Skip to content

Use of a Novel Radiopaque Embolic Agent in Prostatic Artery Embolisation for Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Enlargement

Use of a Novel Radiopaque Embolic Agent in Prostatic Artery Embolisation for Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Enlargement

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03109925
Enrollment
23
Registered
2017-04-12
Start date
2017-06-02
Completion date
2021-06-29
Last updated
2020-10-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Keywords

PAE, embolization, non-surgical, prostate artery embolization, radio-opaque embolic

Brief summary

This is a study protocol for the use of a novel radiopaque embolic agent in the treatment of lower urinary tract Symptoms (LUTS) with prostatic artery embolisation (PAE). This study will allow us to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this embolic in PAE along with giving us a better understanding of embolic distribution.

Detailed description

This is a study protocol for the use of a novel radiopaque embolic agent in the treatment of lower urinary tract Symptoms (LUTS) with prostatic artery embolisation (PAE). This study will allow us to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this embolic in PAE along with giving us a better understanding of embolic distribution. It would also give us answers to: * How does embolic efficacy compare to current available embolic agents? * Does enhancement on rotational CT correlate with embolic distribution? * How does embolic distribution compare with tissue infarction? * Does the density of embolic packing correlate with degree of infarction and volume loss? * How predictable is superselective target embolisation? * Does embolic distribution vary with anatomy and gland size? * Does embolic distribution tally with glandular enhancement/ transitional zone vascularity? * If visible, what is the effect and significance of non target embolisation? This is a cohort study aiming to recruit 22 patients to power a non-inferiority assessment comparing the novel embolic agent against current available embolics. Data will be added to our on going local registry of patients who have undergone this procedure . This will provide information about how safe and effective it is for patients and how it compares to the other established embolic agents such as polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and other spherical agents such as Embospheres and Embozenes.

Interventions

DEVICEDC Lumi Bead, BTG

Embolic agent which is radio-opaque

Sponsors

BTG International Inc.
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

No masking

Intervention model description

Single group of patients undergoing prostate artery embolization with a new embolic which is radio-opaque and can give a better idea of embolization distribution (DC Lumi Beads by BTG)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
50 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 50-80 Moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic enlargement (BPE) IPSS\>14, QOL≥4 Prostate volume ≥ 40 cc Maximum urinary flow rate \< 12ml/s Medically refractory BPE \> 6 months (or unable/ unwilling to tolerate medical treatment due to side effects)

Exclusion criteria

* Atherosclerosis of the prostatic arteries Surgical indications (Chronic retention, bladder diverticulae, urethral stenosis), detrusor instability, neurogenic bladder Malignancy (TRUS/ MRI/ Biopsy proven). PSA \> 4 or high SWOP risk need prostate biopsy Urodynamics - non-obstructed eGFR ≤ 45ml min-1m-2

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse event rate12 monthsRate of adverse events compared with currently available other embolic agents

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Scale of symptomatic improvement12 monthssymptomatic improvement will be gauged used the internationally recognised IPSS questionnaire. Decrease in IPSS score in study participants will be compared against other embolic agents in the literature

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactDrew Maclean
drew.maclean@uhs.nhs.uk023 8120 8002

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026