Skip to content

Violence Prevention for Middle School Boys

Partner Violence Prevention for Middle School Boys: A Dyadic Web-Based Intervention

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03109184
Enrollment
119
Registered
2017-04-12
Start date
2015-01-01
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2019-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intimate Partner Violence

Keywords

Dating violence prevention, Adolescent boys, Middle school, Web-based prevention

Brief summary

This study will develop and test a web-based intervention to enhance emotion regulation skills and parent-son relationship communication to decrease adolescent boys' risk for dating violence involvement as well as attitudes supporting relationship aggression.

Detailed description

Over the past ten years dating violence (DV) has been recognized as a significant public health problem affecting adolescents. Emerging data suggest that boys and girls have different developmental trajectories toward violence and therefore prevention programs that target their unique pathways to DV are needed. Despite this need, there is a relative dearth of such gender-informed programs for early adolescent boys. This research project aims to prevent the emergence of DV perpetration/ victimization among boys by developing a web-based intervention that is informed by research on gender-specific pathways to violence and harnesses the influence of parents during the early adolescent years. Among boys, the perpetration of delinquency-related violence and attitudes supporting violence has been found to predict later perpetration of DV. Thus, gender-informed interventions designed to prevent DV in boys need to target skills that underlie violent behavior and attitudes. The goal of this study is to develop and test a web-based intervention to enhance emotion regulation skills and parent-son relationship communication to prevent DV. Development and testing will occur in three phases. In the Development Phase, the intervention modules will be developed and iteratively reviewed by both a panel of experts familiar with the research in the field as well as an advisory group of parents and teens from the target population. In the Acceptability Testing Phase, testing will be conducted to assess acceptability and feasibility, and this will be followed by revisions to the intervention program based on feedback and observations. During the Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) Phase, 120 families will complete the intervention program in an observed setting, to ensure fidelity to intervention dosing. Parents and adolescents will complete the program together and then complete assessments of aggressive and risk behaviors, parent-child communication, and emotion regulation at baseline, 3-,and 9-month follow-ups.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALProject STRONG

The web-based program consists of a number of games, activities, and didactic information that teens move through with their parent. Didactic information introduces teens and parents to specific emotion management, communication, and problem solving strategies as well as sexual health and healthy relationship information. Games and activities allow parents and teens to practice and apply strategies to developmentally appropriate situations.

Sponsors

Rhode Island Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Northeastern University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
12 Years to 14 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 1\) adolescent enrolled in the 7th or 8th grade, * 2\) parent/legal guardian and teen are English speaking, * 3\) parent/legal guardian is willing to provide consent for the adolescent to participate in the study, * 4\) adolescent is willing to provide assent for their own participation.

Exclusion criteria

* 1\) observable cognitive or developmental delays that would preclude participation, * 2\) residing with participating parent/guardian less than half time

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline, 3 months, and 9 monthsThe Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) is a behavioral measure of abuse perpetration and victimization. It was completed by teens in reference to conflict or disagreement with a current or recent dating partner. Each question is asked twice, first regarding perpetration and, again in relation to victimization producing a perpetration and a victimization sub scale. Percentages include teens endorsing any perpetration or victimization.
Change in General Aggressive Behavior From Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline, 3 months, 9 monthsThe Aggression Questionnaire (AQ) is a 34-item questionnaire that rates five types of aggression (physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, hostility, and indirect aggression). Item responses ranged from 1-5, with 1=Not at all like me, 2=A little like me, 3=Somewhat like me, 4=Very much like me, 5=Completely like me. Higher scores indicate more aggression.
Change in Attitudes About Relationship Violence From Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline, 3 months, and 9 monthsAdolescent Relationship Violence Questionnaire (ARVQ) is a 22-item questionnaire is a composite measure developed to assess changes in knowledge, attitudes, and methods of dealing with relationship violence. Item responses ranged from 1-4 with 1=strongly agree, 2=agree, 3=disagree 4=strongly disagree. Higher scores indicate more favorable attitudes.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Emotion Regulation Skills From Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline, 3 months, and 9 monthsThe Adolescent Self-Regulatory Inventory (ASRI) is a 33 item survey that measures adolescents' use of both functional and dysfunctional emotion regulation strategies. It produces two sub scales measuring short-term and long-term self-regulation. Item responses range from 1-5 with 1= Not at all true for me, 2= Rarely true for me, 3= True some of the time, 4= True most of the time, 5= Really true for me. Items were reverse coded so that higher scores indicate more use of emotion regulation behaviors.
Change in Distress Tolerance From Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline, 3 months, 9 monthsThe Behavioral Indicator of Resiliency to Distress (BIRD) is a 5-minute computerized distress tolerance task for adolescents. This measure generates a score of total time that adolescents persist on a frustrating task, which has been linked to distress tolerance. Scores are recorded in milliseconds (ms) with a maximum time participants can persist is 300 seconds (0-300 is the range). Higher score indicate longer persistence during the frustrating task.
Change in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline, 3 months, and 9 monthsParent Adolescent Communication Survey (PACS) is 20 item survey measuring quality of communication between adolescents and their parents. Adolescents will complete the measure in reference to the parent participating in the intervention with them. This is completed by parents and youth. This scale also produces two sub scales: The Open Family Communication Scale (OFCS) and The Problems in Family Communication Scale (PFCS). Item responses range from 1-5 with 1=Strongly disagree, 2=Moderately disagree, 3=Neither agree neither disagree, 4=Moderately agree, 5=Strongly agree. On the OFCS subscale, higher scores indicate more open communication. One the PFCS subscale, higher scores indicate fewer problems in family communication, thus higher scores on both subscales are favorable.
Change in Emotion Regulation Skills Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline, 3 months, 9 monthsThe Emotion Regulation Behavioral Skills (ERBS) scale is comprised of 8 items rated on a scale of 1 all the time to 5 never and was specifically created for to detect the use of the specific affect management strategies taught in the Project STRONG intervention. Sample items include How often did you…get away from whatever was causing your feeling? …talk to someone about whatever was causing your feeling? Higher scores indicate greater use of emotion regulation skills.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Families were individually randomized at the level of the dyad, thus our study randomized 119 dyads. Parents and teens were not randomized separately. There were only two study arms, CONTROL families and STRONG families.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Waitlist Control
Parents and teens enrolled in the study and randomized to the control condition wait until they complete their 3-month and 9-month follow-up surveys before completing the web-based program.
60
Project STRONG
The web-based program consists of a number of games, activities, and didactic information that teens move through with their parent. Didactic information introduces teens and parents to specific emotion management, communication, and problem solving strategies as well as sexual health and healthy relationship information. Games and activities allow parents and teens to practice and apply strategies to developmentally appropriate situations. Project STRONG: The web-based program consists of a number of games, activities, and didactic information that teens move through with their parent. Didactic information introduces teens and parents to specific emotion management, communication, and problem solving strategies as well as sexual health and healthy relationship information. Games and activities allow parents and teens to practice and apply strategies to developmentally appropriate situations.
54
Total114

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up66
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalProject STRONGWaitlist Control
Age, Continuous42.53 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.75
13.04 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
42.52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.18
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
27 Participants15 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
87 Participants39 Participants48 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Non-white
32 Participants15 Participants17 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown/Not-reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
81 Participants38 Participants43 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
114 participants54 participants60 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
102 Participants0 Participants54 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants54 Participants60 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 600 / 59
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 600 / 59
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 600 / 59

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Attitudes About Relationship Violence From Baseline to 9 Months

Adolescent Relationship Violence Questionnaire (ARVQ) is a 22-item questionnaire is a composite measure developed to assess changes in knowledge, attitudes, and methods of dealing with relationship violence. Item responses ranged from 1-4 with 1=strongly agree, 2=agree, 3=disagree 4=strongly disagree. Higher scores indicate more favorable attitudes.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 9 months

Population: COMPLETER ANALYSIS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Waitlist ControlChange in Attitudes About Relationship Violence From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent Baseline ARVQ3.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
Waitlist ControlChange in Attitudes About Relationship Violence From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent 3-month ARVQ3.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
Waitlist ControlChange in Attitudes About Relationship Violence From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent 9-months ARVQ3.10 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.34
Waitlist ControlChange in Attitudes About Relationship Violence From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent Baseline ARVQ3.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
Waitlist ControlChange in Attitudes About Relationship Violence From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent 3-month ARVQ3.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Waitlist ControlChange in Attitudes About Relationship Violence From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent 9-month ARVQ3.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.32
Project STRONGChange in Attitudes About Relationship Violence From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent 3-month ARVQ3.53 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Project STRONGChange in Attitudes About Relationship Violence From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent Baseline ARVQ2.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Project STRONGChange in Attitudes About Relationship Violence From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent Baseline ARVQ3.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
Project STRONGChange in Attitudes About Relationship Violence From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent 3-month ARVQ3.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.34
Project STRONGChange in Attitudes About Relationship Violence From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent 9-month ARVQ3.51 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
Project STRONGChange in Attitudes About Relationship Violence From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent 9-months ARVQ3.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.34
Primary

Change in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 Months

The Conflict in Adolescent Dating Relationships Inventory (CADRI) is a behavioral measure of abuse perpetration and victimization. It was completed by teens in reference to conflict or disagreement with a current or recent dating partner. Each question is asked twice, first regarding perpetration and, again in relation to victimization producing a perpetration and a victimization sub scale. Percentages include teens endorsing any perpetration or victimization.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 9 months

Population: COMPLETER ANALYSIS

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Waitlist ControlChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 Months9-month DV VictimizationDV Absent50 Participants
Waitlist ControlChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline DV VictimizationDV Present14 Participants
Waitlist ControlChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 Months9-month DV VictimizationDV Present10 Participants
Waitlist ControlChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 Months9-month DV PerpetrationDV Absent49 Participants
Waitlist ControlChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline DV PerpetrationDV Absent46 Participants
Waitlist ControlChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 Months3-month DV VictimizationDV Absent50 Participants
Waitlist ControlChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline DV PerpetrationDV Present14 Participants
Waitlist ControlChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline DV VictimizationDV Absent46 Participants
Waitlist ControlChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 Months3-month DV PerpetrationDV Absent50 Participants
Waitlist ControlChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 Months3-month DV VictimizationDV Present10 Participants
Waitlist ControlChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 Months3-month DV PerpetrationDV Present10 Participants
Waitlist ControlChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 Months9-month DV PerpetrationDV Present11 Participants
Project STRONGChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 Months3-month DV PerpetrationDV Present11 Participants
Project STRONGChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 Months9-month DV PerpetrationDV Present9 Participants
Project STRONGChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline DV VictimizationDV Absent41 Participants
Project STRONGChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline DV VictimizationDV Present13 Participants
Project STRONGChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 Months3-month DV VictimizationDV Absent40 Participants
Project STRONGChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 Months3-month DV VictimizationDV Present14 Participants
Project STRONGChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 Months9-month DV VictimizationDV Absent43 Participants
Project STRONGChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 Months9-month DV VictimizationDV Present11 Participants
Project STRONGChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline DV PerpetrationDV Absent40 Participants
Project STRONGChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline DV PerpetrationDV Present14 Participants
Project STRONGChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 Months3-month DV PerpetrationDV Absent43 Participants
Project STRONGChange in Dating Violence (DV) Perpetration From Baseline to 9 Months9-month DV PerpetrationDV Absent45 Participants
Primary

Change in General Aggressive Behavior From Baseline to 9 Months

The Aggression Questionnaire (AQ) is a 34-item questionnaire that rates five types of aggression (physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, hostility, and indirect aggression). Item responses ranged from 1-5, with 1=Not at all like me, 2=A little like me, 3=Somewhat like me, 4=Very much like me, 5=Completely like me. Higher scores indicate more aggression.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Waitlist ControlChange in General Aggressive Behavior From Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline AQ Total2.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Waitlist ControlChange in General Aggressive Behavior From Baseline to 9 Months3-month AQ Total2.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Waitlist ControlChange in General Aggressive Behavior From Baseline to 9 Months9-month AQ Total2.03 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
Project STRONGChange in General Aggressive Behavior From Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline AQ Total2.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Project STRONGChange in General Aggressive Behavior From Baseline to 9 Months3-month AQ Total2.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.61
Project STRONGChange in General Aggressive Behavior From Baseline to 9 Months9-month AQ Total1.99 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Secondary

Change in Distress Tolerance From Baseline to 9 Months

The Behavioral Indicator of Resiliency to Distress (BIRD) is a 5-minute computerized distress tolerance task for adolescents. This measure generates a score of total time that adolescents persist on a frustrating task, which has been linked to distress tolerance. Scores are recorded in milliseconds (ms) with a maximum time participants can persist is 300 seconds (0-300 is the range). Higher score indicate longer persistence during the frustrating task.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months

Population: COMPLETER ANALYSIS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Waitlist ControlChange in Distress Tolerance From Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline BIRD256.68 secondsStandard Deviation 78.7
Waitlist ControlChange in Distress Tolerance From Baseline to 9 Months3-month BIRD240.98 secondsStandard Deviation 80.06
Waitlist ControlChange in Distress Tolerance From Baseline to 9 Months9-month BIRD227.17 secondsStandard Deviation 84.39
Project STRONGChange in Distress Tolerance From Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline BIRD251.19 secondsStandard Deviation 78.05
Project STRONGChange in Distress Tolerance From Baseline to 9 Months3-month BIRD230.66 secondsStandard Deviation 84.04
Project STRONGChange in Distress Tolerance From Baseline to 9 Months9-month BIRD243.14 secondsStandard Deviation 78.35
Secondary

Change in Emotion Regulation Skills Baseline to 9 Months

The Emotion Regulation Behavioral Skills (ERBS) scale is comprised of 8 items rated on a scale of 1 all the time to 5 never and was specifically created for to detect the use of the specific affect management strategies taught in the Project STRONG intervention. Sample items include How often did you…get away from whatever was causing your feeling? …talk to someone about whatever was causing your feeling? Higher scores indicate greater use of emotion regulation skills.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, 9 months

Population: COMPLETER ANALYSIS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Waitlist ControlChange in Emotion Regulation Skills Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline ERBS2.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Waitlist ControlChange in Emotion Regulation Skills Baseline to 9 Months3-month ERBS2.01 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.83
Waitlist ControlChange in Emotion Regulation Skills Baseline to 9 Months9-month ERBS1.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Project STRONGChange in Emotion Regulation Skills Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline ERBS2.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Project STRONGChange in Emotion Regulation Skills Baseline to 9 Months3-month ERBS2.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.92
Project STRONGChange in Emotion Regulation Skills Baseline to 9 Months9-month ERBS2.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.91
Secondary

Change in Emotion Regulation Skills From Baseline to 9 Months

The Adolescent Self-Regulatory Inventory (ASRI) is a 33 item survey that measures adolescents' use of both functional and dysfunctional emotion regulation strategies. It produces two sub scales measuring short-term and long-term self-regulation. Item responses range from 1-5 with 1= Not at all true for me, 2= Rarely true for me, 3= True some of the time, 4= True most of the time, 5= Really true for me. Items were reverse coded so that higher scores indicate more use of emotion regulation behaviors.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 9 months

Population: COMPLETER ANALYSIS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Waitlist ControlChange in Emotion Regulation Skills From Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline Short-Term Self-Regulation3.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.65
Waitlist ControlChange in Emotion Regulation Skills From Baseline to 9 Months3-month Short-Term Self-Regulation3.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Waitlist ControlChange in Emotion Regulation Skills From Baseline to 9 Months9-month Short-Term Self-Regulation3.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Waitlist ControlChange in Emotion Regulation Skills From Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline Long-Term Self-Regulation3.22 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.57
Waitlist ControlChange in Emotion Regulation Skills From Baseline to 9 Months3-month Long-Term Self-Regulation3.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.55
Waitlist ControlChange in Emotion Regulation Skills From Baseline to 9 Months9-month Long-Term Self-Regulation3.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.51
Project STRONGChange in Emotion Regulation Skills From Baseline to 9 Months3-month Long-Term Self-Regulation3.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.52
Project STRONGChange in Emotion Regulation Skills From Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline Short-Term Self-Regulation3.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.67
Project STRONGChange in Emotion Regulation Skills From Baseline to 9 MonthsBaseline Long-Term Self-Regulation3.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Project STRONGChange in Emotion Regulation Skills From Baseline to 9 Months3-month Short-Term Self-Regulation3.63 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Project STRONGChange in Emotion Regulation Skills From Baseline to 9 Months9-month Long-Term Self-Regulation3.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Project STRONGChange in Emotion Regulation Skills From Baseline to 9 Months9-month Short-Term Self-Regulation3.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.75
Secondary

Change in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 Months

Parent Adolescent Communication Survey (PACS) is 20 item survey measuring quality of communication between adolescents and their parents. Adolescents will complete the measure in reference to the parent participating in the intervention with them. This is completed by parents and youth. This scale also produces two sub scales: The Open Family Communication Scale (OFCS) and The Problems in Family Communication Scale (PFCS). Item responses range from 1-5 with 1=Strongly disagree, 2=Moderately disagree, 3=Neither agree neither disagree, 4=Moderately agree, 5=Strongly agree. On the OFCS subscale, higher scores indicate more open communication. One the PFCS subscale, higher scores indicate fewer problems in family communication, thus higher scores on both subscales are favorable.

Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 9 months

Population: COMPLETER ANALYSIS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Waitlist ControlChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent 3-month # of Relationship Topics1.88 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.18
Waitlist ControlChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent 3-month PFCS37.52 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.58
Waitlist ControlChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent 3-months OFCS36.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.82
Waitlist ControlChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent 9-month PFCS38.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.13
Waitlist ControlChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent Baseline PFCS34.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.52
Waitlist ControlChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent 9-month # of Relationship Topics1.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Waitlist ControlChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent Baseline OFCS38.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.08
Waitlist ControlChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent Baseline OFCS40.17 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.98
Waitlist ControlChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent 3-month PFCS34.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.4
Waitlist ControlChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent 3-month OFCS40.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.41
Waitlist ControlChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent 9-month OFCS35.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.96
Waitlist ControlChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent 9-month PFCS33.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.03
Waitlist ControlChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent Baseline # of Relationship Topics4.32 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.83
Waitlist ControlChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent 9-month OFCS40.55 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.71
Waitlist ControlChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent 3-month # of Relationship Topics3.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.05
Waitlist ControlChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent Baseline # of Relationship Topics3.24 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
Waitlist ControlChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent 9-month # of Relationship Topics3.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.06
Waitlist ControlChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent Baseline PFCS37.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.63
Project STRONGChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent 9-month # of Relationship Topics3.57 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.89
Project STRONGChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent Baseline OFCS37.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.05
Project STRONGChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent 3-months OFCS36.87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.18
Project STRONGChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent Baseline # of Relationship Topics3.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.14
Project STRONGChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent 9-month OFCS35.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.23
Project STRONGChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent Baseline PFCS32.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.23
Project STRONGChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent 3-month PFCS31.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.98
Project STRONGChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent 9-month OFCS40.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.8
Project STRONGChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent Baseline PFCS38.65 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.68
Project STRONGChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent 3-month PFCS39.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.29
Project STRONGChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent 3-month # of Relationship Topics2.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.43
Project STRONGChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent 9-month # of Relationship Topics1.96 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.05
Project STRONGChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent Baseline OFCS39.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.89
Project STRONGChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent 3-month OFCS40.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.06
Project STRONGChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent 9-month PFCS40.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.05
Project STRONGChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent Baseline # of Relationship Topics4.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
Project STRONGChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsParent 3-month # of Relationship Topics4.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.65
Project STRONGChange in Parent-Adolescent Communication From Baseline to 9 MonthsAdolescent 9-month PFCS33.12 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.69

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 25, 2026