Skip to content

Accuracy of the Sensory Test Using the Laryngopharyngeal Endoscopic Esthesiometer in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Accuracy of the Sensory Test Performed Using the Laryngopharyngeal Endoscopic Esthesiometer and Rangefinder in Patients With Suspected Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Hypopnea (OSA): a Prospective Double-blinded, Randomised, Pilot Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03109171
Enrollment
117
Registered
2017-04-12
Start date
2018-01-01
Completion date
2026-11-30
Last updated
2026-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Larynx, Sensory Disorder, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

Keywords

Endoscopy, Lasers, Fiber Optic Technology, Bronchoscopy, Esthesiometer, Mechanoreceptors, Diagnosis, Reflex, Reproducibility of Results, Reliability of Results, Validity of Results, Sensory Thresholds

Brief summary

This is a prospective double blinded randomized crossover controlled trial aiming at validating the measurement of laryngopharyngeal mechanosensitivity in patients with suspected OSA using a recently developed laryngopharyngeal endoscopic esthesiometer and rangefinder (LPEER). Subjects will be recruited from patients with suspected OSA referred for baseline polysomnography to a university hospital sleep laboratory. Intra- and inter-rater reliability will be evaluated using the Bland-Altman's limits of agreement plot, the intraclass correlation coefficient, and the Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient, depending on the distribution of the variables. Diagnostic accuracy will be evaluate plotting Receiver-operating-characteristic-curves (ROC-curves) using as reference standard basal polysomnogram. The sensory threshold values for patients with mild, moderate, and severe OSA, will be determined and compared using ANOVA or Kruskal Wallis test, depending on the distribution of the variables.

Detailed description

INTRODUCTION: Obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSA) patients might have varying degrees of laryngopharyngeal mechanical hyposensitivity; however, these findings come from studies performed with methods having weak inter-rater reliability and accuracy evidence. The purpose of this study is to validate the measurement of laryngopharyngeal mechanosensitivity in patients with OSA using a recently developed laryngopharyngeal endoscopic esthesiometer and rangefinder (LPEER). The LPEER includes an air-pulse generator and an endoscopic laser rangefinder and works coupled to a conventional fiberoptic endoscope. This device generates air-pulses ranging from 0.04 mN to 16.5 mN in order to cover a wide range of laryngopharyngeal reflexes and sensory thresholds. Depending on the reflex or sensory threshold to be explored the LPEER is configured to deliver a sequence of 10 air-pulses of different intensity. METHODS: The study will be prospective, double blinded, and with a randomized and crossover assignment of the raters. Subjects will be recruited from patients with suspected OSA referred for baseline polysomnography to a sleep laboratory of a tertiary care university hospital. They will undergo a laryngopharyngeal sensory test using the LPEER, which includes measurement of the thresholds for the velopharyngeal, hypopharyngeal and aryepiglottic fold psychophysical sensitivity. Intra- and inter-rater reliability will be evaluated using the Bland-Altman's limits of agreement plot, the intraclass correlation coefficient, and the Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficient, depending on the distribution of the variables. Diagnostic accuracy will be evaluate plotting ROC-curves using as reference standard basal polysomnogram. The sensory threshold values for patients with mild, moderate, and severe OSA, will be determined and compared using ANOVA or Kruskal Wallis test, depending on the distribution of the variables.The discriminative capacity as well as correlations between laryngopharyngeal sensory thresholds and OSA severity indexes will be explored in subgroups of subjects with normal and abnormal sensation. The relationship between sensory thresholds and OSA severity indexes will be explored by linear equations as well as by second- and higher-order polynomial equations. The laryngopharyngeal endoscopic esthesiometer and rangefinder (LPEER), could be a new tool for the evaluation and monitoring of laryngopharyngeal sensory involvement in patients with OSA, which, if proved valid, could help to increase the knowledge about the pathophysiological mechanisms of this condition and potentially help finding new therapeutic interventions for OSA. ETHICS: This study will follow the Declaration of Helsinki principles and national legal regulations about research in human subjects. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Fundacion Neumologica Colombiana and all recruited subjects will provided a signed informed consent. DISSEMINATION: The results will be disseminated through conference presentations and peer-reviewed publication.

Interventions

OTHERLaryngopharyngeal sensory test

The sensory measurements will include thresholds for psychophysical sensory thresholds at the velopharynx, hypopharynx and aryepiglottic folds

Sponsors

Universidad de la Sabana
CollaboratorOTHER
Instituto Colombiano para el Desarrollo de la Ciencia y la Tecnología (COLCIENCIAS)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Fundación Neumologica Colombiana
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The allocation sequence, determining which rater (expert vs non-expert) intervenes first or second, will be concealed using the SNOSE strategy (sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes). One of the authors (ARB), who has not competing interests will generate the allocation sequence and conceal it in envelopes. While the first rater measures the sensory thresholds (ST) the second rater will be at a different room for blinding purposes. There will be no communication about the testing results between the two raters nor the staff who are helping the testing performance. To mask the values of the ST, air pulses will be identified by a random combination of three letters instead of by the intensity levels corresponding to the air pulses. The raters will not know the intensity corresponding to each letter combination. At the end of the test, an assistant will replace the letters corresponding to the ST values by the intensity levels of the air pulses in units of force (millinewtons)

Intervention model description

Subjects participating in the inter-rater reliability evaluation will be evaluated by two raters, an expert and a non-expert rater, each rater performing two measurements of laryngopharyngeal sensory thresholds (ST) two times at each side (right and left) of the corresponding laryngopharyngeal structure. All other subjects, participating in the accuracy evaluation, will be evaluated by only one expert rater who will perform three measurements of laryngopharyngeal ST per subject. The varying degrees of rater experience aims to reproduce common scenarios when a new technique (like the measurement of laryngopharyngeal mechanosensitivity) is introduced to clinical practice. The two raters will measure the ST sequentially and in a randomized cross-over design in each subject (the order in which each rater intervenes will be randomized) aiming that the sensory tests be started an equal number of times by an expert rater and non-expert rater.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients being 18 years old or more referred to the sleep laboratory of a tertiary care university hospital for a baseline polysomnography for suspected OSA.

Exclusion criteria

* Anticoagulation (though not a contraindication for the endoscopic laryngopharyngeal sensory test, anticoagulation is an

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Velopharynx psychophysical sensory threshold15 daysSensitivity threshold at the velopharynx in millinewtons (mN).
Hypopharynx psychophysical sensory threshold15 daysSensitivity threshold at the hypopharynx in millinewtons (mN).
Aryepiglottic fold psychophysical sensory threshold15 daysSensitivity threshold at the aryepiglottic folds in millinewtons (mN).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Apnea Hypopnea Index15 daysNumber of apneas and hypopneas per hour reported in polysomnography, according to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine criteria.
Adverse Events15 daysAny adverse event potentially related to the laryngopharyngeal sensory test, including pain, gagging, discomfort, laryngospasm, syncope or pre-syncope, epistaxis, need for observation or referral to emergency room or hospitalization.
Oxygen desaturation index15 daysNumber of desaturation episodes by pulse oximetry (SpO2%) (\>3% fall in SpO2%) per hour reported in polysomnography, according to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine criteria.
T9015 daysTime spent at oxygen saturation below 90% by pulse oximetry

Countries

Colombia

Contacts

Primary ContactLuis F Giraldo-Cadavid, MD, PhD
luisf.giraldo@unisabana.edu.co+573106083557
Backup ContactMaria A Bazurto, MD
mbazurto@neumologica.org+577428900

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026