Skip to content

A Comparison of Cataract Surgery Alone and Cataract Surgery With iStent

A Randomised Controlled Trial of Cataract Surgery Versus Combined Cataract Surgery With Insertion of iStent Inject®

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03106181
Enrollment
93
Registered
2017-04-10
Start date
2018-02-01
Completion date
2022-12-31
Last updated
2023-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma, Open-Angle

Brief summary

This study aims to recruit patients of the Glaucoma Investigative and Research Unit (GIRU) of Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital (RVEEH) with mild to moderate glaucoma who are due to undergo cataract surgery and randomise each to either cataract surgery or combined cataract surgery with iStent Inject® insertion. Only patients who meet the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be recruited. The outcomes measures of the study will be a comparison of: 1) extent of IOP reduction; 2) reduction in number of topical glaucoma medications; 3) patient treatment satisfaction - between the two treatment groups.

Detailed description

Glaucoma is the commonest cause of irreversible blindness in the world. Treatment centres around lowering intraocular pressure (IOP) and typically includes medication (least invasive), laser, to surgery (most invasive). The gold-standard glaucoma operation is the trabeculectomy. Whilst it is effective at lowering IOP, it is associated with potentially devastating complications including bleb leak, hypotonous maculopathy, blebitis and endophthalmitis. In recent years, minimally- invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) has become an increasingly popular option of treating mild to moderate glaucoma. It is usually performed in conjunction with cataract surgery. The iStent (Glaukos Corporation, California, USA) is one of the most commonly utilised MIGS devices in the world and one of two Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)- approved MIGS devices in Australia. The iStent Inject® is the second generation iStent device and Australia is one of the first countries in the world to have access to this. So far there are no published randomised controlled trials comparing the effect of cataract surgery alone to combined cataract surgery with insertion of iStent Inject®. This study aims to recruit patients of the Glaucoma Investigative and Research Unit (GIRU) of Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital (RVEEH) with mild to moderate glaucoma who are due to undergo cataract surgery and randomise each to either cataract surgery or combined cataract surgery with iStent Inject® insertion. Only patients who meet the inclusion criteria and none of the exclusion criteria will be recruited. The outcomes measures of the study will be a comparison of: 1) extent of IOP reduction; 2) reduction in number of topical glaucoma medications; 3) patient treatment satisfaction - between the two treatment groups.

Interventions

DEVICEiStent inject®

Insertion of iStent inject®

PROCEDUREPhacoemulsification and intraocular lens implant

Conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery and intraocular lens implant

Sponsors

Glaukos Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Center for Eye Research Australia
CollaboratorOTHER
Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* \>18 years of age * Diagnosis of mild-to-moderate open angle glaucoma * Presence of cataract requiring surgery * Good understanding of both verbal and written English * Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Recent intraocular surgery within last 3 months * Other ocular pathology affecting vision * Inability to complete the elements of the study, eg: coma, hemodynamic instability, ventilator dependence, that could be of concern in the investigator's judgment. * Non-elective hospitalisation within the past 60 days that could be of concern in the investigator's judgment. * Medical illness that in the judgment of the investigator would jeopardise the safe completion of the study. Examples include cancer, chronic inflammatory disease, chronic liver insufficiency, epilepsy, thrombocytosis.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraocular pressureUp to 2 yearsIntraocular pressure reduction
Glaucoma medicationsUp to 2 yearsNumber of glaucoma medications

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment satisfactionUp to 2 yearsPatient treatment satisfaction

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026