Skip to content

Yttrium-90 (Y90) Glass Microspheres PET/CT in Imaging Patients With Liver Tumors

High Quality Imaging and Dosimetry of Yttrium-90 (90Y) SIRT Using a Digital PET/CT

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03109262
Enrollment
42
Registered
2017-04-12
Start date
2017-02-15
Completion date
2021-02-28
Last updated
2022-01-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Primary Malignant Liver Neoplasm

Brief summary

This clinical trial studies how well yttrium-90 (Y90) glass microspheres positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) works in imaging patients with liver tumors . Images produced by PET/CT may provide better information about the distribution of particles, such as Y90 glass microspheres, delivered for selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) as compared to regular medical care images useing technetium Tc-99m albumin-aggregated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT images.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To evaluate the image quality of yttrium-90 (Y90) microspheres PET/CT post SIRT images as compared to technetium Tc-99m albumin aggregated (99mTc MAA) SPECT/CT. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the superior accuracy in both distribution and dosimetry of Y90 PET/CT post-SIRT imaging compared to 99mTc MAA planar and SPECT/CT imaging. OUTLINE: Immediately after standard of care SIRT, patients receive Y90 glass microspheres and undergo PET/CT over 30 minutes. This study compares the experimental images to the regular medical care images in the same participant.

Interventions

PROCEDUREComputed Tomography (CT)

As part of PET/CT and SPECT/CT scans.

PROCEDUREPositron Emission Tomography (PET)

As part of PET/CT scan

DEVICE90-Yttrium (Y-90) Glass Microspheres

Radiolabel for PET/CT scan

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTTechnetium 99mTc albumin aggregated (99mTc-MAA)

Radiolabel for 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT Scan

PROCEDURESingle-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) scan

As part of SPECT/CT scan

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient provides written informed consent * Patient is referred for 90Y SIRT radioembolization of liver tumor(s) * Patient is capable of complying with study procedures * Patient is able to remain still for duration of imaging procedure (approximately 30 minutes total for digital PET/CT)

Exclusion criteria

* Patient is pregnant or nursing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Image Quality for 90-Y PET/CT Scans1 dayImage quality for 90Y PET/CT scan images was assessed relative to the expected image quality of Standard of Care (SoC) 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT scans obtained from the same participant. Assessments were conducted at 5, 10, 15 and 20 minutes after infusion. Scans were assessed on a 1 to 5 Likert scale by 2 Nuclear Medicine physicians who were blinded to patient information. The Likert scale for image quality was established as follows: 1. = Non-diagnostic 2. = Suboptimal 3. = Acceptable 4. = Good 5. = Excellent, equivalent to a SoC 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT scan The scans for each individual participant at each timepoint was scored on the Likert scale, as determined by the 2 Nuclear Medicine physicians. The outcome is reported as the overall mean of the physician determinations for each time point, with standard deviation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Accuracy for 90-Y PET/CT Scans and 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT Scans1 dayRadiopharmaceutical dosimetry was assessed based on the numerical tumor-absorbed dose value in Gray as calculated by SurePlan (MIM Software Inc, Cleveland, Ohio). The outcome is reported as the median tumor-absorbed dose in Gray for each scan method (90Y PET/CT and 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT), with standard deviation.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Yttrium Y-90 PET/CT vs 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT Scans
All participants receive both Y-90 PET/CT vs 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT Scans * Computed Tomography (CT): As part of PET/CT and SPECT/CT scans. * Positron Emission Tomography (PET): As part of PET/CT scan * Single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) scan: As part of SPECT/CT scan * 90-Yttrium (Y-90) Glass Microspheres: Radiolabel for PET/CT scan * Technetium 99mTc albumin aggregated (99mTc-MAA): Radiolabel for 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT Scan
42
Total42

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicYttrium Y-90 PET/CT vs 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT Scans
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
26 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
16 Participants
Age, Continuous67.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
38 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
42 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 42
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 42

Outcome results

Primary

Image Quality for 90-Y PET/CT Scans

Image quality for 90Y PET/CT scan images was assessed relative to the expected image quality of Standard of Care (SoC) 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT scans obtained from the same participant. Assessments were conducted at 5, 10, 15 and 20 minutes after infusion. Scans were assessed on a 1 to 5 Likert scale by 2 Nuclear Medicine physicians who were blinded to patient information. The Likert scale for image quality was established as follows: 1. = Non-diagnostic 2. = Suboptimal 3. = Acceptable 4. = Good 5. = Excellent, equivalent to a SoC 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT scan The scans for each individual participant at each timepoint was scored on the Likert scale, as determined by the 2 Nuclear Medicine physicians. The outcome is reported as the overall mean of the physician determinations for each time point, with standard deviation.

Time frame: 1 day

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Yttrium Y-90 PET/CT vs 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT ScansImage Quality for 90-Y PET/CT Scans5 minutes3.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
Yttrium Y-90 PET/CT vs 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT ScansImage Quality for 90-Y PET/CT Scans10 minutes4.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
Yttrium Y-90 PET/CT vs 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT ScansImage Quality for 90-Y PET/CT Scans15 minutes4.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
Yttrium Y-90 PET/CT vs 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT ScansImage Quality for 90-Y PET/CT Scans20 minutes4.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.21
Secondary

Radiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Accuracy for 90-Y PET/CT Scans and 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT Scans

Radiopharmaceutical dosimetry was assessed based on the numerical tumor-absorbed dose value in Gray as calculated by SurePlan (MIM Software Inc, Cleveland, Ohio). The outcome is reported as the median tumor-absorbed dose in Gray for each scan method (90Y PET/CT and 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT), with standard deviation.

Time frame: 1 day

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Yttrium Y-90 PET/CT vs 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT ScansRadiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Accuracy for 90-Y PET/CT Scans and 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT Scans142.9 GrayStandard Error 99.7
99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT ScansRadiopharmaceutical Dosimetry Accuracy for 90-Y PET/CT Scans and 99mTc-MAA SPECT/CT Scans118.9 GrayStandard Error 91

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026