Thus, high-output pacing can be utilized to map the His bundle area in difficult situations. By applying this electrophysiologic principle of differential tissue capture to help identify the location of the compact AV node, which is in close proximity to the His bundle. Ventricular pacing was performed initially at high output to capture both the basal right ventricular myocardium and the His bundle and the output was gradually lowered to lose His bundle capture. The QRS duration is relatively narrow with high output pacing and increases when the pacing output is lowered, representing ventricular myocardial capture alone. Finally, loss of ventricular capture is seen with further reduction of pacing output. This maneuver has been shown to aid in determining the proximity of the ablation catheter to compact AV node as was validated by successful ablation at this site. Parahisian pacing in conjunction with av nodal ablation has recently been described in the literature. A novel catheter with three mini electrodes within the ablation tip (IntellaTip MiFi, Boston Scientific, Boston, MA) may enhance the available data for such a signal dependent technique. In this catheter, bipolar signals can be recorded between the three 0.8-mm-wide electrodes that are arranged radially 1.3 mm from the end of the catheter alongside the standard distal and proximal bipolar recordings. Animal studies have already demonstrated that the mini electrodes in this novel catheter are more accurate in identifying conducting gaps in linear ablations than conventional electrode recordings. Study Aims: The aim of our study is to investigate the comparative efficacy of high fidelity multi electrode ablation catheters vs the standard bipolar configuration in success of AV nodal ablation This study will provide insights on the use of new technology where application may increase efficacy, promote patient and physician safety and decrease costs. Primary and secondary objectives Primary endpoints 1. Acute success of ablation identified by a junctional rhythm or complete heart block 2. Time from application of radiofrequency energy to acute success Secondary endpoints include 1. Procedure time 2. Radiation time 3. Frequency of ablation application 4. Duration of ablation application
Interventions
Multielectrode Catheter: standard ablation catheter that has the ability to record low and high frequency signals with high fidelity
Standard of care for patients with certain cardiac arrhythmias.
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
Variable block sizes will be used to improve the blinding of the clinical team. This information will then be used to design a fully-powered randomized study to compare these two arms. Patients will be randomly assigned to study arms. The project biostatistician and team will generate a set of envelopes which contain the random assignments for each patient. Once a patient has consented to participate, the next envelope will be opened for that patient and the catheter assignment will be revealed. This will maintain the blinding of the clinical team.
Intervention model description
Standard ablation catheter vs MIFI catheter
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Patients with a diagnosis of persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation documented on electrocardiography 2. Patients must meet American College of Cardiology and Heart Rhythm Society ACC/HRS guidelines for atrioventricular nodal ablation procedure 3. Patients must be available for at least 1 month post procedure 4. Patients must be greater than or equal to 18 years old.
Exclusion criteria
1\. Patients who do not meet ACC/HRS indications for av nodal ablation
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The Time Differences Between the 2 Arms for Acute Success of Ablation Identified by a Junctional Rhythm or Complete Heart Block | 60 seconds | Identified by a junctional rhythm or complete heart block. Time zero is when the ablation procedure begins and the successful outcomes are either complete heart block or junctional rhythm. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time From Application of Radio-frequency Energy to Acute Success | up to 3000 seconds | The target will be where the HIS electrogram amplitude is greatest and where the QRS complex from pacing is narrowest. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
There was no wash out or run-in event. The significant portion of the research was the AV nodal ablation
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Bipolar Ablation Catheter Subjects will be randomized by random computer programming to receive standard ablation catheter for their procedure.
Standard Ablation Catheter: Standard of care for patients with certain cardiac arrhythmias. | 15 |
| MIFI Ablation Catheter Subjects will be randomized by random computer programming to receive an ablation with MIFI technology. MIFI Catheter contains tightly spaced multielectrode pattern
MIFI Catheter: Multielectrode Catheter: standard ablation catheter that has the ability to record low and high frequency signals with high fidelity | 15 |
| Total | 30 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | MIFI Ablation Catheter | Total | Bipolar Ablation Catheter |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 13 Participants | 26 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 72.46 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 | 74.13 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.73 | 75.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.09 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | 0 Participants | — |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 15 Participants | 30 Participants | 15 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 4 Participants | 10 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 11 Participants | 20 Participants | 9 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
Outcome results
The Time Differences Between the 2 Arms for Acute Success of Ablation Identified by a Junctional Rhythm or Complete Heart Block
Identified by a junctional rhythm or complete heart block. Time zero is when the ablation procedure begins and the successful outcomes are either complete heart block or junctional rhythm.
Time frame: 60 seconds
Population: Randomized
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Bipolar Ablation Catheter | The Time Differences Between the 2 Arms for Acute Success of Ablation Identified by a Junctional Rhythm or Complete Heart Block | 5 seconds |
| MIFI Ablation Catheter | The Time Differences Between the 2 Arms for Acute Success of Ablation Identified by a Junctional Rhythm or Complete Heart Block | 4 seconds |
Time From Application of Radio-frequency Energy to Acute Success
The target will be where the HIS electrogram amplitude is greatest and where the QRS complex from pacing is narrowest.
Time frame: up to 3000 seconds
Population: Randomized
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Bipolar Ablation Catheter | Time From Application of Radio-frequency Energy to Acute Success | 615 seconds |
| MIFI Ablation Catheter | Time From Application of Radio-frequency Energy to Acute Success | 525 seconds |