Skip to content

The Effect of Using Mobile Applications for Improving Oral Hygiene

The Effect of Using Mobile Applications for Improving Oral Hygiene in Patients With Orthodontic Fixed Appliances: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03109769
Enrollment
44
Registered
2017-04-12
Start date
2016-02-12
Completion date
2016-11-04
Last updated
2019-01-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Orthodontic Appliance Complication

Brief summary

The study aims to investigate the effect of the use of mobile phone application sending reminders to patients with orthodontic fixed appliances on oral hygiene.

Detailed description

Subjects were randomized into two groups, the first group received a mobile application that sends active reminders notifications of oral hygiene. The second group received verbal oral hygiene instructions during their regular visits to the orthodontics clinics.

Interventions

Sponsors

Riyadh Colleges of Dentistry and Pharmacy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Participants were having orthodontic fixed appliance treatment. 2. Participants were aged 12 years old and above, owned mobile phones and did not have mental or physical disabilities. 3. Participants were willing to comply with given oral hygiene instructions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Plaque IndexAt baseline and after 4 weeks.Plaque index: 0, no plaque, 1, plaque seen on the tip of the explorer or with disclosing agent, 2. plaque seen with the naked eye, 3, abundance of plaque.
Change in Gingival IndexAt baseline and after 4 weeks.Gingival index: 0, normal gingiva, 1, mild inflammation - slight change in color, slight edema and no bleeding on probing, 2, moderate inflammation - redness, edema and glazing and bleeding on probing, 3, severe inflammation - marked redness and edema, ulceration and tendency to spontaneous bleeding.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Mobile Phone Application
Subjects in this group received a mobile phone application that sends active reminder notifications of oral hygiene 3 times a day. Mobile phone application
22
Verbal Oral Hygiene Instructions
Subjects in this group received verbal oral hygiene instructions during their regular orthodontic visits every 4 weeks. Verbal oral hygiene instructions
22
Total44

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVerbal Oral Hygiene InstructionsTotalMobile Phone Application
Age, Continuous17.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
16.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.4
16.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Saudi Arabia
22 Participants44 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants25 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants19 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 220 / 22
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 220 / 22
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 220 / 22

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Gingival Index

Gingival index: 0, normal gingiva, 1, mild inflammation - slight change in color, slight edema and no bleeding on probing, 2, moderate inflammation - redness, edema and glazing and bleeding on probing, 3, severe inflammation - marked redness and edema, ulceration and tendency to spontaneous bleeding.

Time frame: At baseline and after 4 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mobile Phone ApplicationChange in Gingival IndexGingival index at baseline0.3450 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2955
Mobile Phone ApplicationChange in Gingival IndexGingival index after 4 weeks0.2273 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2256
Verbal Oral Hygiene InstructionsChange in Gingival IndexGingival index at baseline0.4927 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3005
Verbal Oral Hygiene InstructionsChange in Gingival IndexGingival index after 4 weeks0.5941 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5679
Comparison: The sample size was calculated as 44 participants. Sample size calculation was carried out through a pilot study on 30 participants with the group I mean=1.31, SD=0.39 and group II mean=1.62, SD=0.30, with ⍺=0.05 and 80% power.~The null hypothesis was: there is no difference in plaque index and gingival index between verbal oral hygiene instructions and oral hygiene instructions using mobile applications in patients with orthodontic fixed appliances.p-value: 0.0283Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.0002Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.4809Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Primary

Change in Plaque Index

Plaque index: 0, no plaque, 1, plaque seen on the tip of the explorer or with disclosing agent, 2. plaque seen with the naked eye, 3, abundance of plaque.

Time frame: At baseline and after 4 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mobile Phone ApplicationChange in Plaque IndexPlaque index at baseline0.8050 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4062
Mobile Phone ApplicationChange in Plaque IndexPlaque index after 4 weeks0.6677 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3146
Verbal Oral Hygiene InstructionsChange in Plaque IndexPlaque index after 4 weeks0.9891 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5244
Verbal Oral Hygiene InstructionsChange in Plaque IndexPlaque index at baseline0.8959 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.4824
Comparison: The sample size was calculated as 44 participants. Sample size calculation was carried out through a pilot study on 30 participants with the group I mean=1.31, SD=0.39 and group II mean=1.62, SD=0.30, with ⍺=0.05 and 80% power.~The null hypothesis was: there is no difference in plaque index and gingival index between verbal oral hygiene instructions and oral hygiene instructions using mobile applications in patients with orthodontic fixed appliances.p-value: 0.0444Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.0002Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
p-value: 0.0283Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026