Skip to content

Study of Ibrutinib Combined With Venetoclax in Subjects With Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL)

Phase 3 Study of Ibrutinib in Combination With Venetoclax in Subjects With Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03112174
Acronym
SYMPATICO
Enrollment
366
Registered
2017-04-13
Start date
2017-06-19
Completion date
2024-06-27
Last updated
2025-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mantle-Cell Lymphoma

Keywords

PCYC, MCL, Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma, NHL, ibrutinib, venetoclax, Pharmacyclics

Brief summary

This Phase 3 multinational, randomized, double-blind study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax vs. ibrutinib and placebo in subjects with MCL.

Interventions

DRUGIbrutinib

Administered orally once daily

DRUGVenetoclax

Administered orally once daily

DRUGPlacebo Oral tablet to match Venetoclax

Administered orally once daily

Sponsors

Janssen Research & Development, LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Pharmacyclics LLC.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Relapsed/Refractory Arm Inclusion Criteria: * Pathologically confirmed MCL (in tumor tissue), with documentation of either overexpression of cyclin D1 in association with other relevant markers (eg, CD19, CD20, PAX5, CD5) or evidence of t(11;14) as assessed by cytogenetics, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), or polymerase chain reaction (PCR). * At least 1 measurable site of disease on cross-sectional imaging (CT). * At least 1, but no more than 5, prior treatment regimens for MCL. * Failure to achieve at least partial response (PR) with, or documented disease progression after, the most recent treatment regimen. * Subjects must have adequate fresh or paraffin embedded tissue. * Adequate hematologic, hepatic and renal function. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of \<= 2.

Exclusion criteria

* History or current evidence of central nervous system lymphoma. * Concurrent enrollment in another therapeutic investigational study or prior therapy with ibrutinib or other BTK inhibitors. * Prior treatment with venetoclax or other BCL2 inhibitors. * Anticancer therapy including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, small molecule and investigational agents \<= 21 days prior to receiving the first dose of study drug. * Treatment with any of the following within 7 days prior to the first dose of study drug: moderate to strong cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) inhibitors or strong CYP3A inducers. Treatment Naïve Arm Inclusion Criteria: * Pathologically confirmed treatment-naive MCL (tumor tissue), with documentation of either overexpression of cyclin D1 in association with other relevant markers (eg, CD19, CD20, PAX5, CD5) or evidence of t(11;14), as assessed by cytogenetics, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), or polymerase chain reaction (PCR). * Men and women ≥18 years of age with a TP53 mutation. * At least 1 measurable site of disease by CT. * Must have adequate fresh or paraffin-embedded tissue. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score 0 to \<= 2. * Adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) Events (Safety Run-in)After at least 3 months of treatment, with an overall median treatment duration of 20.0 monthsTLS events are defined as follows: * Clinical TLS: any event that meets Howard criteria (N Engl J Med 2011;364:1844-1854) with the following exceptions: * For the purpose of TLS assessment during the Safety Run-in Period, only those increases in serum creatinine \> 1.0 mg/dL from pre-treatment baseline will be considered clinical TLS. * In participants with renal dysfunction at baseline (CrCl \< 60 mL/min), clinical TLS is defined as the presence of laboratory TLS plus either seizures, cardiac dysrhythmia, or death. * Laboratory TLS: any event that meets Howard criteria (N Engl J Med 2011;364:1844-1854) for laboratory TLS, that does not resolve within 72 hours despite protocol required management.
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)After at least 3 months of treatment, with an overall median treatment duration of 20.0 monthsDLT: any Grade (Gr) 3 or higher non-TLS adverse event (AE) at least possibly related to study drug occurring during the DLT assessment period with the following clarifications: Non-Hematologic DLTs: Gr ≥3 nausea, vomiting or diarrhea uncontrolled despite maximum medical supportive care and persisting \>5 days; Gr 3 fatigue persisting \>7 days; Gr 3 infection is not a DLT, however an infection with lifethreatening consequences or requiring urgent intervention (Gr 4) was considered a DLT; Treatment delay of any study drug \>7 days for toxicity. Hematologic DLTs: Gr 3 neutropenia is not a DLT, however, Gr 4 neutropenia (ANC \<500/mm\^3) lasting for \> 7 days is a DLT; Gr 3 or 4 neutropenia complicated by fever ≥38.5°C or infection; Gr 4 thrombocytopenia (\<25,000/mm\^3) that persists for \> 7 days; Gr 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia associated with Gr 2 or greater bleeding; Gr 3 anemia is not a DLT, however, Gr 4 anemia is a DLT; Treatment delay of any study drug \>7 days for hematologic toxicity.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)From first dose of study drug until the end of treatment + 30 days, with an overall median treatment duration of 20.0 monthsAE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study. Serious adverse event (SAE): an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs): any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug. Event severity is graded as mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), life threatening (4), death (5).
Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Randomization Phase)For an overall median time on study of 61.34 monthsPFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014), or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Complete Response (CR) Rate (Treatment-Naive Arm)For an overall median time on study of 40.51 monthsCR rate is defined as the percentage of participants with a CR according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Response Rate (ORR) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase) and 40.51 months (Treatment-Naïve arm)ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR per investigator assessment according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014).
MRD-negative Remission Rate in Participants Who Achieve CR Per Investigator Assessment (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase) and 40.51 months (Treatment-Naïve arm)MRD-negative remission rate is defined as the percentage of participants with undetectable MRD at documented CR in participants who were MRD positive at screening as assessed by flow cytometry in bone marrow and/or peripheral blood, with requirement of confirmation of MRD negativity in the subsequent peripheral blood 12 weeks later.
Overall Survival (OS) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase) and 40.51 months (Treatment-Naïve arm)OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization (Randomization Phase) or the first dose of study treatment (Treatment-Naïve arm) to death from any cause.
Duration of Response (DOR) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase) and 40.51 months (Treatment-Naïve arm)DOR is defined as the time frame for participants who achieve an overall response as the time from the first occurrence of response (CR or PR according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma \[Cheson 2014\]) to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first.
Time to Next Treatment (TTNT) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase) and 40.51 months (Treatment-Naïve arm)TTNT is defined as the duration from the date of randomization (Randomization Phase) or date of first dose of study treatment (Treatment-Naive Arm) to the start date of any anti-lymphoma treatment subsequent to study treatment. Post-treatment stem cell transplantation, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, or other cellular therapies were not considered subsequent anti-cancer treatments for participants responding to the study treatment (CR or PR).
Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)From first dose of study drug until the end of treatment + 30 days, with an overall median treatment duration of 19.5 monthsAE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study. Serious adverse event (SAE): an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs): any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug. Event severity is graded as mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), life threatening (4), death (5).
Number of Participants With TLS TEAEs (Randomization Phase)From first dose of study drug until the end of treatment + 7 days, with an overall median treatment duration 19.5 monthsTreatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs): any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug (SD). Event severity is graded as mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), life threatening (4), death (5).
Steady-State Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Ibrutinib: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) (Randomization Phase)Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dosePre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Time to Cmax (Tmax) (Randomization Phase)Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dosePre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) (Randomization Phase)Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dosePre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2,Term) (Randomization Phase)Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dosePre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Overall Survival (OS) (Safety Run-in)For an overall median time on study of 74.78 monthsOS is defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study treatment to death from any cause.
Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From 0-24 Hours (AUC0-24) (Randomization Phase)Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dosePre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) (Randomization Phase)Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dosePre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Apparent Total Clearance at Steady State (CLss/F) (Randomization Phase)Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dosePre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Steady-State PK of Venetoclax: Cmax (Randomization Phase)Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dosePre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Steady-State PK of Venetoclax: AUC0-24 (Randomization Phase)Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dosePre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Steady-State PK of Venetoclax: Time to Cmax (Tmax) (Randomization Phase)Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dosePre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Steady-State PK of Venetoclax: CLss/F (Randomization Phase)Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dosePre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Time to Worsening in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale of the Health-related Quality of Life (Randomization Phase)For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase)The FACT-Lym lymphoma-specific additional concerns subscale responses to all items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 not at all to 4 very much. The lymphoma subscale includes 15 items and scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores representing better functional status and well-being. A 5-point change in the Lym subscale was selected as a conservative estimate of clinically meaningful deterioration in lymphoma symptoms.
Duration of CR (Treatment-Naive Arm)For an overall median time on study of 40.51 monthsDuration of CR, defined for subjects who achieve CR according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014) as the time from the first occurrence of CR to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Treatment-Naive Arm)For an overall median time on study of 40.51 monthsPFS is defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of disease progression using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014), or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Time of Last Measurable Concentration (Tlast) (Randomization Phase)Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dosePre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Safety Run-in)For an overall median time on study of 74.78 monthsPFS is defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of disease progression using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014), or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
Duration of Response (DOR) (Safety Run-in)For an overall median time on study of 74.78 monthsDOR is defined for participants who achieve an overall response as the time from the first occurrence of response (CR or PR according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma \[Cheson 2014\]) to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first.
Overall Response Rate (ORR) (Safety Run-in)For an overall median time on study of 74.78 monthsORR is defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR per investigator assessment according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014).
Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) (Randomization Phase)For an overall median time on study of 61.34 monthsComplete response rate (CR) based on the best overall response per investigator assessment according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014).

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, South Korea, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at Baseline
Participants with an increased risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) enrolled into the open-label Safety Run-in Period received concurrent ibrutinib at 560 mg once daily and venetoclax starting at 20 mg, and gradually ramped up to a target dose of 400 mg once daily over a 5-week period.
15
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline
Participants with an low risk of TLS enrolled into the open-label Safety Run-in Period received concurrent ibrutinib at 560 mg once daily and venetoclax starting at 20 mg, and gradually ramped up to a target dose of 400 mg once daily over a 5-week period.
6
Randomization Phase: Ibrutinb + Venetoclax
Participants were randomized to ibrutinib 560 mg and venetoclax (starting at 20 mg, and gradually ramped up to a target dose of 400 mg) for approximately 104 weeks, followed by ibrutinib monotherapy until disease progression (PD), unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. Venetoclax was discontinued after 104 weeks of treatment, regardless of response assessment.
134
Randomization Phase: Ibrutinib + Placebo
Participants were randomized to ibrutinib 560 mg and placebo for approximately 104 weeks, followed by ibrutinib monotherapy until PD, unacceptable toxicity or withdrawal of consent. Placebo was discontinued after 104 weeks of treatment, regardless of response assessment.
133
Treatment-naive Open-label Arm
Participants were treated with ibrutinib 560 mg and venetoclax (starting at 20 mg, and gradually ramped up to a target dose of 400 mg).
78
Total366

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyDeath83677318
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11232
Overall StudyOther, Not Specified10120
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject301197

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRandomization Phase: Ibrutinb + VenetoclaxRandomization Phase: Ibrutinib + PlaceboSafety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineTreatment-naive Open-label ArmTotalSafety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at Baseline
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
93 Participants86 Participants13 Participants65 Participants258 Participants1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
41 Participants47 Participants2 Participants13 Participants108 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants7 Participants1 Participants1 Participants17 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
112 Participants110 Participants11 Participants72 Participants310 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
14 Participants16 Participants3 Participants5 Participants39 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants3 Participants0 Participants6 Participants11 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants3 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
15 Participants14 Participants3 Participants3 Participants35 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
116 Participants115 Participants12 Participants68 Participants317 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
31 Participants25 Participants6 Participants25 Participants89 Participants2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
103 Participants108 Participants9 Participants53 Participants277 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
8 / 153 / 670 / 13478 / 13220 / 78
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 156 / 6131 / 134127 / 13277 / 78
serious
Total, serious adverse events
15 / 153 / 692 / 13486 / 13248 / 78

Outcome results

Primary

Complete Response (CR) Rate (Treatment-Naive Arm)

CR rate is defined as the percentage of participants with a CR according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014).

Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 40.51 months

Population: All Enrolled Treatment-Naïve Participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineComplete Response (CR) Rate (Treatment-Naive Arm)69.2 percentage of participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)

DLT: any Grade (Gr) 3 or higher non-TLS adverse event (AE) at least possibly related to study drug occurring during the DLT assessment period with the following clarifications: Non-Hematologic DLTs: Gr ≥3 nausea, vomiting or diarrhea uncontrolled despite maximum medical supportive care and persisting \>5 days; Gr 3 fatigue persisting \>7 days; Gr 3 infection is not a DLT, however an infection with lifethreatening consequences or requiring urgent intervention (Gr 4) was considered a DLT; Treatment delay of any study drug \>7 days for toxicity. Hematologic DLTs: Gr 3 neutropenia is not a DLT, however, Gr 4 neutropenia (ANC \<500/mm\^3) lasting for \> 7 days is a DLT; Gr 3 or 4 neutropenia complicated by fever ≥38.5°C or infection; Gr 4 thrombocytopenia (\<25,000/mm\^3) that persists for \> 7 days; Gr 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia associated with Gr 2 or greater bleeding; Gr 3 anemia is not a DLT, however, Gr 4 anemia is a DLT; Treatment delay of any study drug \>7 days for hematologic toxicity.

Time frame: After at least 3 months of treatment, with an overall median treatment duration of 20.0 months

Population: All treated safety run-in participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE/Any Grade3 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE/ Grade 3+43 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE/Grade 50 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Atrial fibrillation/Any Grade1 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Atrial fibrillation/Grade 3+41 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Atrial fibrillation/Grade 50 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Infection/Any Grade1 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Infection/Grade 3+41 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Infection/Grade 50 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Neutropenia/Any Grade1 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Neutropenia/Grade 3+41 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Neutropenia/Grade 50 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Neutropenia/Grade 3+40 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE/Any Grade0 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Infection/Any Grade0 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE/ Grade 3+40 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Neutropenia/Any Grade0 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE/Grade 50 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Infection/Grade 3+40 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Atrial fibrillation/Any Grade0 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Neutropenia/Grade 50 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Atrial fibrillation/Grade 3+40 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Infection/Grade 50 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT) (Safety Run-in)Atrial fibrillation/Grade 50 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)

AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study. Serious adverse event (SAE): an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs): any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug. Event severity is graded as mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), life threatening (4), death (5).

Time frame: From first dose of study drug until the end of treatment + 30 days, with an overall median treatment duration of 20.0 months

Population: All treated safety run-in participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (I only)1 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (I or V)14 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any Ibrutinib (I) Related TEAE13 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (I Only)1 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (V only)1 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (V Only)0 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE, Grade 315 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (Both I and V)13 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (Both I and V)4 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TESAE14 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any I Related TEAE Grade >=312 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TESAE, Grade >=314 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (I or V)7 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TESAE, V Related9 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any V Related TEAE Grade >=313 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TESAE, I Related10 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (I Only)1 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TESAE, V or I Related10 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (I or V)6 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Fatal TEAE1 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (V Only)3 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Major Hemorrhage2 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any Venetoclax (V) Related TEAE14 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Major Hemorrhage, Grade >=32 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (Both I and V)3 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Major Hemorrhage, TESAE2 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE15 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Major Hemorrhage, TESAE0 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE6 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE, Grade 35 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any Venetoclax (V) Related TEAE6 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any V Related TEAE Grade >=34 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any Ibrutinib (I) Related TEAE5 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any I Related TEAE Grade >=34 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (I or V)2 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (I only)0 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (V only)0 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (Both I and V)2 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (I or V)4 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (I Only)3 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (V Only)0 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (Both I and V)1 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (I or V)4 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (I Only)1 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (V Only)0 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (Both I and V)3 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TESAE3 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TESAE, Grade >=32 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TESAE, V Related1 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TESAE, I Related1 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Any TESAE, V or I Related1 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Fatal TEAE0 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Major Hemorrhage0 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) (Safety Run-in)Major Hemorrhage, Grade >=30 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) Events (Safety Run-in)

TLS events are defined as follows: * Clinical TLS: any event that meets Howard criteria (N Engl J Med 2011;364:1844-1854) with the following exceptions: * For the purpose of TLS assessment during the Safety Run-in Period, only those increases in serum creatinine \> 1.0 mg/dL from pre-treatment baseline will be considered clinical TLS. * In participants with renal dysfunction at baseline (CrCl \< 60 mL/min), clinical TLS is defined as the presence of laboratory TLS plus either seizures, cardiac dysrhythmia, or death. * Laboratory TLS: any event that meets Howard criteria (N Engl J Med 2011;364:1844-1854) for laboratory TLS, that does not resolve within 72 hours despite protocol required management.

Time frame: After at least 3 months of treatment, with an overall median treatment duration of 20.0 months

Population: All treated safety run-in participants

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) Events (Safety Run-in)1 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS) Events (Safety Run-in)0 Participants
Primary

Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Randomization Phase)

PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of disease progression using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014), or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.

Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months

Population: All randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineProgression-free Survival (PFS) (Randomization Phase)31.9 months
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineProgression-free Survival (PFS) (Randomization Phase)22.1 months
p-value: 0.002495% CI: [0.465, 0.85]Log Rank
Secondary

Duration of CR (Treatment-Naive Arm)

Duration of CR, defined for subjects who achieve CR according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014) as the time from the first occurrence of CR to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first.

Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 40.51 months

Population: All Enrolled Treatment-Naïve Subjects Achieving CR

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineDuration of CR (Treatment-Naive Arm)37.1 months
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)

DOR is defined as the time frame for participants who achieve an overall response as the time from the first occurrence of response (CR or PR according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma \[Cheson 2014\]) to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first.

Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase) and 40.51 months (Treatment-Naïve arm)

Population: All randomized participants and all enrolled treatment-naïve participants achieving response (partial response or better)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineDuration of Response (DOR) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)42.1 months
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineDuration of Response (DOR) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)27.6 months
Treatment-naive Open-label ArmDuration of Response (DOR) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)37.1 months
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR) (Safety Run-in)

DOR is defined for participants who achieve an overall response as the time from the first occurrence of response (CR or PR according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma \[Cheson 2014\]) to disease progression or death, whichever occurs first.

Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 74.78 months

Population: All Enrolled Safety Run-in Subjects Achieving Response (Partial Response or Better)

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineDuration of Response (DOR) (Safety Run-in)44.1 months
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineDuration of Response (DOR) (Safety Run-in)NA months
Secondary

MRD-negative Remission Rate in Participants Who Achieve CR Per Investigator Assessment (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)

MRD-negative remission rate is defined as the percentage of participants with undetectable MRD at documented CR in participants who were MRD positive at screening as assessed by flow cytometry in bone marrow and/or peripheral blood, with requirement of confirmation of MRD negativity in the subsequent peripheral blood 12 weeks later.

Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase) and 40.51 months (Treatment-Naïve arm)

Population: All enrolled treatment-naïve participants achieving CR who were evaluable for MRD (those who had positive MRD status at screening). Participants with a given post-screening sample.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineMRD-negative Remission Rate in Participants Who Achieve CR Per Investigator Assessment (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)Bone marrow aspirate61.5 percentage of participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineMRD-negative Remission Rate in Participants Who Achieve CR Per Investigator Assessment (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)Peripheral blood77.4 percentage of participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineMRD-negative Remission Rate in Participants Who Achieve CR Per Investigator Assessment (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)Bone marrow aspirate28.6 percentage of participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineMRD-negative Remission Rate in Participants Who Achieve CR Per Investigator Assessment (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)Peripheral blood12.5 percentage of participants
Treatment-naive Open-label ArmMRD-negative Remission Rate in Participants Who Achieve CR Per Investigator Assessment (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)Bone marrow aspirate59.1 percentage of participants
Treatment-naive Open-label ArmMRD-negative Remission Rate in Participants Who Achieve CR Per Investigator Assessment (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)Peripheral blood76.5 percentage of participants
Comparison: Bone marrow aspiratep-value: 0.2028Fisher Exact
Comparison: Peripheral bloodp-value: 0.0014Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)

AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study. Serious adverse event (SAE): an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the participant and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs): any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug. Event severity is graded as mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), life threatening (4), death (5).

Time frame: From first dose of study drug until the end of treatment + 30 days, with an overall median treatment duration of 19.5 months

Population: All randomized and treated participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (I only)15 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (I or V)106 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any Ibrutinib (I) Related TEAE121 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (I Only)18 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (V only)2 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (V Only)6 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE, Grade 3113 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (Both I and V)82 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (Both I and V)26 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TESAE88 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any I Related TEAE Grade >=383 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TESAE, Grade >=376 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (I or V)50 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TESAE, V Related31 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any V Related TEAE Grade >=375 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TESAE, I Related47 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (I Only)19 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TESAE, V or I Related49 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (I or V)43 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Fatal TEAE22 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (V Only)13 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Major Hemorrhage13 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any Venetoclax (V) Related TEAE112 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Major Hemorrhage, Grade >=310 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (Both I and V)18 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Major Hemorrhage, TESAE12 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE134 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Major Hemorrhage, TESAE6 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE131 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE, Grade 3100 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any Venetoclax (V) Related TEAE104 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any V Related TEAE Grade >=346 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any Ibrutinib (I) Related TEAE114 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any I Related TEAE Grade >=358 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (I or V)48 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (I only)11 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (V only)7 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Study Drug (Both I and V)30 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (I or V)29 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (I Only)14 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (V Only)7 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Reduction of Study Drug (Both I and V)8 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (I or V)99 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (I Only)18 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (V Only)4 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TEAE Leading to Dose Hold of Study Drug (Both I and V)77 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TESAE80 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TESAE, Grade >=373 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TESAE, V Related25 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TESAE, I Related37 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any TESAE, V or I Related37 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Fatal TEAE18 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Major Hemorrhage8 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Major Hemorrhage, Grade >=37 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With TLS TEAEs (Randomization Phase)

Treatment-emergent adverse events/treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TEAEs/TESAEs): any event that began or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug (SD). Event severity is graded as mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), life threatening (4), death (5).

Time frame: From first dose of study drug until the end of treatment + 7 days, with an overall median treatment duration 19.5 months

Population: All randomized and treated participants

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TLS TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any Grade7 Participants
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TLS TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Grades 3 and 46 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TLS TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Any Grade3 Participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineNumber of Participants With TLS TEAEs (Randomization Phase)Grades 3 and 43 Participants
Secondary

Overall Response Rate (ORR) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR per investigator assessment according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014).

Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase) and 40.51 months (Treatment-Naïve arm)

Population: All randomized participants and all treatment-naive open-label arm participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineOverall Response Rate (ORR) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)82.1 percentage of participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineOverall Response Rate (ORR) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)74.4 percentage of participants
Treatment-naive Open-label ArmOverall Response Rate (ORR) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)94.9 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.127995% CI: [0.973, 1.247]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Overall Response Rate (ORR) (Safety Run-in)

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR per investigator assessment according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014).

Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 74.78 months

Population: All enrolled Safety Run-in participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineOverall Response Rate (ORR) (Safety Run-in)80.0 percentage of participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineOverall Response Rate (ORR) (Safety Run-in)83.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)

OS is defined as the time from the date of randomization (Randomization Phase) or the first dose of study treatment (Treatment-Naïve arm) to death from any cause.

Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase) and 40.51 months (Treatment-Naïve arm)

Population: All randomized and all enrolled treatment-naïve participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineOverall Survival (OS) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)44.9 months
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineOverall Survival (OS) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)38.6 months
Treatment-naive Open-label ArmOverall Survival (OS) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)NA months
p-value: 0.266995% CI: [0.602, 1.151]Log Rank
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) (Safety Run-in)

OS is defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study treatment to death from any cause.

Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 74.78 months

Population: All Enrolled Safety Run-in participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineOverall Survival (OS) (Safety Run-in)52.3 months
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineOverall Survival (OS) (Safety Run-in)NA months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) (Randomization Phase)

Complete response rate (CR) based on the best overall response per investigator assessment according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014).

Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months

Population: All randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselinePercentage of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) (Randomization Phase)53.7 percentage of participants
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselinePercentage of Participants With a Complete Response (CR) (Randomization Phase)32.3 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.000495% CI: [1.24, 2.218]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Safety Run-in)

PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of disease progression using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014), or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.

Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 74.78 months

Population: All Enrolled Safety Run-in participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineProgression-free Survival (PFS) (Safety Run-in)46.9 months
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineProgression-free Survival (PFS) (Safety Run-in)35.0 months
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS) (Treatment-Naive Arm)

PFS is defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of disease progression using the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2014), or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.

Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 40.51 months

Population: All enrolled treatment-naïve participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineProgression-free Survival (PFS) (Treatment-Naive Arm)40.2 months
Secondary

Steady-State Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Ibrutinib: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) (Randomization Phase)

Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.

Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose

Population: Participants with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineSteady-State Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Ibrutinib: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) (Randomization Phase)195 ng/mLStandard Deviation 179
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineSteady-State Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Ibrutinib: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) (Randomization Phase)287 ng/mLStandard Deviation 230
Secondary

Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Apparent Total Clearance at Steady State (CLss/F) (Randomization Phase)

Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.

Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose

Population: Participants with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineSteady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Apparent Total Clearance at Steady State (CLss/F) (Randomization Phase)1020 L/hourStandard Deviation 1130
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineSteady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Apparent Total Clearance at Steady State (CLss/F) (Randomization Phase)709 L/hourStandard Deviation 651
Secondary

Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From 0-24 Hours (AUC0-24) (Randomization Phase)

Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.

Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose

Population: Participants with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineSteady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From 0-24 Hours (AUC0-24) (Randomization Phase)1090 ng·h/mLStandard Deviation 870
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineSteady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From 0-24 Hours (AUC0-24) (Randomization Phase)1440 ng·h/mLStandard Deviation 1060
Secondary

Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) (Randomization Phase)

Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.

Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose

Population: Participants with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineSteady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) (Randomization Phase)1090 ng·h/mLStandard Deviation 870
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineSteady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Measurable Concentration (AUClast) (Randomization Phase)1440 ng·h/mLStandard Deviation 1060
Secondary

Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2,Term) (Randomization Phase)

Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.

Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose

Population: Participants with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineSteady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2,Term) (Randomization Phase)6.29 hoursStandard Deviation 1.92
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineSteady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Terminal Elimination Half-Life (t1/2,Term) (Randomization Phase)6.66 hoursStandard Deviation 2.15
Secondary

Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) (Randomization Phase)

Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.

Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose

Population: Participants with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineSteady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) (Randomization Phase)0.123 1/hourStandard Deviation 0.0556
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineSteady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) (Randomization Phase)0.114 1/hourStandard Deviation 0.0332
Secondary

Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Time of Last Measurable Concentration (Tlast) (Randomization Phase)

Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.

Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose

Population: Participants with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineSteady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Time of Last Measurable Concentration (Tlast) (Randomization Phase)24.0 hours
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineSteady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Time of Last Measurable Concentration (Tlast) (Randomization Phase)24.0 hours
Secondary

Steady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Time to Cmax (Tmax) (Randomization Phase)

Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.

Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose

Population: Participants with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineSteady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Time to Cmax (Tmax) (Randomization Phase)2.00 hours
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineSteady-State PK of Ibrutinib: Time to Cmax (Tmax) (Randomization Phase)2.00 hours
Secondary

Steady-State PK of Venetoclax: AUC0-24 (Randomization Phase)

Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.

Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose

Population: Participants receiving venetoclax with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineSteady-State PK of Venetoclax: AUC0-24 (Randomization Phase)65000 ng·h/mLStandard Deviation 32900
Secondary

Steady-State PK of Venetoclax: CLss/F (Randomization Phase)

Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.

Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose

Population: Participants receiving venetoclax with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineSteady-State PK of Venetoclax: CLss/F (Randomization Phase)8.09 L/hourStandard Deviation 4.82
Secondary

Steady-State PK of Venetoclax: Cmax (Randomization Phase)

Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.

Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose

Population: Participants receiving venetoclax with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineSteady-State PK of Venetoclax: Cmax (Randomization Phase)3620 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1650
Secondary

Steady-State PK of Venetoclax: Time to Cmax (Tmax) (Randomization Phase)

Pre-dose concentrations were applied as 24-hour concentrations in order to calculate steady-state PK parameters.

Time frame: Week 6, Day 1: Predose, at Dose, 1 hour (± 15 minutes [min]), 2 hours (± 15 min), 4 hours (± 30 min), 6 hours (± 30 min), 8 hours (± 1 hour), 24 hours post-dose

Population: Participants receiving venetoclax with an evaluable PK assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineSteady-State PK of Venetoclax: Time to Cmax (Tmax) (Randomization Phase)6.00 hours
Secondary

Time to Next Treatment (TTNT) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)

TTNT is defined as the duration from the date of randomization (Randomization Phase) or date of first dose of study treatment (Treatment-Naive Arm) to the start date of any anti-lymphoma treatment subsequent to study treatment. Post-treatment stem cell transplantation, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, or other cellular therapies were not considered subsequent anti-cancer treatments for participants responding to the study treatment (CR or PR).

Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase) and 40.51 months (Treatment-Naïve arm)

Population: All randomized and all enrolled treatment-naïve participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineTime to Next Treatment (TTNT) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)NA months
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineTime to Next Treatment (TTNT) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)35.4 months
Treatment-naive Open-label ArmTime to Next Treatment (TTNT) (Randomization Phase and Treatment-Naive Arm)NA months
p-value: 0.001395% CI: [0.369, 0.792]Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Worsening in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale of the Health-related Quality of Life (Randomization Phase)

The FACT-Lym lymphoma-specific additional concerns subscale responses to all items are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 not at all to 4 very much. The lymphoma subscale includes 15 items and scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores representing better functional status and well-being. A 5-point change in the Lym subscale was selected as a conservative estimate of clinically meaningful deterioration in lymphoma symptoms.

Time frame: For an overall median time on study of 61.34 months (Randomization Phase)

Population: All randomized participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Safety Run-in: Increased TLS Risk at BaselineTime to Worsening in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale of the Health-related Quality of Life (Randomization Phase)9.3 months
Safety Run-in: Low TLS Risk at BaselineTime to Worsening in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Subscale of the Health-related Quality of Life (Randomization Phase)12.5 months
p-value: 0.286195% CI: [0.879, 1.554]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026