Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy
Conditions
Keywords
Polyethylene glycol, Bowel cleansing, Colonoscopy
Brief summary
A randomised, single-blind, active controlled, multi-centre trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, acceptability and palatability of PMF104 compared to a conventional PEG-electrolyte solution in paediatric subjects requiring a diagnostic procedure concerning the colon.
Detailed description
The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, tolerability, acceptability and palatability of PMF104 compared to Klean-prep® in children aged from 2 to less than 18 years old requiring a diagnostic procedure of the colon. Patients will be stratified according the following age strata: * Children from 2 to less than 6 years of age (PMF104 PD1/13) * Children from 6 to less than 12 years of age (PMF104 PD2/13) * Children from 12 to less than 18 years of age (PMF104 PD3/13) The study will consist of a Screening Visit (V1), a Randomisation Visit (V2), a Drug Administration (Day 1), a Diagnostic Procedure (i.e. colonoscopy; V3) and a Follow-up Telephone Contact (FU). At Screening Visit (V1) children will be evaluated for study eligibility, up to 11 days before the colonoscopy. At Randomisation Visit (V2), if eligible, they will be randomised according to a single blind randomisation schedule in a 1:1 ratio to PMF104 or Klean-prep®; they will also receive the instructions to be followed for bowel preparation, and the questionnaire to be answered on the day of the bowel preparation. In case the Investigator will consider it as appropriate, the child will be hospitalised in the clinical facility the day before the colonoscopy in order to perform bowel preparation. The day before the colonoscopy study drug will be administered orally starting in the mid-late afternoon (4-6 p.m.), as single dose. The day of colonoscopy the diagnostic procedure will be performed blindly by an endoscopist unaware of the treatment administered to the subject, and both primary and secondary endpoints will be assessed. On day 31 ± 2 (i.e. 30 ± 2 days after the day of the bowel preparation intake), the subjects will be contacted by a telephone call, to inquire about possible adverse events occurred after hospital discharge.
Interventions
Powder for oral solution: * Sachet A: macrogol 4000 52.500 g, anhydrous sodium sulphate 3.750 g, simeticone 0.080 g; * Sachet B: sodium citrate 1.863 g, anhydrous citric acid 0.813 g, sodium chloride 0.730 g, potassium chloride 0.370 g; One sachet A + 1 sachet B in 500 ml of water
Powder for oral solution: macrogol 3350 59.000 g, anhydrous sodium sulphate 5.685 g, sodium bicarbonate 1.685 g, sodium chloride 1.465 g, potassium chloride 0.7425 g. One sachet to be dissolved in 1 L of water
Sponsors
Study design
Masking description
During the study a single-blind design with respect to the investigational products will be achieved by providing the randomisation list only to the unblinded study staff personnel who will handle study drug management, preparation, dispensation and collection but who will not be involved in colonoscopy performing. The colonoscopy will be performed by experienced endoscopists who are unaware of the treatment actually being dispensed in each case. The endoscopist will be blinded by instructing all the other involved clinical staff, patients and patients' families to not discuss with him the specifics of the preparation.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Male and female patients aged from 2 to less than 18 years during the entire study period undergoing elective colonoscopy; 2. Female subjects currently either of: * Non-childbearing potential (i.e. physiologically incapable of becoming pregnant, including any female who is surgically sterilised via documented hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation), or * Childbearing potential: the subject is eligible to enter and participate in this study if she is not lactating and has a negative pregnancy test, and agrees to abstain from intercourses until the colonoscopy is performed (only menstruated females); 3. Patients whose parents/legal representatives have been thoroughly informed of the aim of the study procedures and provided signed and dated written informed consent; 4. Children aged from 6 to less than 12 years providing informed assent whenever possible; 5. Adolescents aged from 12 to less than 18 years providing informed assent; 6. Ability of the subjects and/or their parents/legal representatives to understand and comply with protocol requirements, instructions and protocol-stated restrictions.
Exclusion criteria
1. Requirement for urgent colonoscopy; 2. Gastrointestinal obstruction or perforation; 3. Bowel pseudo-obstruction; 4. Gastric retention; 5. Toxic colitis; 6. Toxic megacolon; 7. Known or suspected hypersensitivity to the active or other ingredients of both test product and reference product; 8. Clinically significant electrolyte imbalance; 9. Prior intestinal resection; 10. Structural abnormality of the lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract; 11. Known metabolic (particularly phenylketonuria), hepatic, renal or cardiac disease; 12. Congestive heart failure (NYHA class III and IV); 13. Known pregnancy; 14. Subject who have participated in another clinical trial or have taken an investigational drug within the last 3 months prior screening.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Colon cleansing efficacy | Visit 3 (Day 2) | Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score assessed blindly by the endoscopist |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of patients in whom caecal intubation was achieved during colonoscopy | Visit 3 (Day 2) | Proportion of patients in whom caecal intubation was achieved during colonoscopy |
| Proportion of patients achieving a BBPS score greater than or equal to 5 | Visit 3 (Day 2) | Based on the BBPS score assigned during colonoscopy, each patient will be classified as being a success (patient achieving a BBPS score ≥ 5) or a failure (patient achieving a BBPS score \< 5). |
| Proportion of patients that needs a rescue dose | Day 1 | Additional amount of test or reference will be given if patient will not have clear watery stools 3 hours after the administration of the scheduled amount of bowel solution |
| Compliance | Day 1 | Poor: intake of \< 75% of the solution; Good: intake of at least 75% of the solution but \<100%; Optimal: intake of the whole solution. |
| Time to reach clear watery stools | Day 1 | The time when clear watery stools are obtained after completing the bowel solution |
| Palatability | Day 1 | Pre-determined answers to question:How did the solution taste? 1 =Very bad; 2 = Bad; 3 =Good; 4 = Very good |
| Number of adverse events | From Visit 1 to Follow-up telephone contact | Number of adverse events coded by System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term (PT), using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). |
| Subjects withdrawn due to treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) | From Visit 1 to Follow-up telephone contact | Number and percentage of patients withdrawn due to TEAEs |
| Tolerability Assessment | Visit 3 (Day 2) | Recording of occurence and severity of nausea, vomiting, bloating, abdominal pain/cramps, anal irritation and fatigue/weakness, according to a 4 point scale: 0 =No distress 1. =Mild distress 2. =Moderate distress 3. = Severe distress |
| Acceptability | Day 1 | Pre-determined answers to question:How difficult was to drink the bowel preparation solution? 1 =Very difficult; 2 =Moderately difficult; 3 = Slightly difficult; 4 =Not difficult at all |
Countries
Belgium, France, Italy