Mantle-Cell Lymphoma
Conditions
Keywords
PCYC, MCL, Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, NHL, ibrutinib, venetoclax, Pharmacyclics
Brief summary
This Phase 3 multinational, randomized, double-blind study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax vs. ibrutinib and placebo in subjects with MCL.
Interventions
Administered orally once daily
Administered orally once daily
Administered orally once daily
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Relapsed/Refractory Arm Inclusion Criteria: * Pathologically confirmed MCL (in tumor tissue), with documentation of either overexpression of cyclin D1 in association with other relevant markers (eg, CD19, CD20, PAX5, CD5) or evidence of t(11;14) as assessed by cytogenetics, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), or polymerase chain reaction (PCR). * At least 1 measurable site of disease on cross-sectional imaging (CT). * At least 1, but no more than 5, prior treatment regimens for MCL. * Failure to achieve at least partial response (PR) with, or documented disease progression after, the most recent treatment regimen. * Subjects must have adequate fresh or paraffin embedded tissue. * Adequate hematologic, hepatic and renal function. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of \<= 2.
Exclusion criteria
* History or current evidence of central nervous system lymphoma. * Concurrent enrollment in another therapeutic investigational study or prior therapy with ibrutinib or other BTK inhibitors. * Prior treatment with venetoclax or other BCL2 inhibitors. * Anticancer therapy including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, small molecule and investigational agents \<= 21 days prior to receiving the first dose of study drug. * Treatment with any of the following within 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug: moderate to strong cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) inhibitors or strong CYP3A inducers. Treatment Naïve Arm Inclusion Criteria: * Pathologically confirmed treatment-naive MCL (tumor tissue), with documentation of either overexpression of cyclin D1 in association with other relevant markers (eg, CD19, CD20, PAX5, CD5) or evidence of t(11;14), as assessed by cytogenetics, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), or polymerase chain reaction (PCR). * Men and women ≥18 years of age with a TP53 mutation. * At least 1 measurable site of disease by CT. * Must have adequate fresh or paraffin-embedded tissue. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score 0 to \<= 2. * Adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) Events (Safety Run-in) | After at least 3 months of treatment, with an overall median treatment duration of 20.0 months | TLS events are defined as follows: * Clinical TLS: any event that meets Howard criteria (N Engl J Med 2011;364:1844-1854) with the following exceptions: * For the purpose of TLS assessment during the Safety Run-in Period, only those increases in serum creatinine \> 1.0 mg/dL from pre-treatment baseline will be considered clinical TLS. * In participants with renal dysfunction at baseline (CrCl \< 60 mL/min), clinical TLS is defined as the presence of laboratory TLS plus either seizures, cardiac dysrhythmia, or death. * Laboratory TLS: any event that meets Howard criteria (N Engl J Med 2011;364:1844-1854) for laboratory TLS, that does not resolve within 72 hours despite protocol required management. |
| Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | After at least 3 months of treatment, with an overall median treatment duration of 20.0 months | DLT: any Grade (Gr) 3 or higher non-TLS adverse event (AE) at least possibly related to study drug occurring during the DLT assessment period with the following clarifications: Non-Hematologic DLTs: Gr ≥3 nausea, vomiting or diarrhea uncontrolled despite maximum medical supportive care and persisting \>5 days; Gr 3 fatigue persisting \>7 days; Gr 3 infection is not a DLT, however an infection with lifethreatening consequences or requiring urgent intervention (Gr 4) was considered a DLT; Treatment delay of any study drug \>7 days for toxicity. Hematologic DLTs: Gr 3 neutropenia is not a DLT, however, Gr 4 neutropenia (ANC \<500/mm\^3) lasting for \> 7 days is a DLT; Gr 3 or 4 neutropenia complicated by fever ≥38.5°C or infection; Gr 4 thrombocytopenia (\<25,000/mm\^3) that persists for \> 7 days; Gr 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia associated with Gr 2 or greater bleeding; Gr 3 anemia is not a DLT, however, Gr 4 anemia is a DLT; Treatment delay of any study drug \>7 days for hematologic toxicity. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | From first dose of study drug until the end of treatment + 30 days, with an overall median treatment duration of 20.0 months | AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study. Serious adverse event (SAE): an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs): any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug. Event severity is graded as mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), life threatening (4), death (5). |
| Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Randomization Phase) | For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months | PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014), or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. |
| Complete Response (CR) Rate (Treatment-Naive Arm) | For an overall median time on study of 40.51 months | CR rate is defined as the percentage of participants with a CR according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Response Rate (ORR) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase) and 40.51 months (Treatment-Naïve arm) | ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR per investigator assessment according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014). |
| MRD-negative Remission Rate in Participants Who Achieve CR Per Investigator Assessment (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase) and 40.51 months (Treatment-Naïve arm) | MRD-negative remission rate is defined as the percentage of participants with undetectable MRD at documented CR in participants who were MRD positive at screening as assessed by flow cytometry in bone marrow and/or peripheral blood, with requirement of confirmation of MRD negativity in the subsequent peripheral blood 12 weeks later. |
| Overall Survival (OS) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase) and 40.51 months (Treatment-Naïve arm) | OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization (Randomization Phase) or the first dose of study treatment (Treatment-Naïve arm) to death from any cause. |
| Duration of Response (DOR) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase) and 40.51 months (Treatment-Naïve arm) | DOR is defined as the time frame for participants who achieve an overall response as the time from the first occurrence of response (CR or PR according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma \[Cheson 2014\]) to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first. |
| Time to Next Treatment (TTNT) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase) and 40.51 months (Treatment-Naïve arm) | TTNT is defined as the duration from the date of randomization (Randomization Phase) or date of first dose of study treatment (Treatment-Naive Arm) to the start date of any anti-lymphoma treatment subsequent to study treatment. Post-treatment stem cell transplantation, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, or other cellular therapies were not considered subsequent anti-cancer treatments for participants responding to the study treatment (CR or PR). |
| Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | From first dose of study drug until the end of treatment + 30 days, with an overall median treatment duration of 19.5 months | AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study. Serious adverse event (SAE): an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs): any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug. Event severity is graded as mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), life threatening (4), death (5). |
| Number of Participants With TLS TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | From first dose of study drug until the end of treatment + 7 days, with an overall median treatment duration 19.5 months | Treatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs): any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug (SD). Event severity is graded as mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), life threatening (4), death (5). |
| Steady-State Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Ibrutinib: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) (Randomization Phase) | Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose | Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters. |
| Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Time to Cmax (Tmax) (Randomization Phase) | Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose | Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters. |
| Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) (Randomization Phase) | Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose | Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters. |
| Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2,Term) (Randomization Phase) | Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose | Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters. |
| Overall Survival (OS) (Safety Run-in) | For an overall median time on study of 74.78 months | OS is defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study treatment to death from any cause. |
| Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From 0-24 Hours (AUC0-24) (Randomization Phase) | Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose | Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters. |
| Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) (Randomization Phase) | Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose | Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters. |
| Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Apparent Total Clearance at Steady State (CLss/F) (Randomization Phase) | Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose | Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters. |
| Steady-State PK of Venetoclax: Cmax (Randomization Phase) | Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose | Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters. |
| Steady-State PK of Venetoclax: AUC0-24 (Randomization Phase) | Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose | Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters. |
| Steady-State PK of Venetoclax: Time to Cmax (Tmax) (Randomization Phase) | Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose | Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters. |
| Steady-State PK of Venetoclax: CLss/F (Randomization Phase) | Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose | Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters. |
| Time to Worsening in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale of the Health-related Quality of Life (Randomization Phase) | For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase) | The FACT-Lym lymphoma-specific additional concerns subscale responses to all items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 not at all to 4 very much. The lymphoma subscale includes 15 items and scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores representing better functional status and well-being. A 5-point change in the Lym subscale was selected as a conservative estimate of clinically meaningful deterioration in lymphoma symptoms. |
| Duration of CR (Treatment-Naive Arm) | For an overall median time on study of 40.51 months | Duration of CR, defined for subjects who achieve CR according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014) as the time from the first occurrence of CR to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first. |
| Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Treatment-Naive Arm) | For an overall median time on study of 40.51 months | PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of disease progression using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014), or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. |
| Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Time of Last Measurable Concentration (Tlast) (Randomization Phase) | Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose | Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters. |
| Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Safety Run-in) | For an overall median time on study of 74.78 months | PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of disease progression using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014), or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. |
| Duration of Response (DOR) (Safety Run-in) | For an overall median time on study of 74.78 months | DOR is defined for participants who achieve an overall response as the time from the first occurrence of response (CR or PR according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma \[Cheson 2014\]) to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first. |
| Overall Response Rate (ORR) (Safety Run-in) | For an overall median time on study of 74.78 months | ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR per investigator assessment according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014). |
| Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) (Randomization Phase) | For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months | Complete response rate (CR) based on the best overall response per investigator assessment according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014). |
Countries
Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline Participants with an increased risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) enrolled into the open-label Safety Run-in Period received concurrent ibrutinib at 560 mg once daily and venetoclax starting at 20 mg, and gradually ramped up to a target dose of 400 mg once daily over a 5-week period. | 15 |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline Participants with an low risk of TLS enrolled into the open-label Safety Run-in Period received concurrent ibrutinib at 560 mg once daily and venetoclax starting at 20 mg, and gradually ramped up to a target dose of 400 mg once daily over a 5-week period. | 6 |
| Randomization Phase: Ibrutinb + Venetoclax Participants were randomized to ibrutinib 560 mg and venetoclax (starting at 20 mg, and gradually ramped up to a target dose of 400 mg) for approximately 104 weeks, followed by ibrutinib monotherapy until disease progression (PD), unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. Venetoclax was discontinued after 104 weeks of treatment, regardless of response assessment. | 134 |
| Randomization Phase: Ibrutinib + Placebo Participants were randomized to ibrutinib 560 mg and placebo for approximately 104 weeks, followed by ibrutinib monotherapy until PD, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. Placebo was discontinued after 104 weeks of treatment, regardless of response assessment. | 133 |
| Treatment-naive Open-label Arm Participants were treated with ibrutinib 560 mg and venetoclax (starting at 20 mg, and gradually ramped up to a target dose of 400 mg). | 78 |
| Total | 366 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 | FG004 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 8 | 3 | 67 | 73 | 18 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Other, Not Specified | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 3 | 0 | 11 | 9 | 7 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Randomization Phase: Ibrutinb + Venetoclax | Randomization Phase: Ibrutinib + Placebo | Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Treatment-naive Open-label Arm | Total | Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 93 Participants | 86 Participants | 13 Participants | 65 Participants | 258 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 41 Participants | 47 Participants | 2 Participants | 13 Participants | 108 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 8 Participants | 7 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 17 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 112 Participants | 110 Participants | 11 Participants | 72 Participants | 310 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 14 Participants | 16 Participants | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 39 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 2 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants | 6 Participants | 11 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 15 Participants | 14 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 35 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 116 Participants | 115 Participants | 12 Participants | 68 Participants | 317 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 31 Participants | 25 Participants | 6 Participants | 25 Participants | 89 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 103 Participants | 108 Participants | 9 Participants | 53 Participants | 277 Participants | 4 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk | EG003 affected / at risk | EG004 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 8 / 15 | 3 / 6 | 70 / 134 | 78 / 132 | 20 / 78 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 15 / 15 | 6 / 6 | 131 / 134 | 127 / 132 | 77 / 78 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 15 / 15 | 3 / 6 | 92 / 134 | 86 / 132 | 48 / 78 |
Outcome results
Complete Response (CR) Rate (Treatment-Naive Arm)
CR rate is defined as the percentage of participants with a CR according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014).
Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 40.51 months
Population: All Enrolled Treatment-Naïve Participants
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Complete Response (CR) Rate (Treatment-Naive Arm) | 69.2 percentage of participants |
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)
DLT: any Grade (Gr) 3 or higher non-TLS adverse event (AE) at least possibly related to study drug occurring during the DLT assessment period with the following clarifications: Non-Hematologic DLTs: Gr ≥3 nausea, vomiting or diarrhea uncontrolled despite maximum medical supportive care and persisting \>5 days; Gr 3 fatigue persisting \>7 days; Gr 3 infection is not a DLT, however an infection with lifethreatening consequences or requiring urgent intervention (Gr 4) was considered a DLT; Treatment delay of any study drug \>7 days for toxicity. Hematologic DLTs: Gr 3 neutropenia is not a DLT, however, Gr 4 neutropenia (ANC \<500/mm\^3) lasting for \> 7 days is a DLT; Gr 3 or 4 neutropenia complicated by fever ≥38.5°C or infection; Gr 4 thrombocytopenia (\<25,000/mm\^3) that persists for \> 7 days; Gr 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia associated with Gr 2 or greater bleeding; Gr 3 anemia is not a DLT, however, Gr 4 anemia is a DLT; Treatment delay of any study drug \>7 days for hematologic toxicity.
Time frame: After at least 3 months of treatment, with an overall median treatment duration of 20.0 months
Population: All treated safety run-in participants
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE/Any Grade | 3 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE/ Grade 3+4 | 3 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE/Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Atrial fibrillation/Any Grade | 1 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Atrial fibrillation/Grade 3+4 | 1 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Atrial fibrillation/Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Infection/Any Grade | 1 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Infection/Grade 3+4 | 1 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Infection/Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Neutropenia/Any Grade | 1 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Neutropenia/Grade 3+4 | 1 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Neutropenia/Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Neutropenia/Grade 3+4 | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE/Any Grade | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Infection/Any Grade | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE/ Grade 3+4 | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Neutropenia/Any Grade | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE/Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Infection/Grade 3+4 | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Atrial fibrillation/Any Grade | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Neutropenia/Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Atrial fibrillation/Grade 3+4 | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Infection/Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in) | Atrial fibrillation/Grade 5 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)
AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study. Serious adverse event (SAE): an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs): any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug. Event severity is graded as mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), life threatening (4), death (5).
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until the end of treatment + 30 days, with an overall median treatment duration of 20.0 months
Population: All treated safety run-in participants
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (I only) | 1 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (I or V) | 14 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any Ibrutinib (I) Related TEAE | 13 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (I Only) | 1 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (V only) | 1 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (V Only) | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE, Grade 3 | 15 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (Both I and V) | 13 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (Both I and V) | 4 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TESAE | 14 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any I Related TEAE Grade >=3 | 12 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TESAE, Grade >=3 | 14 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (I or V) | 7 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TESAE, V Related | 9 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any V Related TEAE Grade >=3 | 13 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TESAE, I Related | 10 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (I Only) | 1 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TESAE, V or I Related | 10 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (I or V) | 6 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Fatal TEAE | 1 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (V Only) | 3 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Major Hemorrhage | 2 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any Venetoclax (V) Related TEAE | 14 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Major Hemorrhage, Grade >=3 | 2 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (Both I and V) | 3 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Major Hemorrhage, TESAE | 2 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE | 15 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Major Hemorrhage, TESAE | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE | 6 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE, Grade 3 | 5 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any Venetoclax (V) Related TEAE | 6 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any V Related TEAE Grade >=3 | 4 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any Ibrutinib (I) Related TEAE | 5 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any I Related TEAE Grade >=3 | 4 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (I or V) | 2 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (I only) | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (V only) | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (Both I and V) | 2 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (I or V) | 4 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (I Only) | 3 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (V Only) | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (Both I and V) | 1 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (I or V) | 4 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (I Only) | 1 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (V Only) | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (Both I and V) | 3 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TESAE | 3 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TESAE, Grade >=3 | 2 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TESAE, V Related | 1 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TESAE, I Related | 1 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Any TESAE, V or I Related | 1 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Fatal TEAE | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Major Hemorrhage | 0 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in) | Major Hemorrhage, Grade >=3 | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) Events (Safety Run-in)
TLS events are defined as follows: * Clinical TLS: any event that meets Howard criteria (N Engl J Med 2011;364:1844-1854) with the following exceptions: * For the purpose of TLS assessment during the Safety Run-in Period, only those increases in serum creatinine \> 1.0 mg/dL from pre-treatment baseline will be considered clinical TLS. * In participants with renal dysfunction at baseline (CrCl \< 60 mL/min), clinical TLS is defined as the presence of laboratory TLS plus either seizures, cardiac dysrhythmia, or death. * Laboratory TLS: any event that meets Howard criteria (N Engl J Med 2011;364:1844-1854) for laboratory TLS, that does not resolve within 72 hours despite protocol required management.
Time frame: After at least 3 months of treatment, with an overall median treatment duration of 20.0 months
Population: All treated safety run-in participants
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) Events (Safety Run-in) | 1 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) Events (Safety Run-in) | 0 Participants |
Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Randomization Phase)
PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014), or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months
Population: All randomized participants
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Randomization Phase) | 31.9 months |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Randomization Phase) | 22.1 months |
Duration of CR (Treatment-Naive Arm)
Duration of CR, defined for subjects who achieve CR according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014) as the time from the first occurrence of CR to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 40.51 months
Population: All Enrolled Treatment-Naïve Subjects Achieving CR
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Duration of CR (Treatment-Naive Arm) | 37.1 months |
Duration of Response (DOR) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)
DOR is defined as the time frame for participants who achieve an overall response as the time from the first occurrence of response (CR or PR according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma \[Cheson 2014\]) to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase) and 40.51 months (Treatment-Naïve arm)
Population: All randomized participants and all enrolled treatment-naïve participants achieving response (partial response or better)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Duration of Response (DOR) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | 42.1 months |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Duration of Response (DOR) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | 27.6 months |
| Treatment-naive Open-label Arm | Duration of Response (DOR) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | 37.1 months |
Duration of Response (DOR) (Safety Run-in)
DOR is defined for participants who achieve an overall response as the time from the first occurrence of response (CR or PR according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma \[Cheson 2014\]) to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 74.78 months
Population: All Enrolled Safety Run-in Subjects Achieving Response (Partial Response or Better)
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Duration of Response (DOR) (Safety Run-in) | 44.1 months |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Duration of Response (DOR) (Safety Run-in) | NA months |
MRD-negative Remission Rate in Participants Who Achieve CR Per Investigator Assessment (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)
MRD-negative remission rate is defined as the percentage of participants with undetectable MRD at documented CR in participants who were MRD positive at screening as assessed by flow cytometry in bone marrow and/or peripheral blood, with requirement of confirmation of MRD negativity in the subsequent peripheral blood 12 weeks later.
Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase) and 40.51 months (Treatment-Naïve arm)
Population: All enrolled treatment-naïve participants achieving CR who were evaluable for MRD (those who had positive MRD status at screening). Participants with a given post-screening sample.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | MRD-negative Remission Rate in Participants Who Achieve CR Per Investigator Assessment (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | Bone marrow aspirate | 61.5 percentage of participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | MRD-negative Remission Rate in Participants Who Achieve CR Per Investigator Assessment (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | Peripheral blood | 77.4 percentage of participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | MRD-negative Remission Rate in Participants Who Achieve CR Per Investigator Assessment (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | Bone marrow aspirate | 28.6 percentage of participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | MRD-negative Remission Rate in Participants Who Achieve CR Per Investigator Assessment (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | Peripheral blood | 12.5 percentage of participants |
| Treatment-naive Open-label Arm | MRD-negative Remission Rate in Participants Who Achieve CR Per Investigator Assessment (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | Bone marrow aspirate | 59.1 percentage of participants |
| Treatment-naive Open-label Arm | MRD-negative Remission Rate in Participants Who Achieve CR Per Investigator Assessment (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | Peripheral blood | 76.5 percentage of participants |
Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)
AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study. Serious adverse event (SAE): an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs): any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug. Event severity is graded as mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), life threatening (4), death (5).
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until the end of treatment + 30 days, with an overall median treatment duration of 19.5 months
Population: All randomized and treated participants
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (I only) | 15 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (I or V) | 106 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any Ibrutinib (I) Related TEAE | 121 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (I Only) | 18 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (V only) | 2 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (V Only) | 6 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE, Grade 3 | 113 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (Both I and V) | 82 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (Both I and V) | 26 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TESAE | 88 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any I Related TEAE Grade >=3 | 83 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TESAE, Grade >=3 | 76 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (I or V) | 50 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TESAE, V Related | 31 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any V Related TEAE Grade >=3 | 75 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TESAE, I Related | 47 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (I Only) | 19 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TESAE, V or I Related | 49 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (I or V) | 43 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Fatal TEAE | 22 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (V Only) | 13 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Major Hemorrhage | 13 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any Venetoclax (V) Related TEAE | 112 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Major Hemorrhage, Grade >=3 | 10 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (Both I and V) | 18 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Major Hemorrhage, TESAE | 12 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE | 134 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Major Hemorrhage, TESAE | 6 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE | 131 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE, Grade 3 | 100 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any Venetoclax (V) Related TEAE | 104 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any V Related TEAE Grade >=3 | 46 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any Ibrutinib (I) Related TEAE | 114 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any I Related TEAE Grade >=3 | 58 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (I or V) | 48 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (I only) | 11 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (V only) | 7 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (Both I and V) | 30 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (I or V) | 29 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (I Only) | 14 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (V Only) | 7 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (Both I and V) | 8 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (I or V) | 99 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (I Only) | 18 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (V Only) | 4 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (Both I and V) | 77 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TESAE | 80 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TESAE, Grade >=3 | 73 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TESAE, V Related | 25 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TESAE, I Related | 37 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any TESAE, V or I Related | 37 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Fatal TEAE | 18 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Major Hemorrhage | 8 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Major Hemorrhage, Grade >=3 | 7 Participants |
Number of Participants With TLS TEAEs (Randomization Phase)
Treatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs): any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug (SD). Event severity is graded as mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), life threatening (4), death (5).
Time frame: From first dose of study drug until the end of treatment + 7 days, with an overall median treatment duration 19.5 months
Population: All randomized and treated participants
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TLS TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any Grade | 7 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TLS TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Grades 3 and 4 | 6 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TLS TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Any Grade | 3 Participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Number of Participants With TLS TEAEs (Randomization Phase) | Grades 3 and 4 | 3 Participants |
Overall Response Rate (ORR) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR per investigator assessment according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014).
Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase) and 40.51 months (Treatment-Naïve arm)
Population: All randomized participants and all treatment-naive open-label arm participants.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Overall Response Rate (ORR) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | 82.1 percentage of participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Overall Response Rate (ORR) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | 74.4 percentage of participants |
| Treatment-naive Open-label Arm | Overall Response Rate (ORR) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | 94.9 percentage of participants |
Overall Response Rate (ORR) (Safety Run-in)
ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR per investigator assessment according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014).
Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 74.78 months
Population: All enrolled Safety Run-in participants
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Overall Response Rate (ORR) (Safety Run-in) | 80.0 percentage of participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Overall Response Rate (ORR) (Safety Run-in) | 83.3 percentage of participants |
Overall Survival (OS) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)
OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization (Randomization Phase) or the first dose of study treatment (Treatment-Naïve arm) to death from any cause.
Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase) and 40.51 months (Treatment-Naïve arm)
Population: All randomized and all enrolled treatment-naïve participants
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Overall Survival (OS) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | 44.9 months |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Overall Survival (OS) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | 38.6 months |
| Treatment-naive Open-label Arm | Overall Survival (OS) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | NA months |
Overall Survival (OS) (Safety Run-in)
OS is defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study treatment to death from any cause.
Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 74.78 months
Population: All Enrolled Safety Run-in participants
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Overall Survival (OS) (Safety Run-in) | 52.3 months |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Overall Survival (OS) (Safety Run-in) | NA months |
Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) (Randomization Phase)
Complete response rate (CR) based on the best overall response per investigator assessment according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014).
Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months
Population: All randomized participants
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) (Randomization Phase) | 53.7 percentage of participants |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) (Randomization Phase) | 32.3 percentage of participants |
Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Safety Run-in)
PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of disease progression using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014), or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 74.78 months
Population: All Enrolled Safety Run-in participants
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Safety Run-in) | 46.9 months |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Safety Run-in) | 35.0 months |
Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Treatment-Naive Arm)
PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of disease progression using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014), or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 40.51 months
Population: All enrolled treatment-naïve participants
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Treatment-Naive Arm) | 40.2 months |
Steady-State Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Ibrutinib: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) (Randomization Phase)
Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose
Population: Participants with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Steady-State Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Ibrutinib: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) (Randomization Phase) | 195 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 179 |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Steady-State Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Ibrutinib: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) (Randomization Phase) | 287 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 230 |
Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Apparent Total Clearance at Steady State (CLss/F) (Randomization Phase)
Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose
Population: Participants with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Apparent Total Clearance at Steady State (CLss/F) (Randomization Phase) | 1020 L/hour | Standard Deviation 1130 |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Apparent Total Clearance at Steady State (CLss/F) (Randomization Phase) | 709 L/hour | Standard Deviation 651 |
Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From 0-24 Hours (AUC0-24) (Randomization Phase)
Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose
Population: Participants with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From 0-24 Hours (AUC0-24) (Randomization Phase) | 1090 ng·h/mL | Standard Deviation 870 |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From 0-24 Hours (AUC0-24) (Randomization Phase) | 1440 ng·h/mL | Standard Deviation 1060 |
Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) (Randomization Phase)
Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose
Population: Participants with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) (Randomization Phase) | 1090 ng·h/mL | Standard Deviation 870 |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) (Randomization Phase) | 1440 ng·h/mL | Standard Deviation 1060 |
Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2,Term) (Randomization Phase)
Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose
Population: Participants with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2,Term) (Randomization Phase) | 6.29 hours | Standard Deviation 1.92 |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2,Term) (Randomization Phase) | 6.66 hours | Standard Deviation 2.15 |
Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) (Randomization Phase)
Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose
Population: Participants with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) (Randomization Phase) | 0.123 1/hour | Standard Deviation 0.0556 |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) (Randomization Phase) | 0.114 1/hour | Standard Deviation 0.0332 |
Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Time of Last Measurable Concentration (Tlast) (Randomization Phase)
Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose
Population: Participants with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Time of Last Measurable Concentration (Tlast) (Randomization Phase) | 24.0 hours |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Time of Last Measurable Concentration (Tlast) (Randomization Phase) | 24.0 hours |
Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Time to Cmax (Tmax) (Randomization Phase)
Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose
Population: Participants with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Time to Cmax (Tmax) (Randomization Phase) | 2.00 hours |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Time to Cmax (Tmax) (Randomization Phase) | 2.00 hours |
Steady-State PK of Venetoclax: AUC0-24 (Randomization Phase)
Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose
Population: Participants receiving venetoclax with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Steady-State PK of Venetoclax: AUC0-24 (Randomization Phase) | 65000 ng·h/mL | Standard Deviation 32900 |
Steady-State PK of Venetoclax: CLss/F (Randomization Phase)
Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose
Population: Participants receiving venetoclax with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Steady-State PK of Venetoclax: CLss/F (Randomization Phase) | 8.09 L/hour | Standard Deviation 4.82 |
Steady-State PK of Venetoclax: Cmax (Randomization Phase)
Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose
Population: Participants receiving venetoclax with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Steady-State PK of Venetoclax: Cmax (Randomization Phase) | 3620 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 1650 |
Steady-State PK of Venetoclax: Time to Cmax (Tmax) (Randomization Phase)
Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose
Population: Participants receiving venetoclax with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Steady-State PK of Venetoclax: Time to Cmax (Tmax) (Randomization Phase) | 6.00 hours |
Time to Next Treatment (TTNT) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)
TTNT is defined as the duration from the date of randomization (Randomization Phase) or date of first dose of study treatment (Treatment-Naive Arm) to the start date of any anti-lymphoma treatment subsequent to study treatment. Post-treatment stem cell transplantation, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, or other cellular therapies were not considered subsequent anti-cancer treatments for participants responding to the study treatment (CR or PR).
Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase) and 40.51 months (Treatment-Naïve arm)
Population: All randomized and all enrolled treatment-naïve participants
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Time to Next Treatment (TTNT) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | NA months |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Time to Next Treatment (TTNT) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | 35.4 months |
| Treatment-naive Open-label Arm | Time to Next Treatment (TTNT) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm) | NA months |
Time to Worsening in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale of the Health-related Quality of Life (Randomization Phase)
The FACT-Lym lymphoma-specific additional concerns subscale responses to all items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 not at all to 4 very much. The lymphoma subscale includes 15 items and scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores representing better functional status and well-being. A 5-point change in the Lym subscale was selected as a conservative estimate of clinically meaningful deterioration in lymphoma symptoms.
Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase)
Population: All randomized participants
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline | Time to Worsening in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale of the Health-related Quality of Life (Randomization Phase) | 9.3 months |
| Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline | Time to Worsening in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale of the Health-related Quality of Life (Randomization Phase) | 12.5 months |